部分属实

评分： 6.5/10

报告问题
Coalition
C0286

声明内容

“花费40万澳元帮助训练缅甸军方，而缅甸军方当时已被确认对罗兴亚人进行持续的种族灭绝，后来更是发动了一场字面意义上的政变来推翻其政府，包括枪击并杀害数百名和平的反政变抗议者。”
腐败 伦理 国际
原始来源： Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

###### ### 核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ：： ： 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 花费huā fèi huā fèi 了le le 4040 40 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ？？ ？
### Core Claim: Did Australia Spend $400,000?
 ** * ** * 是shì shì 的de de ，， ， 已yǐ yǐ 确认què rèn què rèn 。。 。
**Yes, confirmed.** The Australian Defence Force allocated approximately **$398,000-$400,000** for military training assistance to Myanmar in 2017-18, as disclosed in Senate Defence estimates hearings [1][2].
 ** * ** * 澳大利亚国防军ào dà lì yà guó fáng jūn ào dà lì yà guó fáng jūn 在zài zài 20172017 2017 -- - 1818 18 年度nián dù nián dù 为wèi wèi 对duì duì 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 的de de 军事训练jūn shì xùn liàn jūn shì xùn liàn 援助yuán zhù yuán zhù 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 约yuē yuē ** * ** * 39.839.8 39.8 万至wàn zhì wàn zhì 4040 40 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ** * ** * ，， ， 这zhè zhè 在zài zài 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 国防guó fáng guó fáng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 中zhōng zhōng 已有yǐ yǒu yǐ yǒu 披露pī lù pī lù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The Lowy Institute and multiple news sources confirm this specific dollar amount was provided through the Defence Cooperation Program (DCP) [3].
 洛伊luò yī luò yī 研究所yán jiū suǒ yán jiū suǒ 及jí jí 多家duō jiā duō jiā 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí ，， ， 这笔zhè bǐ zhè bǐ 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 金额jīn é jīn é 是shì shì 通过tōng guò tōng guò 国防guó fáng guó fáng 合作hé zuò hé zuò 计划jì huà jì huà (( ( DCPDCP DCP )) ) 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
### Timeline and Training Content
 ###### ### 时间shí jiān shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn 和hé hé 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 内容nèi róng nèi róng
The training occurred during **2017-2018**, within the context of Australia's Defence Cooperation Program re-established with Myanmar in 2013 following Myanmar's democratic transition [1].
 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài ** * ** * 20172017 2017 -- - 20182018 2018 年nián nián ** * ** * 期间qī jiān qī jiān ，， ， 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 转型zhuǎn xíng zhuǎn xíng 后hòu hòu 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 与yǔ yǔ 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 的de de 国防guó fáng guó fáng 合作hé zuò hé zuò 计划jì huà jì huà [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The training programs included: - English-language training for military officers [2] - Humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HADR) training [3] - Peacekeeping operations capacity building [1] - Professional development courses [4] These were defensive in nature and framed as capacity-building rather than combat training [2].
 训练项目xùn liàn xiàng mù xùn liàn xiàng mù 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò ：： ：
### Rohingya Crisis Timing
 -- - 为wèi wèi 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 军官jūn guān jūn guān 提供tí gōng tí gōng 英语yīng yǔ yīng yǔ 培训péi xùn péi xùn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The claim's assertion that Myanmar was "known at the time to be guilty of ongoing genocide" is **substantially accurate**.
 -- - 人道主义rén dào zhǔ yì rén dào zhǔ yì 援助yuán zhù yuán zhù 和hé hé 灾害zāi hài zāi hài 救援jiù yuán jiù yuán (( ( HADRHADR HADR )) ) 培训péi xùn péi xùn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
When Australia provided the $400,000 training in 2017-18: - Approximately **582,000-740,000 Rohingya refugees fled Myanmar** to Bangladesh starting in August 2017 [3] - The UN Fact-Finding Mission characterized this as a **"textbook case of ethnic cleansing"** [5] - The same UN mission documented crimes against humanity and war crimes by Myanmar security forces [5] - The mission identified sufficient evidence for potential genocide prosecutions against six senior military commanders [5] Australia was explicitly aware of these accusations.
 -- - 维和wéi hé wéi hé 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 能力néng lì néng lì 建设jiàn shè jiàn shè [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Parliamentary debate in May 2018 cited awareness of ethnic cleansing accusations, yet Australia continued the training program [6].
 -- - 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 课程kè chéng kè chéng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
### 2021 Myanmar Coup and Aftermath
 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 内容nèi róng nèi róng 属于shǔ yú shǔ yú 防御fáng yù fáng yù 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì ，， ， 被bèi bèi 定位dìng wèi dìng wèi 为wèi wèi 能力néng lì néng lì 建设jiàn shè jiàn shè 而ér ér 非作战fēi zuò zhàn fēi zuò zhàn 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim correctly references Myanmar's **February 1, 2021 military coup** [7].
