部分属实

评分: 6.5/10

Coalition
C0205

声明内容

“引入了新的法律,防止涉嫌犯罪的人选择自己的律师。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù le le zài zài 特定tè dìng tè dìng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng xià xià 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ
The Coalition government did introduce legislation that restricted lawyer selection in specific circumstances.
** * ** * 20202020 2020 nián nián 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 安全ān quán ān quán 情报组织qíng bào zǔ zhī qíng bào zǔ zhī 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn ** * ** * 20202020 2020 nián nián 55 5 yuè yuè 1313 13 提出tí chū tí chū 经跨jīng kuà jīng kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 支持zhī chí zhī chí 通过tōng guò tōng guò 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi le le ASIOASIO ASIO 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn zhōng zhōng de de 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 扩大kuò dà kuò dà le le 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn 权力quán lì quán lì 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò duì duì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo de de xīn xīn 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The **Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill 2020** (introduced 13 May 2020, passed with cross-party support) modified provisions in the ASIO Act to expand national security questioning powers, including new restrictions on legal representation [1].
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì de de 具体内容jù tǐ nèi róng jù tǐ nèi róng 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng de de 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 细致xì zhì xì zhì
However, the specifics of the restriction are more nuanced than the claim suggests.
根据gēn jù gēn jù 修订xiū dìng xiū dìng hòu hòu ASIOASIO ASIO 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 34F34F 34F (( ( 44 4 )) ) tiáo tiáo 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 特定tè dìng tè dìng 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 联系lián xì lián xì 可能kě néng kě néng 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì (( ( aa a )) ) xiàng xiàng 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 安全ān quán ān quán 威胁wēi xié wēi xié de de 人员rén yuán rén yuán 发出fā chū fā chū 警报jǐng bào jǐng bào huò huò (( ( bb b )) ) 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 销毁xiāo huǐ xiāo huǐ ASIOASIO ASIO 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ gāi gāi 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 联系lián xì lián xì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Under Section 34F(4) of the amended ASIO Act, ASIO can prevent contact with a *particular lawyer* if such contact could: (a) alert someone posing a security threat, or (b) result in destruction of evidence [2].
zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 全面禁止quán miàn jìn zhǐ quán miàn jìn zhǐ 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 任何rèn hé rèn hé 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī
This is NOT a blanket prohibition on choosing any lawyer.
相反xiāng fǎn xiāng fǎn 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 嫌疑人xián yí rén xián yí rén 偏好piān hǎo piān hǎo de de 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 联系lián xì lián xì huò huò 在所难免zài suǒ nán miǎn zài suǒ nán miǎn gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 规定guī dìng guī dìng "" " ASIOASIO ASIO 必须bì xū bì xū 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 一名yī míng yī míng 愿意yuàn yì yuàn yì bèi bèi 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng de de 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī "" " lái lái 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo gāi gāi 人员rén yuán rén yuán [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
Instead, if a suspect's preferred lawyer is unavailable or unavoidable, the legislation provides that "ASIO must appoint a lawyer who is willing to be appointed" to represent the person [3].
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 法律委员会fǎ lǜ wěi yuán huì fǎ lǜ wěi yuán huì jiāng jiāng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 确定què dìng què dìng wèi wèi 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 关切guān qiè guān qiè jiāng jiāng 描述miáo shù miáo shù wèi wèi "" " duì duì 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng de de 极端jí duān jí duān 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì "" " bìng bìng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 有权yǒu quán yǒu quán zài zài 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn 期间qī jiān qī jiān 解雇jiě gù jiě gù bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi "" " 过度guò dù guò dù 干扰gān rǎo gān rǎo "" " de de 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
The Law Council of Australia identified these lawyer restrictions as a major concern, describing them as "extreme limitations on the role of lawyers" and noting the government's power to remove lawyers deemed "unduly disruptive" during questioning [4].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 适用shì yòng shì yòng ASIOASIO ASIO de de 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn 权力quán lì quán lì ér ér 不适bù shì bù shì 用于yòng yú yòng yú 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 审判shěn pàn shěn pàn huò huò 普通pǔ tōng pǔ tōng 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 调查diào chá diào chá [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
These restrictions apply specifically to ASIO's national security questioning powers, not to criminal trials or ordinary police investigation [2].

