部分属实

评分: 6.5/10

Coalition
C0142

声明内容

“引入了针对养老基金的新基准系统,对仅考虑短期表现而忽视风险的基金进行处罚。这意味着如果某些基金进行高风险、高回报的投资(如安然公司),其他基金就会被激励效仿,就像旅鼠跳崖一样。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí zài zài 20202020 2020 -- - 2121 21 年度预算nián dù yù suàn nián dù yù suàn zhōng zhōng 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù le le 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 养老yǎng lǎo yǎng lǎo 基金jī jīn jī jīn de de xīn xīn 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Coalition government did introduce a new benchmark system for superannuation funds in the 2020-21 Budget [1].
zhè zhè bèi bèi 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 称为chēng wéi chēng wéi "" " YourYour Your FutureFuture Future ,, , YourYour Your SuperSuper Super "" " YFYSYFYS YFYS 改革方案gǎi gé fāng àn gǎi gé fāng àn 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 年度nián dù nián dù 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 绩效jì xiào jì xiào 测试cè shì cè shì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
This was formally called the "Your Future, Your Super" (YFYS) reform package, which included the Annual Superannuation Performance Test [2]. **What the test actually measures:** The performance test compares MySuper products' actual financial year returns "net of fees" over the past **8 years** against composite benchmarks derived from strategic asset allocations [3].
** * ** * 测试cè shì cè shì de de 实际shí jì shí jì 衡量héng liáng héng liáng 内容nèi róng nèi róng ** * ** *
The test is not strictly "short-term" as the claim suggests—it uses an 8-year lookback period, which institutional investors typically consider medium to long-term [4]. **How benchmarks are constructed:** APRA uses "an agreed set of benchmarks to judge each asset class" [5].
绩效jì xiào jì xiào 测试cè shì cè shì jiāng jiāng MySuperMySuper MySuper 产品chǎn pǐn chǎn pǐn 过去guò qù guò qù ** * ** * 88 8 nián nián ** * ** * de de 实际shí jì shí jì 财年cái nián cái nián 回报huí bào huí bào "" " 扣除kòu chú kòu chú 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng hòu hòu "" " 基于jī yú jī yú 战略zhàn lüè zhàn lüè 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 配置pèi zhì pèi zhì de de 复合fù hé fù hé 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
These benchmarks are composite rates based on the mix of assets within each fund.
gāi gāi 测试cè shì cè shì 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 如该rú gāi rú gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 所说suǒ shuō suǒ shuō de de 严格yán gé yán gé 意义yì yì yì yì shàng shàng de de "" " 短期duǎn qī duǎn qī "" " 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 88 8 nián nián 回顾huí gù huí gù 机构jī gòu jī gòu 投资者tóu zī zhě tóu zī zhě 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng jiāng jiāng 视为shì wèi shì wèi 中期zhōng qī zhōng qī zhì zhì 长期cháng qī cháng qī [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
The test specifically measures whether funds beat a benchmark tailored to their asset allocation, not a one-size-fits-all comparison [3]. **Consequences for underperformance:** Funds that fail the test two consecutive years are barred from accepting new members, though they can resume accepting members when performance improves [1].
** * ** * 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn de de 构建gòu jiàn gòu jiàn 方式fāng shì fāng shì ** * ** *
This is less punitive than permanent closure and acknowledges recovery potential [3].
APRAAPRA APRA 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng "" " 一套yī tào yī tào 商定shāng dìng shāng dìng de de 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn lái lái 评判píng pàn píng pàn 每个měi gè měi gè 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 类别lèi bié lèi bié "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn shì shì 基于jī yú jī yú 基金jī jīn jī jīn 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 组合zǔ hé zǔ hé 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng de de 复合fù hé fù hé 利率lì lǜ lì lǜ
测试cè shì cè shì 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 衡量héng liáng héng liáng 基金jī jīn jī jīn 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu pǎo pǎo yíng yíng wèi wèi 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 配置pèi zhì pèi zhì 量身liàng shēn liàng shēn 定制dìng zhì dìng zhì de de 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn ér ér fēi fēi 一刀切yī dāo qiē yī dāo qiē shì shì de de 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
** * ** * duì duì 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn 不佳bù jiā bù jiā de de 处罚chǔ fá chǔ fá ** * ** *
连续lián xù lián xù 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián wèi wèi 通过tōng guò tōng guò 测试cè shì cè shì de de 基金jī jīn jī jīn jiāng jiāng bèi bèi 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 接纳jiē nà jiē nà xīn xīn 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán dàn dàn dāng dāng 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn shí shí 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 恢复huī fù huī fù 接纳jiē nà jiē nà 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
这比zhè bǐ zhè bǐ 永久yǒng jiǔ yǒng jiǔ 关闭guān bì guān bì de de 惩罚性chéng fá xìng chéng fá xìng yào yào xiǎo xiǎo bìng bìng 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 基金jī jīn jī jīn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 恢复huī fù huī fù 潜力qián lì qián lì [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]