 ###### ### 罗兴亚luó xīng yà luó xīng yà 危机wēi jī wēi jī 的de de 时间shí jiān shí jiān 点diǎn diǎn
The coup resulted in: - Immediate detention of democratically elected leader Aung San Suu Kyi and government officials [7] - **Documented shootings of anti-coup protesters** - Security forces killed over 1,400 people in the first year following the coup [8] - International condemnation and suspension of foreign military cooperation [7] Australia **immediately suspended all military cooperation** with Myanmar following the coup, including the Defence Cooperation Program and English-language training [7][9].
 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 称chēng chēng 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān "" " 当时dāng shí dāng shí 已yǐ yǐ 被bèi bèi 确认què rèn què rèn 对duì duì 持续chí xù chí xù 的de de 种族灭绝zhǒng zú miè jué zhǒng zú miè jué 有罪yǒu zuì yǒu zuì "" " ，， ， 这一zhè yī zhè yī 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ** * ** * 大体dà tǐ dà tǐ 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ** * ** * 。。 。
当dāng dāng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 20172017 2017 -- - 1818 18 年nián nián 提供tí gōng tí gōng 4040 40 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 时shí shí ：： ：
-- - 约yuē yuē ** * ** * 58.258.2 58.2 万至wàn zhì wàn zhì 7474 74 万罗兴亚wàn luó xīng yà wàn luó xīng yà 难民nàn mín nàn mín 从cóng cóng 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 逃往táo wǎng táo wǎng 孟加拉国mèng jiā lā guó mèng jiā lā guó ** * ** * ，， ， 始于shǐ yú shǐ yú 20172017 2017 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 实况shí kuàng shí kuàng 调查团diào chá tuán diào chá tuán 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 为wèi wèi ** * ** * "" " 教科书jiào kē shū jiào kē shū 式shì shì 的de de 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 清洗qīng xǐ qīng xǐ "" " ** * ** * [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
-- - 同一tóng yī tóng yī 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 代表团dài biǎo tuán dài biǎo tuán 记录jì lù jì lù 了le le 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 安全部队ān quán bù duì ān quán bù duì 犯下fàn xià fàn xià 的de de 危害wēi hài wēi hài 人类rén lèi rén lèi 罪zuì zuì 和hé hé 战争zhàn zhēng zhàn zhēng 罪zuì zuì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
-- - 该gāi gāi 代表团dài biǎo tuán dài biǎo tuán 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 对duì duì 六名liù míng liù míng 高级gāo jí gāo jí 军事jūn shì jūn shì 指挥官zhǐ huī guān zhǐ huī guān 存在cún zài cún zài 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 的de de 潜在qián zài qián zài 种族灭绝zhǒng zú miè jué zhǒng zú miè jué 起诉qǐ sù qǐ sù 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 明确míng què míng què 知晓zhī xiǎo zhī xiǎo 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 。。 。
20182018 2018 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 的de de 议会yì huì yì huì 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 了le le 对duì duì 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 清洗qīng xǐ qīng xǐ 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 的de de 认知rèn zhī rèn zhī ，， ， 然而rán ér rán ér 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 仍réng réng 继续jì xù jì xù 该gāi gāi 训练项目xùn liàn xiàng mù xùn liàn xiàng mù [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
###### ### 20212021 2021 年nián nián 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 及jí jí 后果hòu guǒ hòu guǒ
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 正确zhèng què zhèng què 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 了le le 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān ** * ** * 20212021 2021 年nián nián 22 2 月yuè yuè 11 1 日rì rì 的de de 军事政变jūn shì zhèng biàn jūn shì zhèng biàn ** * ** * [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì ：： ：
-- - 立即lì jí lì jí 拘留jū liú jū liú 民选mín xuǎn mín xuǎn 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù 昂山áng shān áng shān 素季sù jì sù jì 及jí jí 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 官员guān yuán guān yuán [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]
-- - ** * ** * 记录jì lù jì lù 到dào dào 的de de 反fǎn fǎn 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 抗议者kàng yì zhě kàng yì zhě 遭zāo zāo 枪击qiāng jī qiāng jī 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn ** * ** * —— — —— — 安全部队ān quán bù duì ān quán bù duì 在zài zài 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 后hòu hòu 第一年dì yī nián dì yī nián 内nèi nèi 杀害shā hài shā hài 了le le 超过chāo guò chāo guò 11 1 ,, , 400400 400 人rén rén [[ [ 88 8 ]] ]
-- - 国际guó jì guó jì 谴责qiǎn zé qiǎn zé 及jí jí 外国wài guó wài guó 军事jūn shì jūn shì 合作hé zuò hé zuò 暂停zàn tíng zàn tíng [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 后hòu hòu ** * ** * 立即lì jí lì jí 暂停zàn tíng zàn tíng 了le le 与yǔ yǔ 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 的de de 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 军事jūn shì jūn shì 合作hé zuò hé zuò ** * ** * ，， ， 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 国防guó fáng guó fáng 合作hé zuò hé zuò 计划jì huà jì huà 和hé hé 英语yīng yǔ yīng yǔ 培训péi xùn péi xùn [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