缺失背景

gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng zài zài 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 不够bù gòu bù gòu 精确jīng què jīng què 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 模糊mó hú mó hú le le 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng
The claim is imprecise in several critical ways that obscure the full picture: 1. **"Suspected of a crime"** - This framing is misleading.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * "" " 涉嫌犯罪shè xián fàn zuì shè xián fàn zuì "" " ** * ** * -- - 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng
ASIO deals with national security matters (terrorism, espionage, foreign interference, politically motivated violence), not ordinary crime [1].
ASIOASIO ASIO 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ de de shì shì 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 事务shì wù shì wù 恐怖主义kǒng bù zhǔ yì kǒng bù zhǔ yì 间谍活动jiàn dié huó dòng jiàn dié huó dòng 外国wài guó wài guó 干预gān yù gān yù 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 动机dòng jī dòng jī 暴力bào lì bào lì ér ér fēi fēi 普通pǔ tōng pǔ tōng 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The legislation expanded ASIO's powers to question people about these specific security threats, not criminal suspects generally [2]. 2. **Blanket vs.
gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 扩大kuò dà kuò dà le le ASIOASIO ASIO duì duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 特定tè dìng tè dìng 安全ān quán ān quán 威胁wēi xié wēi xié de de 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn 权力quán lì quán lì ér ér fēi fēi 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 一般yì bān yì bān 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 嫌疑人xián yí rén xián yí rén [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Targeted Restrictions** - The wording "prevent someone...from choosing their own lawyer" could be interpreted as a total ban.
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 全面quán miàn quán miàn 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 针对性zhēn duì xìng zhēn duì xìng 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì ** * ** * -- - "" " 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 某人mǒu rén mǒu rén 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ de de 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī "" " 这一zhè yī zhè yī 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 可能kě néng kě néng bèi bèi 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě wèi wèi 全面禁止quán miàn jìn zhǐ quán miàn jìn zhǐ
The actual restriction is narrower: ASIO can exclude *specific lawyers* in specific circumstances (where contact could compromise national security), but the right to legal representation itself is maintained [3]. 3. **Historical Context Omitted** - ASIO questioning powers were first introduced in 2003 in post-9/11 legislation [5].
实际shí jì shí jì 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 狭窄xiá zhǎi xiá zhǎi ASIOASIO ASIO 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ zài zài 特定tè dìng tè dìng 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng xià xià 联系lián xì lián xì 可能kě néng kě néng 危害wēi hài wēi hài 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán shí shí 排除pái chú pái chú ** * 特定tè dìng tè dìng 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī ** * dàn dàn 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 代表权dài biǎo quán dài biǎo quán 本身běn shēn běn shēn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The 2020 amendments expanded these pre-existing powers, not created entirely new ones.
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 省略shěng lüè shěng lüè de de 历史背景lì shǐ bèi jǐng lì shǐ bèi jǐng ** * ** * -- - ASIOASIO ASIO 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn 权力quán lì quán lì 最初zuì chū zuì chū 20032003 2003 nián nián zài zài 99 9 // / 1111 11 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn hòu hòu de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ zhōng zhōng 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
This was not a sudden or unprecedented restriction. 4. **Labor Government Support** - The claim implies this was a unilateral Coalition action, but the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill 2020 passed with Labor support [6].
20202020 2020 nián nián de de 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn le le 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 权力quán lì quán lì ér ér fēi fēi 创造chuàng zào chuàng zào le le 全新quán xīn quán xīn de de 权力quán lì quán lì
Labor has supported ASIO power expansions since the 2003 legislation and voted for this 2020 expansion. 5. **Safeguards Retained** - While the restrictions are concerning, the legislation preserves the fundamental right to legal representation in ASIO questioning, with mandatory appointment of counsel if the person's preferred lawyer is unavailable [3].
zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì 突然tū rán tū rán huò huò 前所未有qián suǒ wèi yǒu qián suǒ wèi yǒu de de 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí ** * ** * -- - gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 暗示àn shì àn shì 这是zhè shì zhè shì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng de de 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng dàn dàn 20202020 2020 nián nián 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 安全ān quán ān quán 情报组织qíng bào zǔ zhī qíng bào zǔ zhī 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn shì shì zài zài 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí xià xià 通过tōng guò tōng guò de de [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
