部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0517

声明内容

“在大学学费去监管化影响评估模型问题上,花费超过2万澳元进行法律诉讼以隐瞒相关信息。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 30 Jan 2026

原始来源

事实核查

核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 准确无误zhǔn què wú wù zhǔn què wú wù
The core factual claim is accurate.
教育jiào yù jiào yù 培训部péi xùn bù péi xùn bù zài zài 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 大学dà xué dà xué 学费xué fèi xué fèi 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn huà huà 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 评估píng gū píng gū 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 模型mó xíng mó xíng de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu (( ( FOIFOI FOI )) ) 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 抗辩kàng biàn kàng biàn shí shí 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng le le ** * ** * 2020 20 ,, , 932.78932.78 932.78 澳元ào yuán ào yuán ** * ** * de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Department of Education and Training incurred **$20,932.78** in legal costs fighting a Freedom of Information (FOI) request seeking the government's modelling on university fee deregulation impacts [1].
gāi gāi 部门bù mén bù mén 聘请pìn qǐng pìn qǐng 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 事务所shì wù suǒ shì wù suǒ zài zài 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 上诉shàng sù shàng sù shěn shěn 裁处cái chǔ cái chǔ (( ( AATAAT AAT )) ) 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 出庭chū tíng chū tíng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The department engaged the Australian Government Solicitor to represent it in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) [1].
FOIFOI FOI 申请人shēn qǐng rén shēn qǐng rén CrispinCrispin Crispin RovereRovere Rovere 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 4545 45 fèn fèn 共计gòng jì gòng jì 77 7 ,, , 932932 932 de de 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 涉及shè jí shè jí 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 评估píng gū píng gū 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 内容nèi róng nèi róng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè duì duì 学生xué shēng xué shēng 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng de de 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
The FOI applicant, Crispin Rovere, sought access to 45 documents totaling 7,932 pages related to higher education modelling, including the effect of the policy on students and public funding levels [2][4].
AATAAT AAT 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 裁定cái dìng cái dìng 不予bù yǔ bù yǔ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The AAT ultimately ruled against releasing the documents [1][3].
尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 20142014 2014 nián nián 1212 12 yuè yuè 20152015 2015 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè 两次liǎng cì liǎng cì bèi bèi 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ réng réng 重申chóng shēn chóng shēn 计划jì huà jì huà zài zài 20152015 2015 nián nián 春季chūn jì chūn jì jiāng jiāng 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 议会yì huì yì huì 审议shěn yì shěn yì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The government reaffirmed its intention to bring the higher education reform package back to parliament in spring 2015, despite having been blocked twice by the Senate in December 2014 and March 2015 [1].

