C0456 - refugees tax | PoliticalClaims.au

C0456

声明内容

“仅花费5500万澳元在柬埔寨重新安置了两名难民。”

难民税收

原始来源： Matthew Davis

分析时间： 30 Jan 2026

原始来源

mdavis.xyz

Documentation of Coalition government policies and claims.

Matthew Davis

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 要素yào sù yào sù 准确无误zhǔn què wú wù zhǔn què wú wù 。。。

The core factual elements of this claim are accurate.

20142014 2014 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 的de de 《《《澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà -- - 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 难民nàn mín nàn mín 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 协议xié yì xié yì 》》》涉及shè jí shè jí 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 向xiàng xiàng 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 提供tí gōng tí gōng 约yuē yuē 55005500 5500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ，，，其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 40004000 4000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 额外é wài é wài 援助yuán zhù yuán zhù 和hé hé 15001500 1500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 通过tōng guò tōng guò 国际guó jì guó jì 移民yí mín yí mín 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 支持zhī chí zhī chí 服务fú wù fú wù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

The Australia-Cambodia refugee resettlement agreement, signed in September 2014, involved Australia providing approximately $55 million to Cambodia—comprising $40 million in additional aid and $15 million for resettlement support services through the International Organization for Migration [1][2].

据jù jù 20162016 2016 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 预算yù suàn yù suàn 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 记录jì lù jì lù ，，，工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán TimTim Tim WattWatt Watt 确认què rèn què rèn 55005500 5500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 这个zhè ge zhè ge 数字shù zì shù zì "" " 已yǐ yǐ 指定zhǐ dìng zhǐ dìng 用于yòng yú yòng yú 该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì ，，，其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 40004000 4000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 用于yòng yú yòng yú 援助yuán zhù yuán zhù ，，，约yuē yuē 15001500 1500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 用于yòng yú yòng yú 实际shí jì shí jì 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

According to a Senate estimates hearing in October 2016, Labor Senator Tim Watt confirmed the $55 million figure was "earmarked for the agreement, divided between $40 million in aid and about $15 million for the actual resettlement" [1].

重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 的de de 难民nàn mín nàn mín 数量shù liàng shù liàng 确实què shí què shí 极少jí shǎo jí shǎo 。。。

The number of refugees resettled was indeed minimal.

最初zuì chū zuì chū ，，， 20152015 2015 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 有yǒu yǒu 四名sì míng sì míng 难民nàn mín nàn mín 被bèi bèi 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 到dào dào 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 。。。

Initially, four refugees were relocated to Cambodia in June 2015.

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，到dào dào 20162016 2016 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè ，，，其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 两人liǎng rén liǎng rén 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 离开lí kāi lí kāi —— — —— — 一人yī rén yī rén 返回fǎn huí fǎn huí 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān ，，，一对yī duì yī duì 伊朗yī lǎng yī lǎng 夫妇fū fù fū fù 返回fǎn huí fǎn huí 祖国zǔ guó zǔ guó [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

However, by March 2016, two of those refugees had left—one returned to Myanmar, and an Iranian couple returned to their homeland [2].

在zài zài 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 提出tí chū tí chū 时shí shí ，，，只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 两名liǎng míng liǎng míng 难民nàn mín nàn mín 根据gēn jù gēn jù 该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì 永久yǒng jiǔ yǒng jiǔ 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 。。。

This left only two refugees permanently resettled under the deal at the time the claim was made.

到dào dào 20172017 2017 年nián nián ，，，据jù jù 报道bào dào bào dào 原yuán yuán 小组xiǎo zǔ xiǎo zǔ 中zhōng zhōng 只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 一名yī míng yī míng 难民nàn mín nàn mín 留在liú zài liú zài 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。。

By 2017, reports indicated only one refugee remained in Cambodia from the original group [3].

