属实

评分: 7.0/10

Coalition
C0013

声明内容

“违背了关闭漏洞的承诺,这些漏洞允许儿童虐待者保留他们的养老金,即使当他们没钱向受害者支付赔偿时。”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

###### ### 核实hé shí hé shí 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí
### Core Facts Verified
** * ** * 20182018 2018 年nián nián 的de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò :: : ** * ** *
**The 2018 Promise:** In 2018, Kelly O'Dwyer, then Minister for Financial Services, publicly promised to close a legal loophole allowing child sex offenders to quarantine their superannuation from civil compensation payouts [1].
20182018 2018 年nián nián ,, , 时任shí rèn shí rèn 金融服务jīn róng fú wù jīn róng fú wù 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 的de de KellyKelly Kelly OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 关闭guān bì guān bì 一个yí gè yí gè 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng ,, , 该gāi gāi 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng 允许yǔn xǔ yǔn xǔ 儿童性ér tóng xìng ér tóng xìng 犯罪者fàn zuì zhě fàn zuì zhě 将jiāng jiāng 他们tā men tā men 的de de 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 与yǔ yǔ 民事mín shì mín shì 赔偿péi cháng péi cháng 支付zhī fù zhī fù 隔离gé lí gé lí 开来kāi lái kāi lái [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
O'Dwyer held a press conference with victim advocate groups including Bravehearts where she stated that legislation would be introduced "before the end of the year" [1].
OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer 与yǔ yǔ 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò BraveheartsBravehearts Bravehearts 在内zài nèi zài nèi 的de de 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 举行jǔ xíng jǔ xíng 了le le 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 发布会fā bù huì fā bù huì ,, , 在zài zài 会上huì shàng huì shàng 她tā tā 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 将jiāng jiāng 在zài zài "" " 年底nián dǐ nián dǐ 前qián qián "" " 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This promise came after a petition containing 20,000 signatures demanding law changes was presented by victims' advocate Howard Brown [1]. **The Loophole's Reality:** The loophole is factually real.
这一zhè yī zhè yī 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 是shì shì 在zài zài 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě HowardHoward Howard BrownBrown Brown 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 的de de 包含bāo hán bāo hán 22 2 万个wàn gè wàn gè 签名qiān míng qiān míng 的de de 请愿书qǐng yuàn shū qǐng yuàn shū 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 修改xiū gǎi xiū gǎi 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu 做出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Under Australian civil law and bankruptcy law, superannuation is classified as a "protected asset" and cannot be accessed by victims through civil compensation suits [1][2].
** * ** * 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng 的de de 现实xiàn shí xiàn shí :: : ** * ** *
Multiple high-profile cases demonstrate this: - **Maurice Van Ryn** (Bega region paedophile): Committed horrific crimes against nine children and accumulated a multimillion-dollar superannuation portfolio that was legally shielded from victims' compensation claims [1].
该gāi gāi 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de 。。 。
Victims were forced to accept reduced settlements because his superannuation was deemed untouchable [1]. - **Peter Liddy** (South Australian magistrate): Sentenced in 2001 to 25 years for child sex crimes against young boys; most of his substantial fortune was protected in his superannuation account, meaning victims could not receive meaningful compensation [1][2]. **The Promise Was Not Fulfilled by Coalition:** As of April 2022 (four years after the initial promise), no legislation had been introduced to close the loophole [1].
根据gēn jù gēn jù 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 民事mín shì mín shì 法fǎ fǎ 和hé hé 破产法pò chǎn fǎ pò chǎn fǎ ,, , 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 被bèi bèi 归类guī lèi guī lèi 为wèi wèi "" " 受shòu shòu 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn "" " ,, , 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 通过tōng guò tōng guò 民事mín shì mín shì 赔偿péi cháng péi cháng 诉讼sù sòng sù sòng 获得huò dé huò dé [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
A Finance Ministry spokesperson stated that "Treasury has undertaken initial design work on the proposals outlined in that paper.
多个duō gè duō gè 高调gāo diào gāo diào 案例àn lì àn lì 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 了le le 这zhè zhè 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn :: :
We anticipate undertaking additional consultation prior to finalising a bill for introduction into the Parliament" [1].
-- - ** * ** * MauriceMaurice Maurice VanVan Van RynRyn Ryn ** * ** * (( ( BegaBega Bega 地区dì qū dì qū 恋童liàn tóng liàn tóng 癖者pǐ zhě pǐ zhě )) ) :: : 对duì duì 九名jiǔ míng jiǔ míng 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 犯下fàn xià fàn xià 可怕kě pà kě pà 罪行zuì xíng zuì xíng ,, , 并bìng bìng 积累jī lěi jī lěi 了le le 数百万美元shù bǎi wàn měi yuán shù bǎi wàn měi yuán 的de de 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 投资tóu zī tóu zī 组合zǔ hé zǔ hé ,, , 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 投资tóu zī tóu zī 在zài zài 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 上shàng shàng 受到shòu dào shòu dào 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù ,, , 免受miǎn shòu miǎn shòu 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 的de de 赔偿péi cháng péi cháng 索赔suǒ péi suǒ péi [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This indicated ongoing work but no concrete timeline for legislative action. **O'Dwyer Resigned:** Kelly O'Dwyer left federal Parliament in 2018 following the drafting of initial policy proposals, which advocates claim contributed to the legislative effort stalling [1].
