C0108 - 腐败、网络虐待、诽谤

C0108

声明内容

“赋予一名非民选官员删除政治人物网络帖子的权力，并因表达有争议的政治观点而禁止他们使用平台。”

腐败网络安全诽谤

原始来源： Matthew Davis

分析时间： 29 Jan 2026

原始来源

mdavis.xyz

Documentation of Coalition government policies and claims.

Matthew Davis

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 混淆hùn xiáo hùn xiáo 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 事实性shì shí xìng shì shí xìng 和hé hé 非fēi fēi 事实性shì shí xìng shì shí xìng 要素yào sù yào sù 。。。

The claim conflates several factual and non-factual elements.

《《《 20212021 2021 年nián nián 在线zài xiàn zài xiàn 安全法ān quán fǎ ān quán fǎ 》》》确实què shí què shí 确立què lì què lì 了le le 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 发出fā chū fā chū 删除shān chú shān chú 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 的de de 权力quán lì quán lì ，，，但dàn dàn 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 细节xì jié xì jié 与yǔ yǔ 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 相xiāng xiāng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

The Online Safety Act 2021 did establish the eSafety Commissioner's powers to issue removal notices, but key details contradict the claim [1][2]. **What is true:** - The Coalition Government did pass the Online Safety Act 2021, which commenced on 23 January 2022 [1] - The eSafety Commissioner (an independent statutory office) was granted statutory powers to issue removal notices for certain content [2] - The eSafety Commissioner is appointed by the Governor-General on advice and not directly elected [3] **What is misleading or false:** - The eSafety Commissioner **cannot arbitrarily delete political posts** or ban politicians [2][4].

** * ** * 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de 部分bù fèn bù fèn ：：： ** * ** *

The power is specifically limited to removal of "class 1 material" (extremely violent content, child sexual abuse material, material likely to be rated RC) and "cyber-abuse material targeted at Australian adults" [4][5] - Removal notices require the content to meet strict statutory definitions, not subjective political judgment [5] - **The most recent court case explicitly shows these powers do NOT extend to political speech.** In 2025, the Administrative Review Tribunal struck down the eSafety Commissioner's order to remove a post by Chris Elston (Billboard Chris) attacking transgender activist Teddy Cook, finding it did not meet the statutory definition of cyber-abuse material [6].

-- - CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 通过tōng guò tōng guò 了le le 《《《 20212021 2021 年nián nián 在线zài xiàn zài xiàn 安全法ān quán fǎ ān quán fǎ 》》》，，，该法于gāi fǎ yú gāi fǎ yú 20222022 2022 年nián nián 11 1 月yuè yuè 2323 23 日rì rì 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

The tribunal noted the post, while offensive, did not establish intent to cause serious harm [6]

-- - 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán （（（一个yí gè yí gè 独立dú lì dú lì 法定fǎ dìng fǎ dìng 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi ）））被bèi bèi 赋予fù yǔ fù yǔ 发出fā chū fā chū 特定tè dìng tè dìng 内容nèi róng nèi róng 删除shān chú shān chú 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 的de de 法定fǎ dìng fǎ dìng 权力quán lì quán lì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]

-- - 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 由yóu yóu 总督zǒng dū zǒng dū 根据gēn jù gēn jù 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng ，，，并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]

** * ** * 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 或huò huò 虚假xū jiǎ xū jiǎ 的de de 部分bù fèn bù fèn ：：： ** * ** *

-- - 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán ** * ** * 不能bù néng bù néng 随意suí yì suí yì 删除shān chú shān chú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 帖子tiě zi tiě zi ** * ** * 或huò huò 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 人物rén wù rén wù [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。。

该gāi gāi 权力quán lì quán lì 严格yán gé yán gé 限于xiàn yú xiàn yú 删除shān chú shān chú "" " 一级yī jí yī jí 材料cái liào cái liào "" " （（（极端jí duān jí duān 暴力bào lì bào lì 内容nèi róng nèi róng 、、、儿童ér tóng ér tóng 性虐待xìng nüè dài xìng nüè dài 材料cái liào cái liào 、、、可能kě néng kě néng 被评bèi píng bèi píng 定为dìng wèi dìng wèi RCRC RC 的de de 材料cái liào cái liào ）））和hé hé "" " 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 成年人chéng nián rén chéng nián rén 的de de 网络wǎng luò wǎng luò 虐待nüè dài nüè dài 材料cái liào cái liào "" " [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]

