属实

评分: 8.0/10

Coalition
C0372

声明内容

“在批评特定法庭案件的监禁刑期过轻后,险些面临3项藐视法庭指控,其行为违反了法庭与议会分离的原则。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng de de 事实shì shí shì shí 核心hé xīn hé xīn 准确无误zhǔn què wú wù zhǔn què wú wù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The factual core of this claim is accurate [1].
三名sān míng sān míng 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 人类rén lèi rén lèi 服务fú wù fú wù 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng AlanAlan Alan TudgeTudge Tudge 卫生部长wèi shēng bù zhǎng wèi shēng bù zhǎng GregGreg Greg HuntHunt Hunt 助理zhù lǐ zhù lǐ 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng MichaelMichael Michael SukkarSukkar Sukkar 确实què shí què shí zài zài 20172017 2017 nián nián 66 6 yuè yuè 批评pī píng pī píng 维州wéi zhōu wéi zhōu 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng de de 量刑liàng xíng liàng xíng 决定jué dìng jué dìng hòu hòu 险些xiǎn xiē xiǎn xiē 面临miàn lín miàn lín 藐视miǎo shì miǎo shì 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Three Coalition ministers - Human Services Minister Alan Tudge, Health Minister Greg Hunt, and Assistant Treasurer Michael Sukkar - did indeed narrow avoid contempt of court charges after criticising Victorian court sentencing decisions in June 2017 [1].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng zài zài 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén bào bào shàng shàng 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 评论píng lùn píng lùn 批评pī píng pī píng duì duì 两名liǎng míng liǎng míng 未遂wèi suì wèi suì 恐怖分子kǒng bù fèn zi kǒng bù fèn zi SevdetSevdet Sevdet BesimBesim Besim 一名yī míng yī míng bèi bèi 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng wèi wèi MHKMHK MHK de de 青少年qīng shào nián qīng shào nián de de 判决pàn jué pàn jué 过轻guò qīng guò qīng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The ministers published comments in The Australian newspaper criticising sentences given to two would-be terrorists - Sevdet Besim and a teenager identified as MHK - as too lenient [1].
BesimBesim Besim yīn yīn 策划cè huà cè huà 20152015 2015 nián nián 澳新ào xīn ào xīn 军团jūn tuán jūn tuán 恐怖袭击kǒng bù xí jī kǒng bù xí jī bèi bèi 判处pàn chǔ pàn chǔ 1010 10 nián nián 监禁jiān jìn jiān jìn MHKMHK MHK yīn yīn 策划cè huà cè huà 20152015 2015 nián nián 母亲节mǔ qīn jié mǔ qīn jié 炸弹zhà dàn zhà dàn 袭击xí jī xí jī bèi bèi 判处pàn chǔ pàn chǔ 77 7 nián nián 监禁jiān jìn jiān jìn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Besim had been sentenced to 10 years imprisonment for planning a 2015 Anzac Day terrorist attack, and MHK had been sentenced to 7 years for planning a Mother's Day 2015 bomb attack [1].
维州wéi zhōu wéi zhōu 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 裁定cái dìng cái dìng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng men men de de 评论píng lùn píng lùn "" " 未能wèi néng wèi néng 尊重zūn zhòng zūn zhòng 权力quán lì quán lì 分立fēn lì fēn lì 原则yuán zé yuán zé "" " bìng bìng "" " 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn le le 未决wèi jué wèi jué 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 评论píng lùn píng lùn 原则yuán zé yuán zé subsub sub judicejudice judice "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Victorian Court of Appeal ruled that the ministers' comments had "failed to respect the doctrine of separation of powers" and "breached the principle of sub judice" [1].
法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng men men de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi "" " 根本gēn běn gēn běn 错误cuò wù cuò wù "" " bìng bìng "" " zuì zuì 强烈qiáng liè qiáng liè de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí "" " jiāng jiāng 描述miáo shù miáo shù wèi wèi "" " 令人震惊lìng rén zhèn jīng lìng rén zhèn jīng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The court stated that the ministers' behaviour was "fundamentally wrong" and described it in "the strongest terms" as "appalling" [1].
然而rán ér rán ér 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng wèi wèi duì duì 藐视miǎo shì miǎo shì 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 予以yǔ yǐ yǔ yǐ 追究zhuī jiū zhuī jiū 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 三名sān míng sān míng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 联邦lián bāng lián bāng zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng StephenStephen Stephen DonaghueDonaghue Donaghue xiàng xiàng 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo le le 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 道歉dào qiàn dào qiàn 声明shēng míng shēng míng 他们tā men tā men "" " 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 意图yì tú yì tú 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng "" " bìng bìng jiāng jiāng "" " zài zài 未来wèi lái wèi lái 极其jí qí jí qí 谨慎jǐn shèn jǐn shèn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
However, the court did not proceed with contempt of court charges after the three ministers (through Commonwealth Solicitor-General Stephen Donaghue) issued formal apologies to the court, stating they "never intended to influence the court" and that they would "exercise great care in the future" [1].

