部分属实

评分： 6.0/10

报告问题
Coalition
C0453

声明内容

“禁止欠Centrelink债务的人离境，无论债务金额多小或他们计划何时返回。”
难民 福利
原始来源： Matthew Davis
分析时间： 30 Jan 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 于yú yú 20162016 2016 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 推出tuī chū tuī chū 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ ，， ， 将jiāng jiāng 离境lí jìng lí jìng 禁令jìn lìng jìn lìng 令lìng lìng (( ( DPOsDPOs DPOs )) ) 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 至zhì zhì CentrelinkCentrelink Centrelink // / 福利fú lì fú lì 债务zhài wù zhài wù 。。 。
The Coalition government did introduce legislation in March 2016 to extend Departure Prohibition Orders (DPOs) to Centrelink/welfare debts.
 据jù jù HuffPostHuffPost HuffPost 报道bào dào bào dào ，， ， 社会shè huì shè huì 服务fú wù fú wù 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng ChristianChristian Christian PorterPorter Porter 宣布xuān bù xuān bù ，， ， 欠qiàn qiàn CentrelinkCentrelink Centrelink 债务zhài wù zhài wù 的de de 人rén rén 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 在zài zài 还清huán qīng huán qīng 债务zhài wù zhài wù 前qián qián 试图shì tú shì tú 离开lí kāi lí kāi 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà ，， ， 可能kě néng kě néng 会huì huì 在zài zài 机场jī chǎng jī chǎng 被bèi bèi 拦截lán jié lán jié [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
According to the HuffPost report, Social Services Minister Christian Porter announced that people owing Centrelink debts could be stopped at airports if they attempted to leave the country before paying back their debts [1].
 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 提议tí yì tí yì ，， ， DPODPO DPO 可kě kě 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú "" " 未wèi wèi 就jiù jiù 偿还cháng huán cháng huán 福利fú lì fú lì 债务zhài wù zhài wù 达成dá chéng dá chéng '' ' 满意mǎn yì mǎn yì '' ' 协议xié yì xié yì 的de de 人rén rén ，， ， 且qiě qiě 无论wú lùn wú lùn 债务人zhài wù rén zhài wù rén 计划jì huà jì huà 在zài zài 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 停留tíng liú tíng liú 多长时间duō zhǎng shí jiān duō zhǎng shí jiān "" " 均jūn jūn 适用shì yòng shì yòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The legislation proposed that DPOs could be applied to "a person who has not entered into a 'satisfactory' agreement to repay their welfare debts, and would apply to debtors regardless of the time they plan to spend overseas" [1].
 这zhè zhè 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 中zhōng zhōng "" " 无论wú lùn wú lùn 他们tā men tā men 计划jì huà jì huà 何时hé shí hé shí 返回fǎn huí fǎn huí "" " 的de de 部分bù fèn bù fèn 。。 。
This confirms the "regardless of how soon they will return" aspect of the claim.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 中zhōng zhōng "" " 无论wú lùn wú lùn 债务zhài wù zhài wù 金额jīn é jīn é 多duō duō 小xiǎo xiǎo "" " 的de de 断言duàn yán duàn yán 需要xū yào xū yào 更gèng gèng 仔细zǐ xì zǐ xì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 。。 。
However, the claim's assertion about "regardless of how small the debt is" requires closer examination.
 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 的de de 是shì shì 2727 27 万名wàn míng wàn míng 共欠gòng qiàn gòng qiàn 8.78.7 8.7 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 且qiě qiě "" " 未wèi wèi 努力nǔ lì nǔ lì 偿还债务cháng huán zhài wù cháng huán zhài wù "" " 的de de 人rén rén [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The legislation targeted the 270,000 people who owed a collective $870 million and "are not making an effort to repay the debt" [1].
 PorterPorter Porter 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ，， ， 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 将jiāng jiāng 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì "" " 不再bù zài bù zài 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 福利fú lì fú lì 、、 、 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 有yǒu yǒu 偿还cháng huán cháng huán 能力néng lì néng lì 但dàn dàn 拒绝jù jué jù jué 达成dá chéng dá chéng 并bìng bìng 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 可kě kě 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 还款hái kuǎn hái kuǎn 安排ān pái ān pái 的de de 债务人zhài wù rén zhài wù rén "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Minister Porter specifically stated the policy would target "debtors who are no longer receiving welfare and therefore have the means to repay their debt, but refuse to enter into and honour an acceptable repayment arrangement" [1].
 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 资料zī liào zī liào 尚shàng shàng 不bù bù 清楚qīng chǔ qīng chǔ 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 20162016 2016 年nián nián 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 通过tōng guò tōng guò 议会yì huì yì huì 或huò huò 得以dé yǐ dé yǐ 实施shí shī shí shī 。。 。
It is unclear from available sources whether this specific 2016 legislation passed Parliament or was implemented.
 截至jié zhì jié zhì 20182018 2018 -- - 20192019 2019 年nián nián ，， ， 在zài zài 人力资源rén lì zī yuán rén lì zī yuán 服务fú wù fú wù 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng MichaelMichael Michael KeenanKeenan Keenan 任内rèn nèi rèn nèi ，， ， 离境lí jìng lí jìng 禁令jìn lìng jìn lìng 令lìng lìng 用于yòng yú yòng yú 福利fú lì fú lì 债务zhài wù zhài wù 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 后来hòu lái hòu lái 得到dé dào dé dào 确认què rèn què rèn ，， ， 他tā tā 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 超过chāo guò chāo guò 1515 15 万人wàn rén wàn rén 欠下qiàn xià qiàn xià 足够zú gòu zú gòu 的de de 福利fú lì fú lì 债务zhài wù zhài wù 以致yǐ zhì yǐ zhì 可能kě néng kě néng 被bèi bèi 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 出境chū jìng chū jìng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Departure Prohibition Orders for welfare debts were later confirmed to be in use by 2018-2019 under Human Services Minister Michael Keenan, who stated over 150,000 people owed enough welfare debt to be subject to travel bans [2].

