部分属实

评分： 6.5/10

报告问题
Coalition
C0137

声明内容

“拒绝发布一份关于COVID政策传播策略的报告，该报告耗资超过50万澳元。”
腐败 新冠疫情 税收
原始来源： Matthew Davis
分析时间： 29 Jan 2026

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 基本jī běn jī běn 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn "" " 拒绝jù jué jù jué 发布fā bù fā bù "" " 的de de 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 需要xū yào xū yào 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 说明shuō míng shuō míng 。。 。
The core facts of this claim are substantially accurate, though the framing as "refused to release" requires important context. [1] **The Research Contract**: The Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C) commissioned market research from Resolve Strategic, a company run by Jim Reed, a former long-term researcher for the Liberal Party's polling firm Crosby Textor. [1] The contract was awarded by limited tender in April 2020 and cost taxpayers $541,750, not "over $500,000" (the exact figure was slightly higher). [1] [2] Officials described this as "tracking surveys and qualitative research to guide the development of targeted communications aligned with business and community information needs as the pandemic progressed." [1] **Was There a Second Research Contract?**: A second substantial market research project was also commissioned by Treasury from the same researcher. [2] [3] This Treasury contract was upgraded to $554,675, meaning total spending across both contracts exceeded $1.09 million combined. [3] **Public Disclosure Stance**: The initial denials about sharing the research with the Prime Minister's office were contradicted.
 [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
During Senate estimates, Gerard Martin (first assistant secretary of PMC's ministerial support division) twice stated "I don't believe so, senator" when asked if the research had been shared with the PM's office. [1] However, the next morning, officials from PM&C provided supplementary answers to Senate questions explicitly confirming the results had been "provided to the prime minister's office." [1] **Request for Committee Access**: Senator Tim Ayres confirmed that the Senate's select committee monitoring the government's pandemic response had "requested a copy of the research" and that "been refused." [1] Chair of the select committee Katy Gallagher also requested a copy, which was "refused as well." [1] **Stated Justification for Non-Release**: The government did not formally refuse under Freedom of Information (FOI) legislation; rather, it simply did not release the research proactively or to parliamentary committees requesting it. [1]
 ** * ** * 研究yán jiū yán jiū 合同hé tóng hé tóng ** * ** * ：： ： 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 和hé hé 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 部bù bù （（ （ PMPM PM && & CC C ）） ） 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō ResolveResolve Resolve StrategicStrategic Strategic 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 市场shì chǎng shì chǎng 研究yán jiū yán jiū ，， ， 该gāi gāi 公司gōng sī gōng sī 由yóu yóu JimJim Jim ReedReed Reed 经营jīng yíng jīng yíng ，， ， 他tā tā 曾céng céng 是shì shì LiberalLiberal Liberal PartyParty Party 民调mín diào mín diào 公司gōng sī gōng sī CrosbyCrosby Crosby TextorTextor Textor 的de de 长期cháng qī cháng qī 研究yán jiū yán jiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 该gāi gāi 合同hé tóng hé tóng 于yú yú 20202020 2020 年nián nián 44 4 月yuè yuè 通过tōng guò tōng guò 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ ，， ， 花费huā fèi huā fèi 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 541541 541 ,, , 750750 750 澳元ào yuán ào yuán ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi "" " 超过chāo guò chāo guò 5050 50 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán "" " （（ （ 实际shí jì shí jì 金额jīn é jīn é 略lüè lüè 高gāo gāo ）） ） 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 官员guān yuán guān yuán 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 跟踪调查gēn zōng diào chá gēn zōng diào chá 和hé hé 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng 研究yán jiū yán jiū ，， ， 以yǐ yǐ 指导zhǐ dǎo zhǐ dǎo 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 与yǔ yǔ 企业qǐ yè qǐ yè 和hé hé 社区shè qū shè qū 信息xìn xī xìn xī 需求xū qiú xū qiú 相一致xiāng yí zhì xiāng yí zhì 的de de 针对性zhēn duì xìng zhēn duì xìng 传播chuán bō chuán bō 策略cè lüè cè lüè ，， ， 以yǐ yǐ 应对yìng duì yìng duì 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 的de de 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn "" " 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 存在cún zài cún zài 第二份dì èr fèn dì èr fèn 研究yán jiū yán jiū 合同hé tóng hé tóng ？？ ？
** * ** * ：： ： 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 也yě yě 从cóng cóng 同一tóng yī tóng yī 研究yán jiū yán jiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán 处chù chù 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 了le le 另lìng lìng 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 大型dà xíng dà xíng 市场shì chǎng shì chǎng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 。。 。
[[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 该gāi gāi 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 合同hé tóng hé tóng 升级shēng jí shēng jí 至zhì zhì 554554 554 ,, , 675675 675 澳元ào yuán ào yuán ，， ， 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 两份liǎng fèn liǎng fèn 合同hé tóng hé tóng 的de de 总支出zǒng zhī chū zǒng zhī chū 合计hé jì hé jì 超过chāo guò chāo guò 109109 109 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 。。 。
