部分属实

评分： 6.0/10

报告问题
Coalition
C0156

声明内容

“无视 Administrative Appeals Tribunal 的裁决，构成犯罪。”
腐败
原始来源： Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 基本jī běn jī běn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 结论jié lùn jié lùn 存在cún zài cún zài 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 。。 。
The core facts of this claim are substantially accurate, though the ultimate legal conclusion is contested.
 该案gāi àn gāi àn 涉及shè jí shè jí 代理dài lǐ dài lǐ 移民yí mín yí mín 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng AlanAlan Alan TudgeTudge Tudge 和hé hé 阿富汗ā fù hàn ā fù hàn 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 庇护bì hù bì hù 者zhě zhě PDWLPDWL PDWL [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The case involved Acting Immigration Minister Alan Tudge and Afghan asylum seeker PDWL [1]. **The Tribunal Decision**: On 11 March 2020, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal reversed the immigration department's refusal and granted PDWL a Safe Haven Enterprise visa [1].
 ** * ** * 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 裁决cái jué cái jué ** * ** * ：： ： 20202020 2020 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 1111 11 日rì rì ，， ， AdministrativeAdministrative Administrative AppealsAppeals Appeals TribunalTribunal Tribunal 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 了le le 移民yí mín yí mín 部门bù mén bù mén 的de de 拒签jù qiān jù qiān 决定jué dìng jué dìng ，， ， 向xiàng xiàng PDWLPDWL PDWL 发放fā fàng fā fàng 了le le SafeSafe Safe HavenHaven Haven EnterpriseEnterprise Enterprise 签证qiān zhèng qiān zhèng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The tribunal found PDWL posed no risk to the Australian community despite a prior assault conviction [1]. **The Detention After Ruling**: Despite the AAT's grant of the visa, PDWL remained in detention at Yongah Hill Immigration Detention Centre for five days after 11 March 2020 [1].
 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn PDWLPDWL PDWL 曾céng céng 有yǒu yǒu 袭击xí jī xí jī 罪zuì zuì 定罪dìng zuì dìng zuì 记录jì lù jì lù ，， ， 但dàn dàn 他tā tā 对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 社区shè qū shè qū 不bù bù 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The minister immediately appealed the tribunal's decision [1].
 ** * ** * 裁决cái jué cái jué 后hòu hòu 的de de 拘留jū liú jū liú ** * ** * ：： ： 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 了le le 签证qiān zhèng qiān zhèng ，， ， PDWLPDWL PDWL 在zài zài 20202020 2020 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 1111 11 日rì rì 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 仍réng réng 被bèi bèi 关押guān yā guān yā 在zài zài YongahYongah Yongah HillHill Hill 移民yí mín yí mín 拘留jū liú jū liú 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 长zhǎng zhǎng 达dá dá 五天wǔ tiān wǔ tiān [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
PDWL was not released until a federal court order on 17 March 2020 [1]. **The Initial Court Judgment (September 2020)**: Federal Court Justice Geoffrey Flick issued a scathing decision finding Tudge "engaged in conduct which can only be described as criminal" by unlawfully depriving PDWL of liberty [1].
 该gāi gāi 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 立即lì jí lì jí 对duì duì 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 提出tí chū tí chū 上诉shàng sù shàng sù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Justice Flick stated Tudge was "above the law" and the conduct was "disgraceful" [1].
 PDWLPDWL PDWL 直到zhí dào zhí dào 20202020 2020 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 1717 17 日rì rì 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 下令xià lìng xià lìng 后hòu hòu 才cái cái 获释huò shì huò shì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The judgment found the minister failed to comply with 12 March court orders to explain why PDWL remained detained and provided no "real explanation" [1]. **The Appeal Decision (April 2021)**: The full Federal Court unanimously allowed Tudge's appeal, overturning Justice Flick's "criminal conduct" finding [2].
 ** * ** * 初审chū shěn chū shěn 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 判决pàn jué pàn jué （（ （ 20202020 2020 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè ）） ） ** * ** * ：： ： 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān GeoffreyGeoffrey Geoffrey FlickFlick Flick 作出zuò chū zuò chū 严厉yán lì yán lì 裁决cái jué cái jué ，， ， 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng TudgeTudge Tudge "" " 其qí qí 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 只能zhǐ néng zhǐ néng 被bèi bèi 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì "" " ，， ， 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 剥夺bō duó bō duó 了le le PDWLPDWL PDWL 的de de 自由zì yóu zì yóu [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The three justices found that: - The "criminal conduct" characterization was "a personal criticism" levelled without giving Tudge opportunity to respond [2] - Tudge "had no relevant knowledge at all" of the circumstances that led to the detention [2] - The problems were caused by the Home Affairs Department, not Tudge personally [2] - Department officials were "acting conscientiously on legal advice" that believed the tribunal's decision was a "nullity" because it had misapplied the law [2] - The court "appeared likely" Justice Flick had confused Tudge with Peter Dutton, the Home Affairs Minister [2] - While the department's failure to explain the detention "fell well short" of proper conduct, Tudge played no role in that failure and "at no time was he consulted" [2] **The Legal Assessment**: While a judge initially characterized the conduct as "criminal" in a metaphorical sense, this was not a finding that actual criminal offenses were committed [1].
 