###### ### 11 1 .. . 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng vsvs vs 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 军事jūn shì jūn shì 接触jiē chù jiē chù
### 1. Coalition vs. Labor Military Engagement
 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 是shì shì ，， ， ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) 在zài zài 其qí qí 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 与yǔ yǔ 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 军事jūn shì jūn shì 合作hé zuò hé zuò ** * ** * [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Importantly, the **Labor government (2007-2013) did not engage in military cooperation with Myanmar** during its period in power.
 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 与yǔ yǔ 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 的de de 军事jūn shì jūn shì 接触jiē chù jiē chù 是shì shì ** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì ** * ** * 的de de ，， ， 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 20112011 2011 年nián nián 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 转型zhuǎn xíng zhuǎn xíng 后hòu hòu 关系guān xì guān xì 正常化zhèng cháng huà zhèng cháng huà 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Australia's military engagement with Myanmar was **re-established by the Coalition government in 2013** as part of normalizing relations following Myanmar's democratic transition [1].
 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 暗示àn shì àn shì 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 延续yán xù yán xù ，， ， 但dàn dàn 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 由yóu yóu 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 发起fā qǐ fā qǐ 的de de 。。 。
The claim's framing implies this was a continuation, but it was initiated by the Coalition.
 ###### ### 22 2 .. . 其他qí tā qí tā 国家guó jiā guó jiā 的de de 军事jūn shì jūn shì 接触jiē chù jiē chù
### 2. Other Countries' Military Engagement
 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 20172017 2017 -- - 1818 18 年nián nián 期间qī jiān qī jiān ** * ** * 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 唯一wéi yī wéi yī ** * ** * 与yǔ yǔ 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 军事训练jūn shì xùn liàn jūn shì xùn liàn 的de de 国家guó jiā guó jiā 。。 。
Australia was **not alone** in maintaining military training with Myanmar during 2017-18.
 多个duō gè duō gè 国家guó jiā guó jiā 继续jì xù jì xù 与yǔ yǔ 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 军事jūn shì jūn shì 合作hé zuò hé zuò ：： ：
Multiple countries continued military cooperation: - **India** conducted bilateral military exercises (IMBAX-2017) in November 2017 focused on UN peacekeeping operations [10] - **Russia** maintained defense cooperation agreements signed in 2016 [11] - **Israel** had military cooperation memorandum covering training and intelligence [11] - **Multiple ASEAN countries** continued military exchanges [10] The criticism applies to international military policy more broadly, not uniquely to Australia's approach [10].
 -- - ** * ** * 印度yìn dù yìn dù ** * ** * 于yú yú 20172017 2017 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 双边shuāng biān shuāng biān 军事演习jūn shì yǎn xí jūn shì yǎn xí (( ( IMBAXIMBAX IMBAX -- - 20172017 2017 )) ) ，， ， 聚焦jù jiāo jù jiāo 于yú yú 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 维和wéi hé wéi hé 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]
### 3. Coalition's Policy Rationale
 -- - ** * ** * 俄罗斯é luó sī é luó sī ** * ** * 维持wéi chí wéi chí 了le le 20162016 2016 年nián nián 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 的de de 防务fáng wù fáng wù 合作hé zuò hé zuò 协议xié yì xié yì [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ]
The Coalition's stated rationale for continued engagement was **capacity-building and professionalization** of the Myanmar military with the hope that incremental engagement would "humanize" the military and facilitate civil-military relations [1].
 -- - ** * ** * 以色列yǐ sè liè yǐ sè liè ** * ** * 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 了le le 涵盖hán gài hán gài 培训péi xùn péi xùn 和hé hé 情报qíng bào qíng bào 的de de 军事jūn shì jūn shì 合作hé zuò hé zuò 备忘录bèi wàng lù bèi wàng lù [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ]
Former Foreign Minister Alexander Downer argued for maintaining "channels of discussion on issues of concern" [1].
 -- - ** * ** * 多个duō gè duō gè 东盟国家dōng méng guó jiā dōng méng guó jiā ** * ** * 继续jì xù jì xù 军事jūn shì jūn shì 交流jiāo liú jiāo liú [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]
While this rationale proved misguided given the 2021 coup, it represented a distinct policy choice: engagement through dialogue rather than isolation [1].
 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 批评pī píng pī píng 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 国际guó jì guó jì 军事jūn shì jūn shì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi uniquelyuniquely uniquely 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。 。
### 4. Post-Coup Response
 ###### ### 33 3 .. . 联盟lián méng lián méng 党的政策dǎng de zhèng cè dǎng de zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu
After the February 2021 coup, Australia's response was swift and comprehensive: - Immediately condemned the coup [7] - Suspended all military cooperation and defence attaché engagement [7] - Called on international community to cease arms sales to Myanmar [9] - Redirected development assistance to humanitarian and human security support [9] This contrasts with the continuation of training in 2017-18 and demonstrates policy reassessment following the coup's severity.
 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 继续jì xù jì xù 接触jiē chù jiē chù 的de de 既定jì dìng jì dìng 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì ** * ** * 为wèi wèi 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 能力néng lì néng lì 建设jiàn shè jiàn shè 和hé hé 专业化zhuān yè huà zhuān yè huà ** * ** * ，， ， 希望xī wàng xī wàng 渐进式jiàn jìn shì jiàn jìn shì 接触jiē chù jiē chù 能够néng gòu néng gòu "" " 人性化rén xìng huà rén xìng huà "" " 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 并bìng bìng 促进cù jìn cù jìn 军民关系jūn mín guān xì jūn mín guān xì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
### 5. Non-Combat Nature of Training
 前qián qián 外交部长wài jiāo bù zhǎng wài jiāo bù zhǎng 亚历山大yà lì shān dà yà lì shān dà ·· · 唐纳táng nà táng nà 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí "" " 就jiù jiù 关切guān qiè guān qiè 问题wèn tí wèn tí 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 的de de 渠道qú dào qú dào "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The training was explicitly limited to humanitarian, peacekeeping, and professional development content rather than combat operations [1][2][3].
 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 这一zhè yī zhè yī 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 在zài zài 20212021 2021 年nián nián 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 后hòu hòu 被bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 是shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de ，， ， 但dàn dàn 它tā tā 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 截然不同jié rán bù tóng jié rán bù tóng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé ：： ： 通过tōng guò tōng guò 对话duì huà duì huà 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 孤立gū lì gū lì 来lái lái 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 接触jiē chù jiē chù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
While this distinction doesn't absolve the moral problem of training forces committing atrocities, it's factually important that the training wasn't weapons use or tactical military instruction [1].
 ###### ### 44 4 .. . 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 后hòu hòu 的de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng
在zài zài 20212021 2021 年nián nián 22 2 月yuè yuè 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 后hòu hòu ，， ， 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng 迅速xùn sù xùn sù 而ér ér 全面quán miàn quán miàn ：： ：
-- - 立即lì jí lì jí 谴责qiǎn zé qiǎn zé 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]
-- - 暂停zàn tíng zàn tíng 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 军事jūn shì jūn shì 合作hé zuò hé zuò 和hé hé 武官wǔ guān wǔ guān 接触jiē chù jiē chù [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]
-- - 呼吁hū yù hū yù 国际guó jì guó jì 社会shè huì shè huì 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 向xiàng xiàng 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 出售chū shòu chū shòu 武器wǔ qì wǔ qì [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]
-- - 将jiāng jiāng 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 援助yuán zhù yuán zhù 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 定向dìng xiàng dìng xiàng 于yú yú 人道主义rén dào zhǔ yì rén dào zhǔ yì 和hé hé 人权rén quán rén quán 安全ān quán ān quán 支持zhī chí zhī chí [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]
这zhè zhè 与yǔ yǔ 20172017 2017 -- - 1818 18 年nián nián 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 的de de 延续yán xù yán xù 形成xíng chéng xíng chéng 对比duì bǐ duì bǐ ，， ， 并bìng bìng 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 严重性yán zhòng xìng yán zhòng xìng 后hòu hòu 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 评估píng gū píng gū 。。 。
###### ### 55 5 .. . 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 的de de 非作战fēi zuò zhàn fēi zuò zhàn 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì
训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 明确míng què míng què 限于xiàn yú xiàn yú 人道主义rén dào zhǔ yì rén dào zhǔ yì 、、 、 维和wéi hé wéi hé 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 内容nèi róng nèi róng ，， ， 而ér ér 非作战fēi zuò zhàn fēi zuò zhàn 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 区别qū bié qū bié 不能bù néng bù néng 免除miǎn chú miǎn chú 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 犯下fàn xià fàn xià 暴行bào xíng bào xíng 军队jūn duì jūn duì 的de de 道德dào dé dào dé 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 但dàn dàn 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 是shì shì ，， ， 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 武器wǔ qì wǔ qì 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 或huò huò 战术zhàn shù zhàn shù 军事jūn shì jūn shì 指导zhǐ dǎo zhǐ dǎo [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。

