属实

评分: 8.0/10

Coalition
C0270

声明内容

“违背选举承诺,未建立空壳公司所有权登记册,以打击企业逃税行为。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis
分析时间: 30 Jan 2026

原始来源

事实核查

核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ** * ** * 基本jī běn jī běn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ** * ** *
The core claim is **substantially accurate**.
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 确实què shí què shí 作出zuò chū zuò chū le le 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 受益shòu yì shòu yì 所有权suǒ yǒu quán suǒ yǒu quán 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè de de 明确míng què míng què 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 随后suí hòu suí hòu 放弃fàng qì fàng qì le le gāi gāi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò
The Coalition did make an explicit public commitment to establish a beneficial ownership register and subsequently abandoned it. **The Promise:** In April 2016, Assistant Treasurer Kelly O'Dwyer announced the Coalition would establish a public register revealing the beneficial owners of shell companies [1].
** * ** * 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 内容nèi róng nèi róng ** * ** *
O'Dwyer stated directly: "We agree there needs to be a registry of beneficial ownership in our country" and said it would "much, much harder to engage in tax avoidance" [2].
20162016 2016 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè 助理zhù lǐ zhù lǐ 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng KellyKelly Kelly OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng jiāng jiāng 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 一个yí gè yí gè 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè 揭示jiē shì jiē shì 空壳kōng ké kōng ké 公司gōng sī gōng sī de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 所有者suǒ yǒu zhě suǒ yǒu zhě [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The announcement was made in the lead-up to the 2016 federal election [1]. **Why It Was Promised:** The register was explicitly framed as bringing Australia into line with G20 commitments on transparency [1].
OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " 我们wǒ men wǒ men 同意tóng yì tóng yì 我国wǒ guó wǒ guó 需要xū yào xū yào 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 一个yí gè yí gè 受益shòu yì shòu yì 所有权suǒ yǒu quán suǒ yǒu quán 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè "" " 并称bìng chēng bìng chēng zhè zhè jiāng jiāng 使shǐ shǐ "" " 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 税务shuì wù shuì wù 避逃bì táo bì táo 变得biàn dé biàn dé 非常fēi cháng fēi cháng 非常fēi cháng fēi cháng 困难kùn nán kùn nán "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The timing followed the Panama Papers scandal, which revealed how shell companies were being used globally for tax minimization and illicit activities [2]. **The Abandonment:** By February 2019, nearly three years later, the Coalition had completely reversed its position.
gāi gāi announcementannouncement announcement shì shì zài zài 20162016 2016 nián nián 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 前夕qián xī qián xī 作出zuò chū zuò chū de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
When questioned by the Greens Senator Peter Whish-Wilson, the Treasury Department responded: "No commitment to implement a register has been made by government" [1].
** * ** * 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn ** * ** *
This direct contradiction was widely reported as a "ministry of truth" moment - the government was denying it had ever made the commitment it had explicitly announced in April 2016 [1]. **Timeline of Stalling:** - April 2016: Kelly O'Dwyer announces the register will be created - 2016: Government reaffirms commitment in Open Government National Action Plan - February 2017: Treasury releases consultation paper - March 2017: Consultation period ends - By December 2018: No plans to legislate before election [3] - February 2019: Treasury denies any commitment was ever made [1] **Supporting Statements from Other Officials:** When inquired about the register's status in December 2018, a spokesman for Assistant Treasurer Stuart Robert said: "We remain committed and we're considering options" [3].