FlickFlick Flick 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 称chēng chēng TudgeTudge Tudge "" " 凌驾于líng jià yú líng jià yú 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 之上zhī shàng zhī shàng "" " ，， ， 其qí qí 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi "" " 可耻kě chǐ kě chǐ "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The full Federal Court explicitly rejected the suggestion of criminal conduct as unfounded [2].
 裁决cái jué cái jué 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 该gāi gāi 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 未wèi wèi 遵守zūn shǒu zūn shǒu 33 3 月yuè yuè 1212 12 日rì rì 的de de 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 命令mìng lìng mìng lìng 解释jiě shì jiě shì PDWLPDWL PDWL 为何wèi hé wèi hé 仍réng réng 被bèi bèi 拘留jū liú jū liú ，， ， 也yě yě 未wèi wèi 提供tí gōng tí gōng "" " 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 解释jiě shì jiě shì "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 裁决cái jué cái jué （（ （ 20212021 2021 年nián nián 44 4 月yuè yuè ）） ） ** * ** * ：： ： 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 全体quán tǐ quán tǐ 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 一致yí zhì yí zhì 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ TudgeTudge Tudge 上诉shàng sù shàng sù ，， ， 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 了le le FlickFlick Flick 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 关于guān yú guān yú "" " 犯罪行为fàn zuì xíng wèi fàn zuì xíng wèi "" " 的de de 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
三位sān wèi sān wèi 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng ：： ：
-- - "" " 犯罪行为fàn zuì xíng wèi fàn zuì xíng wèi "" " 的de de 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 是shì shì "" " 人身攻击rén shēn gōng jī rén shēn gōng jī "" " ，， ， 且qiě qiě 未wèi wèi 给予jǐ yǔ jǐ yǔ TudgeTudge Tudge 回应huí yìng huí yìng 的de de 机会jī huì jī huì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - TudgeTudge Tudge "" " 对duì duì 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 完全wán quán wán quán 不知情bù zhī qíng bù zhī qíng "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 问题wèn tí wèn tí 由yóu yóu HomeHome Home AffairsAffairs Affairs DepartmentDepartment Department 造成zào chéng zào chéng ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi TudgeTudge Tudge 个人gè rén gè rén [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 部门bù mén bù mén 官员guān yuán guān yuán "" " 基于jī yú jī yú 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 认真rèn zhēn rèn zhēn 行事xíng shì xíng shì "" " ，， ， 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 的de de 裁决cái jué cái jué 因yīn yīn 适用法律shì yòng fǎ lǜ shì yòng fǎ lǜ 错误cuò wù cuò wù 而ér ér "" " 无效wú xiào wú xiào "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn "" " 似乎sì hū sì hū 很hěn hěn 可能kě néng kě néng "" " FlickFlick Flick 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 将jiāng jiāng TudgeTudge Tudge 与yǔ yǔ HomeHome Home AffairsAffairs Affairs MinisterMinister Minister PeterPeter Peter DuttonDutton Dutton 混淆hùn xiáo hùn xiáo 了le le [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 部门bù mén bù mén 未能wèi néng wèi néng 解释jiě shì jiě shì 拘留jū liú jū liú 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn "" " 远yuǎn yuǎn 未wèi wèi 达到dá dào dá dào "" " 适当shì dàng shì dàng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn ，， ， 但dàn dàn TudgeTudge Tudge 未wèi wèi 参与cān yù cān yù 该gāi gāi 失职shī zhí shī zhí 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ，， ， 且qiě qiě "" " 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 被bèi bèi 征询zhēng xún zhēng xún 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
** * ** * 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 评估píng gū píng gū ** * ** * ：： ： 虽然suī rán suī rán 一名yī míng yī míng 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 最初zuì chū zuì chū 以yǐ yǐ 比喻bǐ yù bǐ yù 意义yì yì yì yì 将jiāng jiāng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 为wèi wèi "" " 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì "" " ，， ， 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 实际shí jì shí jì 发生fā shēng fā shēng 了le le 刑事犯罪xíng shì fàn zuì xíng shì fàn zuì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 全体quán tǐ quán tǐ 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 明确míng què míng què 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn 为wèi wèi 犯罪行为fàn zuì xíng wèi fàn zuì xíng wèi 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ，， ， 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 其qí qí 毫无根据háo wú gēn jù háo wú gēn jù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī ：： ：
The claim omits several critical pieces of context: **1.
 ** * ** * 11 1 .. . 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 涉及shè jí shè jí 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 解释jiě shì jiě shì ** * ** * ：： ： 这zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì 任意rèn yì rèn yì 违抗wéi kàng wéi kàng ，， ， 而是ér shì ér shì 对duì duì 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 正确zhèng què zhèng què 解释jiě shì jiě shì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 存在cún zài cún zài 分歧fēn qí fēn qí 。。 。
The Dispute Was Over Legal Interpretation**: This was not arbitrary defiance but disagreement over whether the tribunal had correctly interpreted the law.