缺失背景

gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 省略shěng lüè shěng lüè le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 对于duì yú duì yú 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 实际shí jì shí jì 发生fā shēng fā shēng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 至关重要zhì guān zhòng yào zhì guān zhòng yào de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 细节xì jié xì jié
The claim omits several important contextual details that are crucial to understanding what actually occurred: **The Initial Defiance:** The ministers did not immediately apologize.
** * ** * 最初zuì chū zuì chū de de 抗拒kàng jù kàng jù ** * ** * 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng men men 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 立即lì jí lì jí 道歉dào qiàn dào qiàn
When first called before the Court of Appeal to explain why they should not be charged with contempt, they initially "withdrew some of the statements they made, but refused to apologise" [1].
dāng dāng 首次shǒu cì shǒu cì bèi bèi 传唤chuán huàn chuán huàn zhì zhì 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 解释jiě shì jiě shì 为何wèi hé wèi hé yīng yīng 被控bèi kòng bèi kòng 藐视miǎo shì miǎo shì 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng shí shí 他们tā men tā men 最初zuì chū zuì chū "" " 撤回chè huí chè huí le le 部分bù fèn bù fèn 言论yán lùn yán lùn dàn dàn 拒绝jù jué jù jué 道歉dào qiàn dào qiàn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The court was particularly critical of this delay, stating "The delay is most regrettable and aggravated the contempt" [1].
法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng duì duì 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 拖延tuō yán tuō yán 特别tè bié tè bié 批评pī píng pī píng chēng chēng "" " 这一zhè yī zhè yī 拖延tuō yán tuō yán 极为jí wéi jí wéi 遗憾yí hàn yí hàn bìng bìng 加重jiā zhòng jiā zhòng le le 藐视miǎo shì miǎo shì 程度chéng dù chéng dù "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
It took a "stern discussion" between the bench and the Solicitor-General, and "days of reflection," before the formal apology was issued [1]. **The Court's Concern:** The court welcomed the apology but emphasized that "it is expected there will be no repetition of this type of appalling behaviour" and warned "It would be a grave matter for the administration of justice if it were to reoccur" [1].
经过jīng guò jīng guò 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān de de "" " 严厉yán lì yán lì 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn "" " 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí "" " 数日shù rì shù rì de de 反思fǎn sī fǎn sī "" " hòu hòu cái cái 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo le le 道歉dào qiàn dào qiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This indicates the court considered the conduct serious enough to warrant such explicit warnings. **The Actual Outcome:** The ministers avoided prosecution not because the conduct was trivial, but because they formally capitulated and apologized unreservedly [1].
** * ** * 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ** * ** * 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng duì duì 道歉dào qiàn dào qiàn 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 欢迎huān yíng huān yíng dàn dàn 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào "" " 预期yù qī yù qī 此类cǐ lèi cǐ lèi 令人震惊lìng rén zhèn jīng lìng rén zhèn jīng de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 不会bú huì bú huì 重演chóng yǎn chóng yǎn "" " bìng bìng 警告jǐng gào jǐng gào "" " 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 再次发生zài cì fā shēng zài cì fā shēng jiāng jiāng duì duì 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The court made clear that without this apology, charges likely would have proceeded [1]. **The Court Rulings Themselves:** It is also worth noting that the Court of Appeal subsequently upheld or modified the original sentences - Besim's sentence was increased from 10 years to 14 years (the ministers' criticism that it was too lenient had merit in that sense) [1].
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi gāi gāi 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng dào dào 需要xū yào xū yào 此类cǐ lèi cǐ lèi 明确míng què míng què 警告jǐng gào jǐng gào
This suggests the ministers' criticism of leniency may have had some factual basis, though that does not excuse the breach of separation of powers in publicly criticizing specific pending cases.
** * ** * 实际shí jì shí jì 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ ** * ** * 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng men men 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 轻微qīng wēi qīng wēi 而是ér shì ér shì 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 他们tā men tā men 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 屈服qū fú qū fú bìng bìng 毫无保留háo wú bǎo liú háo wú bǎo liú 道歉dào qiàn dào qiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 这一zhè yī zhè yī 道歉dào qiàn dào qiàn 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng hěn hěn 可能kě néng kě néng huì huì 继续jì xù jì xù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 裁决cái jué cái jué 本身běn shēn běn shēn ** * ** * 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì de de shì shì 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 随后suí hòu suí hòu 维持wéi chí wéi chí huò huò 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi le le 原判yuán pàn yuán pàn BesimBesim Besim de de 刑期xíng qī xíng qī cóng cóng 1010 10 nián nián 增至zēng zhì zēng zhì 1414 14 nián nián cóng cóng 这个zhè ge zhè ge 意义yì yì yì yì shàng shàng shuō shuō 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng men men duì duì 刑期xíng qī xíng qī 过轻guò qīng guò qīng de de 批评pī píng pī píng yǒu yǒu 一定yí dìng yí dìng 道理dào lǐ dào lǐ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng men men duì duì 量刑liàng xíng liàng xíng 过轻guò qīng guò qīng de de 批评pī píng pī píng 可能kě néng kě néng zài zài 事实shì shí shì shí 基础jī chǔ jī chǔ shàng shàng 站得住脚zhàn dé zhù jiǎo zhàn dé zhù jiǎo 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn zhè zhè 不能bù néng bù néng 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 公开批评gōng kāi pī píng gōng kāi pī píng 特定tè dìng tè dìng 未决wèi jué wèi jué 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn de de 借口jiè kǒu jiè kǒu

