部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0348

声明内容

“他们就何时发现医疗保险数据在黑市上被出售一事撒了谎。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 涉及shè jí shè jí 20172017 2017 nián nián 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 数据shù jù shù jù 泄露xiè lòu xiè lòu 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 当时dāng shí dāng shí 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 个人gè rén gè rén 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 详情xiáng qíng xiáng qíng zài zài àn àn 网上wǎng shàng wǎng shàng bèi bèi 出售chū shòu chū shòu
The claim relates to the 2017 Medicare data breach, where personal Medicare details were discovered being sold on the dark web.
核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 问题wèn tí wèn tí shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 官员guān yuán guān yuán 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu zài zài 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 泄露xiè lòu xiè lòu 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn de de 时间shí jiān shí jiān shàng shàng 做出zuò chū zuò chū le le 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 陈述chén shù chén shù
The core factual issue is whether government officials misrepresented the timing of when they discovered the breach. **Timeline of Events:** The Guardian first publicly revealed on July 4, 2017, that Medicare numbers were being sold on the dark web [1].
** * ** * 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 时间shí jiān shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn ** * ** *
However, internal Department of Human Services (DHS) emails obtained under freedom of information laws reveal that senior DHS officials discussed the illicit sale of Medicare details on the dark net as early as June 22, 2017 - nearly two weeks before the public revelation [2].
卫报wèi bào wèi bào 20172017 2017 nián nián 77 7 yuè yuè 44 4 首次shǒu cì shǒu cì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 披露pī lù pī lù 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 号码hào mǎ hào mǎ 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài àn àn 网上wǎng shàng wǎng shàng bèi bèi 出售chū shòu chū shòu [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
According to The New Daily's reporting, on June 22, Rhonda Morris (national manager for serious non-compliance) raised the issue with Kate Buggy (national manager for internal fraud control and investigations) and Mark Withnell (general manager of business integrity), among other unnamed officials [2].
然而rán ér rán ér 根据gēn jù gēn jù 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 获得huò dé huò dé de de 内部nèi bù nèi bù 人类rén lèi rén lèi 服务部fú wù bù fú wù bù DHSDHS DHS 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 高级gāo jí gāo jí DHSDHS DHS 官员guān yuán guān yuán zǎo zǎo zài zài 20172017 2017 nián nián 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 jiù jiù 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn le le àn àn 网上wǎng shàng wǎng shàng 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 详情xiáng qíng xiáng qíng de de 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 销售xiāo shòu xiāo shòu 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 披露pī lù pī lù zǎo zǎo le le jìn jìn 两周liǎng zhōu liǎng zhōu [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
In a subsequent July 3 email, Mr.
xīn xīn 日报rì bào rì bào 报道bào dào bào dào 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 RhondaRhonda Rhonda MorrisMorris Morris 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 合规hé guī hé guī 国家guó jiā guó jiā 经理jīng lǐ jīng lǐ xiàng xiàng KateKate Kate BuggyBuggy Buggy 内部nèi bù nèi bù 欺诈qī zhà qī zhà 控制kòng zhì kòng zhì 调查diào chá diào chá 国家guó jiā guó jiā 经理jīng lǐ jīng lǐ MarkMark Mark WithnellWithnell Withnell 商业shāng yè shāng yè 诚信chéng xìn chéng xìn 总经理zǒng jīng lǐ zǒng jīng lǐ 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 其他qí tā qí tā wèi wèi 具名jù míng jù míng 官员guān yuán guān yuán 提出tí chū tí chū le le zhè zhè 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Withnell apparently connected The Guardian's inquiries to the department's earlier discussions, writing to colleagues: "This is the one I was mentioning last week" [2]. **Government's Public Statements:** In the immediate aftermath of The Guardian's July 4 revelation, Human Services Minister Alan Tudge stated publicly that he and his department had only learned of the illicit trade when contacted by a Guardian journalist on July 3 [2].
zài zài 随后suí hòu suí hòu 77 7 yuè yuè 33 3 de de 封电子邮件fēng diàn zi yóu jiàn fēng diàn zi yóu jiàn zhōng zhōng WithnellWithnell Withnell 先生xiān shēng xiān shēng 显然xiǎn rán xiǎn rán jiāng jiāng 卫报wèi bào wèi bào de de 询问xún wèn xún wèn 部门bù mén bù mén 早前zǎo qián zǎo qián de de 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 联系lián xì lián xì 起来qǐ lái qǐ lái 写信给xiě xìn gěi xiě xìn gěi 同事tóng shì tóng shì "" " zhè zhè 就是jiù shì jiù shì 上周shàng zhōu shàng zhōu 提到tí dào tí dào de de 那个nà ge nà ge "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