 HomeHome Home AffairsAffairs Affairs DepartmentDepartment Department 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 在zài zài 适用shì yòng shì yòng 品格pǐn gé pǐn gé 测试cè shì cè shì 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 时shí shí 存在cún zài cún zài 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 错误cuò wù cuò wù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The Home Affairs Department believed the tribunal had made a legal error in misapplying character test provisions [2].
 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 认同rèn tóng rèn tóng 原yuán yuán 拒签jù qiān jù qiān 决定jué dìng jué dìng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 法律依据fǎ lǜ yī jù fǎ lǜ yī jù ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn FlickFlick Flick 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 仍réng réng 因该yīn gāi yīn gāi 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 处理不当chǔ lǐ bù dàng chǔ lǐ bù dàng 而ér ér 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 了le le 签证qiān zhèng qiān zhèng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The courts ultimately agreed the original refusal had legal merit, though Justice Flick still awarded the visa based on how poorly the matter was handled [1]. **2.
 ** * ** * 22 2 .. . 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 推翻tuī fān tuī fān ** * ** * ：： ： 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 仅jǐn jǐn 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 了le le 20202020 2020 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 的de de 初审chū shěn chū shěn 判决pàn jué pàn jué ，， ， 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 六个月liù gè yuè liù gè yuè 后hòu hòu 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 全体quán tǐ quán tǐ 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 一致yí zhì yí zhì 推翻tuī fān tuī fān "" " 犯罪行为fàn zuì xíng wèi fàn zuì xíng wèi "" " 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Judicial Reversal**: The claim presents only the initial September 2020 judgment.
 在zài zài 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 可能kě néng kě néng 提出tí chū tí chū 的de de 时间shí jiān shí jiān （（ （ 20202020 2020 年nián nián 后hòu hòu ）） ） ，， ， 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 裁定cái dìng cái dìng 是shì shì TudgeTudge Tudge 未wèi wèi 实施shí shī shí shī 犯罪行为fàn zuì xíng wèi fàn zuì xíng wèi [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
It omits that six months later, the full Federal Court unanimously reversed the "criminal conduct" finding [2].
 ** * ** * 33 3 .. . 责任zé rèn zé rèn 归属guī shǔ guī shǔ 混淆hùn xiáo hùn xiáo ** * ** * ：： ： 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 裁决cái jué cái jué 澄清chéng qīng chéng qīng ，， ， 是shì shì 部门bù mén bù mén 官员guān yuán guān yuán 而ér ér 非fēi fēi TudgeTudge Tudge 个人gè rén gè rén 作出zuò chū zuò chū 了le le 拘留jū liú jū liú 决定jué dìng jué dìng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
By the time this claim would be made (2020+), the ultimate legal determination was that Tudge had not engaged in criminal conduct [2]. **3.
 TudgeTudge Tudge "" " 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 被bèi bèi 征询zhēng xún zhēng xún "" " 关于guān yú guān yú 继续jì xù jì xù 拘留jū liú jū liú PDWLPDWL PDWL 的de de 事宜shì yí shì yí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Confusion About Responsibility**: The appeal judgment clarified that department officials, not Tudge personally, made detention decisions [2].
 初审chū shěn chū shěn 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 似乎sì hū sì hū 将jiāng jiāng TudgeTudge Tudge 与yǔ yǔ PeterPeter Peter DuttonDutton Dutton 混淆hùn xiáo hùn xiáo 了le le [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Tudge "at no time was consulted" about keeping PDWL detained [2].
 ** * ** * 44 4 .. . 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 程序chéng xù chéng xù ** * ** * ：： ： HomeHome Home AffairsAffairs Affairs DepartmentDepartment Department 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 基于jī yú jī yú 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 存在cún zài cún zài 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The initial judge had apparently confused Tudge with Peter Dutton [2]. **4.
 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 不力bù lì bù lì （（ （ 未能wèi néng wèi néng 向xiàng xiàng 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 解释jiě shì jiě shì 拘留jū liú jū liú 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn ）） ） ，， ， 但dàn dàn 基本jī běn jī běn 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 轻率qīng shuài qīng shuài [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Legitimate Legal Process**: The Home Affairs Department's position was based on legal advice that the tribunal had erred [2].
 FlickFlick Flick 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 确实què shí què shí 存在cún zài cún zài 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 错误cuò wù cuò wù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
While the execution was poor (failing to explain the detention to the court), the underlying legal position was not frivolous [2].

