部分属实

评分: 6.0/10

Coalition
C0260

声明内容

“将寻求庇护者的经济支持资金削减8700万澳元。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng zhǐ zhǐ de de shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 支持zhī chí zhī chí 资金zī jīn zī jīn
The claim refers to cuts to financial support for asylum seekers under the Coalition government.
难民nàn mín nàn mín 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 分析fēn xī fēn xī 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 支持zhī chí zhī chí 资金zī jīn zī jīn bèi bèi 大幅dà fú dà fú 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Refugee Council's budget analysis confirms that asylum seeker support funding has been dramatically reduced over the Coalition's period in government [1].
根据gēn jù gēn jù 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 难民nàn mín nàn mín 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì de de 数据shù jù shù jù 用于yòng yú yòng yú xiàng xiàng 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 提供tí gōng tí gōng 经济援助jīng jì yuán zhù jīng jì yuán zhù de de 身份shēn fèn shēn fèn 解决jiě jué jiě jué 支持zhī chí zhī chí 服务fú wù fú wù SRSSSRSS SRSS 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù zài zài 20152015 2015 -- - 1616 16 nián nián zhì zhì 随后suí hòu suí hòu 几年jǐ nián jǐ nián 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān bèi bèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn le le yuē yuē 95%95% 95% cóng cóng 33 3 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo dào dào 20222022 2022 -- - 2323 23 年度nián dù nián dù de de jǐn jǐn 15001500 1500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
According to the Refugee Council of Australia, spending on the Status Resolution Support Services (SRSS) program—which provided financial assistance to people seeking asylum—was cut by approximately 95% between 2015-16 and subsequent years, from $300 million to just $15 million by 2022-23 [1].
澳大利亚广播公司ào dà lì yà guǎng bō gōng sī ào dà lì yà guǎng bō gōng sī ABCABC ABC de de 调查diào chá diào chá 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí le le zhè zhè 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn 报道bào dào bào dào chēng chēng "" " zài zài 过去guò qù guò qù 1010 10 nián nián zhōng zhōng SRSSSRSS SRSS 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn bèi bèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn le le 95%95% 95% "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The ABC News investigation corroborates this, reporting that "In the last 10 years, the funding has been cut by 95 per cent to the SRSS program" [2].
20182018 2018 nián nián zài zài 内政部长nèi zhèng bù zhǎng nèi zhèng bù zhǎng PeterPeter Peter DuttonDutton Dutton 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo xià xià de de CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 缩小suō xiǎo suō xiǎo le le SRSSSRSS SRSS de de 资格zī gé zī gé 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā le le 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú bìng bìng duì duì 学习xué xí xué xí xiàng xiàng 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 汇款huì kuǎn huì kuǎn 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù le le 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
In 2018, the Coalition government under Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton narrowed the eligibility criteria for SRSS, increasing documentation requirements and introducing restrictions on studying and sending money overseas [2].
寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 报告bào gào bào gào chēng chēng 20182018 2018 nián nián SRSSSRSS SRSS 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 支持zhī chí zhī chí le le 超过chāo guò chāo guò 1212 12 ,, , 000000 000 rén rén yuē yuē zhàn zhàn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 人口rén kǒu rén kǒu de de 20%20% 20% dàn dàn dào dào 20232023 2023 nián nián 66 6 yuè yuè 这一zhè yī zhè yī 数字shù zì shù zì 已降yǐ jiàng yǐ jiàng zhì zhì jǐn jǐn 11 1 ,, , 541541 541 rén rén yuē yuē zhàn zhàn 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 人口rén kǒu rén kǒu de de 2%2% 2% [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The Asylum Seekers Centre reported that in 2018, the SRSS program supported more than 12,000 people (about 20% of people seeking asylum in Australia), but by June 2023 this had fallen to just 1,541 people (approximately 2% of the asylum seeker population) [2].
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng zhōng zhōng 提到tí dào tí dào de de "" " 87008700 8700 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán "" " 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 数字shù zì shù zì 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 来源lái yuán lái yuán 独立dú lì dú lì 核实hé shí hé shí
However, the specific figure of "$87 million" mentioned in the claim could not be independently verified through available sources.
gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 似乎sì hū sì hū 要么yào me yào me 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 要么yào me yào me zhǐ zhǐ de de shì shì 特定tè dìng tè dìng de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 措施cuò shī cuò shī 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 指向zhǐ xiàng zhǐ xiàng zǒng zǒng 计数jì shù jì shù 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán de de gèng gèng 大规模dà guī mó dà guī mó 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn
The claim appears to be either incomplete or referring to a specific budget measure, as the broader evidence points to much larger cuts totaling hundreds of millions of dollars.