[[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
** * ** * 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 披露pī lù pī lù 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ** * ** * ：： ： 关于guān yú guān yú 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 与yǔ yǔ 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 共享gòng xiǎng gòng xiǎng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 的de de 初步chū bù chū bù 否认fǒu rèn fǒu rèn 后来hòu lái hòu lái 被bèi bèi 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 。。 。
在zài zài 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 预算yù suàn yù suàn 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 上shàng shàng ，， ， 当dāng dāng 问及wèn jí wèn jí 研究yán jiū yán jiū 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 已yǐ yǐ 与yǔ yǔ 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 共享gòng xiǎng gòng xiǎng 时shí shí ，， ， PMPM PM && & CC C 部长级bù zhǎng jí bù zhǎng jí 支持zhī chí zhī chí 司sī sī 第一dì yī dì yī 助理zhù lǐ zhù lǐ 秘书mì shū mì shū GerardGerard Gerard MartinMartin Martin 两次liǎng cì liǎng cì 回答huí dá huí dá "" " 我wǒ wǒ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu ，， ， 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán "" " 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 第二天dì èr tiān dì èr tiān 早上zǎo shàng zǎo shàng ，， ， PMPM PM && & CC C 官员guān yuán guān yuán 向xiàng xiàng 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 问题wèn tí wèn tí 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 补充bǔ chōng bǔ chōng 答复dá fù dá fù ，， ， 明确míng què míng què 确认què rèn què rèn 研究yán jiū yán jiū 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ 已yǐ yǐ "" " 提供tí gōng tí gōng 给gěi gěi 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì "" " 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú ** * ** * ：： ： 参议员cān yì yuán cān yì yuán TimTim Tim AyresAyres Ayres 确认què rèn què rèn ，， ， 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 监督jiān dū jiān dū 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 应对yìng duì yìng duì 的de de 特别tè bié tè bié 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì "" " 已yǐ yǐ 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 获得huò dé huò dé 该gāi gāi 研究yán jiū yán jiū 报告bào gào bào gào 的de de 副本fù běn fù běn "" " ，， ， 但dàn dàn "" " 遭到zāo dào zāo dào 拒绝jù jué jù jué "" " 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 特别tè bié tè bié 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí KatyKaty Katy GallagherGallagher Gallagher 也yě yě 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 获得huò dé huò dé 一份yī fèn yī fèn 副本fù běn fù běn ，， ， 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng "" " 遭到zāo dào zāo dào 拒绝jù jué jù jué "" " 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 不bù bù 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * ：： ： 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 根据gēn jù gēn jù 《《 《 信息xìn xī xìn xī 自由zì yóu zì yóu 法fǎ fǎ 》》 》 （（ （ FOIFOI FOI ）） ） 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 拒绝jù jué jù jué ；； ； 相反xiāng fǎn xiāng fǎn ，， ， 它tā tā 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 向xiàng xiàng 议会yì huì yì huì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 披露pī lù pī lù 或huò huò 提供tí gōng tí gōng 该gāi gāi 研究yán jiū yán jiū 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 要点yào diǎn yào diǎn ：： ：
The claim omits several important contextual points: **1.
 ** * ** * 11 1 .. . 危机wēi jī wēi jī 期间qī jiān qī jiān 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 传播chuán bō chuán bō routinelyroutinely routinely 需要xū yào xū yào 研究yán jiū yán jiū 支持zhī chí zhī chí ** * ** * ：： ： LaborLabor Labor 和hé hé CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 各gè gè 机构jī gòu jī gòu 定期dìng qī dìng qī 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 市场shì chǎng shì chǎng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 来lái lái 为wèi wèi 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 或huò huò 危机wēi jī wēi jī 传播chuán bō chuán bō 提供tí gōng tí gōng 信息xìn xī xìn xī 。。 。
Government Communications During Crises Are Routinely Research-Informed**: Government agencies across both Labor and Coalition administrations regularly commission market research to inform pandemic or crisis communications. [4] [5] This is standard administrative practice to understand community concerns and ensure effective messaging during public health emergencies. **2.
 [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 这是zhè shì zhè shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 的de de 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 程序chéng xù chéng xù ，， ， 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 社区shè qū shè qū 关切guān qiè guān qiè 并bìng bìng 确保què bǎo què bǎo 公共卫生gōng gòng wèi shēng gōng gòng wèi shēng 紧急情况jǐn jí qíng kuàng jǐn jí qíng kuàng 下xià xià 的de de 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào 信息xìn xī xìn xī 传递chuán dì chuán dì 。。 。