每名měi míng měi míng 难民nàn mín nàn mín 的de de 成本计算chéng běn jì suàn chéng běn jì suàn （（（约yuē yuē 27502750 2750 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ）））基于jī yú jī yú 55005500 5500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 总额zǒng é zǒng é 和hé hé 两名liǎng míng liǎng míng 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 难民nàn mín nàn mín ，，，在zài zài 数学shù xué shù xué 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 。。。

The cost-per-refugee calculation (approximately $27.5 million per person) is mathematically accurate based on the $55 million total and two resettled refugees.

缺失背景

** * ** * 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 缺少quē shǎo quē shǎo 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 难民nàn mín nàn mín 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 。。。

**The broader refugee policy context is absent from the claim.** The Cambodia deal was part of Australia's offshore processing policy, which was originally established by the Howard government (Coalition) as the "Pacific Solution" in 2001, closed by the Rudd Labor government in 2008, then reopened by the Gillard Labor government in 2012 [4][5].

** * ** * 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 协议xié yì xié yì 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ，，，该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 最初zuì chū zuì chū 由yóu yóu 霍华德huò huá dé huò huá dé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ （（（ CoalitionCoalition Coalition ）））于yú yú 20012001 2001 年nián nián 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi "" " 太平洋tài píng yáng tài píng yáng 解决方案jiě jué fāng àn jiě jué fāng àn "" " 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì ，，， 20082008 2008 年nián nián 由yóu yóu 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 关闭guān bì guān bì ，，，然后rán hòu rán hòu 由yóu yóu 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20122012 2012 年nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 开放kāi fàng kāi fàng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

The offshore detention centers on Nauru and Manus Island were operational under both Labor and Coalition governments. **The purpose of the deal is not explained.** The Cambodia arrangement was intended as a "third country resettlement" option for refugees who had been processed on Nauru and found to be genuine refugees, but whom Australia would not resettle due to the policy that "if you arrive by boat then you can either return to your country of origin or be resettled in a third country" [2].

瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 和hé hé 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo 的de de 离岸lí àn lí àn 拘留jū liú jū liú 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 在zài zài 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 均jūn jūn 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò 。。。

Nauru only offered temporary resettlement, creating a need for permanent resettlement locations. **Not all $55 million was drawn down at the time of the claim.** According to Department of Immigration officials at Senate estimates, while $55 million was earmarked, "not all of which has been drawn down" [1].

** * ** * 该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì 的de de 目的mù dì mù dì 未wèi wèi 被bèi bèi 说明shuō míng shuō míng 。。。

The actual expenditure on resettlement assistance at that time was reported as $4.77 million [1]. **The deal was eventually superseded.** In September 2016, the Turnbull government (Coalition) secured a more substantial refugee resettlement agreement with the United States, agreed to by the Obama administration, which ultimately resettled over 1,000 refugees from Nauru and Manus Island [6][7]. **Cambodia was a voluntary resettlement option.** Refugees were not forced to go to Cambodia; they volunteered for the program.

** * ** * 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 安排ān pái ān pái 是shì shì 为wèi wèi 在zài zài 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 并bìng bìng 被bèi bèi 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 为wèi wèi 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 难民nàn mín nàn mín 、、、但dàn dàn 因yīn yīn "" " 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 你nǐ nǐ 乘船chéng chuán chéng chuán 抵达dǐ dá dǐ dá ，，，那么nà me nà me 你nǐ nǐ 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 返回fǎn huí fǎn huí 原籍yuán jí yuán jí 国guó guó 或huò huò 在zài zài 第三国dì sān guó dì sān guó 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì "" " 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 而ér ér 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 的de de 难民nàn mín nàn mín 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de "" " 第三国dì sān guó dì sān guó 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì "" " 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

The Iranian couple who left Cambodia in March 2016 "can elect to return to their country of origin at any time, which is what an Iranian couple in Cambodia decided to do recently" according to Immigration Minister Peter Dutton's office [2].

瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 仅jǐn jǐn 提供tí gōng tí gōng 临时lín shí lín shí 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì ，，，因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 需要xū yào xū yào 永久yǒng jiǔ yǒng jiǔ 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 地点dì diǎn dì diǎn 。。。

** * ** * 在zài zài 提出tí chū tí chū 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 时shí shí ，，，并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 55005500 5500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 都dōu dōu 已yǐ yǐ 支出zhī chū zhī chū 。。。

** * ** * 据jù jù 移民部yí mín bù yí mín bù 官员guān yuán guān yuán 在zài zài 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 预算yù suàn yù suàn 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 上shàng shàng 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ，，，虽然suī rán suī rán 指定zhǐ dìng zhǐ dìng 了le le 55005500 5500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ，，，但dàn dàn "" " 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 全部quán bù quán bù 都dōu dōu 已yǐ yǐ 支出zhī chū zhī chū "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

当时dāng shí dāng shí 报告bào gào bào gào 的de de 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 援助yuán zhù yuán zhù 实际shí jì shí jì 支出zhī chū zhī chū 为wèi wèi 477477 477 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

** * ** * 该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 被bèi bèi 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 。。。

** * ** * 20162016 2016 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè ，，，特恩tè ēn tè ēn 布尔bù ěr bù ěr 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ （（（ CoalitionCoalition Coalition ）））与yǔ yǔ 美国měi guó měi guó 达成dá chéng dá chéng 了le le 更具gèng jù gèng jù 实质性shí zhì xìng shí zhì xìng 的de de 难民nàn mín nàn mín 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 协议xié yì xié yì ，，，该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì 由yóu yóu 奥巴马ào bā mǎ ào bā mǎ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 同意tóng yì tóng yì ，，，最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 从cóng cóng 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 和hé hé 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 了le le 10001000 1000 多名duō míng duō míng 难民nàn mín nàn mín [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。。

** * ** * 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 是shì shì 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 。。。

** * ** * 难民nàn mín nàn mín 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 被迫bèi pò bèi pò 前往qián wǎng qián wǎng 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài ；；；他们tā men tā men 是shì shì 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 参加cān jiā cān jiā 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 的de de 。。。

20162016 2016 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 离开lí kāi lí kāi 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 的de de 伊朗yī lǎng yī lǎng 夫妇fū fù fū fù "" " 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 随时suí shí suí shí 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 返回fǎn huí fǎn huí 原籍yuán jí yuán jí 国guó guó ，，，这zhè zhè 就是jiù shì jiù shì 最近zuì jìn zuì jìn 在zài zài 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 的de de 一对yī duì yī duì 伊朗yī lǎng yī lǎng 夫妇fū fù fū fù 所suǒ suǒ 做zuò zuò 的de de "" " ，，，据jù jù 移民yí mín yí mín 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng PeterPeter Peter DuttonDutton Dutton 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

来源可信度评估

提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì ** * ** * 《《《澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》》 ** * ** * ，，，这是zhè shì zhè shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 可靠kě kào kě kào 报道bào dào bào dào 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 。。。

The original source provided is **The Guardian Australia**, a mainstream media outlet with generally reliable reporting standards.

《《《卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》》持中chí zhōng chí zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ，，，一直yì zhí yì zhí 批评pī píng pī píng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 的de de 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。。

The Guardian has a center-left editorial stance and has been critical of Australia's offshore processing policies under both Labor and Coalition governments [8].

所suǒ suǒ 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 来自lái zì lái zì 移民yí mín yí mín 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng PeterPeter Peter DuttonDutton Dutton 为wèi wèi 该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引语yǐn yǔ yǐn yǔ ，，，提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 一定yí dìng yí dìng 的de de 平衡性píng héng xìng píng héng xìng 。。。

The specific article cited includes direct quotes from Immigration Minister Peter Dutton defending the deal, providing some balance.