He later reiterated: "I was not aware of this case until July 3 when the journalist alerted me to them" [2]. **Key Distinction:** However, the DHS spokesman denied the department had knowledge of a "specific breach" in June and claimed internal discussions had only related to "general matters" related to dark net activity, not the specific Medicare data sales [2].
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng ** * ** *
This is an important clarification - the June 22 email discussions may have concerned general dark web fraud threats rather than the specific Medicare "Machine" vendor that was later revealed by The Guardian [2].
zài zài 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 77 7 yuè yuè 44 4 披露pī lù pī lù 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn hòu hòu de de 立即lì jí lì jí 回应huí yìng huí yìng zhōng zhōng 人类rén lèi rén lèi 服务fú wù fú wù 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng AlanAlan Alan TudgeTudge Tudge 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì de de 部门bù mén bù mén 直到zhí dào zhí dào 77 7 yuè yuè 33 3 一名yī míng yī míng 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 记者jì zhě jì zhě 联系lián xì lián xì 他们tā men tā men 时才shí cái shí cái 得知dé zhī dé zhī 这一zhè yī zhè yī 非法交易fēi fǎ jiāo yì fēi fǎ jiāo yì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Most significantly, it remains unclear from the released documents exactly what DHS knew about the sale of Medicare details specifically on the dark web prior to July 4's media report, as the department "redacted most of the content of the emails" citing "exemptions related to law enforcement and criminal investigations" and refused to release numerous other related emails entirely [2].
后来hòu lái hòu lái 重申chóng shēn chóng shēn "" " 直到zhí dào zhí dào 77 7 yuè yuè 33 3 记者jì zhě jì zhě 提醒tí xǐng tí xǐng 我时wǒ shí wǒ shí cái cái 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo 此事cǐ shì cǐ shì "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié ** * ** *
然而rán ér rán ér DHSDHS DHS 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn 部门bù mén bù mén zài zài 66 6 yuè yuè 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo "" " 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 违规wéi guī wéi guī 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn "" " bìng bìng 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 内部nèi bù nèi bù 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn jǐn jǐn 涉及shè jí shè jí 暗网àn wǎng àn wǎng 活动huó dòng huó dòng 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān de de "" " 一般性yì bān xìng yì bān xìng 事务shì wù shì wù "" " ér ér fēi fēi 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ de de 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 数据shù jù shù jù 销售xiāo shòu xiāo shòu [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 澄清chéng qīng chéng qīng 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 de de 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 可能kě néng kě néng 涉及shè jí shè jí 一般性yì bān xìng yì bān xìng de de 暗网àn wǎng àn wǎng 欺诈qī zhà qī zhà 威胁wēi xié wēi xié ér ér fēi fēi 后来hòu lái hòu lái 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 揭露jiē lù jiē lù de de 特定tè dìng tè dìng 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn "" " 机器jī qì jī qì "" " 供应商gōng yìng shāng gōng yìng shāng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
zuì zuì 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì de de shì shì 由于yóu yú yóu yú 部门bù mén bù mén "" " duì duì 大部分dà bù fèn dà bù fèn 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 内容nèi róng nèi róng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng le le 删减shān jiǎn shān jiǎn "" " citingciting citing "" " 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 调查diào chá diào chá 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān de de 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn "" " bìng bìng 完全wán quán wán quán 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公布gōng bù gōng bù 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 其他qí tā qí tā 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ cóng cóng 公布gōng bù gōng bù de de 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn zhōng zhōng réng réng 清楚qīng chǔ qīng chǔ DHSDHS DHS zài zài 77 7 yuè yuè 44 4 媒体报道méi tǐ bào dào méi tǐ bào dào 之前zhī qián zhī qián 对暗duì àn duì àn 网上wǎng shàng wǎng shàng 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 详情xiáng qíng xiáng qíng 销售xiāo shòu xiāo shòu de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 程度chéng dù chéng dù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]