-- - 删除shān chú shān chú 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 内容nèi róng nèi róng 符合fú hé fú hé 严格yán gé yán gé 的de de 法定fǎ dìng fǎ dìng 定义dìng yì dìng yì ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi 主观zhǔ guān zhǔ guān 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 判断pàn duàn pàn duàn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]

-- - ** * ** * 最近zuì jìn zuì jìn 的de de 法庭fǎ tíng fǎ tíng 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 明确míng què míng què 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 权力quán lì quán lì 不适bù shì bù shì 用于yòng yú yòng yú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 言论yán lùn yán lùn 。。。

** * ** * 20252025 2025 年nián nián ，，，行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 复审fù shěn fù shěn 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 推翻tuī fān tuī fān 了le le 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 删除shān chú shān chú ChrisChris Chris ElstonElston Elston （（（ BillboardBillboard Billboard ChrisChris Chris ）））攻击gōng jī gōng jī 跨kuà kuà 性别xìng bié xìng bié 活动家huó dòng jiā huó dòng jiā TeddyTeddy Teddy CookCook Cook 的de de 帖子tiě zi tiě zi 的de de 命令mìng lìng mìng lìng ，，，认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 其qí qí 不bù bù 符合fú hé fú hé 网络wǎng luò wǎng luò 虐待nüè dài nüè dài 材料cái liào cái liào 的de de 法定fǎ dìng fǎ dìng 定义dìng yì dìng yì [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，，，该gāi gāi 帖子tiě zi tiě zi 虽然suī rán suī rán 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 冒犯mào fàn mào fàn 性xìng xìng ，，，但dàn dàn 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 确立què lì què lì 造成zào chéng zào chéng 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 伤害shāng hài shāng hài 的de de 意图yì tú yì tú [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 对duì duì 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 权力quán lì quán lì 的de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì ：：：

The claim omits critical limitations on eSafety's powers: 1. **Strict statutory definitions:** The eSafety Commissioner can only act on content meeting specific legal definitions, not "controversial political opinions" [5].

11 1 .. . ** * ** * 严格yán gé yán gé 的de de 法定fǎ dìng fǎ dìng 定义dìng yì dìng yì ：：： ** * ** * 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 只能zhǐ néng zhǐ néng 对duì duì 符合fú hé fú hé 特定tè dìng tè dìng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 定义dìng yì dìng yì 的de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi "" " 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

Material must be intended to cause serious harm, and be menacing, harassing, or offensive in the circumstances [5] 2. **Court oversight:** The eSafety Commissioner's decisions are subject to Administrative Appeals Tribunal review and Federal Court challenge [2][6].

材料cái liào cái liào 必须bì xū bì xū 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 造成zào chéng zào chéng 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 伤害shāng hài shāng hài ，，，并且bìng qiě bìng qiě 在zài zài 具体情况jù tǐ qíng kuàng jù tǐ qíng kuàng 下xià xià 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 威胁性wēi xié xìng wēi xié xìng 、、、骚扰sāo rǎo sāo rǎo 性xìng xìng 或huò huò 冒犯mào fàn mào fàn 性xìng xìng [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]

In June 2024, the Federal Court in *eSafety Commissioner v X Corp* [2024] FCA 499 significantly limited the Commissioner's enforcement powers, holding that issuing global removal notices is unreasonable and conflicts with international comity [2][7] 3. **Recent defeats on political/opinion content:** The 2025 Administrative Appeals Tribunal case shows the Commissioner attempting to remove political speech (transgender debate) and losing [6].

22 2 .. . ** * ** * 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 监督jiān dū jiān dū ：：： ** * ** * 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 受shòu shòu 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 和hé hé 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 质疑zhì yí zhì yí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

This demonstrates the system is NOT functioning as the claim suggests 4. **Exemptions for news content:** Material published as part of legitimate news reporting has exemptions, protecting political reporting and commentary [1] 5. **Platform compliance issues:** In practice, platforms often resist or ignore removal notices.