缺失背景

** * ** * gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng jiāng jiāng 测试cè shì cè shì 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi "" " 短期duǎn qī duǎn qī "" " shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de
**The claim's characterization of "short-term" focus is inaccurate.** The 8-year measurement period is not short-term—it's explicitly designed to avoid penalizing funds for temporary market downturns.
** * ** * 88 8 nián nián de de 衡量héng liáng héng liáng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 短期duǎn qī duǎn qī 明确míng què míng què 设计shè jì shè jì 目的mù dì mù dì 就是jiù shì jiù shì 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn jǐn jǐn yīn yīn 暂时性zàn shí xìng zàn shí xìng 市场shì chǎng shì chǎng 低迷dī mí dī mí ér ér 惩罚chéng fá chéng fá 基金jī jīn jī jīn
An academic analysis notes that when the test began: "when the performance test began, it was aimed squarely at MySuper default funds" and "Of the thirteen funds which failed in the first year, only four of nine (44%) failed a second time" [4], demonstrating that one-year poor performance doesn't result in closure. **Risk-adjustment considerations:** The claim asserts the test ignores risk, but this requires nuance.
学术xué shù xué shù 分析fēn xī fēn xī 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū dāng dāng 测试cè shì cè shì 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ shí shí "" " 绩效jì xiào jì xiào 测试cè shì cè shì 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ shí shí 目标mù biāo mù biāo 直指zhí zhǐ zhí zhǐ MySuperMySuper MySuper 默认mò rèn mò rèn 基金jī jīn jī jīn "" " "" " 第一年dì yī nián dì yī nián wèi wèi 通过tōng guò tōng guò 测试cè shì cè shì de de 1313 13 jiā jiā 基金jī jīn jī jīn zhōng zhōng 只有zhǐ yǒu zhǐ yǒu 44 4 jiā jiā 44%44% 44% zài zài 第二年dì èr nián dì èr nián 再次zài cì zài cì wèi wèi 通过tōng guò tōng guò "" " [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 一年yī nián yī nián de de 不佳bù jiā bù jiā 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn bìng bìng 不会bú huì bú huì 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 关闭guān bì guān bì
The benchmarks are asset-class specific and reflect the fund's actual asset allocation [3].
** * ** * 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 考量kǎo liáng kǎo liáng ** * ** *
A balanced fund is compared to a balanced benchmark, a growth fund to a growth benchmark.
gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 测试cè shì cè shì 忽视hū shì hū shì le le 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn dàn dàn zhè zhè 需要xū yào xū yào nuancednuanced nuanced 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě
However, critics have noted the test does not explicitly incorporate risk-adjusted metrics like Sharpe ratios or other sophisticated risk measures [5]. **The Enron analogy is unsupported.** The claim suggests the system incentivizes dangerous risk-taking, but the actual mechanism does not: - Benchmarks are based on the fund's stated asset allocation strategy, not on absolute returns [3] - Funds cannot simply chase high-risk investments and be rewarded—they'd be compared against a different benchmark if they changed their asset allocation - The test has resulted in improved market stability, not herding into risky assets [6]
