属实

评分: 8.0/10

Coalition
C0223

声明内容

“通过声称减税将在相关立法通过之前就开始实施而进行虚假陈述。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

关于guān yú guān yú 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ ScottScott Scott MorrisonMorrison Morrison 就jiù jiù 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 时机shí jī shí jī 做出zuò chū zuò chū 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 保证bǎo zhèng bǎo zhèng 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng ** * ** * 实质shí zhì shí zhì 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ** * ** * 。。 。
The core claim that Prime Minister Scott Morrison made false assurances about tax cut timing is **substantively accurate**.
20192019 2019 年nián nián ,, , MorrisonMorrison Morrison 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 价值jià zhí jià zhí 11 1 ,, , 080080 080 澳元ào yuán ào yuán 的de de 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 将jiāng jiāng 于yú yú 20192019 2019 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 11 1 日rì rì 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
In 2019, Morrison announced that tax cuts worth $1,080 would take effect on July 1, 2019 [1].
他tā tā 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 税务局shuì wù jú shuì wù jú (( ( ATOATO ATO )) ) 在zài zài 议会yì huì yì huì 通过tōng guò tōng guò 所suǒ suǒ 需xū xū 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 之前zhī qián zhī qián 以yǐ yǐ "" " 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng "" " 方式fāng shì fāng shì 实施shí shī shí shī [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
He claimed these cuts could be delivered "administratively" by the Australian Tax Office (ATO) before Parliament had passed the required legislation [2].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 税务局shuì wù jú shuì wù jú 发布fā bù fā bù 了le le 一份yī fèn yī fèn 官方guān fāng guān fāng 声明shēng míng shēng míng ,, , 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 驳斥bó chì bó chì 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ,, , 声明shēng míng shēng míng 称chēng chēng :: : "" " ATOATO ATO 需要xū yào xū yào 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 支持zhī chí zhī chí 才能cái néng cái néng 按àn àn 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 的de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng 实施shí shī shí shī 该gāi gāi 措施cuò shī cuò shī ,, , 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 手段shǒu duàn shǒu duàn 实施shí shī shí shī "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
However, the Australian Tax Office issued an official statement directly contradicting this claim, stating: "The ATO requires law in order to deliver the measure as announced, and as such cannot be delivered administratively" [3].
《《 《 20192019 2019 年nián nián 财政法cái zhèng fǎ cái zhèng fǎ 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn (( ( 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 让ràng ràng 工薪阶层gōng xīn jiē céng gōng xīn jiē céng 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 更gèng gèng 多duō duō 收入shōu rù shōu rù )) ) 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 》》 》 直到zhí dào zhí dào 20192019 2019 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 33 3 -- - 44 4 日才rì cái rì cái 由yóu yóu 议会yì huì yì huì 通过tōng guò tōng guò —— — —— — 比bǐ bǐ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 的de de 77 7 月yuè yuè 11 1 日rì rì 实施shí shī shí shī 日期rì qī rì qī 晚wǎn wǎn 了le le 33 3 -- - 44 4 天tiān tiān [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Relief So Working Australians Keep More Of Their Money) Bill 2019 was not passed by Parliament until July 3-4, 2019 - three to four days after the promised July 1 implementation date [4].
关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : MorrisonMorrison Morrison 本人běn rén běn rén 将jiāng jiāng 20192019 2019 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 2828 28 日rì rì 定为dìng wèi dìng wèi 令状lìng zhuàng lìng zhuàng 返还fǎn huán fǎn huán 日期rì qī rì qī (( ( 议会yì huì yì huì 复会fù huì fù huì 日期rì qī rì qī )) ) ,, , 这zhè zhè 使得shǐ de shǐ de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 在zài zài 77 7 月yuè yuè 11 1 日前rì qián rì qián 通过tōng guò tōng guò 在zài zài 数学shù xué shù xué 上shàng shàng 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 不bù bù 可能kě néng kě néng [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The crucial context: Morrison himself set June 28, 2019 as the return of writs date (Parliament's return to sitting), which made it mathematically impossible for legislation to pass before July 1 [5].
这一zhè yī zhè yī 日程安排rì chéng ān pái rì chéng ān pái 决定jué dìng jué dìng 是shì shì 他tā tā 签署qiān shǔ qiān shǔ 致zhì zhì 总督zǒng dū zǒng dū 的de de 信函xìn hán xìn hán 中zhōng zhōng 做出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de 。。 。
This scheduling decision was made in his signed letter to the Governor-General.