来源可信度评估

suǒ suǒ 提供tí gōng tí gōng de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 声誉卓著shēng yù zhuó zhù shēng yù zhuó zhù de de 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu zài zài 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 事务shì wù shì wù 报道bào dào bào dào 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 有着yǒu zhe yǒu zhe 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo 记录jì lù jì lù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The original source provided (ABC News) is a mainstream, reputable Australian news organization with a strong track record for accurate reporting of legal and political matters [1].
gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 声明shēng míng shēng míng 官方guān fāng guān fāng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 来源lái yuán lái yuán zǒng zǒng 检察长jiǎn chá zhǎng jiǎn chá zhǎng 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 使shǐ shǐ 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 此次cǐ cì cǐ cì 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn de de 可靠kě kào kě kào 一手yī shǒu yī shǒu 来源lái yuán lái yuán
The article cites direct court statements and official government sources (the Solicitor-General's office), making it a reliable primary source for this incident.
ABCABC ABC 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 基于jī yú jī yú 官方guān fāng guān fāng 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 程序chéng xù chéng xù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 声明shēng míng shēng míng ér ér fēi fēi 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn huò huò 解读jiě dú jiě dú 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 基本jī běn jī běn 事实shì shí shì shí 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 高度gāo dù gāo dù 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The ABC article is based on official court proceedings and government statements, not opinion or interpretation, making it highly credible for the basic facts [1].
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 有过yǒu guò yǒu guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi
**Did Labor do something similar?** This claim involves breach of separation of powers by executive members criticizing judicial decisions.
** * ** *
While general parliamentary criticism of court decisions occasionally occurs across Australian politics, the specific scenario - executive ministers publicly commenting on pending or recent specific cases in ways the court deems contemptuous - appears to be relatively uncommon and was treated as a serious breach by the Victorian Court of Appeal.
gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 涉及shè jí shè jí 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 批评pī píng pī píng 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 决定jué dìng jué dìng ér ér 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn 权力quán lì quán lì 分立fēn lì fēn lì 原则yuán zé yuán zé
No equivalent documented Labor government incident of three ministers jointly criticizing specific sentencing decisions and being called before a court for contempt was found in readily available sources.
虽然suī rán suī rán 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì zhōng zhōng 偶尔ǒu ěr ǒu ěr huì huì 发生fā shēng fā shēng duì duì 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 决定jué dìng jué dìng de de 一般性yì bān xìng yì bān xìng 议会yì huì yì huì 批评pī píng pī píng dàn dàn 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 情形qíng xíng qíng xíng 行政部长xíng zhèng bù zhǎng xíng zhèng bù zhǎng 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 评论píng lùn píng lùn 未决wèi jué wèi jué huò huò 近期jìn qī jìn qī 特定tè dìng tè dìng 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn bèi bèi 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng wèi wèi 藐视miǎo shì miǎo shì 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 似乎sì hū sì hū 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 罕见hǎn jiàn hǎn jiàn bìng bìng bèi bèi 维州wéi zhōu wéi zhōu 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 视为shì wèi shì wèi 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 违规wéi guī wéi guī
This type of incident appears to be specifically unusual, though occasional parliamentary criticism of judicial decisions (without reaching the level of formal contempt proceedings) occurs across political parties.
zài zài 现成xiàn chéng xiàn chéng 来源lái yuán lái yuán zhōng zhōng wèi wèi 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ yǒu yǒu 类似lèi sì lèi sì 记录jì lù jì lù 三名sān míng sān míng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 联合lián hé lián hé 批评pī píng pī píng 特定tè dìng tè dìng 量刑liàng xíng liàng xíng 决定jué dìng jué dìng bìng bìng bèi bèi 传唤chuán huàn chuán huàn zhì zhì 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 藐视miǎo shì miǎo shì 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng
However, it is worth noting that the principle of separation of powers and sub judice rules apply equally to all governments, and any executive members (Coalition or Labor) would face similar court action for similar conduct [1].