来源可信度评估

###### ### 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán
### Original Sources Provided
 ** * ** * 《《 《 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 》》 》 (( ( GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia )) ) ：： ： ** * ** * [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà // / 英国yīng guó yīng guó 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu ，， ， 以yǐ yǐ 调查diào chá diào chá 报道bào dào bào dào 著称zhù chēng zhù chēng 。。 。
**The Guardian (Guardian Australia):** [1] Mainstream Australian/UK news organization with strong reputation for investigative reporting.
 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo 偏左piān zuǒ piān zuǒ ，， ， 但dàn dàn 事实shì shí shì shí 严谨yán jǐn yán jǐn 。。 。
Known for left-leaning perspective but factually rigorous.
 在zài zài 报道bào dào bào dào 军事训练jūn shì xùn liàn jūn shì xùn liàn 金额jīn é jīn é 或huò huò 日期rì qī rì qī 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 时shí shí 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 。。 。
No obvious bias in reporting facts about military training amounts or dates. [12] **The Jakarta Post & CNN:** Both are mainstream news organizations.
 [[ [ 1212 12 ]] ]
CNN coverage of Myanmar military and coup has been factually accurate and well-sourced.
 ** * ** * 《《 《 雅加达yǎ jiā dá yǎ jiā dá 邮报yóu bào yóu bào 》》 》 CNNCNN CNN ：： ： ** * ** * 两者liǎng zhě liǎng zhě 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu 。。 。
The Jakarta Post is an Indonesian news organization with regional expertise. [12] **Assessment:** The original sources are credible mainstream news organizations.
 CNNCNN CNN 对duì duì 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 和hé hé 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 且qiě qiě 来源lái yuán lái yuán 可靠kě kào kě kào 的de de 。。 。
While sourced from a Labor-aligned compilation, the underlying sources are not partisan advocacy outlets.
 《《 《 雅加达yǎ jiā dá yǎ jiā dá 邮报yóu bào yóu bào 》》 》 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 区域qū yù qū yù 专业知识zhuān yè zhī shí zhuān yè zhī shí 的de de 印尼yìn ní yìn ní 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu 。。 。
[[ [ 1212 12 ]] ]
** * ** * 评估píng gū píng gū ：： ： ** * ** * 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu 。。 。
尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 来源于lái yuán yú lái yuán yú 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 的de de 汇编huì biān huì biān ，， ， 但dàn dàn 基础jī chǔ jī chǔ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 性xìng xìng 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