缺失背景

虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 在zài zài MorrisonMorrison Morrison 就jiù jiù 时机shí jī shí jī 做出zuò chū zuò chū 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 陈述chén shù chén shù 这一zhè yī zhè yī 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 正确zhèng què zhèng què 的de de ,, , 但dàn dàn 有yǒu yǒu 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 因素yīn sù yīn sù 值得zhí de zhí de 关注guān zhù guān zhù :: :
While the claim is factually correct that Morrison made false statements about timing, several important contextual factors deserve attention: 1. **Brevity of the Delay:** The actual implementation was delayed by only 3-4 days, not weeks or months [4].
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 延迟时间yán chí shí jiān yán chí shí jiān 短暂duǎn zàn duǎn zàn :: : ** * ** * 实际shí jì shí jì 实施shí shī shí shī 仅jǐn jǐn 延迟yán chí yán chí 了le le 33 3 -- - 44 4 天tiān tiān ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 数周shù zhōu shù zhōu 或huò huò 数月shù yuè shù yuè [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The tax cuts were ultimately delivered as promised, just with a minor administrative delay while legislation progressed through Parliament. 2. **Historical Precedent Argument:** Morrison claimed that past governments had delivered tax cuts "administratively" without legislation when there was bipartisan support [6].
减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 按àn àn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 实施shí shī shí shī ,, , 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 在zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 议会yì huì yì huì 期间qī jiān qī jiān 出现chū xiàn chū xiàn 了le le 短暂duǎn zàn duǎn zàn 的de de 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 延迟yán chí yán chí 。。 。
While this claim proved incorrect in the ATO's assessment, it shows Morrison believed he had historical precedent, though this belief was mistaken. 3. **Political Context:** This occurred during the 2019 election campaign (May 18 election), when Morrison made these assurances to voters.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 先例xiān lì xiān lì 论点lùn diǎn lùn diǎn :: : ** * ** * MorrisonMorrison Morrison 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 过去guò qù guò qù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 获得huò dé huò dé 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 曾céng céng 通过tōng guò tōng guò "" " 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng "" " 手段shǒu duàn shǒu duàn 在zài zài 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 实施shí shī shí shī 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The election timing pressured the government to demonstrate quick delivery of the promised tax cuts [1]. 4. **Ultimate Legislative Passage:** Despite the timing discrepancy, the legislation ultimately passed with broad support.
虽然suī rán suī rán 这一zhè yī zhè yī 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 在zài zài ATOATO ATO 的de de 评估píng gū píng gū 中zhōng zhōng 被bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 是shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de ,, , 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng MorrisonMorrison Morrison 相信xiāng xìn xiāng xìn 他tā tā 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 先例xiān lì xiān lì ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 这一zhè yī zhè yī 信念xìn niàn xìn niàn 是shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de 。。 。
Labor, despite criticizing the timing issues, ultimately voted FOR the tax cuts [7].
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 这zhè zhè 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 20192019 2019 年nián nián 大选dà xuǎn dà xuǎn 竞选jìng xuǎn jìng xuǎn 期间qī jiān qī jiān (( ( 55 5 月yuè yuè 1818 18 日rì rì 大选dà xuǎn dà xuǎn )) ) ,, , 当时dāng shí dāng shí MorrisonMorrison Morrison 向xiàng xiàng 选民xuǎn mín xuǎn mín 做出zuò chū zuò chū 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 保证bǎo zhèng bǎo zhèng 。。 。
Only the Greens voted against. 5. **Electoral Scheduling Impact:** Morrison's decision to schedule the June 28 return of writs meant Parliament would not sit until after July 1, ensuring the timing problem would exist regardless of legislative processing speed.