此类cǐ lèi cǐ lèi 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 似乎sì hū sì hū 特别tè bié tè bié 罕见hǎn jiàn hǎn jiàn 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 偶尔ǒu ěr ǒu ěr 发生fā shēng fā shēng de de 议会yì huì yì huì 批评pī píng pī píng 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 决定jué dìng jué dìng wèi wèi 达到dá dào dá dào 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 藐视miǎo shì miǎo shì 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 程度chéng dù chéng dù zài zài 各政党gè zhèng dǎng gè zhèng dǎng 中均zhōng jūn zhōng jūn yǒu yǒu 出现chū xiàn chū xiàn
然而rán ér rán ér 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì de de shì shì 权力quán lì quán lì 分立fēn lì fēn lì 原则yuán zé yuán zé 未决wèi jué wèi jué 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 评论píng lùn píng lùn 规则guī zé guī zé 平等píng děng píng děng 适用shì yòng shì yòng 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 任何rèn hé rèn hé 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng huò huò 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 作出zuò chū zuò chū 类似lèi sì lèi sì 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi dōu dōu jiāng jiāng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 类似lèi sì lèi sì 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què dàn dàn 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng hěn hěn 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào
While the claim is factually accurate, understanding the full context is important: **The Breach:** The ministers' comments did breach separation of powers principles and sub judice rules - the Victorian Court of Appeal was unequivocal in this assessment [1].
** * ** * 违规行为wéi guī xíng wéi wéi guī xíng wéi ** * ** * 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng men men de de 评论píng lùn píng lùn 确实què shí què shí 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn le le 权力quán lì quán lì 分立fēn lì fēn lì 原则yuán zé yuán zé 未决wèi jué wèi jué 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 评论píng lùn píng lùn 规则guī zé guī zé 维州wéi zhōu wéi zhōu 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 对此duì cǐ duì cǐ 评估píng gū píng gū 毫不含糊háo bù hán hú háo bù hán hú [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The court found the conduct "fundamentally wrong" and described it as "appalling behavior" [1].
法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng gāi gāi 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi "" " 根本gēn běn gēn běn 错误cuò wù cuò wù "" " bìng bìng jiāng jiāng 描述miáo shù miáo shù wèi wèi "" " 令人震惊lìng rén zhèn jīng lìng rén zhèn jīng de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This is a serious matter concerning judicial independence. **The Justification (or Lack Thereof):** The ministers stated they "never intended to influence the court," but the court found that intent is largely irrelevant - the breach occurred regardless of intent [1].
这是zhè shì zhè shì 关乎guān hū guān hū 司法独立sī fǎ dú lì sī fǎ dú lì de de 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 问题wèn tí wèn tí
In principle, judges must be free from public political pressure when making sentencing decisions, and executive members commenting on pending cases undermines that independence. **The Mitigating Factor:** However, it should be noted that: 1.
** * ** * 正当性zhèng dāng xìng zhèng dāng xìng huò huò 缺乏quē fá quē fá 正当性zhèng dāng xìng zhèng dāng xìng ** * ** * 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng men men chēng chēng 他们tā men tā men "" " 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 意图yì tú yì tú 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng "" " dàn dàn 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 意图yì tú yì tú 基本jī běn jī běn 无关wú guān wú guān 违规行为wéi guī xíng wéi wéi guī xíng wéi 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 发生fā shēng fā shēng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The ministers did ultimately apologize fully and unreservedly when formal proceedings were initiated [1] 2.
原则上yuán zé shàng yuán zé shàng 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān zài zài 作出zuò chū zuò chū 量刑liàng xíng liàng xíng 决定jué dìng jué dìng shí shí 必须bì xū bì xū 免受miǎn shòu miǎn shòu 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 压力yā lì yā lì 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 评论píng lùn píng lùn 未决wèi jué wèi jué 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn huì huì 损害sǔn hài sǔn hài 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 独立性dú lì xìng dú lì xìng
The court accepted the apology as sufficient to avoid prosecution [1] 3.
** * ** * 减轻jiǎn qīng jiǎn qīng 因素yīn sù yīn sù ** * ** * 然而rán ér rán ér yīng yīng 注意zhù yì zhù yì
The sentences the ministers criticized were later modified by the Court of Appeal itself (increased), suggesting the original sentences may have been arguable on their merits [1] 4.