《《《卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》》关于guān yú guān yú 难民nàn mín nàn mín 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ，，，但dàn dàn 往往wǎng wǎng wǎng wǎng 从cóng cóng 批评pī píng pī píng 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 庇护bì hù bì hù 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 角度jiǎo dù jiǎo dù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 。。。

The Guardian's reporting on refugee issues is generally factually accurate but often framed from a perspective critical of restrictive asylum policies.

这zhè zhè 篇文章piān wén zhāng piān wén zhāng 遵循zūn xún zūn xún 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 模式mó shì mó shì —— — —— — 虽然suī rán suī rán 报道bào dào bào dào 了le le DuttonDutton Dutton 的de de 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ，，，但dàn dàn 标题biāo tí biāo tí 和hé hé 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 了le le 对duì duì 该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì 成本chéng běn chéng běn 效益xiào yì xiào yì 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng 。。。

This article follows that pattern—while reporting Dutton's defense, the headline and framing emphasize the criticism of the deal's cost-effectiveness.

查阅chá yuè chá yuè 的de de 其他qí tā qí tā 来源lái yuán lái yuán 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò ：：：

Additional sources consulted include: - **UNSW Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law**: Academic research center, highly credible for refugee law and policy analysis [1][3] - **ABC News**: Australia's public broadcaster, mainstream and generally balanced [6] - **SBS News**: Publicly funded multicultural broadcaster, credible reporting [5] - **Migration Policy Institute**: Independent US-based think tank, credible on migration issues [3]

-- - ** * ** * 新南威尔士xīn nán wēi ěr shì xīn nán wēi ěr shì 大学dà xué dà xué KaldorKaldor Kaldor 国际guó jì guó jì 难民nàn mín nàn mín 法fǎ fǎ 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn ** * ** * ：：：学术研究xué shù yán jiū xué shù yán jiū 单位dān wèi dān wèi ，，，在zài zài 难民nàn mín nàn mín 法fǎ fǎ 和hé hé 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 分析fēn xī fēn xī 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 高度gāo dù gāo dù 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]

-- - ** * ** * ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén ** * ** * ：：：澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 公共广播gōng gòng guǎng bō gōng gòng guǎng bō 公司gōng sī gōng sī ，，，主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 且qiě qiě 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 保持平衡bǎo chí píng héng bǎo chí píng héng [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]

-- - ** * ** * SBSSBS SBS 新闻xīn wén xīn wén ** * ** * ：：：公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 资助zī zhù zī zhù 的de de 多元duō yuán duō yuán 文化wén huà wén huà 广播公司guǎng bō gōng sī guǎng bō gōng sī ，，，报道bào dào bào dào 可信kě xìn kě xìn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]

-- - ** * ** * 移民yí mín yí mín 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 研究所yán jiū suǒ yán jiū suǒ ** * ** * ：：：美国měi guó měi guó 独立dú lì dú lì 智库zhì kù zhì kù ，，，在zài zài 移民yí mín yí mín 问题wèn tí wèn tí 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]

⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ？？？

**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government refugee resettlement policy Manus Island Nauru comparison" **Finding: Labor not only supported offshore processing but reopened it and faced similar resettlement challenges.** The Rudd Labor government closed the Howard-era Pacific Solution in 2008.

** * ** *

However, following increased boat arrivals, the Gillard Labor government reopened the Nauru and Manus Island detention centers in 2012 [4][5].

搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng ：：： "" " 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 难民nàn mín nàn mín 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào "" "

Labor's immigration spokesperson Richard Marles criticized the Cambodia deal as "botched" and an "abject failure" [2], but this criticism exists within the context that: 1. **Labor created the same policy problem**: Labor reopened offshore processing in 2012, creating the population of refugees on Nauru who needed third-country resettlement [4][5]. 2. **Labor faced the same resettlement challenge**: When Labor reopened Nauru and Manus in 2012, they also needed to find third countries willing to resettle refugees, as Australia maintained the policy of not resettling boat arrivals.

** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ：：：工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 不仅bù jǐn bù jǐn 支持zhī chí zhī chí 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ ，，，而且ér qiě ér qiě 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 开放kāi fàng kāi fàng 了le le 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ，，，并bìng bìng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 。。。

Labor was unable to secure any third-country resettlement agreements during their 2012-2013 period in government [5]. 3. **Labor supported the Cambodia deal initially**: The Cambodia agreement was signed in September 2014, just over a year after the Coalition took office.

** * ** *

Labor criticized its implementation but did not fundamentally oppose the concept of third-country resettlement, as they had pursued similar arrangements themselves [2]. 4. **Both parties spent billions on offshore processing**: Both Labor and Coalition governments have spent billions of dollars on offshore processing infrastructure and operations on Nauru and Manus Island over the past two decades [5]. 5. **The US resettlement deal was secured by Coalition**: The more successful US resettlement arrangement was negotiated by the Turnbull Coalition government in September 2016 [6][7].

陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20082008 2008 年nián nián 关闭guān bì guān bì 了le le 霍华德huò huá dé huò huá dé 时代shí dài shí dài 的de de 太平洋tài píng yáng tài píng yáng 解决方案jiě jué fāng àn jiě jué fāng àn 。。。

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，随着suí zhe suí zhe 乘船chéng chuán chéng chuán 抵达dǐ dá dǐ dá 人数rén shù rén shù 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā ，，，吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20122012 2012 年nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 开放kāi fàng kāi fàng 了le le 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 和hé hé 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo 拘留jū liú jū liú 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 移民yí mín yí mín 事务shì wù shì wù 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén RichardRichard Richard MarlesMarles Marles 批评pī píng pī píng 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 协议xié yì xié yì 是shì shì "" " 搞砸gǎo zá gǎo zá 了le le "" " 和hé hé "" " 彻底chè dǐ chè dǐ 失败shī bài shī bài "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] ，，，但dàn dàn 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 批评pī píng pī píng 存在cún zài cún zài 于yú yú 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 下xià xià ：：：

11 1 .. . ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 制造zhì zào zhì zào 了le le 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 问题wèn tí wèn tí ** * ** * ：：：工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 于yú yú 20122012 2012 年nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 开放kāi fàng kāi fàng 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ ，，，制造zhì zào zhì zào 了le le 需要xū yào xū yào 在zài zài 第三国dì sān guó dì sān guó 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 的de de 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 难民nàn mín nàn mín 人口rén kǒu rén kǒu [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

22 2 .. . ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 的de de 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn ** * ** * ：：：当dāng dāng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 在zài zài 20122012 2012 年nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 开放kāi fàng kāi fàng 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 和hé hé 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛时dǎo shí dǎo shí ，，，他们tā men tā men 也yě yě 需要xū yào xū yào 找到zhǎo dào zhǎo dào 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 难民nàn mín nàn mín 的de de 第三国dì sān guó dì sān guó ，，，因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 维持wéi chí wéi chí 不bù bù 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 乘船chéng chuán chéng chuán 抵达dǐ dá dǐ dá 者zhě zhě 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。。

工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 在zài zài 20122012 2012 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 未能wèi néng wèi néng 达成dá chéng dá chéng 任何rèn hé rèn hé 第三国dì sān guó dì sān guó 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 协议xié yì xié yì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

33 3 .. . ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 最初zuì chū zuì chū 支持zhī chí zhī chí 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 协议xié yì xié yì ** * ** * ：：：柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 协议xié yì xié yì 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè ，，，即jí jí CoalitionCoalition Coalition 上台shàng tái shàng tái 一年yī nián yī nián 多后duō hòu duō hòu 。。。

工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 批评pī píng pī píng 其qí qí 实施shí shī shí shī ，，，但dàn dàn 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 根本gēn běn gēn běn 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 第三国dì sān guó dì sān guó 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 的de de 概念gài niàn gài niàn ，，，因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 他们tā men tā men 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 也yě yě 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 过guò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 安排ān pái ān pái [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