缺失背景

** * ** * 既有jì yǒu jì yǒu 的de de DPODPO DPO 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià ：： ： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 忽略hū lüè hū lüè 了le le 离境lí jìng lí jìng 禁令jìn lìng jìn lìng 令lìng lìng 在zài zài 20162016 2016 年nián nián 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 新xīn xīn 事物shì wù shì wù 。。 。
**Pre-existing DPO framework:** The claim omits that Departure Prohibition Orders were not new in 2016.
 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 税务shuì wù shuì wù 债务zhài wù zhài wù 的de de DPODPO DPO 至少zhì shǎo zhì shǎo 自zì zì 19911991 1991 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 就jiù jiù 已yǐ yǐ 存在cún zài cún zài ，， ， 依据yī jù yī jù 是shì shì 《《 《 19531953 1953 年nián nián 税务shuì wù shuì wù 管理法guǎn lǐ fǎ guǎn lǐ fǎ 》》 》 第dì dì 14S14S 14S 条tiáo tiáo [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
DPOs for tax debts have existed since at least 1991 under Section 14S of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 [3].
 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 子女zǐ nǚ zǐ nǚ 抚养费fǔ yǎng fèi fǔ yǎng fèi 债务zhài wù zhài wù 的de de DPODPO DPO 也yě yě 已yǐ yǐ 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 十多年shí duō nián shí duō nián ，， ， 其qí qí 模式mó shì mó shì 与yǔ yǔ 税务shuì wù shuì wù 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ closelyclosely closely modelledmodelled modelled [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
DPOs for child support debts have also been in use for over a decade, modelled closely on the tax legislation [4]. **Criteria for application:** The policy applied to debtors who refused to enter repayment arrangements, not automatically to all debtors.
 ** * ** * 适用shì yòng shì yòng 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn ：： ： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú 拒绝jù jué jù jué 达成dá chéng dá chéng 还款hái kuǎn hái kuǎn 安排ān pái ān pái 的de de 债务人zhài wù rén zhài wù rén ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 自动zì dòng zì dòng 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 债务人zhài wù rén zhài wù rén 。。 。
The Ombudsman's report on child support DPOs notes they are only used "in very specific circumstances" where there are concerns about flight risk or asset dissipation [4]. **Exemptions existed:** The legislation allowed for humanitarian exemptions through Departure Authorisation Certificates for "cultural reasons or family emergencies such as a funeral" [1]. **Purpose of the policy:** The government stated the purpose was to recover $870 million in outstanding debts from 270,000 people who were not making repayment efforts, targeting those with means to pay but who refused to engage [1].
 监察jiān chá jiān chá 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 关于guān yú guān yú 子女zǐ nǚ zǐ nǚ 抚养费fǔ yǎng fèi fǔ yǎng fèi DPODPO DPO 的de de 报告bào gào bào gào 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，， ， DPODPO DPO 仅jǐn jǐn 在zài zài "" " 非常fēi cháng fēi cháng 特定tè dìng tè dìng 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià "" " 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng ，， ， 即jí jí 存在cún zài cún zài 潜逃qián táo qián táo 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 或huò huò 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 转移zhuǎn yí zhuǎn yí 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 时shí shí [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn ：： ： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 离境lí jìng lí jìng 授权shòu quán shòu quán 证书zhèng shū zhèng shū 出于chū yú chū yú 人道主义rén dào zhǔ yì rén dào zhǔ yì 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn 获得huò dé huò dé 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn ，， ， 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò "" " 文化wén huà wén huà 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn 或huò huò 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 紧急情况jǐn jí qíng kuàng jǐn jí qíng kuàng 如rú rú 葬礼zàng lǐ zàng lǐ "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 目的mù dì mù dì ：： ： ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ，， ， 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 从cóng cóng 2727 27 万名wàn míng wàn míng 未wèi wèi 努力nǔ lì nǔ lì 