选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 时机shí jī shí jī 给gěi gěi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 带来dài lái dài lái 压力yā lì yā lì ,, , 需要xū yào xū yào 展示zhǎn shì zhǎn shì 快速kuài sù kuài sù 兑现duì xiàn duì xiàn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 的de de 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 通过tōng guò tōng guò :: : ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 存在cún zài cún zài 时间shí jiān shí jiān 差异chā yì chā yì ,, , 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 获得huò dé huò dé 广泛支持guǎng fàn zhī chí guǎng fàn zhī chí 通过tōng guò tōng guò 。。 。
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 虽然suī rán suī rán 批评pī píng pī píng 时机shí jī shí jī 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 但dàn dàn 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 投票tóu piào tóu piào 支持zhī chí zhī chí 了le le 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 绿党lǜ dǎng lǜ dǎng 投tóu tóu 反对票fǎn duì piào fǎn duì piào 。。 。
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 日程rì chéng rì chéng 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng :: : ** * ** * MorrisonMorrison Morrison 决定jué dìng jué dìng 将令jiàng lìng jiàng lìng 状zhuàng zhuàng 返还fǎn huán fǎn huán 日期rì qī rì qī 定于dìng yú dìng yú 66 6 月yuè yuè 2828 28 日rì rì ,, , 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 议会yì huì yì huì 将jiāng jiāng 到dào dào 77 7 月yuè yuè 11 1 日后rì hòu rì hòu 才cái cái 复会fù huì fù huì ,, , 这zhè zhè 确保què bǎo què bǎo 了le le 无论wú lùn wú lùn 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 处理速度chǔ lǐ sù dù chǔ lǐ sù dù 如何rú hé rú hé ,, , 都dōu dōu 会huì huì 出现chū xiàn chū xiàn 时机shí jī shí jī 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * TheThe The NewNew New DailyDaily Daily (( ( 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán )) ) :: : ** * ** * TheThe The NewNew New DailyDaily Daily 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 与yǔ yǔ 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 阵营zhèn yíng zhèn yíng 有yǒu yǒu 关联guān lián guān lián 的de de 偏左piān zuǒ piān zuǒ 新闻媒体xīn wén méi tǐ xīn wén méi tǐ [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
**The New Daily (Original Source):** The New Daily is a left-leaning news outlet with ties to the Australian Labor Party ecosystem [8].
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 就jiù jiù 在zài zài MorrisonMorrison Morrison 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 时机shí jī shí jī 陈述chén shù chén shù 这一zhè yī zhè yī 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 上shàng shàng ,, , 其qí qí 报道bào dào bào dào 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ,, , 并bìng bìng 得到dé dào dé dào 了le le 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò ATOATO ATO 自身zì shēn zì shēn 官方guān fāng guān fāng 声明shēng míng shēng míng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 在内zài nèi zài nèi 的de de 独立dú lì dú lì 来源lái yuán lái yuán 的de de 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 。。 。
However, on this specific claim about Morrison's tax cut timing statements, the reporting is factually accurate and well-corroborated by independent sources including the ATO's own official statement [3].
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 记录jì lù jì lù 了le le MorrisonMorrison Morrison 关于guān yú guān yú "" " 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng "" " 实施shí shī shí shī 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 的de de 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 保证bǎo zhèng bǎo zhèng 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí ATOATO ATO 对此duì cǐ duì cǐ 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 的de de 驳斥bó chì bó chì 。。 。
The article accurately documents Morrison's false assurance about "administrative" delivery and the ATO's contradiction of this claim.
虽然suī rán suī rán TheThe The NewNew New DailyDaily Daily 的de de 整体zhěng tǐ zhěng tǐ 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 偏向piān xiàng piān xiàng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 且qiě qiě 对duì duì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 持chí chí 批评pī píng pī píng 态度tài dù tài dù ,, , 但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 中zhōng zhōng 关于guān yú guān yú MorrisonMorrison Morrison 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 可kě kě 在zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 前qián qián 通过tōng guò tōng guò 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 手段shǒu duàn shǒu duàn 实施shí shī shí shī 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 事实shì shí shì shí 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng ,, , 得到dé dào dé dào 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 机构jī gòu jī gòu (( ( ATOATO ATO )) ) 官方guān fāng guān fāng 声明shēng míng shēng míng 和hé hé 议会yì huì yì huì 记录jì lù jì lù [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 的de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí 。。 。