gāi gāi 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè 明确míng què míng què bèi bèi 描述miáo shù miáo shù wèi wèi 使shǐ shǐ 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 符合fú hé fú hé G20G20 G20 关于guān yú guān yú 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Yet just two months later, Treasury was claiming no commitment existed [1].
时机shí jī shí jī 紧随jǐn suí jǐn suí 巴拿马bā ná mǎ bā ná mǎ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 丑闻chǒu wén chǒu wén 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu gāi gāi 丑闻chǒu wén chǒu wén 揭示jiē shì jiē shì le le 空壳kōng ké kōng ké 公司gōng sī gōng sī zài zài 全球quán qiú quán qiú 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi nèi nèi bèi bèi 用于yòng yú yòng yú 税务shuì wù shuì wù 最小化zuì xiǎo huà zuì xiǎo huà 非法活动fēi fǎ huó dòng fēi fǎ huó dòng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ** * ** *
dào dào 20192019 2019 nián nián 22 2 yuè yuè 近三年jìn sān nián jìn sān nián hòu hòu 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 完全wán quán wán quán 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn le le 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng
dāng dāng 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán PeterPeter Peter WhishWhish Whish -- - WilsonWilson Wilson 询问xún wèn xún wèn shí shí 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 回应huí yìng huí yìng "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 作出zuò chū zuò chū 实施shí shī shí shī 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn bèi bèi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 报道bào dào bào dào wèi wèi "" " 真理zhēn lǐ zhēn lǐ "" " 时刻shí kè shí kè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn céng céng 作出zuò chū zuò chū zài zài 20162016 2016 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè 明确míng què míng què 宣布xuān bù xuān bù de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 拖延时间tuō yán shí jiān tuō yán shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn ** * ** *
-- - 20162016 2016 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè KellyKelly Kelly OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 将要jiāng yào jiāng yào 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè
-- - 20162016 2016 nián nián 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ zài zài 开放kāi fàng kāi fàng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 国家guó jiā guó jiā 行动计划xíng dòng jì huà xíng dòng jì huà zhōng zhōng 再次zài cì zài cì 确认què rèn què rèn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò
-- - 20172017 2017 nián nián 22 2 yuè yuè 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 发布fā bù fā bù 咨询zī xún zī xún 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn
-- - 20172017 2017 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè 咨询zī xún zī xún 结束jié shù jié shù
-- - 20182018 2018 nián nián 1212 12 yuè yuè qián qián 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ qián qián 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 计划jì huà jì huà [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 20192019 2019 nián nián 22 2 yuè yuè 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn céng céng 作出zuò chū zuò chū 任何rèn hé rèn hé 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 其他qí tā qí tā 官员guān yuán guān yuán de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng ** * ** *
20182018 2018 nián nián 1212 12 yuè yuè 询问xún wèn xún wèn 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè 状态zhuàng tài zhuàng tài shí shí 助理zhù lǐ zhù lǐ 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng StuartStuart Stuart RobertRobert Robert de de 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " 我们wǒ men wǒ men 仍然réng rán réng rán 致力于zhì lì yú zhì lì yú 我们wǒ men wǒ men 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 各种gè zhǒng gè zhǒng 选项xuǎn xiàng xuǎn xiàng "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
然而rán ér rán ér 仅仅jǐn jǐn jǐn jǐn 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè yuè yuè hòu hòu 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù jiù jiù 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 存在cún zài cún zài guò guò 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