还款hái kuǎn hái kuǎn 的de de 人rén rén 手中shǒu zhōng shǒu zhōng 追回zhuī huí zhuī huí 8.78.7 8.7 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán ，， ， 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 的de de 是shì shì 有yǒu yǒu 还款hái kuǎn hái kuǎn 能力néng lì néng lì 但dàn dàn 拒绝jù jué jù jué 配合pèi hé pèi hé 的de de 人rén rén [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * HuffPostHuffPost HuffPost AustraliaAustralia Australia ：： ： ** * ** * 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì HuffPostHuffPost HuffPost AustraliaAustralia Australia ，， ， 该gāi gāi 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 于yú yú 20212021 2021 年nián nián 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng 。。 。
**HuffPost Australia:** The original source is HuffPost Australia, which ceased operations in 2021.
 HuffPostHuffPost HuffPost 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 被bèi bèi 视为shì wèi shì wèi 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻媒体xīn wén méi tǐ xīn wén méi tǐ ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 其qí qí 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 版以bǎn yǐ bǎn yǐ 进步jìn bù jìn bù // / 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 著称zhù chēng zhù chēng 。。 。
HuffPost is generally considered a mainstream news outlet, though its Australian edition had a reputation for progressive/left-leaning editorial stance.
 该gāi gāi 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 基于jī yú jī yú 政府公告zhèng fǔ gōng gào zhèng fǔ gōng gào 和hé hé 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào ，， ， 包含bāo hán bāo hán 社会shè huì shè huì 服务fú wù fú wù 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng ChristianChristian Christian PorterPorter Porter 和hé hé AlanAlan Alan TudgeTudge Tudge 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引述yǐn shù yǐn shù 。。 。
The specific article appears to be factual reporting based on government announcements and ministerial statements, with direct quotes from Ministers Christian Porter and Alan Tudge.
 信息xìn xī xìn xī 与yǔ yǔ 该gāi gāi 时期shí qī shí qī 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 发布fā bù fā bù 一致yí zhì yí zhì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The information aligns with government media releases from the period [1].
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ？？ ？
**Did Labor do something similar?** **Tax Debt DPOs:** The Taxation Administration Act 1953 (which includes Section 14S on DPOs) predates the Coalition government.
 ** * ** *
This legislation has been used by governments of both persuasions for decades.
 ** * ** * 税务shuì wù shuì wù 债务zhài wù zhài wù DPODPO DPO ：： ： ** * ** * 《《 《 19531953 1953 年nián nián 税务shuì wù shuì wù 管理法guǎn lǐ fǎ guǎn lǐ fǎ 》》 》 (( ( 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 第dì dì 14S14S 14S 条tiáo tiáo 关于guān yú guān yú DPODPO DPO 的de de 规定guī dìng guī dìng )) ) 早于zǎo yú zǎo yú CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 。。 。
The famous case of actor Paul Hogan being issued a DPO for a $150 million tax debt occurred in 2010 under the Labor government [5]. **Child Support DPOs:** DPOs for child support debts have been in use since at least the 2000s.
 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 已yǐ yǐ 被bèi bèi 各届gè jiè gè jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 数十年shù shí nián shù shí nián 。。 。
The Commonwealth Ombudsman's 2009 investigation into CSA DPO administration found these powers were actively used during the Howard, Rudd, and Gillard governments [4]. **Labor's position on welfare debt:** The 2016 legislation was introduced by the Coalition.
 著名演员zhù míng yǎn yuán zhù míng yǎn yuán PaulPaul Paul HoganHogan Hogan 因yīn yīn 1.51.5 1.5 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 税务shuì wù shuì wù 债务zhài wù zhài wù 被bèi bèi 发出fā chū fā chū DPODPO DPO 的de de 案例àn lì àn lì 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 20102010 2010 年nián nián LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
While Labor may have opposed the specific bill (parliamentary records are unclear), the broader DPO framework existed under previous Labor governments for other debt types.