缺失背景

gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng jiāng jiāng 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi "" " jiù jiù 何时hé shí hé shí 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 一事yī shì yī shì le le huǎng huǎng "" " 需要xū yào xū yào duì duì 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng 时间shí jiān shí jiān 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 仔细zǐ xì zǐ xì 审查shěn chá shěn chá
The claim's framing as "lied about when they found out" requires careful examination of what exactly was known and when: 1. **General threat awareness vs. specific breach:** The June 22 emails may have discussed general dark web activity or security vulnerabilities rather than proof that Medicare data was actively being sold [2].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 一般性yì bān xìng yì bān xìng 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 意识yì shí yì shí 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 违规wéi guī wéi guī ** * ** * 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 de de 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 可能kě néng kě néng 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn de de shì shì 一般性yì bān xìng yì bān xìng de de 暗网àn wǎng àn wǎng 活动huó dòng huó dòng huò huò 安全漏洞ān quán lòu dòng ān quán lòu dòng ér ér fēi fēi 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 数据shù jù shù jù zhèng zhèng bèi bèi 积极jī jí jī jí 出售chū shòu chū shòu de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
This is a significant distinction. 2. **Scope of DHS knowledge:** Senator questioning revealed that as of September 2017, DHS believed as many as 165 people may have had their Medicare numbers sold to unknown parties, but this was an estimate, not a confirmed number [2]. 3. **Security vulnerability vs. active exploitation:** The government's investigation determined the breach resulted from "traditional criminal activity" (a professional accessing the system) rather than a cyber attack, suggesting the vulnerability may have existed for some time without active knowledge of exploitation [1]. 4. **Investigation constraints:** The Australian Federal Police investigation into the source of the breach was ongoing, which may have limited what officials could publicly disclose [1]. 5. **The nature of the June 22 discussion:** The specific content of internal discussions is heavily redacted, making it impossible to determine whether officials discussed confirmed sales, suspected vulnerability, or general dark web monitoring concerns [2].
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 区别qū bié qū bié
22 2 .. . ** * ** * DHSDHS DHS 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo de de 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi ** * ** * 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán de de 质询zhì xún zhì xún 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 截至jié zhì jié zhì 20172017 2017 nián nián 99 9 yuè yuè DHSDHS DHS 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 可能kě néng kě néng yǒu yǒu 多达duō dá duō dá 165165 165 rén rén de de 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 号码hào mǎ hào mǎ bèi bèi 出售chū shòu chū shòu gěi gěi 未知wèi zhī wèi zhī fāng fāng dàn dàn zhè zhè 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 一个yí gè yí gè 估计gū jì gū jì 数字shù zì shù zì ér ér fēi fēi 确认què rèn què rèn 数字shù zì shù zì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 安全漏洞ān quán lòu dòng ān quán lòu dòng 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 利用lì yòng lì yòng ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 调查diào chá diào chá 确定què dìng què dìng 泄露xiè lòu xiè lòu 源于yuán yú yuán yú "" " 传统chuán tǒng chuán tǒng 犯罪活动fàn zuì huó dòng fàn zuì huó dòng "" " 一名yī míng yī míng 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 人员rén yuán rén yuán 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng ér ér fēi fēi 网络攻击wǎng luò gōng jī wǎng luò gōng jī zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng gāi gāi 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng 可能kě néng kě néng 存在cún zài cún zài 一段时间yī duàn shí jiān yī duàn shí jiān dàn dàn OfficialsOfficials Officials bìng bìng 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo 其正qí zhèng qí zhèng bèi bèi 利用lì yòng lì yòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 调查diào chá diào chá 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì ** * ** * 澳大利亚联邦ào dà lì yà lián bāng ào dà lì yà lián bāng 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá duì duì 泄露xiè lòu xiè lòu 来源lái yuán lái yuán de de 调查diào chá diào chá 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng zhōng zhōng zhè zhè 可能kě néng kě néng 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì le le 官员guān yuán guān yuán 能够néng gòu néng gòu 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 披露pī lù pī lù de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn de de 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì ** * ** * 内部nèi bù nèi bù 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn de de 具体内容jù tǐ nèi róng jù tǐ nèi róng bèi bèi 大量dà liàng dà liàng 删减shān jiǎn shān jiǎn 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 确定què dìng què dìng 官员guān yuán guān yuán men men 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn de de shì shì 确认què rèn què rèn de de 销售xiāo shòu xiāo shòu 疑似yí sì yí sì 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng 还是hái shì hái shì 一般性yì bān xìng yì bān xìng de de 暗网àn wǎng àn wǎng 监控jiān kòng jiān kòng 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán shì shì xīn xīn 日报rì bào rì bào 该报gāi bào gāi bào 20172017 2017 nián nián 1111 11 yuè yuè 2121 21 发表fā biǎo fā biǎo le le 一篇yī piān yī piān 独家dú jiā dú jiā 调查diào chá diào chá 报道bào dào bào dào
The original source provided is The New Daily, which published an exclusive investigation on November 21, 2017.
xīn xīn 日报rì bào rì bào shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 网站wǎng zhàn wǎng zhàn 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 关注guān zhù guān zhù 国内新闻guó nèi xīn wén guó nèi xīn wén 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì
The New Daily is an Australian news website that generally focuses on national news and politics.
根据gēn jù gēn jù 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 分析fēn xī fēn xī xīn xīn 日报rì bào rì bào bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
According to media bias analysis, The New Daily is identified as having a left-leaning bias [3].
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi gāi gāi 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ yǒu yǒu duì duì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 批评性pī píng xìng pī píng xìng 报道bào dào bào dào de de 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ
This is relevant context, as the outlet has a history of critical coverage of Coalition governments.
然而rán ér rán ér xīn xīn 日报rì bào rì bào 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng zhōng zhōng de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 基于jī yú jī yú
However, the core factual claims in The New Daily article are based on: - **Internal DHS emails obtained under Freedom of Information laws** - Official government records [2] - **Direct quotes from Alan Tudge and DHS spokespersons** - Primary sources [2] - **Corroboration from ABC News and Sydney Morning Herald** which covered the original Medicare data sales in July 2017 [1] The claim about the June 22 internal emails is supported by official government documents released via FOI, which is a credible source.
-- - ** * ** * 根据gēn jù gēn jù 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 获得huò dé huò dé de de 内部nèi bù nèi bù DHSDHS DHS 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn ** * ** * -- - 官方guān fāng guān fāng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 记录jì lù jì lù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
However, the interpretation that this constitutes "lying" about timing depends on what those redacted emails actually contained.
-- - ** * ** * AlanAlan Alan TudgeTudge Tudge DHSDHS DHS 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引述yǐn shù yǐn shù ** * ** * -- - 一手yī shǒu yī shǒu 来源lái yuán lái yuán [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - ** * ** * ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 悉尼xī ní xī ní 先驱xiān qū xiān qū 晨报chén bào chén bào de de 佐证zuǒ zhèng zuǒ zhèng ** * ** * zhè zhè 两家liǎng jiā liǎng jiā 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ zài zài 20172017 2017 nián nián 77 7 yuè yuè 报道bào dào bào dào le le 最初zuì chū zuì chū de de 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 数据shù jù shù jù 销售xiāo shòu xiāo shòu 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
关于guān yú guān yú 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 内部nèi bù nèi bù 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn de de 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 得到dé dào dé dào le le 通过tōng guò tōng guò 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 发布fā bù fā bù de de 官方guān fāng guān fāng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 可信kě xìn kě xìn de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán
然而rán ér rán ér jiāng jiāng 此事cǐ shì cǐ shì 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi "" " 撒谎sā huǎng sā huǎng "" " 关于guān yú guān yú 时间shí jiān shí jiān de de 解释jiě shì jiě shì 取决于qǔ jué yú qǔ jué yú 那些nà xiē nà xiē bèi bèi 删减shān jiǎn shān jiǎn de de 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 实际shí jì shí jì 包含bāo hán bāo hán de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 经历jīng lì jīng lì guò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 网络安全wǎng luò ān quán wǎng luò ān quán 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng huò huò 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn
**Did Labor have similar cyber security breaches or cover-ups?** While direct equivalents in data breaches are not readily apparent in searches, Labor governments have faced significant cyber security and data handling controversies: 1. **2012 Electoral Commission Hack:** A Labor-era incident where Australian Electoral Commission data was compromised [4] 2. **Centrelink Data Matching Program:** A separate 2017 incident where the DHS (same department under Coalition oversight) was involved in unauthorized release of personal information to journalists to defuse political claims, described as highly controversial [2] However, the specific scenario of data being actively sold on dark web by criminals appears to be unique to this 2017 incident.
** * ** *
Labor has not faced a directly comparable breach of this scale or nature during the period examined.
虽然suī rán suī rán zài zài 搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ zhōng zhōng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 数据shù jù shù jù 泄露xiè lòu xiè lòu de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 等同děng tóng děng tóng 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn dàn dàn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ céng céng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà de de 网络安全wǎng luò ān quán wǎng luò ān quán 数据处理shù jù chǔ lǐ shù jù chǔ lǐ 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 20122012 2012 nián nián 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 黑客hēi kè hēi kè 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 时代shí dài shí dài 发生fā shēng fā shēng de de 一起yì qǐ yì qǐ 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 数据shù jù shù jù bèi bèi 泄露xiè lòu xiè lòu de de 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
22 2 .. . ** * ** * CentrelinkCentrelink Centrelink 数据shù jù shù jù 匹配pǐ pèi pǐ pèi 计划jì huà jì huà ** * ** * lìng lìng 一起yì qǐ yì qǐ 20172017 2017 nián nián 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn DHSDHS DHS 同一tóng yī tóng yī 部门bù mén bù mén zài zài 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 监督jiān dū jiān dū xià xià 涉及shè jí shè jí xiàng xiàng 记者jì zhě jì zhě 未经wèi jīng wèi jīng 授权shòu quán shòu quán 发布fā bù fā bù 个人信息gè rén xìn xī gè rén xìn xī 化解huà jiě huà jiě 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng bèi bèi 描述miáo shù miáo shù wèi wèi 极具jí jù jí jù 争议性zhēng yì xìng zhēng yì xìng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