缺失背景

gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 忽略hū lüè hū lüè le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 因素yīn sù yīn sù
The claim omits several important contextual factors: **1.
** * ** * 11 1 .. . 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 陈述chén shù chén shù de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu shì shì 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 权利quán lì quán lì de de rén rén 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi bèi bèi 期望qī wàng qī wàng 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò bìng bìng 自食其力zì shí qí lì zì shí qí lì ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 依赖yī lài yī lài 福利fú lì fú lì [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
Policy Rationale:** The Coalition government's stated rationale was that people with work rights should be expected to work and support themselves rather than rely on welfare [3].
zhè zhè bèi bèi 明确míng què míng què 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù wèi wèi jiāng jiāng SRSSSRSS SRSS "" " cóng cóng 福利fú lì fú lì 转向zhuǎn xiàng zhuǎn xiàng "" " 身份shēn fèn shēn fèn 解决jiě jué jiě jué [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
This was explicitly framed as shifting the SRSS "away from welfare" toward status resolution [2]. **2.
** * ** * 22 2 .. . 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 延续yán xù yán xù ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 20182018 2018 nián nián 推出tuī chū tuī chū de de 资格zī gé zī gé 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì yóu yóu 随后suí hòu suí hòu 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ zài zài 移民yí mín yí mín 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng AndrewAndrew Andrew GilesGiles Giles 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo xià xià 继续jì xù jì xù 维持wéi chí wéi chí 延续yán xù yán xù le le 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Bipartisan Continuation:** The 2018 eligibility restrictions introduced by the Coalition were maintained by the subsequent Labor government under Andrew Giles, continuing the restrictive approach [2].
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 获得huò dé huò dé le le 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān de de "" " CoalitionCoalition Coalition 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn "" " 叙事xù shì xù shì suǒ suǒ 暗示àn shì àn shì de de gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 支持zhī chí zhī chí
This suggests the policy has broader political support than a simple "Coalition cut" narrative implies. **3.
** * ** * 33 3 .. . 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù de de 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng ** * ** * gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 区分qū fēn qū fēn 不同bù tóng bù tóng de de 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 支持zhī chí zhī chí 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 解释jiě shì jiě shì SRSSSRSS SRSS 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 解决jiě jué jiě jué 移民yí mín yí mín 身份shēn fèn shēn fèn de de 人员rén yuán rén yuán ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 那些nà xiē nà xiē 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 获得huò dé huò dé 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 签证qiān zhèng qiān zhèng de de 人员rén yuán rén yuán 后者hòu zhě hòu zhě 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 获得huò dé huò dé 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 福利金fú lì jīn fú lì jīn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
Asylum Seeker Program Complexity:** The claim doesn't distinguish between different asylum seeker support programs or explain that the SRSS specifically targets people in the process of resolving their immigration status, as opposed to those who have already been granted protection visas (who generally have access to standard welfare payments) [3]. **4.
** * ** * 44 4 .. . 历史背景lì shǐ bèi jǐng lì shǐ bèi jǐng ** * ** * zài zài 20132013 2013 nián nián 之前zhī qián zhī qián de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 时期shí qī shí qī SRSSSRSS SRSS 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 获得huò dé huò dé 资金zī jīn zī jīn bìng bìng 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de 变化biàn huà biàn huà 大幅dà fú dà fú 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo le le 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Historical Context:** Under the Labor government prior to 2013, the SRSS was also funded and operating, though the Coalition's changes significantly reduced its scope [2].