 ** * ** * 子女zǐ nǚ zǐ nǚ 抚养费fǔ yǎng fèi fǔ yǎng fèi DPODPO DPO ：： ： ** * ** * 自zì zì 20002000 2000 年代nián dài nián dài 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái ，， ， 子女zǐ nǚ zǐ nǚ 抚养费fǔ yǎng fèi fǔ yǎng fèi 债务zhài wù zhài wù 的de de DPODPO DPO 一直yì zhí yì zhí 在zài zài 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 。。 。
The Albanese Labor government (2022-present) has maintained and expanded DPO usage - the ATO issued 21 DPOs in just the first half of 2025-26, exceeding the entire previous financial year [6].
 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 监察jiān chá jiān chá 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 20092009 2009 年nián nián 对duì duì 子女zǐ nǚ zǐ nǚ 抚养费fǔ yǎng fèi fǔ yǎng fèi 管理机构guǎn lǐ jī gòu guǎn lǐ jī gòu DPODPO DPO 权力quán lì quán lì 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ，， ， 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 权力quán lì quán lì 在zài zài HowardHoward Howard 、、 、 RuddRudd Rudd 和hé hé GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 期间qī jiān qī jiān 均jūn jūn 被bèi bèi 积极jī jí jī jí 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 对duì duì 福利fú lì fú lì 债务zhài wù zhài wù 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ：： ： ** * ** * 20162016 2016 年nián nián 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 由yóu yóu CoalitionCoalition Coalition 提出tí chū tí chū 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán LaborLabor Labor 可能kě néng kě néng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 该gāi gāi 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn (( ( 议会yì huì yì huì 记录jì lù jì lù 尚shàng shàng 不bù bù 清楚qīng chǔ qīng chǔ )) ) ，， ， 但dàn dàn 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de DPODPO DPO 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 在zài zài 之前zhī qián zhī qián 的de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 已yǐ yǐ 存在cún zài cún zài 用于yòng yú yòng yú 其他qí tā qí tā 债务zhài wù zhài wù 类型lèi xíng lèi xíng 。。 。
AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20222022 2022 年nián nián 至今zhì jīn zhì jīn )) ) 维持wéi chí wéi chí 并bìng bìng 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 了le le DPODPO DPO 的de de 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng —— — —— — 仅jǐn jǐn 在zài zài 20252025 2025 -- - 2626 26 财年cái nián cái nián 上半年shàng bàn nián shàng bàn nián ，， ， 税务局shuì wù jú shuì wù jú 就jiù jiù 发出fā chū fā chū 了le le 2121 21 份fèn fèn DPODPO DPO ，， ， 超过chāo guò chāo guò 了le le 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 上shàng shàng 一yī yī 财年cái nián cái nián [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 20162016 2016 年nián nián 将jiāng jiāng DPODPO DPO 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 至zhì zhì 福利fú lì fú lì 债务zhài wù zhài wù 的de de 提议tí yì tí yì 虽suī suī 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì ，， ， 但dàn dàn 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 跨多届kuà duō jiè kuà duō jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 债务zhài wù zhài wù 追讨zhuī tǎo zhuī tǎo 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 下xià xià 。。 。
The Coalition's 2016 proposal to extend DPOs to welfare debts was controversial but occurred within a broader context of debt recovery enforcement that has existed across multiple governments. **Arguments supporting the policy:** - The government argued it targeted only those with means to pay who refused to engage, not genuine hardship cases - Minister Porter defended the policy with the statement: "If you have enough money to fly the family to Bali, you have enough money to repay your debt" [1] - The policy aimed to recover $870 million in taxpayer funds - Similar DPO mechanisms existed for tax and child support debts with bipartisan support **Criticisms and concerns:** - Civil liberties concerns about restricting freedom of movement for welfare debts - Risk of overreach - the claim about "regardless of how small" has some validity as the threshold criteria were not clearly defined in public announcements - No parliamentary scrutiny evidence found regarding passage of the specific legislation - Potential disproportionate impact on vulnerable populations **Comparative analysis:** This policy was an extension of existing DPO frameworks rather than a novel restriction.