20032003 2003 nián nián 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 一直yì zhí yì zhí 支持zhī chí zhī chí ASIOASIO ASIO 权力quán lì quán lì 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng bìng bìng 投票tóu piào tóu piào 支持zhī chí zhī chí 20202020 2020 nián nián de de 这次zhè cì zhè cì 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú de de 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī ** * ** * -- - 虽然suī rán suī rán 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 令人lìng rén lìng rén 关切guān qiè guān qiè dàn dàn gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú le le zài zài 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn zhōng zhōng 获得huò dé huò dé 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo de de 基本权利jī běn quán lì jī běn quán lì 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 个人gè rén gè rén 偏好piān hǎo piān hǎo de de 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 联系lián xì lián xì 强制qiáng zhì qiáng zhì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng de de shì shì 悉尼xī ní xī ní 先驱xiān qū xiān qū 晨报chén bào chén bào SMHSMH SMH 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā yóu yóu 九号jiǔ hào jiǔ hào 娱乐yú lè yú lè 公司gōng sī gōng sī 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu de de 大型dà xíng dà xíng 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]
The original source cited is the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH), a mainstream Australian newspaper owned by Nine Entertainment [7].
SMHSMH SMH shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 声誉shēng yù shēng yù 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo de de 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí zhōng zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn [[ [ 88 8 ]] ]
The SMH is a reputable publication with generally accurate factual reporting, though it maintains a center-left editorial perspective [8].
原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng de de 标题biāo tí biāo tí 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng le le 夸张kuā zhāng kuā zhāng de de 语言yǔ yán yǔ yán "" " xiàng xiàng 极权主义jí quán zhǔ yì jí quán zhǔ yì 国家guó jiā guó jiā yòu yòu mài mài 进一步jìn yí bù jìn yí bù "" " zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng le le 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn // / 分析fēn xī fēn xī ér ér fēi fēi 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 报道bào dào bào dào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The headline of the original article uses hyperbolic language ("one more step towards a totalitarian state"), which reflects opinion/analysis rather than neutral reporting [1].
然而rán ér rán ér 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng de de 实质shí zhì shí zhì 内容nèi róng nèi róng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 描述miáo shù miáo shù le le gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ
However, the article's substantive content accurately describes the legislation.
表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 色彩sè cǎi sè cǎi 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 机构jī gòu jī gòu 提出tí chū tí chū de de 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 关切guān qiè guān qiè dàn dàn 事实shì shí shì shí 要素yào sù yào sù shì shì 正确zhèng què zhèng què de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The framing is politically charged and emphasizes the civil liberties concerns raised by legal bodies, but the factual elements are correct [1].
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 法律委员会fǎ lǜ wěi yuán huì fǎ lǜ wěi yuán huì de de 关切guān qiè guān qiè 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē shì shì 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ qiě qiě yǒu yǒu 记录jì lù jì lù de de [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] wèi wèi 核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 增添zēng tiān zēng tiān le le 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù
The article cites Law Council of Australia concerns, which are legitimate and documented [4], lending credibility to its core claims.
SMHSMH SMH 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng shì shì 关于guān yú guān yú gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 事实shì shí shì shí 信息xìn xī xìn xī de de 可靠kě kào kě kào 来源lái yuán lái yuán 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 读者dú zhě dú zhě zài zài 评估píng gū píng gū 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 时应shí yīng shí yīng 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 基调jī diào jī diào [[ [ 88 8 ]] ]
The SMH article is a reliable source for factual information about the legislation, though readers should account for its center-left editorial tone when assessing the framing [8].
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government ASIO restrictions history legislation" **Finding:** Labor's relationship with ASIO expansion is more nuanced than the Coalition's unilateral action.
** * ** *
The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 was originally enacted by Labor, and Labor governments have historically supported ASIO power expansions: - **2003:** Labor negotiated and supported the initial ASIO questioning powers introduced by the Coalition in post-9/11 legislation [5].
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng "" " 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ASIOASIO ASIO 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ "" "
These powers already included restrictions on legal representation, though less extensive than 2020 amendments. - **2020:** Labor actively supported the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill 2020, voting for its passage despite the lawyer restrictions that had drawn criticism from the Law Council of Australia [6].
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng ASIOASIO ASIO 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng de de 关系guān xì guān xì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng de de 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 微妙wēi miào wēi miào