基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn shì shì 特定tè dìng tè dìng 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 类别lèi bié lèi bié de de 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 基金jī jīn jī jīn 实际shí jì shí jì de de 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 配置pèi zhì pèi zhì [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
平衡píng héng píng héng 型基金xíng jī jīn xíng jī jīn 平衡píng héng píng héng xíng xíng 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 成长型chéng zhǎng xíng chéng zhǎng xíng 基金jī jīn jī jīn 成长型chéng zhǎng xíng chéng zhǎng xíng 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào
然而rán ér rán ér 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 测试cè shì cè shì 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 明确míng què míng què 纳入nà rù nà rù 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 指标zhǐ biāo zhǐ biāo 如夏普rú xià pǔ rú xià pǔ 比率bǐ lǜ bǐ lǜ huò huò 其他qí tā qí tā 复杂fù zá fù zá de de 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 衡量标准héng liáng biāo zhǔn héng liáng biāo zhǔn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
** * ** * 安然ān rán ān rán 类比lèi bǐ lèi bǐ 缺乏quē fá quē fá 依据yī jù yī jù
** * ** * gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 暗示àn shì àn shì gāi gāi 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng huì huì 激励jī lì jī lì 危险wēi xiǎn wēi xiǎn de de 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 承担chéng dān chéng dān 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi dàn dàn 实际shí jì shí jì 机制jī zhì jī zhì 并非如此bìng fēi rú cǐ bìng fēi rú cǐ
-- - 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn 基于jī yú jī yú 基金jī jīn jī jīn 设定shè dìng shè dìng de de 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 配置pèi zhì pèi zhì 策略cè lüè cè lüè ér ér fēi fēi 绝对jué duì jué duì 回报huí bào huí bào [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 基金jī jīn jī jīn 不能bù néng bù néng 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 追逐zhuī zhú zhuī zhú 高风险gāo fēng xiǎn gāo fēng xiǎn 投资tóu zī tóu zī bìng bìng 获得huò dé huò dé 回报huí bào huí bào 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 改变gǎi biàn gǎi biàn 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 配置pèi zhì pèi zhì 他们tā men tā men jiāng jiāng 不同bù tóng bù tóng de de 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào
-- - gāi gāi 测试cè shì cè shì 带来dài lái dài lái 市场shì chǎng shì chǎng 稳定性wěn dìng xìng wěn dìng xìng de de 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn ér ér fēi fēi jiāng jiāng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 驱赶qū gǎn qū gǎn zhì zhì 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]