 ** * ** * 支持zhī chí zhī chí 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn ：： ： ** * ** *
The Labor government's use of DPOs against Paul Hogan in 2010 for tax debts (where he was trapped in Australia for his mother's funeral) demonstrates that both parties have used these powers.
 -- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng ，， ， 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 仅jǐn jǐn 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 有yǒu yǒu 还款hái kuǎn hái kuǎn 能力néng lì néng lì 但dàn dàn 拒绝jù jué jù jué 配合pèi hé pèi hé 的de de 人rén rén ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 困难kùn nán kùn nán 案例àn lì àn lì
The key difference is that the Coalition extended DPOs to a new category (welfare debts) while Labor largely used them for tax and child support.
 -- - PorterPorter Porter 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 为wèi wèi 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 时称shí chēng shí chēng ：： ： "" " 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 你nǐ nǐ 有钱yǒu qián yǒu qián 带dài dài 全家quán jiā quán jiā 去qù qù 巴厘岛bā lí dǎo bā lí dǎo ，， ， 你nǐ nǐ 就jiù jiù 有钱yǒu qián yǒu qián 偿还债务cháng huán zhài wù cháng huán zhài wù "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 追讨zhuī tǎo zhuī tǎo 8.78.7 8.7 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 资金zī jīn zī jīn
-- - 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de DPODPO DPO 机制jī zhì jī zhì 在zài zài 获得huò dé huò dé 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 已yǐ yǐ 存在cún zài cún zài 用于yòng yú yòng yú 税务shuì wù shuì wù 和hé hé 子女zǐ nǚ zǐ nǚ 抚养费fǔ yǎng fèi fǔ yǎng fèi 债务zhài wù zhài wù
** * ** * 批评pī píng pī píng 和hé hé 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ：： ： ** * ** *
-- - 对duì duì 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 福利fú lì fú lì 债务人zhài wù rén zhài wù rén 的de de 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 自由zì yóu zì yóu 的de de 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 担忧dān yōu dān yōu
-- - 越权yuè quán yuè quán 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn —— — —— — 关于guān yú guān yú "" " 无论wú lùn wú lùn 金额jīn é jīn é 多duō duō 小xiǎo xiǎo "" " 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 有yǒu yǒu 一定yí dìng yí dìng 道理dào lǐ dào lǐ ，， ， 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 中未zhōng wèi zhōng wèi 明确míng què míng què 界定jiè dìng jiè dìng 门槛mén kǎn mén kǎn 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn
-- - 未wèi wèi 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 关于guān yú guān yú 该gāi gāi 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 的de de 议会yì huì yì huì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù
-- - 可能kě néng kě néng 对duì duì 弱势群体ruò shì qún tǐ ruò shì qún tǐ 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 不成比例bù chéng bǐ lì bù chéng bǐ lì 的de de 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 分析fēn xī fēn xī ：： ： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 是shì shì 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu DPODPO DPO 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 全新quán xīn quán xīn 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 。。 。
LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 20102010 2010 年nián nián 对duì duì PaulPaul Paul HoganHogan Hogan 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng DPODPO DPO 追讨zhuī tǎo zhuī tǎo 税务shuì wù shuì wù 债务zhài wù zhài wù (( ( 他tā tā 被困bèi kùn bèi kùn 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 参加cān jiā cān jiā 母亲mǔ qīn mǔ qīn 的de de 葬礼zàng lǐ zàng lǐ )) ) 的de de 案例àn lì àn lì 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ，， ， 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 曾céng céng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 权力quán lì quán lì 。。 。
关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié 在于zài yú zài yú ，， ， CoalitionCoalition Coalition 将jiāng jiāng DPODPO DPO 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 至zhì zhì 新xīn xīn 类别lèi bié lèi bié (( ( 福利fú lì fú lì 债务zhài wù zhài wù )) ) ，， ， 而ér ér LaborLabor Labor 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 用于yòng yú yòng yú 税务shuì wù shuì wù 和hé hé 子女zǐ nǚ zǐ nǚ 抚养费fǔ yǎng fèi fǔ yǎng fèi 。。 。