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 难民nàn mín nàn mín 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ** * ** * 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú de de 难民nàn mín nàn mín 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī
**Refugee Council of Australia [1]:** A mainstream refugee advocacy organization.
虽然suī rán suī rán 持有chí yǒu chí yǒu 明确míng què míng què de de 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 支持zhī chí zhī chí dàn dàn 预算yù suàn yù suàn 分析fēn xī fēn xī bèi bèi ABCABC ABC děng děng 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 并且bìng qiě bìng qiě 基于jī yú jī yú 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 预算yù suàn yù suàn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn
While it takes a clear advocacy position (opposing cuts to asylum seeker support), its budget analysis is cited by mainstream media including the ABC and is based on publicly available government budget documents.
gāi gāi 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī de de 分析fēn xī fēn xī 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi shì shì 事实shì shí shì shí 可靠kě kào kě kào de de 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 它们tā men tā men 得出dé chū dé chū 批评性pī píng xìng pī píng xìng 结论jié lùn jié lùn
The organization's analyses are generally regarded as factually reliable even when they reach critical conclusions.
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 明确míng què míng què 支持zhī chí zhī chí 难民nàn mín nàn mín 支持zhī chí zhī chí 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 危害wēi hài wēi hài ér ér 非政府fēi zhèng fǔ fēi zhèng fǔ 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu
However, the organization's position is decidedly pro-refugee support, so its framing emphasizes harms rather than government justifications. **ABC News [2]:** Australia's national public broadcaster with a reputation for balanced journalism.
** * ** * ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国家guó jiā guó jiā 公共广播gōng gòng guǎng bō gōng gòng guǎng bō 机构jī gòu jī gòu 平衡píng héng píng héng 报道bào dào bào dào 著称zhù chēng zhù chēng
The ABC article, while sympathetic to asylum seekers' plight, includes government statements explaining the policy rationale and presents specific data about participant numbers and eligibility changes.
ABCABC ABC de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 虽然suī rán suī rán duì duì 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě de de 困境kùn jìng kùn jìng 表示同情biǎo shì tóng qíng biǎo shì tóng qíng dàn dàn 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 解释jiě shì jiě shì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng bìng bìng 提供tí gōng tí gōng le le 有关yǒu guān yǒu guān 参与者cān yù zhě cān yù zhě 人数rén shù rén shù 资格zī gé zī gé 变化biàn huà biàn huà de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 数据shù jù shù jù
This source is credible and relatively balanced.
这个zhè ge zhè ge 来源lái yuán lái yuán shì shì 可信kě xìn kě xìn de de qiě qiě 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 平衡píng héng píng héng de de
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** Yes, with important nuance.
** * ** *
The Labor government (2007-2013) under Prime Ministers Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard operated the SRSS program at a much higher funding level [2].
shì shì de de dàn dàn yǒu yǒu 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 细微差别xì wēi chā bié xì wēi chā bié
However, they also pursued offshore processing of asylum seekers, which the Coalition later expanded [4]. **Critically, when Labor returned to government in 2022 under Anthony Albanese, it did NOT restore the funding levels or eligibility breadth that existed before the Coalition's cuts.** The ABC News article (August 2023) explicitly states: "The eligibility changes, which have been maintained by the Albanese Labor government, mean documentation requirements have increased and strict rules around studying and sending money overseas have been put in place" [2].
20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 nián nián de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ zài zài KevinKevin Kevin RuddRudd Rudd JuliaJulia Julia GillardGillard Gillard 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 下以xià yǐ xià yǐ 高得gāo dé gāo dé duō duō de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò SRSSSRSS SRSS 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
This indicates that the Coalition's policy approach to restricting asylum seeker support has achieved bipartisan acceptance, with Labor choosing to maintain these restrictions rather than reverse them, despite having campaigned on more refugee-friendly policies.
然而rán ér rán ér 他们tā men tā men 推行tuī xíng tuī xíng le le 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě de de 离岸lí àn lí àn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè CoalitionCoalition Coalition 后来hòu lái hòu lái 扩大kuò dà kuò dà le le zhè zhè 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
** * ** * 关键在于guān jiàn zài yú guān jiàn zài yú dāng dāng LaborLabor Labor 20222022 2022 nián nián zài zài AnthonyAnthony Anthony AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo xià xià 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng shí shí bìng bìng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 恢复huī fù huī fù CoalitionCoalition Coalition 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn qián qián de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng huò huò 资格zī gé zī gé 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi
** * ** * ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 20232023 2023 nián nián 88 8 yuè yuè 明确指出míng què zhǐ chū míng què zhǐ chū "" " 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 资格zī gé zī gé 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng yóu yóu AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 继续jì xù jì xù 维持wéi chí wéi chí 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā bìng bìng duì duì 学习xué xí xué xí xiàng xiàng 海外hǎi wài hǎi wài 汇款huì kuǎn huì kuǎn 实施shí shī shí shī le le 严格yán gé yán gé 规定guī dìng guī dìng "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng CoalitionCoalition Coalition 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 支持zhī chí zhī chí de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 获得huò dé huò dé 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu LaborLabor Labor 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 维持wéi chí wéi chí 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì ér ér fēi fēi 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo 它们tā men tā men 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn LaborLabor Labor zài zài 竞选jìng xuǎn jìng xuǎn zhōng zhōng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ gèng gèng 友好yǒu hǎo yǒu hǎo de de 难民nàn mín nàn mín 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** *
**Coalition's Position and Rationale:** The Coalition government's approach was framed around three principles: (1) encouraging self-sufficiency among people with work rights, (2) targeting limited resources to those most in need of assistance, and (3) preventing the SRSS from becoming a de facto welfare program [3].