While The New Daily's overall editorial perspective is left-aligned and critical of the Coalition, the specific factual claim in this article - that Morrison falsely claimed administrative delivery before legislation passed - is supported by official government agency statements (ATO) and parliamentary records [4].
这zhè zhè 区分qū fēn qū fēn 了le le 事实shì shí shì shí 准确性zhǔn què xìng zhǔn què xìng 与yǔ yǔ 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
This distinguishes factual accuracy from editorial framing.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Research conducted: "Labor government false tax cut timing claims", "Labor tax cuts announcement legislation timeline" **Finding:** No comparable instances found where a Labor government announced tax cuts would be implemented before legislation was passed, then made false claims about administrative delivery [7].
** * ** *
When Labor announced stage 3 tax cut modifications in January 2024, the implementation was properly aligned with legislation timing for July 1, 2024 [9].
研究yán jiū yán jiū 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng :: : "" " 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 时机shí jī shí jī 声明shēng míng shēng míng "" " 、、 、 "" " 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 时间shí jiān shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn "" "
Labor's 2024 cost-of-living tax cuts were announced with clear legislative timing aligned with implementation dates, avoiding the timing discrepancy Morrison created [9].
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : ** * ** * 未wèi wèi 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 有yǒu yǒu 在zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 前qián qián 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 将jiāng jiāng 实施shí shī shí shī ,, , 然后rán hòu rán hòu 就jiù jiù 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 实施shí shī shí shī 能力néng lì néng lì 做出zuò chū zuò chū 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 可比kě bǐ kě bǐ 案例àn lì àn lì [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
Labor did not make false claims about administrative delivery capacity.
当dāng dāng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 在zài zài 20242024 2024 年nián nián 11 1 月yuè yuè 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 第三阶段dì sān jiē duàn dì sān jiē duàn 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 时shí shí ,, , 实施shí shī shí shī 时间shí jiān shí jiān 与yǔ yǔ 20242024 2024 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 11 1 日rì rì 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 时间shí jiān shí jiān 适当shì dàng shì dàng 对齐duì qí duì qí [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
In terms of tax policy changes, Labor has been more cautious about timing announcements, ensuring legislative passage before announcing implementation dates to voters.
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 20242024 2024 年nián nián 的de de 生活shēng huó shēng huó 成本chéng běn chéng běn 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 在zài zài 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 时shí shí 与yǔ yǔ 实施shí shī shí shī 日期rì qī rì qī 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 了le le 明确míng què míng què 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 时间shí jiān shí jiān 安排ān pái ān pái ,, , 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 了le le MorrisonMorrison Morrison 造成zào chéng zào chéng 的de de 时间shí jiān shí jiān 差异chā yì chā yì [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
The specific failure - announcing implementation before legislation exists and falsely claiming administrative delivery is possible - appears unique to Morrison's 2019 tax cut handling.
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 就jiù jiù 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 实施shí shī shí shī 能力néng lì néng lì 做出zuò chū zuò chū 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 声明shēng míng shēng míng 。。 。