Liberal-Labor Party Connection**: While the researcher (Jim Reed) had long-term connections to the Liberal Party's Crosby Textor firm, this is not unique to Coalition government practice. [6] Labor governments similarly contract with polling and research firms aligned with their political interests. [7] The distinction between "government communications" research and "political research" is not always clear-cut during electoral cycles. **3.
 ** * ** * 22 2 .. . LiberalLiberal Liberal -- - LaborLabor Labor 的de de 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 联系lián xì lián xì ** * ** * ：： ： 虽然suī rán suī rán 研究yán jiū yán jiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán （（ （ JimJim Jim ReedReed Reed ）） ） 与yǔ yǔ LiberalLiberal Liberal PartyParty Party 的de de CrosbyCrosby Crosby TextorTextor Textor 公司gōng sī gōng sī 有yǒu yǒu 长期cháng qī cháng qī 联系lián xì lián xì ，， ， 但dàn dàn 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。 。
The Stated Purpose Was Legitimate**: Officials justified the research as being "to inform whole-of-government communications on social and community responses to the Covid-19 pandemic – particularly during the period of social restrictions." [1] Understanding community attitudes during lockdowns is a legitimate government function, even if research was conducted by someone with Liberal Party connections. **4.
 [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 与yǔ yǔ 符合fú hé fú hé 其qí qí 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 利益lì yì lì yì 的de de 民意调查mín yì diào chá mín yì diào chá 和hé hé 研究yán jiū yán jiū 公司gōng sī gōng sī 签订合同qiān dìng hé tóng qiān dìng hé tóng 。。 。
Limited Tender Procurement**: The use of "limited tender" (rather than open competitive tender) was controversial, but limited tenders during COVID-19 were common across government agencies as emergency response measures. [3] This was not unique to this research contract. **5.
 [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 在zài zài 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 周期zhōu qī zhōu qī 中zhōng zhōng ，， ， "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 传播chuán bō chuán bō "" " 研究yán jiū yán jiū 与yǔ yǔ "" " 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 研究yán jiū yán jiū "" " 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 界限jiè xiàn jiè xiàn 并bìng bìng 不bù bù 总是zǒng shì zǒng shì 清晰qīng xī qīng xī 的de de 。。 。
Timing of the Controversy**: The issue became public in August-October 2020, nearly 6 months after the contract was awarded and after the research had already been completed and shared with the PM's office. [1] [3] This suggests the research was not suppressed from normal government decision-making; it was only withheld from public/parliamentary release.
 ** * ** * 33 3 .. . 所述suǒ shù suǒ shù 目的mù dì mù dì 是shì shì 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de ** * ** * ：： ： 官员guān yuán guān yuán 为wèi wèi 该gāi gāi 研究yán jiū yán jiū 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ，， ， 称其chēng qí chēng qí "" " 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 为wèi wèi 关于guān yú guān yú COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 的de de 社会shè huì shè huì 和hé hé 社区shè qū shè qū 反应fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 的de de 全quán quán 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 传播chuán bō chuán bō 提供tí gōng tí gōng 信息xìn xī xìn xī —— — —— — 特别tè bié tè bié 是shì shì 在zài zài 社交shè jiāo shè jiāo 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 期间qī jiān qī jiān "" " 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 在zài zài 由yóu yóu 与yǔ yǔ LiberalLiberal Liberal PartyParty Party 有yǒu yǒu 关联guān lián guān lián 的de de 人员rén yuán rén yuán 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià ，， ， 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 封锁fēng suǒ fēng suǒ 期间qī jiān qī jiān 的de de 社区shè qū shè qū 态度tài dù tài dù 也yě yě 是shì shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 职能zhí néng zhí néng 。。 。
** * ** * 44 4 .. . 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu ** * ** * ：： ： 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng "" " 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo "" " （（ （ 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 竞争性jìng zhēng xìng jìng zhēng xìng 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo ）） ） 存在cún zài cún zài 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì ，， ， 但dàn dàn 在zài zài COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 期间qī jiān qī jiān ，， ， 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 各gè gè 部门bù mén bù mén 普遍pǔ biàn pǔ biàn 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 紧急jǐn jí jǐn jí 应对yìng duì yìng duì 措施cuò shī cuò shī 。。 。
[[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 该gāi gāi 研究yán jiū yán jiū 合同hé tóng hé tóng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 。。 。