缺失背景

gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 要素yào sù yào sù
The claim omits several important contextual elements: **The AAT's rationale for the decision:** The tribunal found the modelling was "speculative" and accepted the department's argument that releasing price signalling before the changes took effect could undermine genuine competition in a deregulated market [1].
** * ** * AATAAT AAT 作出zuò chū zuò chū 裁决cái jué cái jué de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * shěn shěn 裁处cái chǔ cái chǔ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi gāi gāi 评估píng gū píng gū 模型mó xíng mó xíng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu "" " 推测tuī cè tuī cè xìng xìng "" " bìng bìng 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu le le 部门bù mén bù mén 关于guān yú guān yú zài zài 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn huà huà 市场shì chǎng shì chǎng 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào qián qián 发布fā bù fā bù 价格jià gé jià gé 信号xìn hào xìn hào 可能kě néng kě néng 破坏pò huài pò huài 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 竞争jìng zhēng jìng zhēng de de 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The department maintained it would be "inappropriate" to release the modelling because it could prejudice the market [1]. **The FOI legal process:** The $20,000 figure represents costs incurred through standard government legal procedures.
部门bù mén bù mén 坚持jiān chí jiān chí 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 鉴于jiàn yú jiàn yú 可能kě néng kě néng duì duì 市场shì chǎng shì chǎng 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 不利bù lì bù lì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 评估píng gū píng gū 模型mó xíng mó xíng shì shì "" " 恰当qià dàng qià dàng de de "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Government departments routinely engage the Australian Government Solicitor for FOI-related legal matters, and AAT appeals are a standard part of the FOI review process [5]. **The broader policy context:** The fee deregulation proposal was part of a larger higher education overhaul that included cutting subsidies for bachelor degrees by an average of 20% and extending funding to sub-bachelor programs and private colleges [1].
** * ** * FOIFOI FOI 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 程序chéng xù chéng xù ** * ** * 22 2 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 这一zhè yī zhè yī 数字shù zì shù zì 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 通过tōng guò tōng guò 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 程序chéng xù chéng xù 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng de de 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng
The government argued these changes were necessary to expand access and improve the sector [1]. **Ongoing secrecy:** The BuzzFeed article from 2017 indicates the department continued to refuse releasing fee modelling data even after the Coalition abandoned full deregulation, with officials claiming any existing work didn't constitute "modelling per se" [2].
政府部门zhèng fǔ bù mén zhèng fǔ bù mén zài zài 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ FOIFOI FOI 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 事务时shì wù shí shì wù shí 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng huì huì 聘请pìn qǐng pìn qǐng 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 事务所shì wù suǒ shì wù suǒ ér ér xiàng xiàng AATAAT AAT 提起tí qǐ tí qǐ 上诉shàng sù shàng sù shì shì FOIFOI FOI 审查shěn chá shěn chá 程序chéng xù chéng xù de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 组成部分zǔ chéng bù fèn zǔ chéng bù fèn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
** * ** * gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * 学费xué fèi xué fèi 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn huà huà 提案tí àn tí àn shì shì gèng gèng 大规模dà guī mó dà guī mó 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò jiāng jiāng 学士学位xué shì xué wèi xué shì xué wèi 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 平均píng jūn píng jūn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 20%20% 20% 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí jiāng jiāng 资助zī zhù zī zhù 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn zhì zhì 学士学位xué shì xué wèi xué shì xué wèi 课程kè chéng kè chéng 私立sī lì sī lì 院校yuàn xiào yuàn xiào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 对于duì yú duì yú 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 教育jiào yù jiào yù 机会jī huì jī huì 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn gāi gāi 部门bù mén bù mén shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 持续chí xù chí xù de de 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì ** * ** * BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 20172017 2017 nián nián de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 全面quán miàn quán miàn 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 化后huà hòu huà hòu gāi gāi 部门bù mén bù mén réng réng 继续jì xù jì xù 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 学费xué fèi xué fèi 评估píng gū píng gū 数据shù jù shù jù 官员guān yuán guān yuán 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 任何rèn hé rèn hé 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò dōu dōu 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng "" " 严格yán gé yán gé 意义yì yì yì yì shàng shàng de de 评估píng gū píng gū 模型mó xíng mó xíng "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà bǎn bǎn ** * ** * 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 信誉xìn yù xìn yù 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo de de 新闻媒体xīn wén méi tǐ xīn wén méi tǐ 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu zhōng zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 编辑biān jí biān jí 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng
**The Guardian Australia:** A mainstream, reputable news outlet with center-left editorial leanings.
DanielDaniel Daniel HurstHurst Hurst 撰写zhuàn xiě zhuàn xiě de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn le le 基于jī yú jī yú 议会yì huì yì huì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 官方guān fāng guān fāng 来源lái yuán lái yuán 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng de de 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào
The article by Daniel Hurst presents factual reporting with direct quotes from parliamentary committee documents and official sources.
卫报wèi bào wèi bào zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 报道bào dào bào dào 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 享有xiǎng yǒu xiǎng yǒu jiào jiào gāo gāo de de 准确性zhǔn què xìng zhǔn què xìng 声誉shēng yù shēng yù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Guardian has a generally strong reputation for accuracy in Australian political coverage [1]. **BuzzFeed News Australia:** While BuzzFeed is primarily known for entertainment content, BuzzFeed News operates as a separate journalism division.
** * ** * BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà bǎn bǎn ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 娱乐yú lè yú lè 内容nèi róng nèi róng 闻名wén míng wén míng dàn dàn BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 独立dú lì dú lì de de 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 部门bù mén bù mén 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng
Alice Workman's reporting on Australian politics is generally factual, citing specific Senate estimates testimony and official documents.
AliceAlice Alice WorkmanWorkman Workman 关于guān yú guān yú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì de de 报道bào dào bào dào 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 基于jī yú jī yú 事实shì shí shì shí 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ de de 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 预算yù suàn yù suàn 审议shěn yì shěn yì 证词zhèng cí zhèng cí 官方guān fāng guān fāng 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn
However, the outlet has a more informal tone and the article includes opinion-framing about "policy inertia" [2].
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 语气yǔ qì yǔ qì 较为jiào wéi jiào wéi 非正式fēi zhèng shì fēi zhèng shì 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 关于guān yú guān yú "" " 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 惯性guàn xìng guàn xìng "" " de de 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn xìng xìng 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Both sources cite official parliamentary documents and committee testimony, lending credibility to the factual claims.
两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán dōu dōu 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng le le 官方guān fāng guān fāng 议会yì huì yì huì 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 证词zhèng cí zhèng cí zhè zhè 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā le le 事实shì shí shì shí 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng de de 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government FOI legal costs education transparency" Finding: While specific instances of Labor fighting FOI requests on education modelling are not documented in the available sources, Labor governments have faced similar criticism regarding transparency.
** * ** *
The Rudd-Gillard government commissioned the Bradley Review (2008) which led to significant higher education reforms, including demand-driven funding [6].