The pattern shows both major parties have expanded ASIO surveillance and questioning powers since 2003.
19791979 1979 nián nián 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 安全ān quán ān quán 情报组织qíng bào zǔ zhī qíng bào zǔ zhī 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 最初zuì chū zuì chū yóu yóu 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ shàng shàng 一直yì zhí yì zhí 支持zhī chí zhī chí ASIOASIO ASIO 权力quán lì quán lì 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng
This is not unique to the Coalition - it represents bipartisan consensus on national security legislation, though with ongoing civil liberties concerns from legal advocates across both government and opposition periods [5][6].
-- - ** * ** * 20032003 2003 nián nián ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 谈判tán pàn tán pàn bìng bìng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng zài zài 99 9 // / 1111 11 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn hòu hòu 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ zhōng zhōng 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù de de 初始chū shǐ chū shǐ ASIOASIO ASIO 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn 权力quán lì quán lì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 权力quán lì quán lì 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 包含bāo hán bāo hán duì duì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo de de 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 不如bù rú bù rú 20202020 2020 nián nián 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn 那么nà me nà me 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn
-- - ** * ** * 20202020 2020 nián nián ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 引起yǐn qǐ yǐn qǐ le le 法律委员会fǎ lǜ wěi yuán huì fǎ lǜ wěi yuán huì de de 批评pī píng pī píng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 积极支持jī jí zhī chí jī jí zhī chí 20202020 2020 nián nián 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 安全ān quán ān quán 情报组织qíng bào zǔ zhī qíng bào zǔ zhī 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 投票tóu piào tóu piào 赞成zàn chéng zàn chéng 通过tōng guò tōng guò [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
gāi gāi 模式mó shì mó shì 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 20032003 2003 nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng dōu dōu 扩大kuò dà kuò dà le le ASIOASIO ASIO de de 监视jiān shì jiān shì 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn 权力quán lì quán lì
zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu de de 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo le le 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng zài zài 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn de de 共识gòng shí gòng shí 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ dǎng dǎng 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 时期shí qī shí qī dōu dōu yǒu yǒu 来自lái zì lái zì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě de de 持续chí xù chí xù 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 关切guān qiè guān qiè [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào le le 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù de de 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì dàn dàn 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 揭示jiē shì jiē shì le le 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng
While the claim highlights a real restriction introduced by the Coalition, the full context reveals complexity: **Legitimate Concerns (Supporting the Claim's Spirit):** The Law Council of Australia raised genuine concerns about "extreme limitations on the role of lawyers" [4].
** * ** * 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 关切guān qiè guān qiè 支持zhī chí zhī chí gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng de de 精神jīng shén jīng shén ** * ** *
The Australian Human Rights Commission warned of potential overreach in civil liberties protections [9].
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 法律委员会fǎ lǜ wěi yuán huì fǎ lǜ wěi yuán huì duì duì "" " 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng de de 极端jí duān jí duān 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì "" " 提出tí chū tí chū le le 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de 关切guān qiè guān qiè [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
These are serious concerns from reputable civil rights advocates.
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 人权委员会rén quán wěi yuán huì rén quán wěi yuán huì 警告jǐng gào jǐng gào 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 可能kě néng kě néng 存在cún zài cún zài 越权yuè quán yuè quán 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]
The ability to exclude lawyers mid-interrogation could theoretically compromise the quality of legal advice received during national security questioning [4]. **Coalition's Justification & Context:** The government argued these powers were necessary for national security, particularly regarding threats of foreign interference and terrorism [1].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē shì shì 知名zhī míng zhī míng 民权mín quán mín quán 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 提出tí chū tí chū de de 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 关切guān qiè guān qiè
The restrictions are not absolute - they apply only when contact with a specific lawyer would directly compromise national security (by alerting targets or causing evidence destruction) [2].