来源可信度评估

** * ** * TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian 和hé hé SMHSMH SMH ** * ** * 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán ，， ， 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 较jiào jiào 高gāo gāo 的de de 声誉shēng yù shēng yù 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
**The Guardian and SMH** are mainstream Australian news sources with strong reputational standards [1][2].
 两者liǎng zhě liǎng zhě 都dōu dōu 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 报道bào dào bào dào 了le le FlickFlick Flick 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 最初zuì chū zuì chū 的de de 严厉yán lì yán lì 判决pàn jué pàn jué 。。 。
Both accurately reported Justice Flick's initial scathing judgment.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 如该rú gāi rú gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 所suǒ suǒ 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 的de de 那样nà yàng nà yàng ，， ， 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 的de de —— — —— — 它们tā men tā men 仅jǐn jǐn 包含bāo hán bāo hán 初审chū shěn chū shěn 判决pàn jué pàn jué ，， ， 而ér ér 未wèi wèi 提及tí jí tí jí 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 全面quán miàn quán miàn 推翻tuī fān tuī fān [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
However, as presented in this claim, the sources are incomplete—they only include the first judgment without the subsequent full court reversal [2].
 这zhè zhè 造成zào chéng zào chéng 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 印象yìn xiàng yìn xiàng ，， ， 即jí jí "" " 犯罪行为fàn zuì xíng wèi fàn zuì xíng wèi "" " 的de de 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ ，， ， 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 它tā tā 已yǐ yǐ 被bèi bèi 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 。。 。
This creates a misleading impression that the "criminal conduct" finding represents the final legal outcome when it was actually overturned.
 消息来源xiāo xī lái yuán xiāo xī lái yuán 本身běn shēn běn shēn 是shì shì 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de ，， ， 但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 似乎sì hū sì hū 依赖yī lài yī lài 20202020 2020 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 的de de 过时guò shí guò shí 报道bào dào bào dào ，， ， 而ér ér 未wèi wèi 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 20212021 2021 年nián nián 44 4 月yuè yuè 的de de 事态shì tài shì tài 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 。。 。
The sources themselves are credible, but the claim appears to rely on outdated reporting from September 2020 without accounting for April 2021 developments.
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ？？ ？
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor immigration detention legal challenge court ruling" Labor governments have also faced court challenges over immigration detention and AAT rulings: - **Peter Garrett (Labor Environment Minister, 2008-2010)**: Faced multiple court challenges, including contempt of court allegations, though circumstances differed [3] - **Julia Gillard Government AAT Challenges**: Labor also experienced court orders requiring compliance with tribunal decisions and faced criticism for handling of immigration matters [3] - **General Pattern**: Both Coalition and Labor governments have faced judicial criticism for immigration detention practices, though specific cases vary [3] The distinction here is that while the initial judgment against Tudge was severe, the full court ultimately found no criminal conduct occurred.
 ** * ** *
Immigration detention remains contentious across both parties.
 搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 关键词guān jiàn cí guān jiàn cí ：： ： "" " LaborLabor Labor immigrationimmigration immigration detentiondetention detention legallegal legal challengechallenge challenge courtcourt court rulingruling ruling "" "
LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 也yě yě 曾céng céng 因yīn yīn 移民yí mín yí mín 拘留jū liú jū liú 和hé hé AATAAT AAT 裁决cái jué cái jué 面临miàn lín miàn lín 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn ：： ：