来源可信度评估

** * ** * TheThe The NewNew New DailyDaily Daily ** * ** * bèi bèi 确认què rèn què rèn wèi wèi "" " yóu yóu IndustryIndustry Industry SuperSuper Super HoldingsHoldings Holdings 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] zhè zhè 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe yóu yóu 一家yī jiā yī jiā 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào de de 行业háng yè háng yè 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 运营商yùn yíng shāng yùn yíng shāng 控制kòng zhì kòng zhì
**The New Daily** is identified as "owned by Industry Super Holdings" [1], which means it is controlled by a major industry superannuation operator.
虽然suī rán suī rán zhè zhè bìng bìng 使shǐ shǐ 报道bào dào bào dào 失效shī xiào shī xiào dàn dàn 造成zào chéng zào chéng le le 潜在qián zài qián zài de de 制度性zhì dù xìng zhì dù xìng 偏向piān xiàng piān xiàng 有利于yǒu lì yú yǒu lì yú 行业háng yè háng yè 基金jī jīn jī jīn 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 规模guī mó guī mó 较大jiào dà jiào dà 成立chéng lì chéng lì 时间shí jiān shí jiān 较长jiào zhǎng jiào zhǎng ér ér fēi fēi 零售líng shòu líng shòu 基金jī jīn jī jīn
While this doesn't invalidate its reporting, it creates a potential institutional bias favoring industry (typically larger, established) funds over retail funds.
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng le le 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén StephenStephen Stephen JonesJones Jones de de 言论yán lùn yán lùn 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì xīn xīn 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 可能kě néng kě néng jiāng jiāng "" " 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 绑定bǎng dìng bǎng dìng zài zài 一个yí gè yí gè làn làn 基金jī jīn jī jīn shàng shàng "" " zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng le le 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 最初zuì chū zuì chū de de 怀疑huái yí huái yí 态度tài dù tài dù dàn dàn 一定yí dìng yí dìng 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 客观kè guān kè guān 分析fēn xī fēn xī
The article quotes Labor superannuation spokesman Stephen Jones stating the new system risked tying "members to a dud," which reflects Labor's initial skepticism but not necessarily objective analysis.
文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 确实què shí què shí 包含bāo hán bāo hán le le 来自lái zì lái zì ChantChant Chant WestWest West 分析师fēn xī shī fēn xī shī IanIan Ian FryerFryer Fryer děng děng 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 来源lái yuán lái yuán 行业háng yè háng yè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo de de 引述yǐn shù yǐn shù 提供tí gōng tí gōng le le 一定yí dìng yí dìng de de 平衡性píng héng xìng píng héng xìng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The article does include quotes from neutral sources like Chant West analyst Ian Fryer and industry representatives, providing some balance [1].
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng
**Did Labor do something similar?** Labor opposed the YFYS reforms when initially proposed, with Stephen Jones calling the consultation process "crazy" and arguing that the government failed to properly consult industry [7].
** * ** *
However, **Labor did not propose eliminating the performance test once in government**.
LaborLabor Labor zài zài YFYSYFYS YFYS 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 最初zuì chū zuì chū 提出tí chū tí chū shí shí 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì StephenStephen Stephen JonesJones Jones chēng chēng 咨询zī xún zī xún 过程guò chéng guò chéng "" " 疯狂fēng kuáng fēng kuáng "" " 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 未能wèi néng wèi néng 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 咨询zī xún zī xún 行业háng yè háng yè 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]
Instead, Stephen Jones as Treasurer extended the performance test in 2023 to include ethical funds and maintained the test's core structure [8]. **Comparison of approaches:** Rather than introducing a fundamentally different system, Labor opted to expand and refine the existing Coalition framework, suggesting they found it workable with modifications [8].
然而rán ér rán ér ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng hòu hòu 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 提议tí yì tí yì 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 绩效jì xiào jì xiào 测试cè shì cè shì ** * ** *
Labor has discussed concerns about "regulatory complexity" but chose enhancement over replacement [9].