然而rán ér rán ér 犯罪分子fàn zuì fèn zǐ fàn zuì fèn zǐ zài zài àn àn 网上wǎng shàng wǎng shàng 积极jī jí jī jí 出售chū shòu chū shòu 数据shù jù shù jù de de 特定tè dìng tè dìng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 似乎sì hū sì hū shì shì zhè zhè 20172017 2017 nián nián 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu de de
zài zài suǒ suǒ 审查shěn chá shěn chá de de 时期shí qī shí qī nèi nèi 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 面临miàn lín miàn lín guò guò 规模guī mó guī mó huò huò 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 相当xiāng dāng xiāng dāng de de 安全漏洞ān quán lòu dòng ān quán lòu dòng
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 似乎sì hū sì hū 部分bù fèn bù fèn 得到dé dào dé dào 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí dàn dàn 需要xū yào xū yào 细微xì wēi xì wēi de de 区分qū fēn qū fēn ** * ** *
**The claim appears to be partially substantiated but requires nuance:** **Evidence supporting the claim:** - Internal emails from June 22, 2017 show DHS officials were discussing dark web security issues weeks before the public revelation [2] - Minister Tudge stated publicly that he only learned of it on July 3, when a Guardian journalist contacted him - this contradicts evidence of internal knowledge [2] - The timing gap (June 22 vs July 3) is a factual discrepancy [2] **Factors complicating the "lie" characterization:** - The redacted nature of internal emails means the specific content and scope of June 22 discussions are unknown [2] - DHS claims the June 22 discussions involved "general matters" about dark web activity, not confirmed Medicare sales [2] - The department's FOI response redactions prevent full verification of what officials actually knew [2] - Government statements might technically be accurate if the June 22 discussions involved vulnerability assessments rather than confirmed active sales [2] - An FOI investigation revealed that in early 2018, the government was still investigating the incident, suggesting genuine uncertainty about the scope and timeline [5] **Key Issue:** The evidence demonstrates that government officials had discussions about dark web security matters before July 3, and that this wasn't disclosed publicly.
** * ** * 支持zhī chí zhī chí gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù ** * ** *
Whether this constitutes "lying" depends on whether June 22 discussions specifically concerned Medicare data sales or broader security concerns.
-- - 20172017 2017 nián nián 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 de de 内部nèi bù nèi bù 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì DHSDHS DHS 官员guān yuán guān yuán zài zài 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 披露pī lù pī lù qián qián 几周jǐ zhōu jǐ zhōu jiù jiù zài zài 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 暗网àn wǎng àn wǎng 安全ān quán ān quán 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The heavy redactions make a definitive determination impossible. **Comparative governance context:** Data breach responses typically involve coordination between departments, law enforcement, and security agencies before public disclosure.
-- - TudgeTudge Tudge 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 直到zhí dào zhí dào 77 7 yuè yuè 33 3 一名yī míng yī míng 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 记者jì zhě jì zhě 联系lián xì lián xì shí shí cái cái 得知dé zhī dé zhī 此事cǐ shì cǐ shì zhè zhè 内部nèi bù nèi bù 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù xiāng xiāng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The question of when "knowledge" occurred (internal discussion vs. confirmed threat vs. public disclosure) is a legitimate area of government accountability scrutiny.
-- - 时间差shí jiān chà shí jiān chà 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 vsvs vs 77 7 yuè yuè 33 3 shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng de de 出入chū rù chū rù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 使shǐ shǐ "" " 撒谎sā huǎng sā huǎng "" " 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 复杂化fù zá huà fù zá huà de de 因素yīn sù yīn sù ** * ** *
-- - 内部nèi bù nèi bù 电子邮件diàn zi yóu jiàn diàn zi yóu jiàn de de 删减shān jiǎn shān jiǎn 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn de de 具体内容jù tǐ nèi róng jù tǐ nèi róng 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi shàng shàng 清楚qīng chǔ qīng chǔ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - DHSDHS DHS 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 de de 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 涉及shè jí shè jí 暗网àn wǎng àn wǎng 活动huó dòng huó dòng de de "" " 一般性yì bān xìng yì bān xìng 事务shì wù shì wù "" " ér ér fēi fēi 确认què rèn què rèn de de 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 销售xiāo shòu xiāo shòu [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 部门bù mén bù mén duì duì 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú de de 删减shān jiǎn shān jiǎn 回应huí yìng huí yìng 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ le le duì duì 官员guān yuán guān yuán 实际shí jì shí jì 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo 内容nèi róng nèi róng de de 完全wán quán wán quán 核实hé shí hé shí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 de de 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 涉及shè jí shè jí 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng 评估píng gū píng gū ér ér fēi fēi 确认què rèn què rèn de de 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 销售xiāo shòu xiāo shòu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 声明shēng míng shēng míng 在技术上zài jì shù shàng zài jì shù shàng 可能kě néng kě néng shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 调查diào chá diào chá 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 20182018 2018 年初nián chū nián chū 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ réng réng zài zài 调查diào chá diào chá gāi gāi 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng duì duì 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 时间shí jiān shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn 存在cún zài cún zài 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de 不确定性bù què dìng xìng bù què dìng xìng [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