** * ** * 55 5 .. . 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 时间shí jiān shí jiān 点diǎn diǎn ** * ** * ：： ： 该gāi gāi 问题wèn tí wèn tí 在zài zài 20202020 2020 年nián nián 88 8 -- - 1010 10 月yuè yuè 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi ，， ， 距离jù lí jù lí 合同hé tóng hé tóng 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ 已近yǐ jìn yǐ jìn 66 6 个gè gè 月yuè yuè ，， ， 且qiě qiě 研究yán jiū yán jiū 已yǐ yǐ 完成wán chéng wán chéng 并bìng bìng 与yǔ yǔ 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 共享gòng xiǎng gòng xiǎng 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 该gāi gāi 研究yán jiū yán jiū 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 从cóng cóng 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 决策jué cè jué cè 中zhōng zhōng 隐瞒yǐn mán yǐn mán ；； ； 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 未向wèi xiàng wèi xiàng 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng // / 议会yì huì yì huì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian AustraliaAustralia Australia ** * ** * ：： ： 该gāi gāi 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 编辑biān jí biān jí 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 的de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 机构jī gòu jī gòu ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 其qí qí 公认gōng rèn gōng rèn 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 偏piān piān 中间zhōng jiān zhōng jiān 偏左piān zuǒ piān zuǒ 。。 。
**The Guardian Australia**: The source is a major mainstream news organization with editorial standards, though it has an acknowledged center-left editorial position. [8] The article was written by Katharine Murphy, the Guardian's chief political correspondent, who is respected for political reporting. [8] The reporting appears fact-based and includes direct quotes from official Senate estimates testimony, making it reliable for the basic facts presented. **Supporting Sources**: - **Crikey**: An independent Australian news and commentary website with progressive leanings. [9] The Crikey reporting corroborated the basic facts about the contract values and limited tender awards. [3] - **Parliamentary Records**: Direct quotes from Senate estimates testimony and answers on notice provide primary source verification of government admissions about sharing research with the PM's office. [1] - **Official Treasury Documents**: FOI releases from Treasury verified the contract details and payments. [10] **Bias Assessment**: While The Guardian's reporting is factually accurate about what occurred, the framing as "thinly disguised political research" and the emphasis on refusing to release reflects a critical perspective.
 [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 由yóu yóu TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian 首席shǒu xí shǒu xí 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 记者jì zhě jì zhě KatharineKatharine Katharine MurphyMurphy Murphy 撰写zhuàn xiě zhuàn xiě ，， ， 她tā tā 以yǐ yǐ 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 报道bào dào bào dào 著称zhù chēng zhù chēng 。。 。
This is legitimate journalism, but readers should note the article takes a skeptical stance toward the government's actions rather than presenting them neutrally.
 [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 报道bào dào bào dào 似乎sì hū sì hū 基于jī yú jī yú 事实shì shí shì shí ，， ， 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 预算yù suàn yù suàn 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引述yǐn shù yǐn shù ，， ， 使shǐ shǐ 其qí qí 所suǒ suǒ 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 的de de 基本jī běn jī běn 事实shì shí shì shí 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 可靠性kě kào xìng kě kào xìng 。。 。
** * ** * 支持zhī chí zhī chí 来源lái yuán lái yuán ** * ** * ：： ：
-- - ** * ** * CrikeyCrikey Crikey ** * ** * ：： ： 一家yī jiā yī jiā 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 进步jìn bù jìn bù 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 的de de 独立dú lì dú lì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 和hé hé 评论píng lùn píng lùn 网站wǎng zhàn wǎng zhàn 。。 。
[[ [ 99 9 ]] ] CrikeyCrikey Crikey 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 关于guān yú guān yú 合同hé tóng hé tóng 价值jià zhí jià zhí 和hé hé 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ 的de de 基本jī běn jī běn 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。
[[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - ** * ** * ParliamentaryParliamentary Parliamentary RecordsRecords Records ** * ** * ：： ： 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 预算yù suàn yù suàn 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 和hé hé 书面shū miàn shū miàn 答复dá fù dá fù 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引述yǐn shù yǐn shù 为wèi wèi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 与yǔ yǔ 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 共享gòng xiǎng gòng xiǎng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 资料zī liào zī liào 验证yàn zhèng yàn zhèng 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - ** * ** * OfficialOfficial Official TreasuryTreasury Treasury DocumentsDocuments Documents ** * ** * ：： ： 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 的de de FOIFOI FOI 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 验证yàn zhèng yàn zhèng 了le le 合同hé tóng hé tóng 细节xì jié xì jié 和hé hé 付款fù kuǎn fù kuǎn 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 。。 。
[[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]