###### ### 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 向xiàng xiàng 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 军事训练jūn shì xùn liàn jūn shì xùn liàn ？？ ？
### Did Labor Government Provide Military Training to Myanmar?
 ** * ** * 未找到wèi zhǎo dào wèi zhǎo dào 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 。。 。
**No direct evidence found.** Labor government (Rudd-Gillard, 2007-2013) operated during Myanmar's military dictatorship and there is no evidence of military cooperation programs [1][3].
 ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén -- - 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé ，， ， 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián )) ) 在zài zài 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 军事jūn shì jūn shì 独裁dú cái dú cái 时期shí qī shí qī 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng ，， ， 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 军事jūn shì jūn shì 合作项目hé zuò xiàng mù hé zuò xiàng mù 的de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Australia's defense engagement with Myanmar was **re-established by the Coalition in 2013** following Myanmar's 2011 democratic reforms [1].
 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 与yǔ yǔ 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 的de de 防务fáng wù fáng wù 接触jiē chù jiē chù 是shì shì ** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì ** * ** * 的de de ，， ， 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 于yú yú 20112011 2011 年nián nián 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 民主改革mín zhǔ gǎi gé mín zhǔ gǎi gé [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This was a Coalition policy choice, not a Labor precedent.
 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 联盟lián méng lián méng 党的政策dǎng de zhèng cè dǎng de zhèng cè 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 先例xiān lì xiān lì 的de de 延续yán xù yán xù 。。 。
### Broader Labor Record on Military Cooperation
 ###### ### 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 军事jūn shì jūn shì 合作hé zuò hé zuò 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 记录jì lù jì lù
Labor governments have historically maintained military cooperation with various countries despite human rights concerns: - Military relationships with strategic partners regardless of human rights records - Similar engagement-through-dialogue approaches with other non-democratic countries However, no specific Labor-era equivalent to the Myanmar military training program is documented. **Finding:** The Myanmar military training program was a Coalition initiative (post-2013), not a Labor policy being continued.
 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在历史上zài lì shǐ shàng zài lì shǐ shàng 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 存在cún zài cún zài 人权rén quán rén quán 关切guān qiè guān qiè ，， ， 仍réng réng 与yǔ yǔ 多个duō gè duō gè 国家guó jiā guó jiā 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 军事jūn shì jūn shì 合作hé zuò hé zuò ：： ：
This represents a policy choice made by the Coalition government.
 -- - 无论wú lùn wú lùn 人权记录rén quán jì lù rén quán jì lù 如何rú hé rú hé ，， ， 与yǔ yǔ 战略伙伴zhàn lüè huǒ bàn zhàn lüè huǒ bàn 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 军事jūn shì jūn shì 关系guān xì guān xì
-- - 对duì duì 其他qí tā qí tā 非fēi fēi 民主mín zhǔ mín zhǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 接触jiē chù jiē chù -- - 对话duì huà duì huà 方式fāng shì fāng shì
然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 记录在案jì lù zài àn jì lù zài àn 的de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 时期shí qī shí qī 与yǔ yǔ 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 军事jūn shì jūn shì 训练项目xùn liàn xiàng mù xùn liàn xiàng mù 相当xiāng dāng xiāng dāng 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 案例àn lì àn lì 。。 。
** * ** * 调查结果diào chá jié guǒ diào chá jié guǒ ：： ： ** * ** * 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 军事jūn shì jūn shì 训练项目xùn liàn xiàng mù xùn liàn xiàng mù 是shì shì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 倡议chàng yì chàng yì (( ( 20132013 2013 年nián nián 后hòu hòu )) ) ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 延续yán xù yán xù 。。 。
这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 做出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