受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 被迫bèi pò bèi pò 接受jiē shòu jiē shòu 较jiào jiào 低dī dī 的de de 和解hé jiě hé jiě 金jīn jīn ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 他tā tā 的de de 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 被bèi bèi 视为shì wèi shì wèi 不可bù kě bù kě 触及chù jí chù jí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - ** * ** * PeterPeter Peter LiddyLiddy Liddy ** * ** * (( ( 南澳大利亚nán ào dà lì yà nán ào dà lì yà 治安zhì ān zhì ān 法官fǎ guān fǎ guān )) ) :: : 20012001 2001 年nián nián 因yīn yīn 对duì duì 年轻nián qīng nián qīng 男孩nán hái nán hái 犯下fàn xià fàn xià 的de de 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 性犯罪xìng fàn zuì xìng fàn zuì 被bèi bèi 判处pàn chǔ pàn chǔ 2525 25 年nián nián 监禁jiān jìn jiān jìn ;; ; 他tā tā 的de de 大部分dà bù fèn dà bù fèn 巨额财产jù é cái chǎn jù é cái chǎn 都dōu dōu 受shòu shòu 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 存放cún fàng cún fàng 在zài zài 他tā tā 的de de 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 账户zhàng hù zhàng hù 中zhōng zhōng ,, , 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 获得huò dé huò dé 有yǒu yǒu 意义yì yì yì yì 的de de 赔偿péi cháng péi cháng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 未wèi wèi 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò :: : ** * ** *
截至jié zhì jié zhì 20222022 2022 年nián nián 44 4 月yuè yuè (( ( 初始chū shǐ chū shǐ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 四年sì nián sì nián 后hòu hòu )) ) ,, , 尚未shàng wèi shàng wèi 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 来lái lái 关闭guān bì guān bì 该gāi gāi 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 发言人fā yán rén fā yán rén 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ,, , "" " 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 已yǐ yǐ 就jiù jiù 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 中zhōng zhōng 概述gài shù gài shù 的de de 提案tí àn tí àn 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 初步设计chū bù shè jì chū bù shè jì 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 。。 。
我们wǒ men wǒ men 预计yù jì yù jì 在zài zài 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 额外é wài é wài 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 后hòu hòu ,, , 才能cái néng cái néng 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 确定què dìng què dìng 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 议会yì huì yì huì 的de de 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò ,, , 但dàn dàn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 时间表shí jiān biǎo shí jiān biǎo 。。 。
** * ** * OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer 辞职cí zhí cí zhí :: : ** * ** *
KellyKelly Kelly OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer 在zài zài 20182018 2018 年nián nián 初步chū bù chū bù 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 提案tí àn tí àn 起草qǐ cǎo qǐ cǎo 后hòu hòu 离开lí kāi lí kāi 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 议会yì huì yì huì ,, , 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 称chēng chēng 这zhè zhè 导致dǎo zhì dǎo zhì 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 停滞tíng zhì tíng zhì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 需要xū yào xū yào 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 才能cái néng cái néng 被bèi bèi 完全wán quán wán quán 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě :: :
However, the claim requires significant context to be fully understood:
###### ### 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 实施shí shī shí shī 的de de 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng
### Complexity of Legislative Implementation
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 声明shēng míng shēng míng 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì 了le le 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] :: :
The government's Treasury statement reveals genuine policy complexity [1]: > "Given the vulnerable stakeholders who the measure would target (many of whom are victims of violent or sexually based crimes) and the multitude of court jurisdictions that would be captured, it is very important that the government get these policy settings right.
>> > "" " 鉴于jiàn yú jiàn yú 该gāi gāi 措施cuò shī cuò shī 将jiāng jiāng 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 的de de 脆弱cuì ruò cuì ruò 利益lì yì lì yì 相关者xiāng guān zhě xiāng guān zhě (( ( 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 许多xǔ duō xǔ duō 是shì shì 暴力bào lì bào lì 或huò huò 性犯罪xìng fàn zuì xìng fàn zuì 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě )) ) 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 将jiāng jiāng 涉及shè jí shè jí 的de de 众多zhòng duō zhòng duō 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 管辖权guǎn xiá quán guǎn xiá quán ,, , 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 正确处理zhèng què chǔ lǐ zhèng què chǔ lǐ 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 设置shè zhì shè zhì 非常fēi cháng fēi cháng 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 。。 。