44 4 .. . ** * ** * 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 花费huā fèi huā fèi 数十亿shù shí yì shù shí yì 用于yòng yú yòng yú 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ ** * ** * ：：：工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 过去guò qù guò qù 二十年èr shí nián èr shí nián 中zhōng zhōng 都dōu dōu 在zài zài 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 和hé hé 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛dǎo dǎo 的de de 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 基础设施jī chǔ shè shī jī chǔ shè shī 和hé hé 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 上shàng shàng 花费huā fèi huā fèi 了le le 数十shù shí shù shí 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

55 5 .. . ** * ** * 美国měi guó měi guó 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 协议xié yì xié yì 由yóu yóu CoalitionCoalition Coalition 达成dá chéng dá chéng ** * ** * ：：：更gèng gèng 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng 的de de 美国měi guó měi guó 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 安排ān pái ān pái 是shì shì 由yóu yóu 特恩tè ēn tè ēn 布尔bù ěr bù ěr CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20162016 2016 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 谈判tán pàn tán pàn 达成dá chéng dá chéng 的de de [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。。

🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 55005500 5500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 协议xié yì xié yì 以yǐ yǐ 极少jí shǎo jí shǎo 的de de 难民nàn mín nàn mín 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 成果chéng guǒ chéng guǒ 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 糟糕zāo gāo zāo gāo 的de de 性价比xìng jià bǐ xìng jià bǐ ，，，但应dàn yīng dàn yīng 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 因素yīn sù yīn sù ：：：

While the $55 million Cambodia deal delivered poor value for money with minimal refugee resettlement outcomes, several important contextual factors should be considered: **Policy rationale**: The deal was part of maintaining Australia's border protection policy, which successive governments (both Labor and Coalition) have argued is necessary to prevent deaths at sea from dangerous boat journeys.

** * ** * 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * ：：：该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì 是shì shì 维持wéi chí wéi chí 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 边境biān jìng biān jìng 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ，，，工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 相继xiāng jì xiāng jì 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 对于duì yú duì yú 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 危险wēi xiǎn wēi xiǎn 海上hǎi shàng hǎi shàng 航行háng xíng háng xíng 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 死亡sǐ wáng sǐ wáng 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de 。。。

The policy relies on denying resettlement in Australia to boat arrivals, which inherently requires finding alternative resettlement locations [2][5]. **Voluntary nature**: Refugees were not forced to go to Cambodia; they chose to volunteer for the program as a pathway off Nauru.

该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 依赖于yī lài yú yī lài yú 拒绝jù jué jù jué 向xiàng xiàng 乘船chéng chuán chéng chuán 抵达dǐ dá dǐ dá 者zhě zhě 提供tí gōng tí gōng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì ，，，这zhè zhè 本身běn shēn běn shēn 就jiù jiù 需要xū yào xū yào 寻找xún zhǎo xún zhǎo 替代tì dài tì dài 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 地点dì diǎn dì diǎn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

The fact that most refugees chose not to take up the offer, and some who did later returned home, indicates the program's unattractiveness—but also that refugees had agency in their decisions [2][3]. **Cambodia's unsuitability**: Critics noted that Cambodia was a problematic resettlement destination due to poverty, human rights concerns, lack of refugee resettlement experience, and absence of education, work opportunities, or language training for refugees [2][3].

** * ** * 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì ** * ** * ：：：难民nàn mín nàn mín 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 被迫bèi pò bèi pò 前往qián wǎng qián wǎng 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài ；；；他们tā men tā men 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 参加cān jiā cān jiā 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà ，，，作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 离开lí kāi lí kāi 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 的de de 途径tú jìng tú jìng 。。。

These criticisms are valid but do not negate that the government was attempting to find resettlement options for a population created by bipartisan-supported policies. **Historical pattern**: The difficulty finding third countries willing to resettle Australia's offshore refugees has been a persistent challenge for both parties.