在zài zài 税收政策shuì shōu zhèng cè shuì shōu zhèng cè 变化biàn huà biàn huà 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn ,, , 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 在zài zài 时机shí jī shí jī 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 上shàng shàng 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 谨慎jǐn shèn jǐn shèn ,, , 确保què bǎo què bǎo 在zài zài 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 实施shí shī shí shī 日期rì qī rì qī 之前zhī qián zhī qián 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 已yǐ yǐ 通过tōng guò tōng guò ,, , 以yǐ yǐ 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 向xiàng xiàng 选民xuǎn mín xuǎn mín 做出zuò chū zuò chū 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 兑现duì xiàn duì xiàn 的de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 。。 。
这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 失误shī wù shī wù —— — —— — 在zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 存在cún zài cún zài 前qián qián 就jiù jiù 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 实施shí shī shí shī 并bìng bìng 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 实施shí shī shí shī 可行kě xíng kě xíng —— — —— — 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì MorrisonMorrison Morrison 20192019 2019 年nián nián 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi MorrisonMorrison Morrison 故意gù yì gù yì 就jiù jiù 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 时机shí jī shí jī 误导wù dǎo wù dǎo 选民xuǎn mín xuǎn mín ,, , 但dàn dàn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 的de de 辩护biàn hù biàn hù 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 。。 。
While critics argue Morrison deliberately misled voters about tax cut timing, the government's perspective offers limited defense.
MorrisonMorrison Morrison 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 他tā tā 遵循zūn xún zūn xún 了le le 通过tōng guò tōng guò "" " 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng "" " 手段shǒu duàn shǒu duàn 实施shí shī shí shī 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 的de de 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 先例xiān lì xiān lì ,, , 而ér ér ATOATO ATO 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 驳斥bó chì bó chì 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Morrison claimed he was following historical precedent for "administrative" delivery of tax cuts, a claim that the ATO directly contradicted [3].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 似乎sì hū sì hū 依赖yī lài yī lài 了le le 对duì duì ATOATO ATO 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 权限quán xiàn quán xiàn 的de de 过时guò shí guò shí 或huò huò 错误cuò wù cuò wù 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 。。 。
The government appeared to rely on outdated or incorrect understandings of ATO administrative authority.
关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 的de de 缓和huǎn hé huǎn hé 因素yīn sù yīn sù 是shì shì 延迟时间yán chí shí jiān yán chí shí jiān 很hěn hěn 短duǎn duǎn —— — —— — 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 实施shí shī shí shī (( ( 77 7 月yuè yuè 11 1 日rì rì )) ) 与yǔ yǔ 实际shí jì shí jì 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 通过tōng guò tōng guò (( ( 77 7 月yuè yuè 33 3 -- - 44 4 日rì rì )) ) 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 仅jǐn jǐn 相隔xiāng gé xiāng gé 33 3 -- - 44 4 天tiān tiān [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The key mitigating factor is that the delay was brief - only 3-4 days between promised implementation (July 1) and actual legislative passage (July 3-4) [4].
选民xuǎn mín xuǎn mín 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 收到shōu dào shōu dào 了le le 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 的de de 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 不是bú shì bú shì 在zài zài 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 的de de 确切què qiè què qiè 日期rì qī rì qī 。。 。
Voters received their promised tax cuts, though not on the exact date promised.
这比zhè bǐ zhè bǐ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 完全wán quán wán quán 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 或huò huò 推迟tuī chí tuī chí 数月shù yuè shù yuè 或huò huò 数年shù nián shù nián 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 要yào yào 小xiǎo xiǎo 。。 。