** * ** * 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 评估píng gū píng gū ** * ** * ：： ： 虽然suī rán suī rán TheThe The GuardianGuardian Guardian 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 对duì duì 所suǒ suǒ 发生fā shēng fā shēng 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ，， ， 但dàn dàn 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 伪装wěi zhuāng wěi zhuāng 拙劣zhuō liè zhuō liè 的de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 研究yán jiū yán jiū "" " 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 批评pī píng pī píng 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo 。。 。
这是zhè shì zhè shì 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào ，， ， 但dàn dàn 读者dú zhě dú zhě 应yīng yīng 注意zhù yì zhù yì 该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 对duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 持chí chí 怀疑huái yí huái yí 态度tài dù tài dù ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ？？ ？
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government market research polling communications spending political research contractors" **Finding**: Labor governments have similarly contracted with firms aligned with their political interests for government communications research. [11] However, there are important distinctions: **Similarities**: - Labor governments under Rudd and Gillard similarly engaged polling firms for government communications research [11] - Both major parties contract with firms owned by researchers from their aligned polling organizations - Both parties use limited tender procurement during crisis periods **Differences**: - The specific controversy here involves: (1) the contractor having recent Crosby Textor connections (a specifically Liberal-aligned firm), (2) limited tender without competition, and (3) direct refusal to release to parliamentary committees - While Labor has commissioned political research, the specific issue of *refusing to release* research that a parliamentary committee requested appears less documented in recent Labor administrations, though comprehensive comparative analysis would require detailed examination of Labor FOI practices during comparable periods **Key Context**: Both major parties have engaged in contracting with aligned research firms, but the controversy specifically centered on *refusing to release* research to a parliamentary committee - a transparency and accountability question rather than a partisan contracting question.
 ** * ** *
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 内容nèi róng nèi róng ：： ： "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 市场shì chǎng shì chǎng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 民意调查mín yì diào chá mín yì diào chá 传播chuán bō chuán bō 支出zhī chū zhī chū 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 研究yán jiū yán jiū 承包商chéng bāo shāng chéng bāo shāng "" "
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ** * ** * ：： ： LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 与yǔ yǔ 符合fú hé fú hé 其qí qí 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 利益lì yì lì yì 的de de 公司gōng sī gōng sī 签订qiān dìng qiān dìng 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 传播chuán bō chuán bō 研究yán jiū yán jiū 合同hé tóng hé tóng 。。 。
[[ [ 1111 11 ]] ] 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 存在cún zài cún zài 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 区别qū bié qū bié ：： ：
** * ** * 相似之处xiāng sì zhī chù xiāng sì zhī chù ** * ** * ：： ：
-- - RuddRudd Rudd 和hé hé GillardGillard Gillard 领导lǐng dǎo lǐng dǎo 的de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 聘请pìn qǐng pìn qǐng 民意调查mín yì diào chá mín yì diào chá 公司gōng sī gōng sī 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 传播chuán bō chuán bō 研究yán jiū yán jiū [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ]
-- - 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 与yǔ yǔ 来自lái zì lái zì 其qí qí 结盟jié méng jié méng 民调mín diào mín diào 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 研究yán jiū yán jiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 的de de 公司gōng sī gōng sī 签订合同qiān dìng hé tóng qiān dìng hé tóng
-- - 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 在zài zài 危机wēi jī wēi jī 期间qī jiān qī jiān 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu
** * ** * 不同之处bù tóng zhī chù bù tóng zhī chù ** * ** * ：： ：
-- - 此处cǐ chù cǐ chù 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 涉及shè jí shè jí ：： ： (( ( 11 1 )) ) 承包商chéng bāo shāng chéng bāo shāng 与yǔ yǔ CrosbyCrosby Crosby TextorTextor Textor （（ （ 特定tè dìng tè dìng LiberalLiberal Liberal 结盟jié méng jié méng 公司gōng sī gōng sī ）） ） 有yǒu yǒu 近期jìn qī jìn qī 联系lián xì lián xì ，， ， (( ( 22 2 )) ) 无wú wú 竞争jìng zhēng jìng zhēng 的de de 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo ，， ， 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí (( ( 33 3 )) ) 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 拒绝jù jué jù jué 向xiàng xiàng 议会yì huì yì huì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi
-- - 虽然suī rán suī rán LaborLabor Labor 曾céng céng 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 研究yán jiū yán jiū ，， ， 但dàn dàn 关于guān yú guān yú ** * 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi ** * 议会yì huì yì huì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 的de de 研究yán jiū yán jiū 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 问题wèn tí wèn tí 在zài zài 近期jìn qī jìn qī 的de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 中zhōng zhōng 记录jì lù jì lù 较jiào jiào 少shǎo shǎo ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 全面quán miàn quán miàn 的de de 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 分析fēn xī fēn xī 需要xū yào xū yào 详细审查xiáng xì shěn chá xiáng xì shěn chá LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 类似lèi sì lèi sì 时期shí qī shí qī 的de de FOIFOI FOI 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * ：： ： 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 存在cún zài cún zài 与yǔ yǔ 结盟jié méng jié méng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 公司gōng sī gōng sī 签订合同qiān dìng hé tóng qiān dìng hé tóng 的de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi ，， ， 但dàn dàn 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 在于zài yú zài yú ** * 拒绝jù jué jù jué 向xiàng xiàng 议会yì huì yì huì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi ** * 研究yán jiū yán jiū —— — —— — 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 和hé hé 问责wèn zé wèn zé 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 合同hé tóng hé tóng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 批评pī píng pī píng 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn ** * ** * ：： ： 该gāi gāi 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 关于guān yú guān yú 问责制wèn zé zhì wèn zé zhì 和hé hé 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 关切guān qiè guān qiè 。。 。
**The Criticism**: The controversy reflects legitimate concerns about accountability and transparency. [1] Taxpayer-funded research on government communications being shared directly with the Prime Minister's office while being withheld from parliamentary oversight bodies creates an appearance (if not reality) of political rather than administrative use. [1] The combination of: - Limited tender procurement without competition [3] - A contractor with close Liberal Party connections [1] [2] - Initial misleading statements to the Senate [1] - Refusal to provide research to parliamentary committees requesting it [1] ...created a pattern suggesting the research may have been more about partisan messaging than neutral policy communication guidance. **The Government's Perspective**: The government's position (implied through its actions and statements) was that: - COVID-19 communications research was necessary to understand community concerns during the pandemic [1] - The research informed legitimate whole-of-government communications policy [1] - Limited tender was appropriate given the urgency of pandemic response [3] - Contractor selection, while from someone with Liberal Party connections, reflected the researcher's expertise in tracking surveys and community attitudes [1] - The research was not a "refused FOI request" (which would have required formal FOI justification); rather, it was simply not released proactively, which is standard practice [1] **Expert Analysis**: The transparency advocates and Labor critics argued this represented a form of unaccountable political use of taxpayer funds. [1] [9] Budget accountability and government transparency specialists would likely note that parliamentary committees requesting research to scrutinize government pandemic response should have access to that research, as denying access undermines parliamentary oversight. [1] **Comparative Context**: This is not unique to the Coalition.
 [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 由yóu yóu 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 资助zī zhù zī zhù 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 传播chuán bō chuán bō 研究yán jiū yán jiū 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 与yǔ yǔ 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 共享gòng xiǎng gòng xiǎng ，， ， 同时tóng shí tóng shí 拒绝jù jué jù jué 向xiàng xiàng 议会yì huì yì huì 监督机构jiān dū jī gòu jiān dū jī gòu 提供tí gōng tí gōng ，， ， 这zhè zhè 造成zào chéng zào chéng 了le le 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 用途yòng tú yòng tú 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 用途yòng tú yòng tú 的de de 印象yìn xiàng yìn xiàng （（ （ 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 事实shì shí shì shí ）） ） 。。 。
Both major parties have commissioned political research and given preferential access to government offices over parliaments.
 [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 因素yīn sù yīn sù 的de de 组合zǔ hé zǔ hé ：： ：
The distinguishing factor here is the specific request from a parliamentary committee and the explicit refusal to provide it.
 -- - 无wú wú 竞争jìng zhēng jìng zhēng 的de de 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo 采购cǎi gòu cǎi gòu [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
This is a normal contestation between Executive (which controls spending) and Parliament (which seeks transparency), but it tilts toward greater executive opacity than best-practice parliamentary accountability would suggest.
 -- - 与yǔ yǔ LiberalLiberal Liberal PartyParty Party 有yǒu yǒu 密切联系mì qiè lián xì mì qiè lián xì 的de de 承包商chéng bāo shāng chéng bāo shāng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
-- - 向xiàng xiàng 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 做出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de 初步chū bù chū bù 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 陈述chén shù chén shù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 拒绝jù jué jù jué 向xiàng xiàng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 提供tí gōng tí gōng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 的de de 议会yì huì yì huì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