相反xiāng fǎn xiāng fǎn 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 财政部长cái zhèng bù zhǎng cái zhèng bù zhǎng de de StephenStephen Stephen JonesJones Jones zài zài 20232023 2023 nián nián jiāng jiāng 绩效jì xiào jì xiào 测试cè shì cè shì 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn zhì zhì 包含bāo hán bāo hán 道德dào dé dào dé 基金jī jīn jī jīn bìng bìng 维持wéi chí wéi chí le le 测试cè shì cè shì de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 结构jié gòu jié gòu [[ [ 88 8 ]] ]
** * ** * 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào ** * ** *
LaborLabor Labor 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 根本gēn běn gēn běn 不同bù tóng bù tóng de de 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 而是ér shì ér shì 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 扩展kuò zhǎn kuò zhǎn 完善wán shàn wán shàn 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu de de CoalitionCoalition Coalition 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 他们tā men tā men 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi gāi gāi 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 经过jīng guò jīng guò 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi hòu hòu shì shì 可行kě xíng kě xíng de de [[ [ 88 8 ]] ]
LaborLabor Labor céng céng 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn guò guò duì duì "" " 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng "" " de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu dàn dàn 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé le le 改进gǎi jìn gǎi jìn ér ér fēi fēi 替换tì huàn tì huàn [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 对系统duì xì tǒng duì xì tǒng de de 批评pī píng pī píng shì shì 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ de de ** * ** *
**Criticisms of the system are legitimate:** Recent industry analysis identifies genuine concerns about the performance test: - It focuses on net-of-fee returns without explicit risk-adjustment metrics [5] - The Reserve Bank of Australia has raised concerns about "herding around common benchmarks," noting funds may adopt similar investment strategies to avoid failing benchmarks, potentially "amplifying shocks" in the financial system [6] - The test does not account for ESG objectives, sustainability goals, or member age profiles [3] **Why the Coalition introduced this system:** The government's rationale was to eliminate poor-performing default funds and reduce the $450 million annually Australians paid in unnecessary fees due to multiple accounts [1].
近期jìn qī jìn qī 行业háng yè háng yè 分析fēn xī fēn xī 确定què dìng què dìng le le 绩效jì xiào jì xiào 测试cè shì cè shì de de 实际shí jì shí jì 关切guān qiè guān qiè
The system was designed to increase transparency and accountability, which have demonstrably worked—fee reductions have been substantial and underperformance has decreased dramatically [3]. **Results suggest the system has been effective:** Since introduction: - In 2021: approximately 1 million Australians were in failing products - By 2025: only 8,500 Australians in failing products (99% reduction) [10] - MySuper default fees have fallen to 0.2-0.4% range from 1-1.5% previously [10] - No MySuper default products failed the 2024 test [3] These outcomes suggest the system, while imperfect, has achieved its primary objective of protecting retirement savings. **Is the "lemming cliff" concern valid?** The herding concern has merit in theory, but practical evidence is mixed: - Funds are compared against benchmarks reflecting their own asset allocation, not a uniform standard [3] - The dramatic improvement in fund performance and fee reduction suggests competition on genuine metrics, not uniform herding [10] - However, the RBA's 2024 warning about herding behavior indicates this remains an ongoing supervision issue [6]
-- - 关注guān zhù guān zhù 扣除kòu chú kòu chú 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng hòu hòu de de 回报huí bào huí bào ér ér 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 明确míng què míng què de de 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 指标zhǐ biāo zhǐ biāo [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
-- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 储备chǔ bèi chǔ bèi 银行yín háng yín háng céng céng duì duì "" " 围绕wéi rào wéi rào 通用tōng yòng tōng yòng 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn de de 羊群yáng qún yáng qún 效应xiào yìng xiào yìng "" " 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 基金jī jīn jī jīn 可能kě néng kě néng 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 类似lèi sì lèi sì de de 投资tóu zī tóu zī 策略cè lüè cè lüè 避免bì miǎn bì miǎn 未能wèi néng wèi néng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn 测试cè shì cè shì 从而cóng ér cóng ér 可能kě néng kě néng "" " 放大fàng dà fàng dà "" " 金融jīn róng jīn róng 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng zhōng zhōng de de 冲击chōng jī chōng jī [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