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 内容nèi róng nèi róng "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ FOIFOI FOI 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 教育jiào yù jiào yù 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù "" "
Labor's higher education spokesman Kim Carr explicitly criticized the Coalition's spending on legal fees, stating: "Now we discover they're spending large sums of money on legal fees to prevent public disclosure about their own funding models" [1].
发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 虽然suī rán suī rán 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 资料zī liào zī liào zhōng zhōng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 记载jì zǎi jì zǎi 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ zài zài 教育jiào yù jiào yù 评估píng gū píng gū 问题wèn tí wèn tí shàng shàng 抗辩kàng biàn kàng biàn FOIFOI FOI 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 案例àn lì àn lì dàn dàn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ céng céng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 批评pī píng pī píng
This suggests Labor positioned itself as more transparent on this specific issue, though whether this reflects actual practice across all FOI matters is not established. **Comparative context:** Both major parties have used FOI exemptions to protect cabinet deliberations and commercially sensitive information.
陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén -- - 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 20082008 2008 nián nián 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng le le 布拉德利bù lā dé lì bù lā dé lì 审查shěn chá shěn chá gāi gāi 审查shěn chá shěn chá 促成cù chéng cù chéng le le 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 需求xū qiú xū qiú 驱动qū dòng qū dòng 资助zī zhù zī zhù 在内zài nèi zài nèi de de 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
The use of AAT appeals is standard practice for government departments regardless of the party in power [5].
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén KimKim Kim CarrCarr Carr 明确míng què míng què 批评pī píng pī píng le le CoalitionCoalition Coalition zài zài 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng shàng shàng de de 支出zhī chū zhī chū 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " 现在xiàn zài xiàn zài 我们wǒ men wǒ men 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 他们tā men tā men 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 花费huā fèi huā fèi 大量dà liàng dà liàng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng lái lái 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 他们tā men tā men 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ de de 资助zī zhù zī zhù 模式mó shì mó shì "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng zài zài 特定tè dìng tè dìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 上将shàng jiàng shàng jiàng 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 定位dìng wèi dìng wèi wèi wèi 更加gèng jiā gèng jiā 透明tòu míng tòu míng 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn zhè zhè 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng zài zài 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu FOIFOI FOI 事务shì wù shì wù shàng shàng de de 实际shí jì shí jì 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 尚未shàng wèi shàng wèi 确定què dìng què dìng
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng dōu dōu céng céng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng FOIFOI FOI 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn lái lái 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 审议shěn yì shěn yì 商业shāng yè shāng yè 敏感mǐn gǎn mǐn gǎn 信息xìn xī xìn xī
无论wú lùn wú lùn 执政党zhí zhèng dǎng zhí zhèng dǎng 为何wèi hé wèi hé 政府部门zhèng fǔ bù mén zhèng fǔ bù mén 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng AATAAT AAT 上诉shàng sù shàng sù dōu dōu shì shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 陈述chén shù chén shù le le 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng dàn dàn 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 因素yīn sù yīn sù 使shǐ shǐ 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān de de "" " 隐瞒yǐn mán yǐn mán "" " 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 变得复杂biàn dé fù zá biàn dé fù zá
While the claim accurately states the legal costs incurred, several contextual factors complicate a simple "hiding" narrative: **Government justification:** The department argued the modelling was "speculative" and that releasing it could prejudice market competition by creating price signalling before policies were finalized [1].
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * 部门bù mén bù mén 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 评估píng gū píng gū 模型mó xíng mó xíng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu "" " 推测tuī cè tuī cè xìng xìng "" " qiě qiě 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 可能kě néng kě néng 通过tōng guò tōng guò zài zài 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 确定què dìng què dìng qián qián 形成xíng chéng xíng chéng 价格jià gé jià gé 信号xìn hào xìn hào ér ér 损害sǔn hài sǔn hài 市场竞争shì chǎng jìng zhēng shì chǎng jìng zhēng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This rationale aligns with standard FOI exemptions for cabinet documents and commercially sensitive information. **Standard practice:** Government departments routinely engage legal representation for AAT matters.
这一zhè yī zhè yī 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 商业shāng yè shāng yè 敏感mǐn gǎn mǐn gǎn 信息xìn xī xìn xī de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn FOIFOI FOI 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 相符xiāng fú xiāng fú
The $20,000 figure, while noteworthy, is not unusually high for federal government legal proceedings.
** * ** * 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ** * ** * 政府部门zhèng fǔ bù mén zhèng fǔ bù mén 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 会为huì wèi huì wèi AATAAT AAT 事务shì wù shì wù 聘请pìn qǐng pìn qǐng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo
The AAT process is designed specifically for reviewing administrative decisions, and departments have a right to defend their FOI determinations [5]. **Policy rationale:** The Coalition's higher education reforms sought to deregulate fees while cutting public subsidies, arguing this would improve competition and quality [1].
22 2 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 这一zhè yī zhè yī 数字shù zì shù zì 虽然suī rán suī rán 引人注目yǐn rén zhù mù yǐn rén zhù mù dàn dàn 对于duì yú duì yú 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 程序chéng xù chéng xù 而言ér yán ér yán bìng bìng 不算bù suàn bù suàn 异常yì cháng yì cháng 高昂gāo áng gāo áng
The government maintained it had "presented a detailed rationale for its higher education reforms to the public" even while withholding specific modelling [1]. **Political context:** The policy was highly unpopular and had been blocked by the Senate twice.
AATAAT AAT 程序chéng xù chéng xù 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 设计shè jì shè jì 用于yòng yú yòng yú 审查shěn chá shěn chá 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 决定jué dìng jué dìng 部门bù mén bù mén 有权yǒu quán yǒu quán wèi wèi FOIFOI FOI 裁定cái dìng cái dìng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 抗辩kàng biàn kàng biàn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The government faced pressure from universities, students, and opposition figures regarding potential fee increases [1][2]. **Key context:** Fighting FOI requests through AAT appeals is standard practice across Australian governments of both political persuasions.
** * ** * 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 试图shì tú shì tú zài zài 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 化学huà xué huà xué fèi fèi de de 同时tóng shí tóng shí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng zhè zhè jiāng jiāng 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn 竞争jìng zhēng jìng zhēng 质量zhì liàng zhì liàng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The specific issue here is the transparency of fee impact modelling for a controversial policy, not a unique instance of secrecy.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn zài zài 隐瞒yǐn mán yǐn mán 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 评估píng gū píng gū 模型mó xíng mó xíng dàn dàn xiàng xiàng 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng "" " 提出tí chū tí chū le le 高等教育gāo děng jiào yù gāo děng jiào yù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé de de 详细xiáng xì xiáng xì 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 受欢迎shòu huān yíng shòu huān yíng 两次liǎng cì liǎng cì bèi bèi 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 面临miàn lín miàn lín 来自lái zì lái zì 大学dà xué dà xué 学生xué shēng xué shēng 反对派fǎn duì pài fǎn duì pài 人士rén shì rén shì 关于guān yú guān yú 潜在qián zài qián zài 学费xué fèi xué fèi 上涨shàng zhǎng shàng zhǎng de de 压力yā lì yā lì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * 通过tōng guò tōng guò AATAAT AAT 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 抗辩kàng biàn kàng biàn FOIFOI FOI 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ
这里zhè lǐ zhè lǐ de de 特定tè dìng tè dìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí shì shì 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 备受bèi shòu bèi shòu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè de de 学费xué fèi xué fèi 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 评估píng gū píng gū de de 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù ér ér fēi fēi 独特dú tè dú tè de de 保密bǎo mì bǎo mì 案例àn lì àn lì