zài zài 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn 期间qī jiān qī jiān 解雇jiě gù jiě gù 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī de de 能力néng lì néng lì 理论lǐ lùn lǐ lùn shàng shàng 可能kě néng kě néng 损害sǔn hài sǔn hài zài zài 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn 期间qī jiān qī jiān 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu de de 法律咨询fǎ lǜ zī xún fǎ lǜ zī xún 质量zhì liàng zhì liàng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
Most people in ASIO questioning retain access to legal counsel, either their preferred lawyer or a government-appointed alternative [3]. **Comparative Perspective:** Labor's support for the 2020 amendments and its historical acceptance of ASIO power expansions since 2003 suggests this reflects bipartisan agreement on national security priorities, not partisan overreach [5][6].
** * ** * 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** *
Both parties have balanced civil liberties concerns against perceived security threats, though with ongoing debate about where that balance should lie [4]. **Expert Assessment:** The Law Council of Australia's criticism was specific: not that ASIO should have zero questioning powers, but that the restrictions on legal representation were excessive and should have included stronger safeguards [4].
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 权力quán lì quán lì duì duì 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào de de 特别tè bié tè bié shì shì 关于guān yú guān yú 外国wài guó wài guó 干预gān yù gān yù 恐怖主义kǒng bù zhǔ yì kǒng bù zhǔ yì 威胁wēi xié wēi xié [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
This indicates reasonable people disagree on the appropriate scope of such powers. **Key Context:** While lawyer selection restrictions are a genuine civil liberties concern, they apply to ASIO national security questioning (not criminal trials), with mandatory legal representation if preferred counsel unavailable, and with historical precedent in 2003 legislation that both parties have supported [2][3][5][6].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 绝对jué duì jué duì jǐn jǐn dāng dāng 特定tè dìng tè dìng 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī de de 联系lián xì lián xì huì huì 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 危害wēi hài wēi hài 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 通过tōng guò tōng guò xiàng xiàng 目标mù biāo mù biāo 发出fā chū fā chū 警报jǐng bào jǐng bào huò huò 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 销毁xiāo huǐ xiāo huǐ 时才shí cái shí cái 适用shì yòng shì yòng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
大多数dà duō shù dà duō shù 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu ASIOASIO ASIO 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn de de rén rén dōu dōu néng néng 获得huò dé huò dé 法律顾问fǎ lǜ gù wèn fǎ lǜ gù wèn 要么yào me yào me shì shì 他们tā men tā men 偏好piān hǎo piān hǎo de de 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 要么yào me yào me shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng de de 替代tì dài tì dài 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo ** * ** *
工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng duì duì 20202020 2020 nián nián 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí 及其jí qí jí qí 20032003 2003 nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái duì duì ASIOASIO ASIO 权力quán lì quán lì 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng de de 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng le le 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng zài zài 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng shàng shàng de de 协议xié yì xié yì ér ér fēi fēi 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 越权yuè quán yuè quán [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng dōu dōu zài zài 感知gǎn zhī gǎn zhī dào dào de de 安全ān quán ān quán 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 关切guān qiè guān qiè 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 平衡píng héng píng héng 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 关于guān yú guān yú 平衡点píng héng diǎn píng héng diǎn de de 持续chí xù chí xù 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn réng réng zài zài 继续jì xù jì xù [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
** * ** * 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 评估píng gū píng gū ** * ** *
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 法律委员会fǎ lǜ wěi yuán huì fǎ lǜ wěi yuán huì de de 批评pī píng pī píng shì shì 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ de de 不是bú shì bú shì ASIOASIO ASIO 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu líng líng 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn 权力quán lì quán lì 而是ér shì ér shì duì duì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo de de 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 过于guò yú guò yú 严格yán gé yán gé 本应běn yīng běn yīng 包含bāo hán bāo hán 更强gèng qiáng gèng qiáng de de 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 理智lǐ zhì lǐ zhì de de rén rén duì duì 这类zhè lèi zhè lèi 权力quán lì quán lì de de 适当shì dàng shì dàng 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 存在cún zài cún zài 分歧fēn qí fēn qí
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì shì shì 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 关切guān qiè guān qiè dàn dàn 它们tā men tā men 适用shì yòng shì yòng ASIOASIO ASIO 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 讯问xùn wèn xùn wèn ér ér fēi fēi 刑事xíng shì xíng shì 审判shěn pàn shěn pàn zài zài 偏好piān hǎo piān hǎo 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 联系lián xì lián xì shí shí 提供tí gōng tí gōng 强制性qiáng zhì xìng qiáng zhì xìng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo bìng bìng yǒu yǒu 20032003 2003 nián nián 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ de de 先例xiān lì xiān lì 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng dōu dōu 支持zhī chí zhī chí gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]