缺失背景

** * ** * 11 1 .. . 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 批评pī píng pī píng ** * ** *
**1.
gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng wèi wèi 提及tí jí tí jí 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 完全wán quán wán quán 致力于zhì lì yú zhì lì yú 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè bìng bìng jiāng jiāng 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 竞选jìng xuǎn jìng xuǎn 议题yì tí yì tí
Labor's Position and Criticism:** The claim omits that Labor fully committed to the register and made this a major campaign issue.
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 影子yǐng zi yǐng zi 助理zhù lǐ zhù lǐ 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng AndrewAndrew Andrew LeighLeigh Leigh 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì "" " 他们tā men tā men 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 实施shí shī shí shī 能够néng gòu néng gòu 告诉gào sù gào sù 我们wǒ men wǒ men shuí shuí 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 企业qǐ yè qǐ yè de de 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 过去guò qù guò qù 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián duō duō 咨询zī xún zī xún 结束jié shù jié shù 过去guò qù guò qù 一年yī nián yī nián
Labor's shadow assistant treasurer Andrew Leigh explicitly stated: "It's been over two years after they promised to implement reforms that would tell us who really owns Australia's firms, and over a year since the consultation ended.
改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 陷入xiàn rù xiàn rù 停滞tíng zhì tíng zhì hěn hěn 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu zài zài ShortenShorten Shorten 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ xià xià 才能cái néng cái néng 获得huò dé huò dé 受益shòu yì shòu yì 所有权suǒ yǒu quán suǒ yǒu quán 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
Reform has stalled...
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 实施shí shī shí shī 一个yí gè yí gè gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 信托xìn tuō xìn tuō [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
It is clear that the only way Australia will get a beneficial ownership registry is under a Shorten Labor government" [3].
** * ** * 22 2 .. . 商业界shāng yè jiè shāng yè jiè 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì ** * ** *
Labor promised to implement an even broader register including trusts [3]. **2.
gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng wèi wèi 提及tí jí tí jí 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè 面临miàn lín miàn lín 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 商业界shāng yè jiè shāng yè jiè 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì zhè zhè hěn hěn 可能kě néng kě néng 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn
Business Opposition:** The claim doesn't mention that the register faced significant business opposition, which likely influenced the government's reversal.
20162016 2016 nián nián de de 报道bào dào bào dào 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 此举cǐ jǔ cǐ jǔ "" " 不太可能bù tài kě néng bù tài kě néng 受到shòu dào shòu dào 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 企业qǐ yè qǐ yè de de 欢迎huān yíng huān yíng "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The 2016 articles note the move was "unlikely to be popular with big business in Australia" [2]. **3.
** * ** * 33 3 .. . 技术jì shù jì shù 可行性kě xíng xìng kě xíng xìng 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ** * ** *
Technical Feasibility Concerns:** The Australian Taxation Office Commissioner Chris Jordan raised legitimate concerns about the register's effectiveness, noting that determined tax avoiders could use "all sorts of different names in places" to obscure ownership, questioning whether it would be "a panacea" [3].
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 税务局shuì wù jú shuì wù jú 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán ChrisChris Chris JordanJordan Jordan duì duì 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè de de 有效性yǒu xiào xìng yǒu xiào xìng 提出tí chū tí chū le le 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū yǒu yǒu 决心jué xīn jué xīn de de 避税bì shuì bì shuì zhě zhě 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng "" " 各种gè zhǒng gè zhǒng 不同bù tóng bù tóng de de 地方dì fāng dì fāng de de 不同bù tóng bù tóng 名字míng zì míng zì "" " lái lái 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài 所有权suǒ yǒu quán suǒ yǒu quán 质疑zhì yí zhì yí zhè zhè 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu huì huì shì shì "" " 灵丹妙药líng dān miào yào líng dān miào yào "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
This suggests practical implementation challenges existed. **4.
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 存在cún zài cún zài 实际shí jì shí jì 实施shí shī shí shī 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn
Consultation Results:** Between the February 2017 consultation and the 2019 backdown, Treasury indicated it received advice but didn't specify what the consultation revealed or what obstacles emerged [1]. **5.
** * ** * 44 4 .. . 咨询zī xún zī xún 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ ** * ** *
International Context:** While the claim references G20 commitments, it doesn't mention that similar beneficial ownership transparency initiatives have faced implementation challenges globally.