###### ### 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 训练项目xùn liàn xiàng mù xùn liàn xiàng mù 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu
### The Case Against the Training Program
 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng 在zài zài 实质shí zhì shí zhì 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de ：： ：
The claim's criticisms are substantively justified: 1. **Timing was ethically problematic.** Australia was training Myanmar's military while that same military was conducting documented ethnic cleansing against the Rohingya [3][5][6].
 11 1 .. . ** * ** * 时间shí jiān shí jiān 点diǎn diǎn 存在cún zài cún zài 伦理lún lǐ lún lǐ 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
Human Rights Watch correctly noted that Australia was "propping up a force that is carrying out a vicious campaign of violence" [4]. 2. **The policy was ineffective.** Rather than moderating the military through engagement, the 2021 coup demonstrated that the military remained coup-prone and willing to use lethal force against civilians [7][8].
 ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 对duì duì 罗兴亚人luó xīng yà rén luó xīng yà rén 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 有yǒu yǒu 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 清洗qīng xǐ qīng xǐ 的de de 同时tóng shí tóng shí ，， ， 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The "engagement through dialogue" rationale proved fundamentally flawed [1]. 3. **Hypocrisy was evident.** Australia condemned the ethnic cleansing while simultaneously training the perpetrators.
 人权rén quán rén quán 观察guān chá guān chá 正确zhèng què zhèng què 地dì dì 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，， ， 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài "" " 支撑zhī chēng zhī chēng 一支yī zhī yī zhī 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 实施shí shī shí shī 恶毒è dú è dú 暴力bào lì bào lì 运动yùn dòng yùn dòng 的de de 军队jūn duì jūn duì "" " [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
This contradiction was captured in media headlines like "How TF Is Australia Condemning The Myanmar Situation With A Straight Face?" [4]
 22 2 .. . ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 是shì shì 无效wú xiào wú xiào 的de de 。。 。
### The Coalition's Perspective
 ** * ** * 20212021 2021 年nián nián 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 的de de 爆发bào fā bào fā 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ，， ， 通过tōng guò tōng guò 接触jiē chù jiē chù 来lái lái 温和wēn hé wēn hé 化huà huà 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 奏效zòu xiào zòu xiào ，， ， 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 仍然réng rán réng rán 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng ，， ， 并bìng bìng 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì 对duì duì 平民píng mín píng mín 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 致命zhì mìng zhì mìng 武力wǔ lì wǔ lì [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition government defended the program on several grounds: 1. **Capacity-building rationale:** The government believed that training and engagement would gradually professionalize the military and improve civil-military relations [1].
 "" " 通过tōng guò tōng guò 对话duì huà duì huà 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 接触jiē chù jiē chù "" " 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 被bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 从根本上cóng gēn běn shàng cóng gēn běn shàng 是shì shì 有yǒu yǒu 缺陷quē xiàn quē xiàn 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This was a genuine, if ultimately incorrect, strategic assessment. 2. **Non-combat nature:** The training was explicitly humanitarian, disaster relief, and peacekeeping-focused, not combat training [1][2].
 33 3 .. . ** * ** * 虚伪xū wěi xū wěi 显而易见xiǎn ér yì jiàn xiǎn ér yì jiàn 。。 。
The government argued this distinction mattered morally. 3. **Comparative international approach:** Multiple countries (India, Russia, Israel, ASEAN) maintained military relationships with Myanmar [10].
 ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 一边yī biān yī biān 谴责qiǎn zé qiǎn zé 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 清洗qīng xǐ qīng xǐ ，， ， 一边yī biān yī biān 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 肇事者zhào shì zhě zhào shì zhě 。。 。
Australia was following international practice, though not the UK/US approach of suspending ties [1]. 4. **Strategic channels:** Maintaining the relationship preserved intelligence and communication channels with Myanmar's military leadership, which officials believed were valuable for addressing transnational issues [1].
 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 被bèi bèi 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 标题biāo tí biāo tí 如rú rú "" " 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 怎么zěn me zěn me 能néng néng 一本正经yī běn zhèng jīng yī běn zhèng jīng 地dì dì 谴责qiǎn zé qiǎn zé 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 局势jú shì jú shì ？？ ？
### Critical Assessment
 "" " 所suǒ suǒ 捕捉bǔ zhuō bǔ zhuō [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The evidence suggests the Coalition's approach was **well-intentioned but strategically naive**.
 ###### ### 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn
The belief that training and dialogue would moderate Myanmar's military proved incorrect.
 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 上shàng shàng 为wèi wèi 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ：： ：
However: - The decision reflected a genuine policy disagreement (engagement vs. isolation), not malice - The training was indeed limited to non-combat capacities - Other countries pursued similar engagement approaches - Australia's post-coup response was appropriate and swift
 11 1 .. . ** * ** * 能力néng lì néng lì 建设jiàn shè jiàn shè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ：： ： ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 相信xiāng xìn xiāng xìn ，， ， 培训péi xùn péi xùn 和hé hé 接触jiē chù jiē chù 将jiāng jiāng 逐步zhú bù zhú bù 使shǐ shǐ 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 专业化zhuān yè huà zhuān yè huà 并bìng bìng 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn 军民关系jūn mín guān xì jūn mín guān xì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 真诚zhēn chéng zhēn chéng 的de de ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 被bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 是shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de ，， ， 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè 评估píng gū píng gū 。。 。
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 非作战fēi zuò zhàn fēi zuò zhàn 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì ：： ： ** * ** * 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 明确míng què míng què 聚焦jù jiāo jù jiāo 于yú yú 人道主义rén dào zhǔ yì rén dào zhǔ yì 、、 、 灾害zāi hài zāi hài 救援jiù yuán jiù yuán 和hé hé 维和wéi hé wéi hé ，， ， 而ér ér 非作战fēi zuò zhàn fēi zuò zhàn 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 区别qū bié qū bié 在zài zài 道德dào dé dào dé 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 国际guó jì guó jì 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ：： ： ** * ** * 多个duō gè duō gè 国家guó jiā guó jiā (( ( 印度yìn dù yìn dù 、、 、 俄罗斯é luó sī é luó sī 、、 、 以色列yǐ sè liè yǐ sè liè 、、 、 东盟dōng méng dōng méng )) ) 与yǔ yǔ 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 军事jūn shì jūn shì 关系guān xì guān xì [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。 。
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 遵循zūn xún zūn xún 国际惯例guó jì guàn lì guó jì guàn lì ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 不是bú shì bú shì 英国yīng guó yīng guó // / 美国měi guó měi guó 暂停zàn tíng zàn tíng 关系guān xì guān xì 的de de 方式fāng shì fāng shì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè 渠道qú dào qú dào ：： ： ** * ** * 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 关系guān xì guān xì 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 了le le 与yǔ yǔ 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 领导层lǐng dǎo céng lǐng dǎo céng 的de de 情报qíng bào qíng bào 和hé hé 沟通gōu tōng gōu tōng 渠道qú dào qú dào ，， ， 官员guān yuán guān yuán 们men men 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这zhè zhè 对duì duì 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 跨国kuà guó kuà guó 问题wèn tí wèn tí 是shì shì 有yǒu yǒu 价值jià zhí jià zhí 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
###### ### 批判性pī pàn xìng pī pàn xìng 评估píng gū píng gū
证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ，， ， 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 是shì shì ** * ** * 出于chū yú chū yú 善意shàn yì shàn yì 但dàn dàn 在zài zài 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 天tiān tiān 真的zhēn de zhēn de ** * ** * 。。 。
相信xiāng xìn xiāng xìn 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 和hé hé 对话会duì huà huì duì huà huì 使shǐ shǐ 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 温和wēn hé wēn hé 化huà huà 的de de 想法xiǎng fǎ xiǎng fǎ 被bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 是shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ：： ：
-- - 这一zhè yī zhè yī 决定jué dìng jué dìng 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 分歧fēn qí fēn qí (( ( 接触jiē chù jiē chù vsvs vs 孤立gū lì gū lì )) ) ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 恶意è yì è yì
-- - 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 确实què shí què shí 限于xiàn yú xiàn yú 非作战fēi zuò zhàn fēi zuò zhàn 能力néng lì néng lì
-- - 其他qí tā qí tā 国家guó jiā guó jiā 追求zhuī qiú zhuī qiú 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 接触jiē chù jiē chù 方式fāng shì fāng shì
-- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 后hòu hòu 的de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng 是shì shì 恰当qià dàng qià dàng 且qiě qiě 迅速xùn sù xùn sù 的de de