20242024 2024 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè ，，，联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 在zài zài ** * 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 诉sù sù XX X 公司gōng sī gōng sī ** * 案àn àn [[ [ 20242024 2024 ]] ] FCAFCA FCA 499499 499 中zhōng zhōng 大幅dà fú dà fú 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 了le le 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 的de de 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 权力quán lì quán lì ，，，裁定cái dìng cái dìng 发布fā bù fā bù 全球quán qiú quán qiú 删除shān chú shān chú 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 是shì shì 不合理bù hé lǐ bù hé lǐ 的de de ，，，且qiě qiě 与yǔ yǔ 国际guó jì guó jì 礼让lǐ ràng lǐ ràng 原则yuán zé yuán zé 冲突chōng tū chōng tū [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]

X Corp (formerly Twitter) won its legal battle and the eSafety Commissioner dropped the case [6][8]

33 3 .. . ** * ** * 近期jìn qī jìn qī 在zài zài 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì // / 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 内容nèi róng nèi róng 上shàng shàng 的de de 败诉bài sù bài sù ：：： ** * ** * 20252025 2025 年nián nián 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 上诉shàng sù shàng sù 仲裁庭zhòng cái tíng zhòng cái tíng 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ，，，专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 试图shì tú shì tú 删除shān chú shān chú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 言论yán lùn yán lùn （（（跨kuà kuà 性别xìng bié xìng bié 议题yì tí yì tí ）））但dàn dàn 败诉bài sù bài sù [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

这zhè zhè 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 该gāi gāi 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 如该rú gāi rú gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 所述suǒ shù suǒ shù 那样nà yàng nà yàng 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò

44 4 .. . ** * ** * 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 内容nèi róng nèi róng 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn ：：： ** * ** * 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 发布fā bù fā bù 的de de 材料cái liào cái liào 享有xiǎng yǒu xiǎng yǒu 豁免huò miǎn huò miǎn ，，，保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 报道bào dào bào dào 和hé hé 评论píng lùn píng lùn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

55 5 .. . ** * ** * 平台píng tái píng tái 合规hé guī hé guī 问题wèn tí wèn tí ：：： ** * ** * 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng ，，，平台píng tái píng tái 经常jīng cháng jīng cháng 抵制dǐ zhì dǐ zhì 或huò huò 忽视hū shì hū shì 删除shān chú shān chú 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 。。。

XX X 公司gōng sī gōng sī （（（原yuán yuán TwitterTwitter Twitter ）））赢得yíng dé yíng dé 了le le 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng ，，，电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 撤回chè huí chè huí 了le le 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ]

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 为wèi wèi 议会yì huì yì huì 和hé hé 官方guān fāng guān fāng 来源lái yuán lái yuán ：：：

The original sources provided are parliamentary and official: - Facebook's response to the exposure draft: A corporate submission by an affected platform, likely to reflect concerns about regulatory overreach but representing an industry perspective rather than neutral analysis [9] - Parliamentary records: Official government records of the legislative process, reliable for what was debated and decided [2] Neither source explicitly makes the claim in question.

-- - FacebookFacebook Facebook 对duì duì 曝光bào guāng bào guāng 草案cǎo àn cǎo àn 的de de 回应huí yìng huí yìng ：：：受shòu shòu 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 的de de 平台píng tái píng tái FacebookFacebook Facebook 的de de 企业qǐ yè qǐ yè 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn ，，，可能kě néng kě néng 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 对duì duì 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 过度guò dù guò dù 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng 的de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu ，，，但dàn dàn 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 的de de 是shì shì 行业háng yè háng yè 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 分析fēn xī fēn xī [[ [ 99 9 ]] ]

The claim appears to be an interpretation/extrapolation of the legislative powers, not a direct quotation. **Missing context about actual source credibility:** The mdavis.xyz source (from the claim file header) is Labor-aligned and has incentive to present Coalition policies negatively.

-- - 议会yì huì yì huì 记录jì lù jì lù ：：：立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 程序chéng xù chéng xù 的de de 官方guān fāng guān fāng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 记录jì lù jì lù ，，，对于duì yú duì yú 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn 和hé hé 决定jué dìng jué dìng 的de de 内容nèi róng nèi róng 是shì shì 可靠kě kào kě kào 的de de [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]

The framing of "unelected official" is politically charged language designed to undermine the regulatory agency's legitimacy [3].