** * ** * 关键问题guān jiàn wèn tí guān jiàn wèn tí ** * ** * 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 官员guān yuán guān yuán zài zài 77 7 yuè yuè 33 3 之前zhī qián zhī qián 确实què shí què shí jiù jiù 暗网àn wǎng àn wǎng 安全ān quán ān quán 问题wèn tí wèn tí 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng guò guò 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn qiě qiě zhè zhè wèi wèi xiàng xiàng 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 披露pī lù pī lù
zhè zhè 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng "" " 撒谎sā huǎng sā huǎng "" " 取决于qǔ jué yú qǔ jué yú 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 de de 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn shì shì 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 涉及shè jí shè jí 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 数据shù jù shù jù 销售xiāo shòu xiāo shòu 还是hái shì hái shì gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 安全ān quán ān quán 问题wèn tí wèn tí
大量dà liàng dà liàng de de 删减shān jiǎn shān jiǎn 使得shǐ de shǐ de 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 做出zuò chū zuò chū 明确míng què míng què de de 判断pàn duàn pàn duàn
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * 数据shù jù shù jù 泄露xiè lòu xiè lòu de de 应对yìng duì yìng duì 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 涉及shè jí shè jí 部门bù mén bù mén 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 安全ān quán ān quán 机构jī gòu jī gòu 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān de de 协调xié tiáo xié tiáo 然后rán hòu rán hòu 才能cái néng cái néng 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 披露pī lù pī lù
何时hé shí hé shí 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng "" " 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo "" " 内部nèi bù nèi bù 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn vsvs vs 确认què rèn què rèn de de 威胁wēi xié wēi xié vsvs vs 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 披露pī lù pī lù shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 问责wèn zé wèn zé 审查shěn chá shěn chá de de 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí zài zài 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 披露pī lù pī lù 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 泄露xiè lòu xiè lòu 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 之前zhī qián zhī qián 内部nèi bù nèi bù 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn guò guò 暗网àn wǎng àn wǎng 安全ān quán ān quán 问题wèn tí wèn tí dàn dàn gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng chēng chēng 他们tā men tā men "" " jiù jiù 何时hé shí hé shí 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 一事yī shì yī shì le le huǎng huǎng "" " 需要xū yào xū yào 根据gēn jù gēn jù 实际shí jì shí jì 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng 何时hé shí hé shí 得到dé dào dé dào 确认què rèn què rèn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 限定xiàn dìng xiàn dìng
The government did discuss dark web security matters internally before publicly disclosing the Medicare breach, but the claim that they "lied about when they found out" requires qualification based on what exactly was known and when it was confirmed.
证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì
The evidence shows: - Government officials discussed dark web activities on June 22 [2] - Public statements indicated knowledge only came on July 3 [2] - This represents a credibility gap However: - The specific content of June 22 discussions remains redacted [2] - It's unclear whether those discussions concerned confirmed Medicare sales or general vulnerabilities [2] - DHS statements suggest discussions may have been about general matters, not specific breach knowledge [2] The claim is largely supported by timing discrepancies but overstates the evidence by using the word "lied" without accounting for what was actually discussed.
-- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 官员guān yuán guān yuán zài zài 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn le le 暗网àn wǎng àn wǎng 活动huó dòng huó dòng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 直到zhí dào zhí dào 77 7 yuè yuè 33 3 日才rì cái rì cái 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo le le 一个yí gè yí gè 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù 差距chā jù chā jù
然而rán ér rán ér
-- - 66 6 yuè yuè 2222 22 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn de de 具体内容jù tǐ nèi róng jù tǐ nèi róng 仍然réng rán réng rán bèi bèi 删减shān jiǎn shān jiǎn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 目前mù qián mù qián shàng shàng 清楚qīng chǔ qīng chǔ 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn shì shì 涉及shè jí shè jí 确认què rèn què rèn de de 医疗保险yī liáo bǎo xiǎn yī liáo bǎo xiǎn 销售xiāo shòu xiāo shòu 还是hái shì hái shì 一般性yì bān xìng yì bān xìng 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - DHSDHS DHS 声明shēng míng shēng míng chēng chēng 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 可能kě néng kě néng shì shì 关于guān yú guān yú 一般性yì bān xìng yì bān xìng 事务shì wù shì wù ér ér fēi fēi 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ de de 违规wéi guī wéi guī 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng zài zài 很大hěn dà hěn dà 程度chéng dù chéng dù shàng shàng 得到dé dào dé dào le le 时间shí jiān shí jiān 出入chū rù chū rù de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí dàn dàn zài zài 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng "" " 撒谎sā huǎng sā huǎng "" " 一词yī cí yī cí shí shí 夸大kuā dà kuā dà le le 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ dào dào 实际shí jì shí jì 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng

📚 来源与引用 (5)

  1. 1
    Government orders Medicare review over dark web concerns

    Government orders Medicare review over dark web concerns

    The Federal Government may make it harder for health professionals to access Medicare numbers online after a news outlet revealed one of its reporters had been able to purchase his details on the dark web.

    Abc Net
  2. 2
    Revealed: Alan Tudge's department knew of Medicare breaches prior to bombshell report

    Revealed: Alan Tudge's department knew of Medicare breaches prior to bombshell report

    The DHS flagged the illegal sale of Medicare details on the dark web almost a fortnight before the illicit trade was exposed, TND reveals.

    Thenewdaily Com
  3. 3
    Medicare card details of every Australian currently up for sale on the dark web

    Medicare card details of every Australian currently up for sale on the dark web

    A confronting report shows that a vendor on the dark web can pull up the full Medicare card details of any Australian on request — and is selling them for around $30 each — indicating a security hole somewhere in the health system.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  4. 4
    LEAKED: Alan Tudge's secret emails on Medicare data breach

    LEAKED: Alan Tudge's secret emails on Medicare data breach

    Leaking of citizens' private information is solely the responsibility of the department and the relevant minister.

    Crikey
  5. 5
    PDF

    Senate Inquiry: Circumstances in which Australians' personal Medicare information has been compromised

    Aph Gov • PDF Document

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。