zài zài 20172017 2017 nián nián 22 2 yuè yuè de de 咨询zī xún zī xún 20192019 2019 nián nián 退缩tuì suō tuì suō 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 收到shōu dào shōu dào le le 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì dàn dàn 未说明wèi shuō míng wèi shuō míng 咨询zī xún zī xún 揭示jiē shì jiē shì le le 什么shén me shén me huò huò 出现chū xiàn chū xiàn le le 什么shén me shén me 障碍zhàng ài zhàng ài [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 55 5 .. . 国际背景guó jì bèi jǐng guó jì bèi jǐng ** * ** *
虽然suī rán suī rán 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 提到tí dào tí dào le le G20G20 G20 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò dàn dàn wèi wèi 提及tí jí tí jí 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 受益shòu yì shòu yì 所有权suǒ yǒu quán suǒ yǒu quán 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 倡议chàng yì chàng yì zài zài 全球quán qiú quán qiú 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi nèi nèi 部署bù shǔ bù shǔ dōu dōu 面临miàn lín miàn lín 实施shí shī shí shī 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 卫报wèi bào wèi bào ** * ** *
**The Guardian:** The primary source (The Guardian Australia) is a mainstream, reputable news organization.
主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 来源lái yuán lái yuán 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà bǎn bǎn shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 信誉xìn yù xìn yù 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo de de 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu
However, it has a center-left editorial stance and the articles are generally critical of the Coalition's backdown.
然而rán ér rán ér 它持tā chí tā chí zhōng zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 报道bào dào bào dào 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng duì duì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng de de 退缩tuì suō tuì suō chí chí 批评pī píng pī píng 态度tài dù tài dù
The reporting is factually supported by direct quotes from government officials and parliamentary records, making the facts verifiable regardless of editorial perspective [1][2][3]. **Verifiable Facts in the Guardian Articles:** - Direct quotes from Kelly O'Dwyer (April 2016) are confirmed in official reporting - Treasury Department response quoted directly from parliamentary question-on-notice responses - Senator Whish-Wilson's statements are direct quotes from parliamentary record - Labor commitments are documented in multiple sources The Guardian's framing is negative toward the Coalition, but the underlying factual claims - that a promise was made and abandoned - are well-documented and not disputed by government sources.
报道bào dào bào dào yǒu yǒu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 官员guān yuán guān yuán de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引述yǐn shù yǐn shù 议会yì huì yì huì 记录jì lù jì lù 支持zhī chí zhī chí 使shǐ shǐ 事实shì shí shì shí 无论wú lùn wú lùn 编辑biān jí biān jí 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo 如何rú hé rú hé dōu dōu 可验证kě yàn zhèng kě yàn zhèng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
** * ** * 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng zhōng zhōng de de 可验证kě yàn zhèng kě yàn zhèng 事实shì shí shì shí ** * ** *
-- - KellyKelly Kelly OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer 20162016 2016 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引述yǐn shù yǐn shù zài zài 官方guān fāng guān fāng 报道bào dào bào dào zhōng zhōng 得到dé dào dé dào 确认què rèn què rèn
-- - 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 回应huí yìng huí yìng 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引述yǐn shù yǐn shù 议会yì huì yì huì 书面shū miàn shū miàn 质询zhì xún zhì xún 回复huí fù huí fù
-- - 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán WhishWhish Whish -- - WilsonWilson Wilson de de 陈述chén shù chén shù shì shì 议会yì huì yì huì 记录jì lù jì lù de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引述yǐn shù yǐn shù
-- - 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò zài zài 多个duō gè duō gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán 中有zhōng yǒu zhōng yǒu 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 记录jì lù jì lù
卫报wèi bào wèi bào de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià duì duì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng chí chí 负面fù miàn fù miàn 态度tài dù tài dù dàn dàn underlyingunderlying underlying de de 事实shì shí shì shí 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 作出zuò chū zuò chū le le 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò yòu yòu 放弃fàng qì fàng qì le le yǒu yǒu 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 记录jì lù jì lù qiě qiě wèi wèi 受到shòu dào shòu dào 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 来源lái yuán lái yuán de de 质疑zhì yí zhì yí
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** The evidence shows the opposite: Labor consistently advocated for the register while the Coalition abandoned it. - In April 2016, when O'Dwyer announced the register, the Guardian reported that "Labor has yet to commit to a register" and shadow assistant treasurer Andrew Leigh was still "carefully considering proposals" [2]. - By July 2017, Labor explicitly committed to introducing the register if elected, and promised to make it even more comprehensive by including trusts [3]. - By December 2018, Labor was campaigning on this as a major policy difference, with Andrew Leigh criticizing the Coalition's stalling [3]. - If anything, Labor was more committed to transparency than the Coalition on this specific issue.