…… … …… … 形成xíng chéng xíng chéng 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 模式mó shì mó shì ，， ， 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 该gāi gāi 研究yán jiū yán jiū 可能kě néng kě néng 更gèng gèng 多duō duō 关于guān yú guān yú 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 信息xìn xī xìn xī 传递chuán dì chuán dì 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 传播chuán bō chuán bō 指导zhǐ dǎo zhǐ dǎo 。。 。
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ** * ** * ：： ： 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng （（ （ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 其qí qí 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 和hé hé 声明shēng míng shēng míng 暗示àn shì àn shì ）） ） ：： ：
-- - COVIDCOVID COVID -- - 1919 19 传播chuán bō chuán bō 研究yán jiū yán jiū 对于duì yú duì yú 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 社区shè qū shè qū 关切guān qiè guān qiè 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 该gāi gāi 研究yán jiū yán jiū 为wèi wèi 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 的de de 全quán quán 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 传播chuán bō chuán bō 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 信息xìn xī xìn xī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 到dào dào 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 应对yìng duì yìng duì 的de de 紧迫性jǐn pò xìng jǐn pò xìng ，， ， 限制性xiàn zhì xìng xiàn zhì xìng 招标zhāo biāo zhāo biāo 是shì shì 适当shì dàng shì dàng 的de de [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
-- - 承包商chéng bāo shāng chéng bāo shāng 的de de 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 虽然suī rán suī rán 来自lái zì lái zì 与yǔ yǔ LiberalLiberal Liberal PartyParty Party 有yǒu yǒu 联系lián xì lián xì 的de de 人员rén yuán rén yuán ，， ， 但dàn dàn 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 该gāi gāi 研究yán jiū yán jiū 人员rén yuán rén yuán 在zài zài 跟踪调查gēn zōng diào chá gēn zōng diào chá 和hé hé 了解liǎo jiě liǎo jiě 社区shè qū shè qū 态度tài dù tài dù 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 的de de 专业知识zhuān yè zhī shí zhuān yè zhī shí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - 该gāi gāi 研究yán jiū yán jiū 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi "" " 拒绝jù jué jù jué FOIFOI FOI 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú "" " （（ （ 这zhè zhè 需要xū yào xū yào 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 的de de FOIFOI FOI 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ）） ） ；； ； 相反xiāng fǎn xiāng fǎn ，， ， 它tā tā 只是zhǐ shì zhǐ shì 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi ，， ， 这是zhè shì zhè shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 分析fēn xī fēn xī ** * ** * ：： ： 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 和hé hé LaborLabor Labor 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi ，， ， 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 不负责任bù fù zé rèn bù fù zé rèn 的de de 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 资金zī jīn zī jīn 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 形式xíng shì xíng shì 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 预算yù suàn yù suàn 问责wèn zé wèn zé 和hé hé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 可能kě néng kě néng 会huì huì 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，， ， 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 研究yán jiū yán jiū 以yǐ yǐ 审查shěn chá shěn chá 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 应对yìng duì yìng duì 的de de 议会yì huì yì huì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi 能够néng gòu néng gòu 获得huò dé huò dé 该gāi gāi 研究yán jiū yán jiū ，， ， 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 拒绝jù jué jù jué 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 破坏pò huài pò huài 了le le 议会yì huì yì huì 监督jiān dū jiān dū 。。 。
[[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * ：： ： 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 。。 。
两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 曾céng céng 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 研究yán jiū yán jiū ，， ， 并bìng bìng 给予jǐ yǔ jǐ yǔ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 于yú yú 议会yì huì yì huì 的de de 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 权限quán xiàn quán xiàn 。。 。
此处cǐ chù cǐ chù 的de de 区别qū bié qū bié 在于zài yú zài yú 议会yì huì yì huì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 请求qǐng qiú qǐng qiú 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 明确míng què míng què 拒绝jù jué jù jué 提供tí gōng tí gōng 。。 。
这是zhè shì zhè shì 行政部门xíng zhèng bù mén xíng zhèng bù mén （（ （ 控制kòng zhì kòng zhì 支出zhī chū zhī chū ）） ） 与yǔ yǔ 议会yì huì yì huì （（ （ 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù ）） ） 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 较量jiào liàng jiào liàng ，， ， 但dàn dàn 它tā tā 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 于yú yú 更gèng gèng 大dà dà 的de de 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 不bù bù 透明tòu míng tòu míng ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 最佳zuì jiā zuì jiā 实践shí jiàn shí jiàn 议会yì huì yì huì 问责wèn zé wèn zé 所suǒ suǒ 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 的de de 那样nà yàng nà yàng 。。 。