两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán 都dōu dōu 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 明确míng què míng què 做出zuò chū zuò chū 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 。。。

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 对duì duì 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 权力quán lì quán lì 的de de 解释jiě shì jiě shì // / 推断tuī duàn tuī duàn ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 。。。

** * ** * 关于guān yú guān yú 实际shí jì shí jì 来源lái yuán lái yuán 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù 的de de 缺失quē shī quē shī 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：：： ** * ** * mdavismdavis mdavis .. . xyzxyz xyz 来源lái yuán lái yuán （（（来自lái zì lái zì 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 头部tóu bù tóu bù ）））倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng LaborLabor Labor ，，，有yǒu yǒu 动机dòng jī dòng jī 负面fù miàn fù miàn 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。。

"" " 非fēi fēi 民选mín xuǎn mín xuǎn 官员guān yuán guān yuán "" " 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí 是shì shì 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 色彩sè cǎi sè cǎi 的de de 语言yǔ yán yǔ yán ，，，旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 削弱xuē ruò xuē ruò 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 合法性hé fǎ xìng hé fǎ xìng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。。

⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn ？？？

**Did Labor support similar regulation?** Labor did not establish the Online Safety Act, but its response has been mixed: - Labor has supported **expanded** online safety regulation, including banning social media for under-16s (the Online Safety Amendment (Social Media Minimum Age) Act 2024, passed by the Labor Government in 2024) [10] - Labor has **not opposed** the eSafety Commissioner's powers; the agency has continued under Labor administration with expanded responsibilities [10][11] - In fact, Labor moved to strengthen content regulation further with age restrictions and "duty of care" obligations on platforms, suggesting Labor wants MORE regulatory power, not less [11] **Key distinction:** Neither party has proposed (nor would propose) regulations allowing arbitrary deletion of political speech.

** * ** *

Labor's approach is actually MORE expansive in terms of regulating platforms generally [11].

LaborLabor Labor 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 《《《在线zài xiàn zài xiàn 安全法ān quán fǎ ān quán fǎ 》》》，，，但dàn dàn 其qí qí 反应fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 不bù bù 一yī yī ：：：

-- - LaborLabor Labor 支持zhī chí zhī chí ** * ** * 扩大kuò dà kuò dà ** * ** * 在线zài xiàn zài xiàn 安全监管ān quán jiān guǎn ān quán jiān guǎn ，，，包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 1616 16 岁suì suì 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 青少年qīng shào nián qīng shào nián 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 社交shè jiāo shè jiāo 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ （（（《《《 20242024 2024 年nián nián 在线zài xiàn zài xiàn 安全ān quán ān quán 修正案xiū zhèng àn xiū zhèng àn （（（社交shè jiāo shè jiāo 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 最低zuì dī zuì dī 年龄nián líng nián líng ）））法fǎ fǎ 》》》，，，由yóu yóu LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20242024 2024 年nián nián 通过tōng guò tōng guò ））） [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ]

-- - LaborLabor Labor ** * ** * 未wèi wèi 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì ** * ** * 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 的de de 权力quán lì quán lì ；；；该gāi gāi 机构jī gòu jī gòu 在zài zài LaborLabor Labor 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 继续jì xù jì xù 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò ，，，职责zhí zé zhí zé 有所yǒu suǒ yǒu suǒ 扩大kuò dà kuò dà [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ]

-- - 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng ，，， LaborLabor Labor 通过tōng guò tōng guò 年龄nián líng nián líng 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 和hé hé 平台píng tái píng tái "" " 注意zhù yì zhù yì 义务yì wù yì wù "" " 进一步jìn yí bù jìn yí bù 加强jiā qiáng jiā qiáng 了le le 内容nèi róng nèi róng 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn ，，，表明biǎo míng biǎo míng LaborLabor Labor 想要xiǎng yào xiǎng yào 更gèng gèng 多duō duō 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 权力quán lì quán lì ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi 更少gèng shǎo gèng shǎo [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ]

** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié ：：： ** * ** * 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 提出tí chū tí chū （（（也yě yě 不会bú huì bú huì 提出tí chū tí chū ）））允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 任意rèn yì rèn yì 删除shān chú shān chú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 言论yán lùn yán lùn 的de de 法规fǎ guī fǎ guī 。。。