** * ** *
There is no equivalent example of Labor making and then breaking a similar promise on beneficial ownership transparency during the 2013-2022 period examined by this project.
证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 相反xiāng fǎn xiāng fǎn 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 始终shǐ zhōng shǐ zhōng 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè ér ér 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 放弃fàng qì fàng qì le le gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà
-- - 20162016 2016 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè dāng dāng OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè shí shí 卫报wèi bào wèi bào 报道bào dào bào dào chēng chēng "" " 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 尚未shàng wèi shàng wèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè "" " 影子yǐng zi yǐng zi 助理zhù lǐ zhù lǐ 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng AndrewAndrew Andrew LeighLeigh Leigh réng réng zài zài "" " 仔细zǐ xì zǐ xì 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 提案tí àn tí àn "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - dào dào 20172017 2017 nián nián 77 7 yuè yuè 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 明确míng què míng què 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 当选dāng xuǎn dāng xuǎn jiāng jiāng 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè bìng bìng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 通过tōng guò tōng guò 纳入nà rù nà rù 信托xìn tuō xìn tuō 使shǐ shǐ 更加gèng jiā gèng jiā 全面quán miàn quán miàn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - dào dào 20182018 2018 nián nián 1212 12 yuè yuè 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng jiāng jiāng 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 分歧fēn qí fēn qí 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 竞选jìng xuǎn jìng xuǎn AndrewAndrew Andrew LeighLeigh Leigh 批评pī píng pī píng 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng de de 拖延tuō yán tuō yán [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 如果说rú guǒ shuō rú guǒ shuō yǒu yǒu 什么shén me shén me 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的话de huà de huà zài zài 这个zhè ge zhè ge 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 问题wèn tí wèn tí shàng shàng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng gèng gèng 致力于zhì lì yú zhì lì yú 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù
zài zài 20132013 2013 -- - 20222022 2022 年本nián běn nián běn 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù de de 考察kǎo chá kǎo chá 期间qī jiān qī jiān 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 作出zuò chū zuò chū bìng bìng 随后suí hòu suí hòu 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn 类似lèi sì lèi sì 受益shòu yì shòu yì 所有权suǒ yǒu quán suǒ yǒu quán 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò de de equivalentequivalent equivalent 例子lì zi lì zi
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ** * ** *
**The Coalition's Stated Position:** The government never provided a detailed public explanation for the backdown.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi jiù jiù 退缩tuì suō tuì suō 提供tí gōng tí gōng 详细xiáng xì xiáng xì de de 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 解释jiě shì jiě shì
Treasury simply claimed no commitment had been made, which is factually incorrect based on O'Dwyer's 2016 statements.
财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 作出zuò chū zuò chū guò guò 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 根据gēn jù gēn jù OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer 20162016 2016 nián nián de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng zhè zhè zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù de de
The government did not argue the register was bad policy - it simply denied having promised it. **Potential Justifications (Not Explicitly Stated):** 1. **Business Opposition:** Big business lobbying against the register likely played a role, though the government didn't explicitly acknowledge this. 2. **Technical Complexity:** Commissioner Jordan's concerns about the register's effectiveness in preventing sophisticated tax avoidance suggest legitimate implementation challenges. 3. **International Coordination Issues:** Beneficial ownership transparency works best when multiple jurisdictions participate.
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè shì shì 不良bù liáng bù liáng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn céng céng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò guò guò
Australia may have concluded unilateral action was insufficient. 4. **Competing Priorities:** By 2017-2018, other tax measures and policy priorities may have taken precedence in a busy legislative agenda. **Comparison to Labor's Track Record:** Labor was similarly limited in delivering on tax transparency goals when in government.
** * ** * 潜在qián zài qián zài 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu wèi wèi 明确míng què míng què 说明shuō míng shuō míng ** * ** *
A significant example: Labor passed legislation in 2013 requiring large private companies (over $100m turnover) to publish tax information, but the Coalition reversed it in October 2015 before it took effect - a similar breaking of tax transparency commitments [3].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 商业界shāng yè jiè shāng yè jiè 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì ** * ** * 企业qǐ yè qǐ yè 游说yóu shuì yóu shuì 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè hěn hěn 可能kě néng kě néng 发挥fā huī fā huī le le 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ wèi wèi 明确míng què míng què 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn zhè zhè 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn
Labor then spent years trying (unsuccessfully due to Senate opposition) to restore this threshold.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 技术jì shù jì shù 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng ** * ** * 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán JordanJordan Jordan 关于guān yú guān yú 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè zài zài 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 复杂fù zá fù zá 避税bì shuì bì shuì 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 有效性yǒu xiào xìng yǒu xiào xìng de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng le le 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ de de 实施shí shī shí shī 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn
This suggests both parties struggle to deliver on transparency commitments when facing business opposition or legislative challenges. **The Core Issue:** This is a genuine broken promise - the Coalition explicitly committed to the register and abandoned it without ever implementing it.
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 国际guó jì guó jì 协调xié tiáo xié tiáo 问题wèn tí wèn tí ** * ** * dāng dāng 多个duō gè duō gè 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 管辖区guǎn xiá qū guǎn xiá qū 参与cān yù cān yù shí shí 受益shòu yì shòu yì 所有权suǒ yǒu quán suǒ yǒu quán 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 效果xiào guǒ xiào guǒ 最佳zuì jiā zuì jiā
However, the backdown appears driven by political/business pressure rather than discovering the policy was fundamentally flawed.
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 可能kě néng kě néng 得出结论dé chū jié lùn dé chū jié lùn 单边dān biān dān biān 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng shì shì 不够bù gòu bù gòu de de
The government's response (denying the promise existed) was notably unconvincing and damaged credibility more than the original reversal would have.
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 竞争性jìng zhēng xìng jìng zhēng xìng 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng ** * ** * dào dào 20172017 2017 -- - 20182018 2018 nián nián 其他qí tā qí tā 税收shuì shōu shuì shōu 措施cuò shī cuò shī 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 可能kě néng kě néng zài zài 繁忙fán máng fán máng de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 议程yì chéng yì chéng zhōng zhōng 占据zhàn jù zhàn jù le le 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 地位dì wèi dì wèi
** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政绩zhèng jì zhèng jì de de 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào ** * ** *
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng shí shí 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 难以nán yǐ nán yǐ 兑现duì xiàn duì xiàn 税收shuì shōu shuì shōu 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 目标mù biāo mù biāo
一个yí gè yí gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 例子lì zi lì zi 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng zài zài 20132013 2013 nián nián 通过tōng guò tōng guò 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 大型dà xíng dà xíng 私营sī yíng sī yíng 公司gōng sī gōng sī 营业额yíng yè é yíng yè é 超过chāo guò chāo guò 11 1 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 税务shuì wù shuì wù 信息xìn xī xìn xī dàn dàn 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng zài zài 20152015 2015 nián nián 1010 10 yuè yuè 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào qián qián jiāng jiāng 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng shì shì 违反wéi fǎn wéi fǎn 税收shuì shōu shuì shōu 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 随后suí hòu suí hòu huā huā le le 数年shù nián shù nián 时间shí jiān shí jiān 试图shì tú shì tú yīn yīn 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì ér ér wèi wèi 成功chéng gōng chéng gōng 恢复huī fù huī fù 这一zhè yī zhè yī 门槛mén kǎn mén kǎn
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng zài zài 面临miàn lín miàn lín 商业界shāng yè jiè shāng yè jiè 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì huò huò 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn shí shí dōu dōu 难以nán yǐ nán yǐ 兑现duì xiàn duì xiàn 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò
** * ** * 核心hé xīn hé xīn 问题wèn tí wèn tí ** * ** *
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 明确míng què míng què 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè 然后rán hòu rán hòu zài zài 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 实施shí shī shí shī de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng xià xià 放弃fàng qì fàng qì le le
然而rán ér rán ér 退缩tuì suō tuì suō 似乎sì hū sì hū shì shì yóu yóu 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì // / 商业shāng yè shāng yè 压力yā lì yā lì 驱动qū dòng qū dòng de de ér ér fēi fēi 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 存在cún zài cún zài 根本gēn běn gēn běn 缺陷quē xiàn quē xiàn
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 存在cún zài cún zài 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 缺乏quē fá quē fá 说服力shuō fú lì shuō fú lì originaloriginal original de de 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn 本身běn shēn běn shēn gèng gèng 损害sǔn hài sǔn hài le le 信誉xìn yù xìn yù