-- - ** * ** * PeterPeter Peter GarrettGarrett Garrett （（ （ LaborLabor Labor 环境huán jìng huán jìng 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng ，， ， 20082008 2008 -- - 20102010 2010 ）） ） ** * ** * ：： ： 面临miàn lín miàn lín 多项duō xiàng duō xiàng 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn ，， ， 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 藐视miǎo shì miǎo shì 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 指控zhǐ kòng zhǐ kòng ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 有所不同yǒu suǒ bù tóng yǒu suǒ bù tóng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - ** * ** * JuliaJulia Julia GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ AATAAT AAT 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn ** * ** * ：： ： LaborLabor Labor 也yě yě 经历jīng lì jīng lì 过guò guò 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 命令mìng lìng mìng lìng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 遵守zūn shǒu zūn shǒu 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 裁决cái jué cái jué 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng ，， ， 并bìng bìng 因yīn yīn 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 移民yí mín yí mín 事务shì wù shì wù 而ér ér 受到shòu dào shòu dào 批评pī píng pī píng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - ** * ** * 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 模式mó shì mó shì ** * ** * ：： ： 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 和hé hé LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 曾céng céng 因yīn yīn 移民yí mín yí mín 拘留jū liú jū liú 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 受到shòu dào shòu dào 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 批评pī píng pī píng ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 各不相同gè bù xiāng tóng gè bù xiāng tóng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
区别qū bié qū bié 在于zài yú zài yú ，， ， 虽然suī rán suī rán 对duì duì TudgeTudge Tudge 的de de 初审chū shěn chū shěn 判决pàn jué pàn jué 严厉yán lì yán lì ，， ， 但dàn dàn 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 未wèi wèi 发生fā shēng fā shēng 犯罪行为fàn zuì xíng wèi fàn zuì xíng wèi 。。 。
移民yí mín yí mín 拘留jū liú jū liú 问题wèn tí wèn tí 在zài zài 两大党liǎng dà dǎng liǎng dà dǎng 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 仍然réng rán réng rán 存在cún zài cún zài 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 批评pī píng pī píng （（ （ 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ ）） ） ：： ： ** * ** *
**The Criticism (Valid):** Justice Flick's initial judgment was based on legitimate concerns [1].
 FlickFlick Flick 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 的de de 初审chū shěn chū shěn 判决pàn jué pàn jué 基于jī yú jī yú 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 关切guān qiè guān qiè [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
PDWL had been lawfully ordered released by a tribunal but remained in detention for five days [1].
 PDWLPDWL PDWL 已yǐ yǐ 被bèi bèi 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 下令xià lìng xià lìng 释放shì fàng shì fàng ，， ， 但dàn dàn 仍réng réng 被bèi bèi 拘留jū liú jū liú 五天wǔ tiān wǔ tiān [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The minister's department failed to explain to the court why he was still detained [1].
 该gāi gāi 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 的de de 部门bù mén bù mén 未能wèi néng wèi néng 向xiàng xiàng 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 解释jiě shì jiě shì 他tā tā 为何wèi hé wèi hé 仍réng réng 被bèi bèi 拘留jū liú jū liú [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The handling was objectively poor—a person granted a visa was denied liberty without adequate explanation [1]. **The Defense (Also Valid):** The full Federal Court's reversal demonstrates the initial judgment was overstated [2].
 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 客观kè guān kè guān 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 糟糕zāo gāo zāo gāo 的de de —— — —— — 一名yī míng yī míng 获得huò dé huò dé 签证qiān zhèng qiān zhèng 的de de 人rén rén 被bèi bèi 剥夺bō duó bō duó 了le le 自由zì yóu zì yóu ，， ， 却què què 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 得到dé dào dé dào 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 解释jiě shì jiě shì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The department was acting on legal advice that the tribunal had erred in interpretation [2].
 ** * ** * 辩护biàn hù biàn hù （（ （ 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ ）） ） ：： ： ** * ** *
Immigration law is genuinely complex; disagreement between tribunals and departments over legal interpretations is common [3].