大多数dà duō shù dà duō shù 难民nàn mín nàn mín 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 不bù bù 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 该gāi gāi 提议tí yì tí yì ，，，而ér ér 一些yī xiē yī xiē 接受者jiē shòu zhě jiē shòu zhě 后来hòu lái hòu lái 返回fǎn huí fǎn huí 家园jiā yuán jiā yuán ，，，这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 缺乏quē fá quē fá 吸引力xī yǐn lì xī yǐn lì —— — —— — 但dàn dàn 也yě yě 说明shuō míng shuō míng 难民nàn mín nàn mín 对duì duì 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 有yǒu yǒu 自主权zì zhǔ quán zì zhǔ quán [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。。

Labor reopened Nauru and Manus in 2012 without securing any resettlement agreements; the Coalition secured Cambodia (failed) and eventually the US deal (more successful) [5][6][7]. **Cost comparisons**: While $55 million for two refugees is poor value, the broader offshore processing program has cost billions under both parties.

** * ** * 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 的de de 不bù bù 适宜性shì yí xìng shì yí xìng ** * ** * ：：：批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，，，由于yóu yú yóu yú 贫困pín kùn pín kùn 、、、人权rén quán rén quán 问题wèn tí wèn tí 、、、缺乏quē fá quē fá 难民nàn mín nàn mín 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 经验jīng yàn jīng yàn 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 缺乏quē fá quē fá 教育jiào yù jiào yù 、、、工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 机会jī huì jī huì 或huò huò 难民nàn mín nàn mín 语言yǔ yán yǔ yán 培训péi xùn péi xùn ，，，柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 有yǒu yǒu 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 目的地mù dì dì mù dì dì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。。

The Cambodia deal represents a small fraction of total offshore processing expenditure since 2012 [5]. **Key context**: This policy failure is not unique to the Coalition—it reflects a bipartisan policy framework (offshore processing without Australian resettlement) that creates the need for third-country arrangements.

这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 批评pī píng pī píng 是shì shì 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào 的de de ，，，但dàn dàn 并bìng bìng 不能bù néng bù néng 否定fǒu dìng fǒu dìng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 试图shì tú shì tú 为wèi wèi 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 所suǒ suǒ 创造chuàng zào chuàng zào 的de de 人口rén kǒu rén kǒu 寻找xún zhǎo xún zhǎo 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 的de de 努力nǔ lì nǔ lì 。。。

Both parties have struggled to find willing resettlement partners.

** * ** * 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 模式mó shì mó shì ** * ** * ：：：寻找xún zhǎo xún zhǎo 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 离岸lí àn lí àn 难民nàn mín nàn mín 的de de 第三国dì sān guó dì sān guó 对duì duì 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 来说lái shuō lái shuō 一直yì zhí yì zhí 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 持续chí xù chí xù 的de de 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 。。。

工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 在zài zài 20122012 2012 年nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 开放kāi fàng kāi fàng 瑙鲁nǎo lǔ nǎo lǔ 和hé hé 马努斯mǎ nǔ sī mǎ nǔ sī 岛时dǎo shí dǎo shí ，，，没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 达成dá chéng dá chéng 任何rèn hé rèn hé 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 协议xié yì xié yì ；；； CoalitionCoalition Coalition 达成dá chéng dá chéng 了le le 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài （（（失败shī bài shī bài ）））和hé hé 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 美国měi guó měi guó 协议xié yì xié yì （（（更gèng gèng 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng ））） [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。。