属实

8.0

/ 10

联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng zài zài 20162016 2016 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè 作出zuò chū zuò chū le le 明确míng què míng què de de 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 一个yí gè yí gè 受益shòu yì shòu yì 所有权suǒ yǒu quán suǒ yǒu quán 登记册dēng jì cè dēng jì cè 帮助bāng zhù bāng zhù 打击dǎ jī dǎ jī 避税bì shuì bì shuì 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi
The Coalition made an explicit public commitment in April 2016 to establish a beneficial ownership register to help combat tax avoidance.
gāi gāi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò zài zài 20172017 2017 nián nián de de 官方guān fāng guān fāng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 计划jì huà jì huà zhōng zhōng 再次zài cì zài cì 得到dé dào dé dào 确认què rèn què rèn
This commitment was reaffirmed in official government plans through 2017.
dào dào 20192019 2019 nián nián 22 2 yuè yuè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 完全wán quán wán quán 放弃fàng qì fàng qì le le gāi gāi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 作出zuò chū zuò chū guò guò 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn yǒu yǒu OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer 声明shēng míng shēng míng de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
By February 2019, the government abandoned the commitment entirely, with Treasury claiming no commitment had ever been made despite direct contradictory evidence of O'Dwyer's announcement [1].
这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí de de yǒu yǒu 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 记录jì lù jì lù de de 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò
This is a genuine, documented broken promise. **Why not "Partially True"?** The claim is straightforward and factually accurate: a promise was made and broken.
** * ** * 为何wèi hé wèi hé 不是bú shì bú shì "" " 部分bù fèn bù fèn 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí "" "
There's no ambiguity about whether a commitment existed - it was explicitly and publicly announced.
** * ** *
The only complexity is around the *reasons* for the backdown, which the claim doesn't specify.
gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 简单明了jiǎn dān míng liǎo jiǎn dān míng liǎo qiě qiě 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 作出zuò chū zuò chū le le 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò yòu yòu 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi le le
The claim makes no statements about causes, only that the promise was broken, which is demonstrably true.
关于guān yú guān yú 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 存在cún zài cún zài 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 任何rèn hé rèn hé 模糊mó hú mó hú zhī zhī chù chù shì shì 明确míng què míng què 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 宣布xuān bù xuān bù de de
唯一wéi yī wéi yī de de 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 在于zài yú zài yú 退缩tuì suō tuì suō de de ** * 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn ** * ér ér gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 未作wèi zuò wèi zuò 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 说明shuō míng shuō míng
gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu jiù jiù 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn 发表声明fā biǎo shēng míng fā biǎo shēng míng zhǐ zhǐ 说明shuō míng shuō míng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò bèi bèi 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi le le 这是zhè shì zhè shì 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng de de 事实shì shí shì shí

📚 来源与引用 (4)

  1. 1
    Coalition abandons plan for register to help beat tax avoidance

    Coalition abandons plan for register to help beat tax avoidance

    Despite explicit promises, Treasury says there was never any commitment to establish beneficial ownership register

    the Guardian
  2. 2
    theguardian.com

    Coalition to create public register to reveal true owners of shell companies

    Theguardian

  3. 3
    Coalition pledge to crack down on tax avoidance achieves almost nothing in three years

    Coalition pledge to crack down on tax avoidance achieves almost nothing in three years

    There seem to be no plans to legislate a public registry of beneficial ownership of shell companies before the election

    the Guardian
  4. 4
    Labor to revisit tax change exploited by Australia's biggest private companies

    Labor to revisit tax change exploited by Australia's biggest private companies

    Shadow treasurer Chris Bowen says Labor will push for reform and if the Senate does not support it ALP will take it to the election

    the Guardian

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。