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 围绕wéi rào wéi rào 三个sān gè sān gè 原则yuán zé yuán zé 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 11 1 鼓励gǔ lì gǔ lì 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 权利quán lì quán lì de de rén rén 实现shí xiàn shí xiàn 自给自足zì jǐ zì zú zì jǐ zì zú 22 2 jiāng jiāng 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 资源zī yuán zī yuán 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì zuì zuì 需要xū yào xū yào 援助yuán zhù yuán zhù de de rén rén 33 3 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ SRSSSRSS SRSS 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng de de 福利fú lì fú lì 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The government argued that people granted work rights should be expected to use them rather than receive government payments [3]. **Evidence of Harm:** The ABC's 2023 investigation documented real hardship resulting from the cuts, with asylum seekers (including those with valid visas) facing homelessness, food insecurity, and dependence on charity [2].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 获得huò dé huò dé 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 权利quán lì quán lì de de rén rén 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi bèi bèi 期望qī wàng qī wàng 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 权利quán lì quán lì ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 付款fù kuǎn fù kuǎn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The Asylum Seekers Centre reported a 21% increase in crisis referrals (people homeless or imminently homeless) due to the funding restrictions [2].
** * ** * 危害wēi hài wēi hài 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù ** * ** *
These impacts are well-documented and significant. **Systemic Context:** Importantly, both major political parties have accepted the Coalition's restrictive approach to asylum seeker support.
ABCABC ABC zài zài 20232023 2023 nián nián de de 调查diào chá diào chá 记录jì lù jì lù le le 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 造成zào chéng zào chéng de de 实际困难shí jì kùn nán shí jì kùn nán 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 持有chí yǒu chí yǒu 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào 签证qiān zhèng qiān zhèng zhě zhě 面临miàn lín miàn lín 无家可归wú jiā kě guī wú jiā kě guī 食品shí pǐn shí pǐn 安全ān quán ān quán 依赖yī lài yī lài 慈善机构cí shàn jī gòu cí shàn jī gòu de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
When Labor returned to government in 2022, despite having opposed the Coalition's asylum seeker policies, they maintained the 2018 eligibility restrictions introduced by Peter Dutton rather than restoring previous funding levels [2].
寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 报告bào gào bào gào chēng chēng 由于yóu yú yóu yú 资金zī jīn zī jīn 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 危机wēi jī wēi jī 转介zhuǎn jiè zhuǎn jiè 无家可归wú jiā kě guī wú jiā kě guī huò huò 即将jí jiāng jí jiāng 无家可归wú jiā kě guī wú jiā kě guī de de rén rén 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā le le 21%21% 21% [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
This suggests the restrictions reflect broader political consensus rather than uniquely Coalition ideology. **Comparison to Other Support Programs:** While cuts to asylum seeker support are severe, it's worth noting that Australia's mainstream welfare system (for citizens and permanent residents) has also seen real-term cuts and tightening of eligibility over the same period, though generally less dramatically.
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng yǒu yǒu 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 记录jì lù jì lù qiě qiě 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà
The asylum seeker support cuts are notably harsher than reductions to general welfare but fit within a broader pattern of welfare tightening across the system.
** * ** * 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** *
重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de shì shì 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng dōu dōu 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu le le CoalitionCoalition Coalition duì duì 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 支持zhī chí zhī chí de de 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ
dāng dāng LaborLabor Labor 20222022 2022 nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng shí shí 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 他们tā men tā men réng réng 维持wéi chí wéi chí le le PeterPeter Peter DuttonDutton Dutton 20182018 2018 nián nián 推出tuī chū tuī chū de de 资格zī gé zī gé 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì ér ér 不是bú shì bú shì 恢复huī fù huī fù 以前yǐ qián yǐ qián de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng de de shì shì gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 共识gòng shí gòng shí ér ér fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu de de 意识形态yì shí xíng tài yì shí xíng tài
** * ** * 其他qí tā qí tā 支持zhī chí zhī chí 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù de de 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào ** * ** *
虽然suī rán suī rán duì duì 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 支持zhī chí zhī chí de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn hěn hěn 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng dàn dàn 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì de de shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 福利fú lì fú lì 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 公民gōng mín gōng mín 永久yǒng jiǔ yǒng jiǔ 居民jū mín jū mín zài zài 同一tóng yī tóng yī 时期shí qī shí qī 经历jīng lì jīng lì le le 实际shí jì shí jì 价值jià zhí jià zhí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 资格zī gé zī gé 收紧shōu jǐn shōu jǐn 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 幅度fú dù fú dù jiào jiào xiǎo xiǎo
duì duì 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 支持zhī chí zhī chí de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 明显míng xiǎn míng xiǎn 普通pǔ tōng pǔ tōng 福利fú lì fú lì 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 严厉yán lì yán lì dàn dàn 符合fú hé fú hé 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 福利fú lì fú lì 收紧shōu jǐn shōu jǐn de de gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 模式mó shì mó shì