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 报告bào gào bào gào le le CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ wèi wèi 抗辩kàng biàn kàng biàn 涉及shè jí shè jí 大学dà xué dà xué 学费xué fèi xué fèi 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn huà huà 评估píng gū píng gū 模型mó xíng mó xíng de de FOIFOI FOI 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú ér ér 花费huā fèi huā fèi 2020 20 ,, , 932.78932.78 932.78 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng de de 事实shì shí shì shí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The claim accurately reports that the Coalition government spent $20,932.78 in legal costs fighting an FOI request for university fee deregulation modelling [1].
然而rán ér rán ér jiāng jiāng 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi "" " 隐瞒yǐn mán yǐn mán "" " 过于guò yú guò yú 简化jiǎn huà jiǎn huà le le 实际shí jì shí jì 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng
However, characterizing this as "hiding" oversimplifies the situation.
AATAAT AAT 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu le le 部门bù mén bù mén 关于guān yú guān yú 评估píng gū píng gū 模型mó xíng mó xíng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 推测tuī cè tuī cè 性且xìng qiě xìng qiě 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 可能kě néng kě néng 破坏pò huài pò huài 市场竞争shì chǎng jìng zhēng shì chǎng jìng zhēng de de 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The AAT accepted the department's argument that the modelling was speculative and that release could undermine market competition [1].
虽然suī rán suī rán 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 支出zhī chū zhī chū shì shì 事实shì shí shì shí dàn dàn 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 暗示àn shì àn shì le le 故意gù yì gù yì 隐瞒yǐn mán yǐn mán 不当bù dàng bù dàng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ér ér fēi fēi 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 既定jì dìng jì dìng 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn FOIFOI FOI 抗辩kàng biàn kàng biàn
While the expenditure is factual, the framing implies deliberate concealment of wrongdoing rather than a standard FOI defense using established exemptions.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ wèi wèi 不予bù yǔ bù yǔ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 提供tí gōng tí gōng le le 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu shěn shěn 裁处cái chǔ cái chǔ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi gāi gāi 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 法律效力fǎ lǜ xiào lì fǎ lǜ xiào lì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The government provided a policy rationale for non-disclosure that a tribunal found legally valid [1][3].