部分属实

6.5

/ 10

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 核心hé xīn hé xīn 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ：： ： 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20172017 2017 -- - 1818 18 年nián nián 花费huā fèi huā fèi 约yuē yuē 4040 40 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng ，， ， 而ér ér 当时dāng shí dāng shí 联合国lián hé guó lián hé guó 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 记录jì lù jì lù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 该gāi gāi 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 对罗兴亚人duì luó xīng yà rén duì luó xīng yà rén 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 清洗qīng xǐ qīng xǐ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The factual core of the claim is accurate: Australia did spend approximately $400,000 to train Myanmar's military in 2017-18, during a period when the military was documented by the UN as committing ethnic cleansing against the Rohingya [1][5].
 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20212021 2021 年nián nián 发动fā dòng fā dòng 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn ，， ， 安全部队ān quán bù duì ān quán bù duì 杀害shā hài shā hài 了le le 数百名shù bǎi míng shù bǎi míng 反fǎn fǎn 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 抗议者kàng yì zhě kàng yì zhě [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
The Myanmar military did later conduct a coup in 2021 in which security forces killed hundreds of anti-coup protesters [7][8].
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 需要xū yào xū yào 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 的de de 情境qíng jìng qíng jìng 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng ：： ：
However, the claim requires critical contextual corrections: 1. **The training was non-combat in nature**, focused on humanitarian assistance, disaster relief, and peacekeeping [1][2], not direct support for ethnic cleansing operations. 2. **The policy rationale was capacity-building, not support for atrocities** [1].
 11 1 .. . ** * ** * 训练xùn liàn xùn liàn 是非shì fēi shì fēi 作战zuò zhàn zuò zhàn 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 的de de ** * ** * ，， ， 聚焦jù jiāo jù jiāo 于yú yú 人道主义rén dào zhǔ yì rén dào zhǔ yì 援助yuán zhù yuán zhù 、、 、 灾害zāi hài zāi hài 救援jiù yuán jiù yuán 和hé hé 维和wéi hé wéi hé [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 对duì duì 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 清洗qīng xǐ qīng xǐ 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 支持zhī chí zhī chí 。。 。
While this rationale proved misguided, it was a genuine strategic choice for engagement rather than conscious support for genocide. 3. **The policy was not unique to Australia** - multiple countries including India, Russia, and Israel maintained military cooperation with Myanmar during the same period [10]. 4. **Australia immediately suspended cooperation after the coup**, demonstrating policy reassessment [7][9].
 22 2 .. . ** * ** * 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 是shì shì 能力néng lì néng lì 建设jiàn shè jiàn shè ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 支持zhī chí zhī chí 暴行bào xíng bào xíng ** * ** * [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim accurately identifies an ethically problematic decision but oversimplifies the government's stated rationale and international context.
 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 这一zhè yī zhè yī 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 被bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 是shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de ，， ， 但dàn dàn 它tā tā 是shì shì 接触jiē chù jiē chù 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 孤立gū lì gū lì 的de de 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 对duì duì 种族灭绝zhǒng zú miè jué zhǒng zú miè jué 的de de 自觉zì jué zì jué 支持zhī chí zhī chí 。。 。
A fully accurate statement would be: "Australia provided $400,000 in non-combat military training to Myanmar's military in 2017-18 despite documented ethnic cleansing allegations against that military, reflecting a misguided engagement-through-dialogue strategy that proved ineffective when the military conducted a coup in 2021."
 33 3 .. . ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu ** * ** * —— — —— — 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 印度yìn dù yìn dù 、、 、 俄罗斯é luó sī é luó sī 和hé hé 以色列yǐ sè liè yǐ sè liè 在内zài nèi zài nèi 的de de 多个duō gè duō gè 国家guó jiā guó jiā 在zài zài 同一tóng yī tóng yī 时期shí qī shí qī 与yǔ yǔ 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 军事jūn shì jūn shì 合作hé zuò hé zuò [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 后hòu hòu 立即lì jí lì jí 暂停zàn tíng zàn tíng 了le le 合作hé zuò hé zuò ** * ** * ，， ， 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 评估píng gū píng gū [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 识别shí bié shí bié 了le le 一个yí gè yí gè 伦理lún lǐ lún lǐ 上shàng shàng 有yǒu yǒu 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng ，， ， 但dàn dàn 过度guò dù guò dù 简化jiǎn huà jiǎn huà 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 既定jì dìng jì dìng 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 和hé hé 国际背景guó jì bèi jǐng guó jì bèi jǐng 。。 。
完全wán quán wán quán 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 陈述chén shù chén shù 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi 是shì shì ：： ： "" " 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 20172017 2017 -- - 1818 18 年nián nián 向xiàng xiàng 缅甸miǎn diān miǎn diān 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 4040 40 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 非作战fēi zuò zhàn fēi zuò zhàn 军事训练jūn shì xùn liàn jūn shì xùn liàn ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 该gāi gāi 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 已yǐ yǐ 被bèi bèi 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 记录jì lù jì lù 犯有fàn yǒu fàn yǒu 种族zhǒng zú zhǒng zú 清洗qīng xǐ qīng xǐ 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng ，， ， 这zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 被bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 无效wú xiào wú xiào 的de de 、、 、 通过tōng guò tōng guò 对话duì huà duì huà 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 接触jiē chù jiē chù 的de de 错误cuò wù cuò wù 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè ，， ， 当dāng dāng 军方jūn fāng jūn fāng 于yú yú 20212021 2021 年nián nián 发动fā dòng fā dòng 政变zhèng biàn zhèng biàn 时shí shí ，， ， 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè 被bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 是shì shì 无效wú xiào wú xiào 的de de 。。 。
"" "