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 经济jīng jì jīng jì 支持zhī chí zhī chí 资金zī jīn zī jīn 这一zhè yī zhè yī 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de
The claim is factually accurate that the Coalition government cut funding for financial support to asylum seekers.
然而rán ér rán ér zài zài 具体性jù tǐ xìng jù tǐ xìng 完整性wán zhěng xìng wán zhěng xìng 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng
However, it is misleading in its specificity and incompleteness: **Why it's partially true:** The Coalition did implement major cuts to asylum seeker support funding (95% reduction overall, from $300 million to $15 million), and the 2018 eligibility restrictions significantly reduced the number of people receiving support [1][2]. **Why it's misleading:** The specific figure of "$87 million" cannot be verified and may refer to a single budget measure rather than the full scope of cuts.
** * ** * 为何wèi hé wèi hé 部分bù fèn bù fèn 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí duì duì 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 支持zhī chí zhī chí 资金zī jīn zī jīn 实施shí shī shí shī le le 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 总体zǒng tǐ zǒng tǐ 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 95%95% 95% cóng cóng 33 3 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 降至jiàng zhì jiàng zhì 15001500 1500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 20182018 2018 nián nián de de 资格zī gé zī gé 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo le le 获得huò dé huò dé 支持zhī chí zhī chí de de 人数rén shù rén shù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
More importantly, the claim frames this as uniquely a Coalition action, when in fact Labor has maintained these restrictions since returning to government in 2022, indicating broader political acceptance of the policy approach [2]. **Key issue:** The claim omits that this policy approach enjoys bipartisan support in its current form, with Labor choosing to continue rather than reverse the Coalition's restrictions.
** * ** * 为何wèi hé wèi hé 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng ** * ** * 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ de de "" " 87008700 8700 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán "" " 数字shù zì shù zì 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 核实hé shí hé shí 可能kě néng kě néng zhǐ zhǐ de de shì shì 单一dān yī dān yī 预算yù suàn yù suàn 措施cuò shī cuò shī ér ér fēi fēi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn de de 全部quán bù quán bù 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi
This is crucial context for understanding whether the cuts represent a partisan policy choice or a broader shift in asylum seeker support policy.
gèng gèng 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào de de shì shì gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng jiāng jiāng 描述miáo shù miáo shù wèi wèi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ér ér 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng LaborLabor Labor 20222022 2022 nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 一直yì zhí yì zhí 维持wéi chí wéi chí 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 获得huò dé huò dé le le gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 关键问题guān jiàn wèn tí guān jiàn wèn tí ** * ** * gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 忽略hū lüè hū lüè le le zhè zhè 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ zài zài 当前dāng qián dāng qián 形式xíng shì xíng shì xià xià 享有xiǎng yǒu xiǎng yǒu kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 支持zhī chí zhī chí LaborLabor Labor 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 继续jì xù jì xù ér ér fēi fēi 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì
zhè zhè 对于duì yú duì yú 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn shì shì 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 还是hái shì hái shì 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù zhě zhě 支持zhī chí zhī chí 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè de de gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 转变zhuǎn biàn zhuǎn biàn 至关重要zhì guān zhòng yào zhì guān zhòng yào

📚 来源与引用 (3)

  1. 1
    refugeecouncil.org.au

    refugeecouncil.org.au

    What are the implications of the Federal Budget for refugees and peope seeking asylum? This summary sets out the implications for Australian refugee policy.

    Refugee Council of Australia
  2. 2
    abc.net.au

    abc.net.au

    Asylum seekers say they want to live with dignity and contribute to the country that has taken them in, but declining government assistance makes that impossible. 

    Abc Net
  3. 3
    aph.gov.au

    aph.gov.au

    Key issue This year (2022) has seen global human displacement rise to record levels. Australia offers resettlement to refugees through the UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees), but the number of places available under this program remains relatively low, parti

    Aph Gov

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。