-- - 测试cè shì cè shì wèi wèi 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ ESGESG ESG 目标mù biāo mù biāo 持续chí xù chí xù 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 目标mù biāo mù biāo huò huò 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 年龄结构nián líng jié gòu nián líng jié gòu [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng de de 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn ** * ** *
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu shì shì 消除xiāo chú xiāo chú 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn 不佳bù jiā bù jiā de de 默认mò rèn mò rèn 基金jī jīn jī jīn bìng bìng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén yīn yīn 多个duō gè duō gè 账户zhàng hù zhàng hù ér ér 每年měi nián měi nián 支付zhī fù zhī fù de de 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 4.54.5 4.5 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
gāi gāi 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 提高tí gāo tí gāo 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 问责制wèn zé zhì wèn zé zhì ér ér 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 目标mù biāo mù biāo bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng shì shì 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào de de 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng 大幅dà fú dà fú 降低jiàng dī jiàng dī 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn 不佳bù jiā bù jiā de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
** * ** * 结果表明jié guǒ biǎo míng jié guǒ biǎo míng gāi gāi 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng shì shì 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào de de ** * ** *
推出tuī chū tuī chū 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái
-- - 20212021 2021 nián nián yuē yuē yǒu yǒu 100100 100 wàn wàn 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 处于chǔ yú chǔ yú 失败shī bài shī bài 产品chǎn pǐn chǎn pǐn zhōng zhōng
-- - 20252025 2025 nián nián jǐn jǐn yǒu yǒu 88 8 ,, , 500500 500 míng míng 澳大利亚人ào dà lì yà rén ào dà lì yà rén 处于chǔ yú chǔ yú 失败shī bài shī bài 产品chǎn pǐn chǎn pǐn zhōng zhōng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 99%99% 99% [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]
-- - MySuperMySuper MySuper 默认mò rèn mò rèn 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng cóng cóng 之前zhī qián zhī qián de de 11 1 -- - 1.5%1.5% 1.5% 降至jiàng zhì jiàng zhì 0.20.2 0.2 -- - 0.4%0.4% 0.4% 区间qū jiān qū jiān [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]
-- - 20242024 2024 nián nián 测试cè shì cè shì zhōng zhōng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu MySuperMySuper MySuper 默认mò rèn mò rèn 产品chǎn pǐn chǎn pǐn wèi wèi 通过tōng guò tōng guò [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 结果表明jié guǒ biǎo míng jié guǒ biǎo míng gāi gāi 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 虽然suī rán suī rán 完美wán měi wán měi dàn dàn 实现shí xiàn shí xiàn 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 退休tuì xiū tuì xiū 储蓄chǔ xù chǔ xù de de 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 目标mù biāo mù biāo
** * ** * "" " 旅鼠lǚ shǔ lǚ shǔ 跳崖tiào yá tiào yá "" " de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào
** * ** *
羊群yáng qún yáng qún 效应xiào yìng xiào yìng 担忧dān yōu dān yōu zài zài 理论lǐ lùn lǐ lùn shàng shàng yǒu yǒu 一定yí dìng yí dìng 道理dào lǐ dào lǐ dàn dàn 实际shí jì shí jì 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù shì shì 复杂fù zá fù zá de de
-- - 基金jī jīn jī jīn 与其yǔ qí yǔ qí 自身zì shēn zì shēn de de 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn 配置pèi zhì pèi zhì 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào ér ér fēi fēi 统一标准tǒng yī biāo zhǔn tǒng yī biāo zhǔn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 基金jī jīn jī jīn 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn 费用fèi yòng fèi yòng de de 大幅dà fú dà fú 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng shì shì 基于jī yú jī yú 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 指标zhǐ biāo zhǐ biāo de de 竞争jìng zhēng jìng zhēng ér ér fēi fēi 统一tǒng yī tǒng yī de de 羊群yáng qún yáng qún 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]
-- - 然而rán ér rán ér RBARBA RBA zài zài 20242024 2024 nián nián 关于guān yú guān yú 羊群yáng qún yáng qún 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi de de 警告jǐng gào jǐng gào 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng zhè zhè 仍然réng rán réng rán shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 持续chí xù chí xù de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]