This is less problematic than, for example, a government abandoning a tax cut entirely or delaying it by months or years.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 保证bǎo zhèng bǎo zhèng 本身běn shēn běn shēn 仍然réng rán réng rán 存在cún zài cún zài 问题wèn tí wèn tí :: : MorrisonMorrison Morrison 明确míng què míng què 告诉gào sù gào sù 选民xuǎn mín xuǎn mín ,, , 在zài zài 议会yì huì yì huì 甚至shèn zhì shèn zhì 还hái hái 未wèi wèi 投票tóu piào tóu piào 之前zhī qián zhī qián ,, , 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 将jiāng jiāng 在zài zài 77 7 月yuè yuè 11 1 日rì rì 通过tōng guò tōng guò "" " 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng "" " 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 实施shí shī shí shī 。。 。
However, the false assurance itself remains problematic: Morrison told voters definitively that tax cuts would be delivered July 1 via "administrative" action before Parliament even voted.
根据gēn jù gēn jù ATOATO ATO 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] ,, , 这zhè zhè 被bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 是shì shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de 。。 。
This was demonstrably false according to the ATO [3].
议会yì huì yì huì 在zài zài 77 7 月yuè yuè 11 1 日后rì hòu rì hòu 迅速xùn sù xùn sù 通过tōng guò tōng guò 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 并bìng bìng 不能bù néng bù néng 追溯zhuī sù zhuī sù 性地xìng dì xìng dì 使shǐ shǐ 先前xiān qián xiān qián 的de de 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 保证bǎo zhèng bǎo zhèng 变为biàn wèi biàn wèi 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 。。 。
The fact that Parliament quickly passed legislation after July 1 does not retroactively make the prior false assurance truthful. **Key context:** Making false promises about government administrative capacity during an election campaign, even when the ultimate outcome is delivered within days, represents a credibility problem.
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng :: : ** * ** * 在zài zài 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 竞选jìng xuǎn jìng xuǎn 期间qī jiān qī jiān 就jiù jiù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 能力néng lì néng lì 做出zuò chū zuò chū 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ,, , 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ 在zài zài 数天shù tiān shù tiān 内nèi nèi 兑现duì xiàn duì xiàn ,, , 也yě yě 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 着zhe zhe 公信力gōng xìn lì gōng xìn lì 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
The Morrison government's own scheduling decisions (June 28 return of writs) created the timing problem, then the government falsely reassured voters that administrative delivery was possible when it was not.
MorrisonMorrison Morrison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 自身zì shēn zì shēn 的de de 日程安排rì chéng ān pái rì chéng ān pái 决定jué dìng jué dìng (( ( 66 6 月yuè yuè 2828 28 日rì rì 令状lìng zhuàng lìng zhuàng 返还fǎn huán fǎn huán )) ) 造成zào chéng zào chéng 了le le 时机shí jī shí jī 问题wèn tí wèn tí ,, , 然后rán hòu rán hòu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 地向dì xiàng dì xiàng 选民xuǎn mín xuǎn mín 保证bǎo zhèng bǎo zhèng 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 实施shí shī shí shī 是shì shì 可行kě xíng kě xíng 的de de ,, , 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 并非如此bìng fēi rú cǐ bìng fēi rú cǐ 。。 。
In government context, this type of false assurance - even when ultimately resolved quickly - demonstrates either: (a) lack of understanding about administrative requirements, or (b) deliberate misleading of voters about what the government could deliver pre-election.
在zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 下xià xià ,, , 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 保证bǎo zhèng bǎo zhèng —— — —— — 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 迅速xùn sù xùn sù 解决jiě jué jiě jué —— — —— — 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng :: : (( ( aa a )) ) 对duì duì 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 缺乏quē fá quē fá 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě ,, , 或huò huò (( ( bb b )) ) 故意gù yì gù yì 在zài zài 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián 就jiù jiù 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 能够néng gòu néng gòu 兑现duì xiàn duì xiàn 的de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng 误导wù dǎo wù dǎo 选民xuǎn mín xuǎn mín 。。 。