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí 于yú yú 20162016 2016 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 提议tí yì tí yì 并bìng bìng 推出tuī chū tuī chū 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ ，， ， 将jiāng jiāng 离境lí jìng lí jìng 禁令jìn lìng jìn lìng 令lìng lìng 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 至zhì zhì CentrelinkCentrelink Centrelink // / 福利fú lì fú lì 债务zhài wù zhài wù ，， ， 这zhè zhè 将jiāng jiāng 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 人们rén men rén men 离境lí jìng lí jìng 。。 。
The Coalition did propose and introduce legislation in March 2016 to extend Departure Prohibition Orders to Centrelink/welfare debts, which would prohibit people from leaving the country.
 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 确实què shí què shí "" " 无论wú lùn wú lùn 他们tā men tā men 计划jì huà jì huà 何时hé shí hé shí 返回fǎn huí fǎn huí "" " 均jūn jūn 适用shì yòng shì yòng —— — —— — HuffPostHuffPost HuffPost 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí ，， ， DPODPO DPO 将jiāng jiāng 无论wú lùn wú lùn 计划jì huà jì huà 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 旅行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 时shí shí 长zhǎng zhǎng 如何rú hé rú hé 均jūn jūn 适用shì yòng shì yòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The policy did apply "regardless of how soon they will return" - the HuffPost article confirms DPOs would apply regardless of the planned duration of overseas travel [1].
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 中zhōng zhōng "" " 无论wú lùn wú lùn 债务zhài wù zhài wù 金额jīn é jīn é 多duō duō 小xiǎo xiǎo "" " 的de de 断言duàn yán duàn yán 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。 。
However, the claim's assertion about "regardless of how small the debt is" overstates the policy.
 该gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 明确míng què míng què 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 2727 27 万名wàn míng wàn míng 共欠gòng qiàn gòng qiàn 8.78.7 8.7 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 且qiě qiě "" " 未wèi wèi 努力nǔ lì nǔ lì 还款hái kuǎn hái kuǎn "" " 的de de 债务人zhài wù rén zhài wù rén [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The legislation specifically targeted the 270,000 debtors who collectively owed $870 million and were "not making an effort to repay" [1].
 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 侧重于cè zhòng yú cè zhòng yú "" " 拒绝jù jué jù jué 达成dá chéng dá chéng 并bìng bìng 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 可kě kě 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 还款hái kuǎn hái kuǎn 安排ān pái ān pái "" " 的de de 人rén rén —— — —— — 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 自动zì dòng zì dòng 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 债务zhài wù zhài wù 无论wú lùn wú lùn 金额jīn é jīn é 大小dà xiǎo dà xiǎo 。。 。
The policy focused on those who "refuse to enter into and honour an acceptable repayment arrangement" - not automatic application to all debts regardless of size.
 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 是shì shì ，， ， DPODPO DPO 在zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 和hé hé LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 已yǐ yǐ 存在cún zài cún zài 数十年shù shí nián shù shí nián ，， ， 用于yòng yú yòng yú 税务shuì wù shuì wù 和hé hé 子女zǐ nǚ zǐ nǚ 抚养费fǔ yǎng fèi fǔ yǎng fèi 债务zhài wù zhài wù 。。 。
The broader context is that DPOs have existed for decades under both Labor and Coalition governments for tax and child support debts.
 20162016 2016 年nián nián 的de de 提议tí yì tí yì 是shì shì 将jiāng jiāng 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 的de de 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 至zhì zhì 新xīn xīn 类别lèi bié lèi bié ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 严厉yán lì yán lì 创新chuàng xīn chuàng xīn 。。 。
The 2016 proposal was an extension of an existing bipartisan enforcement framework to a new category, not a uniquely harsh Coalition innovation.

📚 来源与引用 (5)

  1. 1
    huffingtonpost.com.au

    huffingtonpost.com.au

    If You Owe Centrelink Money, Border Force Will Stop You Leaving The Country

    HuffPost
  2. 2
    classic.austlii.edu.au

    classic.austlii.edu.au

    SECT 14S Departure prohibition orders

  3. 3
    PDF

    CSA administration of departure prohibition order powers investigation report

    Ombudsman Gov • PDF Document
  4. 4
    waterhousetaxlawyers.com.au

    waterhousetaxlawyers.com.au

    The ATO can issue a Departure Prohibition Order (DPO) to stop you from leaving Australia. This is effective until you pay your tax or settle with the ATO.

    Waterhouse Lawyers
  5. 5
    smh.com.au

    smh.com.au

    Exclusive data shows the tax office used its powers to stop huge tax debtors leaving Australia just 46 times over six years.

    The Sydney Morning Herald

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性，但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。

Previous: C0452 Next: C0454