 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 的de de 全面quán miàn quán miàn 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 初审chū shěn chū shěn 判决pàn jué pàn jué 被bèi bèi 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Tudge personally was not consulted about the detention and had "no relevant knowledge" of the circumstances [2].
 该gāi gāi 部门bù mén bù mén 基于jī yú jī yú 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 存在cún zài cún zài 解释jiě shì jiě shì 错误cuò wù cuò wù 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 行事xíng shì xíng shì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The criticism should have been directed at department officials, not the minister [2]. **Key Context**: This case illustrates a genuine problem in Australian immigration law—the tension between ministerial direction/appeal rights and timely implementation of tribunal decisions [2].
 移民法yí mín fǎ yí mín fǎ 确实què shí què shí 复杂fù zá fù zá ；； ； 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 与yǔ yǔ 部门bù mén bù mén 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 就jiù jiù 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 解释jiě shì jiě shì 产生分歧chǎn shēng fēn qí chǎn shēng fēn qí 是shì shì 常见cháng jiàn cháng jiàn 的de de [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The department genuinely believed it had legal grounds to maintain detention during an appeal.
 TudgeTudge Tudge 个人gè rén gè rén 未wèi wèi 被bèi bèi 征询zhēng xún zhēng xún 关于guān yú guān yú 拘留jū liú jū liú 事宜shì yí shì yí ，， ， 对duì duì 该gāi gāi 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng "" " 不知情bù zhī qíng bù zhī qíng "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
While Justice Flick was right that the execution was inadequate, the full court was correct that this didn't constitute criminal conduct and that personal responsibility was misattributed [2].
 批评pī píng pī píng 应yīng yīng 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 部门bù mén bù mén 官员guān yuán guān yuán ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The case prompted discussion about immigration detention protocols but does not represent a minister deliberately ignoring the law so much as a department mishandling the implementation of a tribunal decision while invoking legal advice about the tribunal's correctness.
 ** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * ：： ： 此案cǐ àn cǐ àn 说明shuō míng shuō míng 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 移民法yí mín fǎ yí mín fǎ 的de de 一个yí gè yí gè 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 问题wèn tí wèn tí —— — —— — 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 指示zhǐ shì zhǐ shì // / 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 权quán quán 与yǔ yǔ 及时jí shí jí shí 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 裁决cái jué cái jué 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 紧张jǐn zhāng jǐn zhāng 关系guān xì guān xì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
该gāi gāi 部门bù mén bù mén 真诚地zhēn chéng dì zhēn chéng dì 相信xiāng xìn xiāng xìn 在zài zài 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 期间qī jiān qī jiān 维持wéi chí wéi chí 拘留jū liú jū liú 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 法律依据fǎ lǜ yī jù fǎ lǜ yī jù 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán FlickFlick Flick 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 对duì duì 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 不力bù lì bù lì 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng 是shì shì 正确zhèng què zhèng què 的de de ，， ， 但dàn dàn 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这zhè zhè 并bìng bìng 不bù bù 构成犯罪gòu chéng fàn zuì gòu chéng fàn zuì 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ，， ， 且qiě qiě 个人gè rén gè rén 责任zé rèn zé rèn 归属guī shǔ guī shǔ 错误cuò wù cuò wù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
该案gāi àn gāi àn 引发yǐn fā yǐn fā 了le le 对duì duì 移民yí mín yí mín 拘留jū liú jū liú 程序chéng xù chéng xù 的de de 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn ，， ， 但dàn dàn 并bìng bìng 不bù bù 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 故意gù yì gù yì 无视wú shì wú shì 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ ，， ， 而是ér shì ér shì 部门bù mén bù mén 在zài zài 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 裁决cái jué cái jué 时shí shí 援引yuán yǐn yuán yǐn 关于guān yú guān yú 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 正确性zhèng què xìng zhèng què xìng 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 时shí shí 处理不当chǔ lǐ bù dàng chǔ lǐ bù dàng 。。 。