LaborLabor Labor 的de de 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 在zài zài 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 平台píng tái píng tái 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ] 。。。

🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 对duì duì 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 权力quán lì quán lì 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng （（（部分bù fèn bù fèn 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ ）））：：： ** * ** *

**Criticisms of eSafety's powers (some valid):** Critics argue the eSafety Commissioner has been overly aggressive in interpretation [2]: - The Commissioner attempted to force global removal of content (not just Australian removal) in the X Corp case, which the Federal Court rejected as unreasonable [2][7] - The Commissioner has issued "informal" notices that may reduce transparency and due process [12] - The Commissioner attempted to remove speech about transgender issues, which some view as political overreach [6] **Government/regulatory perspective:** The Coalition and subsequent Labor governments justify these powers as necessary to: - Protect children from extreme violence and abuse material [1] - Prevent severe online harassment of real individuals [5] - Maintain minimum safety standards across platforms [1] **Critical fact:** Despite possessing these powers, the eSafety Commissioner has been **repeatedly limited by courts** when attempting broad enforcement [2][6][7].

批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 在zài zài 解释jiě shì jiě shì 上shàng shàng 过于guò yú guò yú 激进jī jìn jī jìn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] ：：：

The system has built-in judicial checks that prevent arbitrary use of power [2]. **The actual risk:** Not that the Commissioner can delete political speech (courts prevent this), but that the regulatory framework's vague language ("menacing, harassing or offensive in all the circumstances") creates uncertainty and may chill political speech through the threat of regulatory action [2].

-- - 在zài zài XX X 公司gōng sī gōng sī 案中àn zhōng àn zhōng ，，，专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 试图shì tú shì tú 强制qiáng zhì qiáng zhì 全球quán qiú quán qiú 删除shān chú shān chú 内容nèi róng nèi róng （（（而ér ér 非仅fēi jǐn fēi jǐn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 境内jìng nèi jìng nèi 删除shān chú shān chú ））），，，联邦lián bāng lián bāng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这zhè zhè 不合理bù hé lǐ bù hé lǐ [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]

However, court decisions are now clarifying the boundaries [6].

-- - 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 发布fā bù fā bù 了le le "" " 非正式fēi zhèng shì fēi zhèng shì "" " 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī ，，，可能kě néng kě néng 降低jiàng dī jiàng dī 透明度tòu míng dù tòu míng dù 和hé hé 正当程序zhèng dāng chéng xù zhèng dāng chéng xù [[ [ 1212 12 ]] ]

-- - 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 试图shì tú shì tú 删除shān chú shān chú 关于guān yú guān yú 跨kuà kuà 性别xìng bié xìng bié 议题yì tí yì tí 的de de 言论yán lùn yán lùn ，，，一些yī xiē yī xiē 人rén rén 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这是zhè shì zhè shì 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 过度guò dù guò dù 干预gān yù gān yù [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]

** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ // / 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 视角shì jiǎo shì jiǎo ：：： ** * ** *

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 及其jí qí jí qí 后hòu hòu 的de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 为wèi wèi 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 权力quán lì quán lì 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ，，，认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 其qí qí 对于duì yú duì yú 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 目的mù dì mù dì 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de ：：：

-- - 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 免受miǎn shòu miǎn shòu 极端jí duān jí duān 暴力bào lì bào lì 和hé hé 虐待nüè dài nüè dài 材料cái liào cái liào 侵害qīn hài qīn hài [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

-- - 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 对duì duì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 个人gè rén gè rén 的de de 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 网络wǎng luò wǎng luò 骚扰sāo rǎo sāo rǎo [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]

-- - 在zài zài 平台píng tái píng tái 间jiān jiān 维持wéi chí wéi chí 最低zuì dī zuì dī 安全ān quán ān quán 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 事实shì shí shì shí ：：： ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 权力quán lì quán lì ，，，电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 在zài zài 试图shì tú shì tú 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 时shí shí ** * ** * 多次duō cì duō cì 被bèi bèi 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì ** * ** * [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。。

该gāi gāi 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 设有shè yǒu shè yǒu 内置nèi zhì nèi zhì 司法sī fǎ sī fǎ 审查shěn chá shěn chá 机制jī zhì jī zhì ，，，防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 权力quán lì quán lì 被bèi bèi 任意rèn yì rèn yì 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