📚 来源与引用 (6)

  1. 1
    University fee deregulation: Coalition's $20,000 fight to keep modelling secret

    University fee deregulation: Coalition's $20,000 fight to keep modelling secret

    Government also reaffirms plan to bring higher education bill back to parliament before end of year despite being blocked twice by Senate

    the Guardian
  2. 2
    The Government Knows How Much Uni Fees Will Cost Under Deregulation But It Won't Tell Us

    The Government Knows How Much Uni Fees Will Cost Under Deregulation But It Won't Tell Us

    Oh, and the $152 million in cuts to higher education are still on the table.

    BuzzFeed
  3. 3
    Tribunal refuses to release Abbott government's university fee modelling

    Tribunal refuses to release Abbott government's university fee modelling

    Administrative Appeals Tribunal rules on freedom of information dispute, agreeing calculations could undermine competition in a deregulated market

    the Guardian
  4. 4
    news.com.au

    University fee forecasts will remain hidden because modelling 'speculative'

    News Com

  5. 5
    Summary of the freedom of information review process

    Summary of the freedom of information review process

    This guidance material sets out the merit review framework for access refusal and access grant decisions made under the Freedom of Information Act 1982.

    OAIC
  6. 6
    The Rudd Government: Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007-2010

    The Rudd Government: Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007-2010

    ***description of this page***

    2010

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。