部分属实

6.5

/ 10

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù le le 一个yí gè yí gè 基准jī zhǔn jī zhǔn 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 测试cè shì cè shì 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 长期cháng qī cháng qī 退休tuì xiū tuì xiū 期限qī xiàn qī xiàn de de 短期duǎn qī duǎn qī 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 88 8 nián nián de de 衡量héng liáng héng liáng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 严格yán gé yán gé 意义yì yì yì yì shàng shàng de de "" " 短期duǎn qī duǎn qī "" "
The Coalition did introduce a benchmark system that tests short-term (relative to long-term retirement horizons) performance, though the 8-year measurement period is not strictly "short-term." The test does not explicitly incorporate risk-adjustment metrics, making critics' concerns about potentially incentivizing risk-taking theoretically possible.
gāi gāi 测试cè shì cè shì wèi wèi 明确míng què míng què 纳入nà rù nà rù 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 调整tiáo zhěng tiáo zhěng 指标zhǐ biāo zhǐ biāo 使得shǐ de shǐ de 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě duì duì 可能kě néng kě néng 激励jī lì jī lì 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 承担chéng dān chéng dān de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu zài zài 理论lǐ lùn lǐ lùn shàng shàng shì shì 可能kě néng kě néng de de
However, the "lemmings off a cliff" characterization is hyperbolic and unsupported by evidence—the system has actually driven improved performance and reduced herding into underperforming funds.
然而rán ér rán ér "" " 旅鼠lǚ shǔ lǚ shǔ 跳崖tiào yá tiào yá "" " de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù shì shì 夸张kuā zhāng kuā zhāng de de qiě qiě 缺乏quē fá quē fá 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 支持zhī chí zhī chí gāi gāi 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 推动tuī dòng tuī dòng le le 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn de de 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn bìng bìng 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo le le xiàng xiàng 表现biǎo xiàn biǎo xiàn 不佳bù jiā bù jiā 基金jī jīn jī jīn de de 羊群yáng qún yáng qún 效应xiào yìng xiào yìng
The test has real limitations that Labor has acknowledged, but both parties have maintained its core structure when in government.
gāi gāi 测试cè shì cè shì 存在cún zài cún zài 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de 局限性jú xiàn xìng jú xiàn xìng LaborLabor Labor 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn zhè zhè 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn dàn dàn 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng shí shí dōu dōu 维持wéi chí wéi chí le le gāi gāi 测试cè shì cè shì de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 结构jié gòu jié gòu

📚 来源与引用 (10)

  1. 1
    Federal budget 2020: The pros and cons of the superannuation reforms

    Federal budget 2020: The pros and cons of the superannuation reforms

    The budget's proposed superannuation measures are an attempt to end costly multiple accounts and improve performance for members. But there is a risk.

    Thenewdaily Com
  2. 2
    apra.gov.au

    Your Future, Your Super legislation and supporting material

    The Government’s Your Future, Your Super (YFYS) reform package was announced in the 2020-21 Budget.

    Apra Gov
  3. 3
    An expert guide to the superannuation performance test

    An expert guide to the superannuation performance test

    Why do we need the superannuation performance test, how does it work and what do its results mean?

    SelectingSuper
  4. 4
    PDF

    Appendix 1 Your Future Your Super Performance Test Constraints

    Theconexusinstitute Org • PDF Document
  5. 5
    PDF

    Comparing PME Benchmarking with APRA's Performance Test

    Monash • PDF Document
  6. 6
    investmentmagazine.com.au

    RBA commentary another indicator of YFYS consequences

    Investmentmagazine Com

  7. 7
    investmentmagazine.com.au

    Stephen Jones: Strong industry consultation needed

    Investmentmagazine Com

  8. 8
    Stephen Jones rejects push to minimise scrutiny of ethical super funds

    Stephen Jones rejects push to minimise scrutiny of ethical super funds

    The government is also sticking with plans to use indices to benchmark fund performance despite calls from AustralianSuper to ditch them.

    Australian Financial Review
  9. 9
    Why is Labor trying to wind back super reforms?

    Why is Labor trying to wind back super reforms?

    Assistant Treasurer Stephen Jones has asked the Treasury to consider concerns relating to the “regulatory complexity” of a requirement that super funds act in their members' best financial interests.

    SmartCompany
  10. 10
    Super's big test is working, but there is a fatal flaw

    Super's big test is working, but there is a fatal flaw

    The prudential regulator’s testing regime is shining a light across much of the superannuation sector. But it’s great for only one set of fund members.

    The Sydney Morning Herald

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。