部分属实

6.0

/ 10

FlickFlick Flick 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 确实què shí què shí 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 可kě kě 被bèi bèi "" " 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì "" " ，， ， 且qiě qiě PDWLPDWL PDWL 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài AATAAT AAT 裁决cái jué cái jué 批准pī zhǔn pī zhǔn 其qí qí 签证qiān zhèng qiān zhèng 后hòu hòu 仍réng réng 被bèi bèi 拘留jū liú jū liú [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Justice Flick did find conduct that could be "described as criminal," and PDWL was indeed detained despite an AAT ruling granting his visa [1].
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 的de de 是shì shì 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 图景tú jǐng tú jǐng 。。 。
However, the claim presents an incomplete legal picture.
 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 全体quán tǐ quán tǐ 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān 在zài zài 六个月liù gè yuè liù gè yuè 后hòu hòu 一致yí zhì yí zhì 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng ，， ， 裁定cái dìng cái dìng 未wèi wèi 发生fā shēng fā shēng 犯罪行为fàn zuì xíng wèi fàn zuì xíng wèi ，， ， 且qiě qiě TudgeTudge Tudge 个人gè rén gè rén 不bù bù 对duì duì 拘留jū liú jū liú 负责fù zé fù zé [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The full Federal Court unanimously overturned this finding six months later, determining that no criminal conduct occurred and that Tudge was not personally responsible for the detention [2].
 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 暗示àn shì àn shì "" " 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì "" " 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 裁定cái dìng cái dìng ，， ， 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 它tā tā 被bèi bèi 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué 了le le [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The claim implies the "criminal" characterization represents the final legal determination, when it was actually rejected by the appellate court [2].
 核心hé xīn hé xīn 问题wèn tí wèn tí —— — —— — AATAAT AAT 合规hé guī hé guī 处理不当chǔ lǐ bù dàng chǔ lǐ bù dàng —— — —— — 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de 。。 。
The core problem—poor handling of AAT compliance—is real.
 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 为wèi wèi "" " 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì "" " 则zé zé 被bèi bèi 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le ，， ， 与yǔ yǔ 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 判决pàn jué pàn jué 相xiāng xiāng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The characterization as "a crime" is overstated and contradicted by the appellate judgment [2].

📚 来源与引用 (5)

  1. 1
    theguardian.com

    theguardian.com

    Court says acting immigration minister ‘cannot place himself above the law’ in judgment that opens Tudge to sanctions for contempt of court

    the Guardian
  2. 2
    theguardian.com

    theguardian.com

    The federal court allows an appeal against a judgment that the acting immigration minister unlawfully deprived a detainee of liberty

    the Guardian
  3. 3
    abc.net.au

    abc.net.au

    Australia's chief legal officer downplays the significance of a Federal Court judge's blistering attack on Cabinet minister Alan Tudge, whose behaviour was labelled "criminal".

    Abc Net
  4. 4
    sbs.com.au

    sbs.com.au

    A federal court judge has declared Alan Tudge engaged in "criminal" conduct over the continued detention of an asylum seeker following an order for his release.

    SBS News
  5. 5
    basp.org.au

    basp.org.au

    The acting immigration minister, Alan Tudge, has launched an appeal against a federal court judgment that accused him of engaging in criminal conduct by refusing to free an asylum seeker. Tudge was the subject of the scathing ruling after he failed to release an Afghan asylum seeker from detention because he disagreed with the tribunal that ordered […]

    Brigidine Asylum Seekers Project (BASP)

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性，但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。

Previous: C0155 Next: C0157