部分属实

6.5

/ 10

gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 及其jí qí jí qí 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de dàn dàn 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng le le 精确jīng què jīng què de de 语言yǔ yán yǔ yán "" " 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì "" " 全面quán miàn quán miàn de de "" " 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ "" " duì duì 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì de de 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 误导wù dǎo wù dǎo
The claim is factually accurate regarding the legislation's existence and effects, but uses imprecise language ("crime," blanket "prevent") that misleads about the scope and context of the restrictions.
联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 确实què shí què shí 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù le le zài zài 特定tè dìng tè dìng 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng xià xià 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 这是zhè shì zhè shì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 当局dāng jú dāng jú 记录jì lù jì lù de de 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 关切guān qiè guān qiè [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
The Coalition did introduce legislation restricting lawyer selection in specific national security contexts, which is a legitimate civil liberties concern documented by legal authorities [1][4].
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng jiāng jiāng 描述miáo shù miáo shù wèi wèi 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 嫌疑人xián yí rén xián yí rén "" " 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 自己zì jǐ zì jǐ de de 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī "" " 暗示àn shì àn shì 全面禁止quán miàn jìn zhǐ quán miàn jìn zhǐ ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 狭窄xiá zhǎi xiá zhǎi ASIOASIO ASIO 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ zài zài 特定tè dìng tè dìng 安全ān quán ān quán 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng xià xià 排除pái chú pái chú 特定tè dìng tè dìng 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 同时tóng shí tóng shí 维持wéi chí wéi chí 强制性qiáng zhì xìng qiáng zhì xìng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
However, the claim mischaracterizes this as preventing suspects "from choosing their own lawyer" (suggesting a total ban), when the actual restriction is narrower: ASIO can exclude specific lawyers in specific security circumstances, while maintaining mandatory legal representation [2][3].
此外cǐ wài cǐ wài gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu le le zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo le le 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 支持zhī chí zhī chí de de 20032003 2003 nián nián 权力quán lì quán lì de de 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 20202020 2020 nián nián 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn de de 事实shì shí shì shí [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
Additionally, the claim omits that this represents expansion of 2003 powers that Labor governments supported, and that Labor backed the 2020 amendments [5][6].
gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 本质běn zhì běn zhì shàng shàng shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí de de 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ bèi bèi 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù dàn dàn zài zài 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng qiě qiě 缺少quē shǎo quē shǎo 关于guān yú guān yú 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 先例xiān lì xiān lì de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng
The claim is true in essence - it is accurate that restrictive legislation was introduced - but the framing is misleading regarding scope, and critical context about Labor support and historical precedent is absent.

📚 来源与引用 (9)

  1. 1
    smh.com.au

    smh.com.au

    Peter Dutton's new bill amendment, which beefs up the powers of security agencies and further diminishes civil rights, would make an authoritarian regime blush.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  2. 2
    legislation.gov.au

    legislation.gov.au

    Federal Register of Legislation

  3. 3
    aph.gov.au

    aph.gov.au

    Helpful information Text of bill First reading: Text of the bill as introduced into the Parliament Third reading: Prepared if the bill is amended by the house in which it was introduced. This version of the bill is then considered by the second house. As passed by

    Aph Gov
  4. 4
    lawcouncil.au

    lawcouncil.au

    Law Council concerned government amendments to the ASIO Act are an overreach

    Lawcouncil
  5. 5
    aph.gov.au

    aph.gov.au

    Helpful information Text of bill First reading: Text of the bill as introduced into the Parliament Third reading: Prepared if the bill is amended by the house in which it was introduced. This version of the bill is then considered by the second house. As passed by

    Aph Gov
  6. 6
    greensmps.org.au

    greensmps.org.au

    The Australian Greens
  7. 7
    nineentertainment.com.au

    nineentertainment.com.au

    Nine for Brands - This is the home of Australia’s most trusted and loved brands spanning News, Sport, Lifestyle and Entertainment.

    Nine for Brands
  8. 8
    mediabiasfactcheck.com

    mediabiasfactcheck.com

    Mediabiasfactcheck

    Original link no longer available
  9. 9
    humanrights.gov.au

    humanrights.gov.au

    Humanrights Gov

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。