📚 来源与引用 (12)

  1. 1
    Myanmar and Australia: A partnership paved with good intentions

    Myanmar and Australia: A partnership paved with good intentions

    Australia’s rationale for engagement has long been a hope to moderate the excesses of the regime. It does not seem to have listened.

    Lowyinstitute
  2. 2
    Australia keeps military ties with Myanmar

    Australia keeps military ties with Myanmar

    The Australian military continues to provide training to the Myanmar defence force despite ongoing violence against Rohingya Muslims.

    SBS News
  3. 3
    Australia to train Myanmar military despite ethnic cleansing accusations

    Australia to train Myanmar military despite ethnic cleansing accusations

    Defence department spend continues despite claims treatment of Rohingya bears ‘hallmarks of a genocide’

    the Guardian
  4. 4
    How TF Is Australia Condemning The Myanmar Situation With A Straight Face? Look At Our Record

    How TF Is Australia Condemning The Myanmar Situation With A Straight Face? Look At Our Record

    Australia has condemned the Myanmar military coup, but has seemingly forgotten our ties through the military and Adani mine funding.

    PEDESTRIAN.TV
  5. 5
    ohchr.org

    Myanmar: the facts behind the military action - United Nations Fact-Finding Mission

    Ohchr

  6. 6
    openaustralia.org.au

    Rohingya People: 10 May 2018: Senate debates

    Making parliament easy.

    Openaustralia Org
  7. 7
    dfat.gov.au

    Australia's response to the Myanmar military coup

    Dfat Gov

  8. 8
    amnesty.org

    Myanmar: the crisis since the February 2021 coup - Crisis Overview

    Amnesty

    Original link no longer available
  9. 9
    Australian government must immediately halt relationship with Myanmar military

    Australian government must immediately halt relationship with Myanmar military

    In the wake of the military coup in Myanmar, Australia must halt all military, security and policing transfers and training to Myanmar, Amnesty

    Amnesty International Australia
  10. 10
    13 countries involved in training and cooperation with the Burmese military

    13 countries involved in training and cooperation with the Burmese military

    Thirteen countries are involved in military training and/or cooperation with the Burmese military, despite its human rights record. Burma Campaign UK has published a new briefing paper today listing the countries, with open source links to information about the training and cooperation. The Brie

    Burma Campaign UK
  11. 11
    New Military Exercise Highlights India-Myanmar Defense Relations

    New Military Exercise Highlights India-Myanmar Defense Relations

    The drills are focused on peacekeeping operations.

    Thediplomat
  12. 12
    News Organization Credibility Reference Database

    News Organization Credibility Reference Database

    Wikipedia

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性，但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。

Previous: C0285 Next: C0287