部分属实

6.5

/ 10

事实shì shí shì shí 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ：： ： 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 了le le 耗资hào zī hào zī 超过chāo guò chāo guò 5050 50 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 纳税人nà shuì rén nà shuì rén 资助zī zhù zī zhù 的de de COVIDCOVID COVID 传播chuán bō chuán bō 研究yán jiū yán jiū ，， ， 并bìng bìng 确实què shí què shí 拒绝jù jué jù jué 向xiàng xiàng 议会yì huì yì huì 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 。。 。
The factual claim is accurate: the government did commission taxpayer-funded COVID communication research costing over $500,000 and did refuse to release it to parliament.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 为wèi wèi 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 的de de "" " 拒绝jù jué jù jué 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi "" " 掩盖yǎn gài yǎn gài 了le le ：： ： (( ( 11 1 )) ) 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 的de de FOIFOI FOI 拒绝jù jué jù jué ，， ， (( ( 22 2 )) ) 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 传播chuán bō chuán bō 研究yán jiū yán jiū 是shì shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ，， ， 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí (( ( 33 3 )) ) 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 在于zài yú zài yú ** * 议会yì huì yì huì 获取huò qǔ huò qǔ 权限quán xiàn quán xiàn ** * 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 向xiàng xiàng 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 披露pī lù pī lù 。。 。
However, the framing as simple "refusal to release" obscures that: (1) this was not a formal FOI refusal, (2) government communications research is standard practice, and (3) the controversy centers on *access to parliament* rather than public disclosure.
 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 其qí qí 狭义xiá yì xiá yì 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de ，， ， 但dàn dàn 在zài zài 暗示àn shì àn shì 委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 和hé hé 不bù bù 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 研究yán jiū yán jiū 本身běn shēn běn shēn 就是jiù shì jiù shì 腐败fǔ bài fǔ bài 或huò huò 独特dú tè dú tè 问题wèn tí wèn tí 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 。。 。
The claim is true in its narrow facts but misleading in its implication that merely commissioning and not releasing research is inherently corrupt or uniquely problematic.
 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 关切guān qiè guān qiè 是shì shì 关于guān yú guān yú 问责制wèn zé zhì wèn zé zhì 和hé hé 承包商chéng bāo shāng chéng bāo shāng 的de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 联系lián xì lián xì ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 研究yán jiū yán jiū 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 事实shì shí shì shí 。。 。
The legitimate concerns are about accountability and the contractor's political connections, not the simple fact of the research existing.

📚 来源与引用 (11)

  1. 1
    Katharine Murphy, 'Thinly disguised political research' paid for by taxpayers shared with Morrison's office - The Guardian Australia (October 22, 2020)

    Katharine Murphy, 'Thinly disguised political research' paid for by taxpayers shared with Morrison's office - The Guardian Australia (October 22, 2020)

    Labor raises alarm after findings of three-month project that cost $541,750 sent ‘straight to the prime minister’s office’

    the Guardian
  2. 2
    Georgia Wilkins, Circles of influence: Labor questions $1m contracts win for Liberal 'mate' - Crikey (August 10, 2020)

    Georgia Wilkins, Circles of influence: Labor questions $1m contracts win for Liberal 'mate' - Crikey (August 10, 2020)

    In a few short months, a company set up by a former Crosby Textor pollster has gone from being the new kid on the block to receiving more than $1 million in limited tender contracts.

    Crikey
  3. 3
    Morrison pins research spend on officials - Australian Financial News Daily (October 26, 2020)

    Morrison pins research spend on officials - Australian Financial News Daily (October 26, 2020)

    Scott Morrison has sought to distance himself from $1.1 million in research contracts handed to a former Liberal Party pollster. Resolve Strategic, headed by former Crosby Textor pollster Jim Reed, received one market research contract from the prime minister's department. On the department's recommendation, Treasury then commissioned its owned taxpayer-funded…

    Australian Financial News
  4. 4
    Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Senate Estimates Testimony - Parliamentary Record (October 2020)

    Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Senate Estimates Testimony - Parliamentary Record (October 2020)

    The Senate Select Committee on COVID-19 concluded its inquiry when it tabled its report on 7 April 2022. On 8 April 2020, the Senate resolved to establish a Select Committee on COVID-19 to inquire into the Australian Government’s response to the COVID-19 pand

    Aph Gov
  5. 5
    health.gov.au

    Australian Government response to the Senate Select Committee report: COVID-19 Final Report - Department of Health (April 2022)

    Health Gov

  6. 6
    C/T Group (Crosby Textor) - Wikipedia

    C/T Group (Crosby Textor) - Wikipedia

    Wikipedia
  7. 7
    James Morrow, How the Liberals beat Labor at its own game - Sydney Morning Herald (May 23, 2019)

    James Morrow, How the Liberals beat Labor at its own game - Sydney Morning Herald (May 23, 2019)

    From policy war rooms to WhatsApp groups and Game of Thrones-themed memes, the Liberals outgunned Labor, especially in the left's native online habitat.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  8. 8
    theguardian.com

    The Guardian - Editorial Standards and Ownership Information

    Theguardian

    Original link no longer available
  9. 9
    About Crikey - Independent Australian news and commentary

    About Crikey - Independent Australian news and commentary

    We Dig Deeper For just over 20 years, we’ve set out to explain and dissect the news agenda for an intelligent, skeptical, socially and politically aware

    Crikey
  10. 10
    PDF

    Treasury FOI Release 2805 - Department of Treasury (2021)

    Treasury Gov • PDF Document
  11. 11
    Ideology and Effective Government: Lessons from Rudd-Gillard Labor - The Conversation (2014)

    Ideology and Effective Government: Lessons from Rudd-Gillard Labor - The Conversation (2014)

    Political historians are likely to treat the Rudd and Gillard governments far more kindly than many contemporary commentators have - and certainly more kindly than the Murdoch press has. The passing of…

    The Conversation

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性，但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。

Previous: C0136 Next: C0138