11 1 .. . 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng men men 确实què shí què shí zài zài 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 程序chéng xù chéng xù 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng hòu hòu 完全wán quán wán quán qiě qiě 毫无保留háo wú bǎo liú háo wú bǎo liú 道歉dào qiàn dào qiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This appears to have been an isolated incident, not a pattern of behavior [1] **Prime Minister's Role:** Opposition spokesperson Mark Dreyfus noted that Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull "backed in his ministers' comments just after they were made," suggesting the Prime Minister "should have known better" [1].
22 2 .. . 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 道歉dào qiàn dào qiàn 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù de de 充分条件chōng fèn tiáo jiàn chōng fèn tiáo jiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This indicates the incident may reflect inadequate guidance on separation of powers principles within the government at that time, rather than deliberate disregard. **No Prosecution Outcome:** The fact that no charges were filed after the apology suggests the court viewed the misconduct as serious in principle but not warranting criminal prosecution once addressed through the apology and the implicit reprimand [1].
33 3 .. . 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng men men 批评pī píng pī píng de de 刑期xíng qī xíng qī 后来hòu lái hòu lái bèi bèi 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 本身běn shēn běn shēn 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 原判yuán pàn yuán pàn 可能kě néng kě néng zài zài 实质shí zhì shí zhì shàng shàng yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
44 4 .. . zhè zhè 似乎sì hū sì hū shì shì 一次yī cì yī cì 孤立gū lì gū lì 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn ér ér fēi fēi 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 模式mó shì mó shì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ de de 角色jué sè jué sè ** * ** * 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén MarkMark Mark DreyfusDreyfus Dreyfus 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū MalcolmMalcolm Malcolm TurnbullTurnbull Turnbull 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ "" " zài zài 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng men men 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo 评论píng lùn píng lùn hòu hòu 立即lì jí lì jí 支持zhī chí zhī chí 他们tā men tā men "" " 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ "" " 本应běn yīng běn yīng gèng gèng 清楚qīng chǔ qīng chǔ "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng gāi gāi 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 可能kě néng kě néng 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng le le 当时dāng shí dāng shí 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 内部nèi bù nèi bù duì duì 权力quán lì quán lì 分立fēn lì fēn lì 原则yuán zé yuán zé 指导zhǐ dǎo zhǐ dǎo 不足bù zú bù zú ér ér 非故意fēi gù yì fēi gù yì 漠视mò shì mò shì
** * ** * 未予wèi yǔ wèi yǔ 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù de de 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ ** * ** * 道歉dào qiàn dào qiàn hòu hòu wèi wèi 提出tí chū tí chū 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng de de 事实shì shí shì shí 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi gāi gāi 违规行为wéi guī xíng wéi wéi guī xíng wéi zài zài 原则上yuán zé shàng yuán zé shàng 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng dàn dàn 一旦yí dàn yí dàn 通过tōng guò tōng guò 道歉dào qiàn dào qiàn 隐含yǐn hán yǐn hán de de 谴责qiǎn zé qiǎn zé 得到dé dào dé dào 解决jiě jué jiě jué 值得zhí de zhí de 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

属实

8.0

/ 10

gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què
The claim is factually accurate.
三名sān míng sān míng 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 确实què shí què shí zài zài 批评pī píng pī píng 量刑liàng xíng liàng xíng 决定jué dìng jué dìng de de 方式fāng shì fāng shì 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn 权力quán lì quán lì 分立fēn lì fēn lì 原则yuán zé yuán zé hòu hòu 险些xiǎn xiē xiǎn xiē 面临miàn lín miàn lín 藐视miǎo shì miǎo shì 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng
Three Coalition ministers did narrowly avoid contempt of court charges after criticising sentencing decisions in a manner that violated separation of powers principles.
核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 通过tōng guò tōng guò 官方guān fāng guān fāng 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 程序chéng xù chéng xù 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 得到dé dào dé dào 记录jì lù jì lù 核实hé shí hé shí
The core facts are documented and verified through official court proceedings and mainstream news reporting.

📚 来源与引用 (1)

  1. 1
    abc.net.au

    abc.net.au

    Three ministers avoid charges after apologising for comments about "weak" terrorism sentencing in Victoria, as the state's appeals court increases the jail terms given to two would-be terrorists.

    Abc Net

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。