** * ** * 成本chéng běn chéng běn 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào ** * ** * ：：：虽然suī rán suī rán 55005500 5500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 用于yòng yú yòng yú 两名liǎng míng liǎng míng 难民nàn mín nàn mín 性价比xìng jià bǐ xìng jià bǐ 很差hěn chà hěn chà ，，，但dàn dàn 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 计划jì huà jì huà 在zài zài 两liǎng liǎng 党执政dǎng zhí zhèng dǎng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 已yǐ yǐ 花费huā fèi huā fèi 数十亿shù shí yì shù shí yì 。。。

柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 协议xié yì xié yì 仅jǐn jǐn 占zhàn zhàn 20122012 2012 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 总支出zǒng zhī chū zǒng zhī chū 的de de 很小hěn xiǎo hěn xiǎo 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * ：：：这一zhè yī zhè yī 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 失败shī bài shī bài 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu —— — —— — 它tā tā 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià （（（没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì ））），，，该gāi gāi 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 创造chuàng zào chuàng zào 了le le 对duì duì 第三国dì sān guó dì sān guó 安排ān pái ān pái 的de de 需求xū qiú xū qiú 。。。

两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 在zài zài 寻找xún zhǎo xún zhǎo 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì 的de de 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 伙伴huǒ bàn huǒ bàn 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 遇到困难yù dào kùn nán yù dào kùn nán 。。。

属实

6.0

/ 10

事实shì shí shì shí 要素yào sù yào sù 准确无误zhǔn què wú wù zhǔn què wú wù ：：：约yuē yuē 55005500 5500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 用于yòng yú yòng yú 柬埔寨jiǎn pǔ zhài jiǎn pǔ zhài 协议xié yì xié yì ，，，只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 两名liǎng míng liǎng míng 难民nàn mín nàn mín 被bèi bèi 永久yǒng jiǔ yǒng jiǔ 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 。。。

The factual elements are accurate: approximately $55 million was committed to the Cambodia deal, and only two refugees were permanently resettled.

每名měi míng měi míng 难民nàn mín nàn mín 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 确实què shí què shí 高得gāo dé gāo dé 惊人jīng rén jīng rén 。。。

The cost-per-refugee was indeed extraordinarily high.

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：：：（（（ 11 1 ）））这是zhè shì zhè shì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 也yě yě 支持zhī chí zhī chí 和hé hé 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 开放kāi fàng kāi fàng 的de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ；；；（（（ 22 2 ）））该gāi gāi 协议xié yì xié yì 对duì duì 难民nàn mín nàn mín 来说lái shuō lái shuō 是shì shì 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 的de de ；；；（（（ 33 3 ）））并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 资金zī jīn zī jīn 都dōu dōu 已yǐ yǐ 支出zhī chū zhī chū ；；；（（（ 44 4 ））） CoalitionCoalition Coalition 后来hòu lái hòu lái 达成dá chéng dá chéng 了le le 更gèng gèng 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng 的de de 美国měi guó měi guó 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 安置ān zhì ān zhì 协议xié yì xié yì 。。。

However, the claim omits critical context: (1) this was part of a bipartisan offshore processing policy that Labor also supported and reopened; (2) the deal was voluntary for refugees; (3) not all funds had been drawn down; and (4) the Coalition later secured the more successful US resettlement deal.

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 为wèi wèi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 特有tè yǒu tè yǒu 的de de 失败shī bài shī bài ，，，而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 它tā tā 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 中zhōng zhōng 固有gù yǒu gù yǒu 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 。。。

The claim frames this as a Coalition-specific failure when it reflects broader challenges inherent in the offshore processing policy supported by both major parties.

最终评分

6.0

/ 10

属实

The factual elements are accurate: approximately $55 million was committed to the Cambodia deal, and only two refugees were permanently resettled.

每名měi míng měi míng 难民nàn mín nàn mín 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 确实què shí què shí 高得gāo dé gāo dé 惊人jīng rén jīng rén 。。。

The cost-per-refugee was indeed extraordinarily high.

The claim frames this as a Coalition-specific failure when it reflects broader challenges inherent in the offshore processing policy supported by both major parties.