属实

8.0

/ 10

MorrisonMorrison Morrison 确实què shí què shí 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 在zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 前qián qián 就jiù jiù 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 实施shí shī shí shī ,, , 而ér ér 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 声明shēng míng shēng míng 被bèi bèi ATOATO ATO 的de de 官方guān fāng guān fāng 声明shēng míng shēng míng 所suǒ suǒ 驳斥bó chì bó chì ,, , ATOATO ATO 声明shēng míng shēng míng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 是shì shì 必需bì xū bì xū 的de de [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
Morrison did falsely claim that tax cuts could be paid before legislation passed, and this false claim was contradicted by the ATO's official statement that legislation was required [3].
虽然suī rán suī rán 实际shí jì shí jì 延迟时间yán chí shí jiān yán chí shí jiān 很hěn hěn 短duǎn duǎn (( ( 33 3 -- - 44 4 天tiān tiān )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 保证bǎo zhèng bǎo zhèng 是shì shì 在zài zài 20192019 2019 年nián nián 大选dà xuǎn dà xuǎn 竞选jìng xuǎn jìng xuǎn 期间qī jiān qī jiān 明确míng què míng què 向xiàng xiàng 选民xuǎn mín xuǎn mín 做出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
While the actual delay was brief (3-4 days), the false assurance was made definitively to voters during the 2019 election campaign [1].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 自身zì shēn zì shēn 的de de 日程安排rì chéng ān pái rì chéng ān pái 决定jué dìng jué dìng (( ( 66 6 月yuè yuè 2828 28 日rì rì 令状lìng zhuàng lìng zhuàng 返还fǎn huán fǎn huán )) ) 造成zào chéng zào chéng 了le le 不bù bù 可能kě néng kě néng 的de de 时间表shí jiān biǎo shí jiān biǎo ,, , 然后rán hòu rán hòu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 实施shí shī shí shī 可行kě xíng kě xíng ,, , 而ér ér ATOATO ATO 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 不bù bù 可行kě xíng kě xíng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The government's own scheduling decisions (June 28 return of writs) created the impossible timeline, then the government falsely claimed administrative delivery was possible when the ATO explicitly stated it was not [3].
该gāi gāi 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 捕捉bǔ zhuō bǔ zhuō 了le le MorrisonMorrison Morrison 就jiù jiù 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 实施shí shī shí shī 时机shí jī shí jī 和hé hé 机制jī zhì jī zhì 误导wù dǎo wù dǎo 选民xuǎn mín xuǎn mín 的de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 实施shí shī shí shī 仅晚jǐn wǎn jǐn wǎn 了le le 几天jǐ tiān jǐ tiān 。。 。
The claim accurately captures that Morrison misled voters about the timing and mechanism of tax cut delivery, even though the ultimate implementation occurred only days late.

📚 来源与引用 (9)

  1. 1
    Tax cuts: Scott Morrison sets arbitrary date, says voters will get relief on schedule | The New Daily

    Tax cuts: Scott Morrison sets arbitrary date, says voters will get relief on schedule | The New Daily

    Scott Morrison has known since April that it would be "unlikely" he could recall Parliament in time to pass his promised $1080 tax cuts before July.

    Thenewdaily Com
  2. 2
    Morrison insists $1,080 tax cut will be delivered by July 1 | ABC News

    Morrison insists $1,080 tax cut will be delivered by July 1 | ABC News

    Follow the latest headlines from ABC News, Australia's most trusted media source, with live events, audio and on-demand video from the national broadcaster.

    Abc Net
  3. 3
    ATO won't act on July 1 tax cuts unless they are already law | The New Daily

    ATO won't act on July 1 tax cuts unless they are already law | The New Daily

    The ATO has told the government it will not deliver $1080 tax cuts from July 1, unless they have passed into law by the end of the financial year.

    Thenewdaily Com
  4. 4
    en.wikipedia.org

    Stage Three Tax Cuts - Wikipedia: Parliamentary Passage Timeline

    Wikipedia

  5. 5
    theguardian.com

    Morrison's Tax Cut Campaign in Crisis as ATO Refuses to Act Before Law Passed | The Guardian Australia

    Theguardian

    Original link no longer available
  6. 6
    sbs.com.au

    Morrison Claims Historical Precedent for Administrative Tax Delivery | SBS News

    Sbs Com

    Original link no longer available
  7. 7
    Labor votes for Morrison's tax cuts despite timing concerns | ABC News

    Labor votes for Morrison's tax cuts despite timing concerns | ABC News

    Landholders fight for independent review after the controversial Mining bill passes the Lower House.

    Abc Net
  8. 8
    mediamattersa.org.au

    The New Daily - Editorial bias and funding structure analysis | Media Matters Australia

    Mediamattersa Org

  9. 9
    ministers.treasury.gov.au

    Albanese Government's cost-of-living tax cuts to roll out from July 1 | Treasury Ministers

    The Albanese Labor Government’s cost‑of‑living tax cuts today passed the Senate. We want Australians to earn more and keep more of what they earn and our bigger tax cuts for more taxpayers will help make that happen. Labor's legislation will deliver a tax cut for every taxpayer, and more tax relief for more people to help with the cost of living.

    Ministers Treasury Gov

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。