** * ** * 实际shí jì shí jì 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn ：：： ** * ** * 不bù bù 在于zài yú zài yú 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 可以kě yǐ kě yǐ 删除shān chú shān chú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 言论yán lùn yán lùn （（（法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 了le le 这zhè zhè 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn ））），，，而ér ér 在于zài yú zài yú 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 的de de 模糊mó hú mó hú 语言yǔ yán yǔ yán （（（ "" " 在zài zài 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 威胁性wēi xié xìng wēi xié xìng 、、、骚扰sāo rǎo sāo rǎo 性xìng xìng 或huò huò 冒犯mào fàn mào fàn 性xìng xìng "" " ）））造成zào chéng zào chéng 不确定性bù què dìng xìng bù què dìng xìng ，，，并bìng bìng 可能kě néng kě néng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 威胁wēi xié wēi xié 而ér ér 抑制yì zhì yì zhì 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 言论yán lùn yán lùn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 判决pàn jué pàn jué 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 明确míng què míng què 界定jiè dìng jiè dìng 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

具有误导性

3.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 暗示àn shì àn shì 电子diàn zi diàn zi 安全ān quán ān quán 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 任意rèn yì rèn yì 删除shān chú shān chú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 帖子tiě zi tiě zi 并bìng bìng 禁止jìn zhǐ jìn zhǐ 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 人物rén wù rén wù 的de de 权力quán lì quán lì 。。。

The claim implies the eSafety Commissioner has arbitrary power to delete political posts and ban politicians.

证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ：：：

The evidence shows: 1.

11 1 .. . 权力quán lì quán lì 仅限于jǐn xiàn yú jǐn xiàn yú 特定tè dìng tè dìng 的de de 有害yǒu hài yǒu hài 内容nèi róng nèi róng 类别lèi bié lèi bié ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 言论yán lùn yán lùn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]

Powers are limited to specific harmful content categories, not political speech [1][2][5] 2.

22 2 .. . 最近zuì jìn zuì jìn 的de de 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 判决pàn jué pàn jué （（（ 20242024 2024 -- - 20252025 2025 年nián nián ）））明确míng què míng què 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ 将jiāng jiāng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 权力quán lì quán lì 用于yòng yú yòng yú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì // / 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 言论yán lùn yán lùn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ]

Recent court decisions (2024-2025) explicitly prevent the use of these powers against political/opinion speech [2][6][7] 3.

33 3 .. . 专员zhuān yuán zhuān yuán 在zài zài 试图shì tú shì tú 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 时shí shí 输掉shū diào shū diào 了le le 多duō duō 起qǐ qǐ 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]

The Commissioner has lost multiple legal challenges attempting broader enforcement [2][6] 4.

44 4 .. . 该gāi gāi 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 受shòu shòu 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 的de de 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 审查shěn chá shěn chá 和hé hé 推翻tuī fān tuī fān [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]

The agency's actions are subject to full court review and override [2][6] The core claim—that the government granted power to delete political posts—is contradicted by both statute and recent judicial interpretation.

核心hé xīn hé xīn 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng —— — —— — 即jí jí 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ 了le le 删除shān chú shān chú 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 帖子tiě zi tiě zi 的de de 权力quán lì quán lì —— — —— — 被bèi bèi 成文法chéng wén fǎ chéng wén fǎ 和hé hé 近期jìn qī jìn qī 司法解释sī fǎ jiě shì sī fǎ jiě shì 所suǒ suǒ 否定fǒu dìng fǒu dìng 。。。

The claim confuses regulatory powers over harmful content (legitimate) with arbitrary political censorship powers (which do not exist and courts have explicitly prevented).

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 混淆hùn xiáo hùn xiáo 了le le 对duì duì 有害yǒu hài yǒu hài 内容nèi róng nèi róng 的de de 监管jiān guǎn jiān guǎn 权力quán lì quán lì （（（合法hé fǎ hé fǎ ）））与yǔ yǔ 任意rèn yì rèn yì 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 权力quán lì quán lì （（（不bù bù 存在cún zài cún zài 且qiě qiě 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 已yǐ yǐ 明确míng què míng què 阻止zǔ zhǐ zǔ zhǐ ）））。。。

最终评分

3.0