There are difficult issues to be dealt with including balancing the rights of multiple victims, potentially multiple claims over time, and interactions with family law and bankruptcy law." This isn't merely political foot-dragging—the reform requires careful design to address: - Multiple competing victim claims on a single offender's superannuation - Interactions with family law (superannuation division in divorces) [1] - Bankruptcy law implications - Coordination across different court jurisdictions - Proper legal safeguards for fund administration
需要xū yào xū yào 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 的de de 困难kùn nán kùn nán 问题wèn tí wèn tí 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 平衡píng héng píng héng 多个duō gè duō gè 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 的de de 权利quán lì quán lì 、、 、 随suí suí 时间shí jiān shí jiān 可能kě néng kě néng 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 的de de 多项duō xiàng duō xiàng 索赔suǒ péi suǒ péi ,, , 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 与yǔ yǔ 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 法fǎ fǎ 和hé hé 破产法pò chǎn fǎ pò chǎn fǎ 的de de 互动hù dòng hù dòng 。。 。
### No Legislative History Found for Labor Government
"" "
Crucially, there is no evidence that the Labor government (which took office in May 2022, after these articles) has introduced legislation to close this loophole either [3].
这zhè zhè 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn 是shì shì 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 拖延tuō yán tuō yán —— — —— — 该gāi gāi 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 需要xū yào xū yào 精心设计jīng xīn shè jì jīng xīn shè jì 以yǐ yǐ 解决jiě jué jiě jué :: :
A search for any Labor government action on this issue yields no specific legislative outcomes, suggesting this remains an unaddressed problem under both governments.
-- - 单一dān yī dān yī 犯罪者fàn zuì zhě fàn zuì zhě 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 上shàng shàng 的de de 多个duō gè duō gè 竞争性jìng zhēng xìng jìng zhēng xìng 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 索赔suǒ péi suǒ péi
### Initial Policy Work Was Genuine
-- - 与yǔ yǔ 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 法fǎ fǎ 的de de 互动hù dòng hù dòng (( ( 离婚lí hūn lí hūn 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 分割fēn gē fēn gē )) ) [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The 2018 consultation paper and initial design work were real government activity, not empty promises [1].
-- - 破产法pò chǎn fǎ pò chǎn fǎ 的de de 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng
The delay appears to reflect genuine grappling with complex policy rather than deliberate obstruction.
-- - 不同bù tóng bù tóng 法院fǎ yuàn fǎ yuàn 管辖权guǎn xiá quán guǎn xiá quán 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 协调xié tiáo xié tiáo
-- - 基金jī jīn jī jīn 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 人rén rén 的de de 适当shì dàng shì dàng 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng
###### ### 未wèi wèi 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ
至关重要zhì guān zhòng yào zhì guān zhòng yào 的de de 是shì shì ,, , 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ (( ( 20222022 2022 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 就职jiù zhí jiù zhí ,, , 在zài zài 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu )) ) 也yě yě 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 了le le 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 来lái lái 关闭guān bì guān bì 这一zhè yī zhè yī 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 问题wèn tí wèn tí 上shàng shàng 的de de 任何rèn hé rèn hé 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng 都dōu dōu 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ ,, , 这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这zhè zhè 在zài zài 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 仍然réng rán réng rán 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 未wèi wèi 解决jiě jué jiě jué 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
###### ### 初步chū bù chū bù 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de
20182018 2018 年nián nián 的de de 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 和hé hé 初步设计chū bù shè jì chū bù shè jì 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 是shì shì 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 活动huó dòng huó dòng ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 空洞kōng dòng kōng dòng 的de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
延迟yán chí yán chí 似乎sì hū sì hū 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 与yǔ yǔ 复杂fù zá fù zá 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 斗争dòu zhēng dòu zhēng ,, , 而ér ér 非故意fēi gù yì fēi gù yì 阻挠zǔ náo zǔ náo 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * SydneySydney Sydney MorningMorning Morning HeraldHerald Herald (( ( SMHSMH SMH )) ) :: : ** * ** *
**Sydney Morning Herald (SMH):** SMH is a mainstream Australian newspaper owned by Nine Entertainment, one of Australia's major media companies [1].
SMHSMH SMH 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ ,, , 由yóu yóu NineNine Nine EntertainmentEntertainment Entertainment 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu ,, , NineNine Nine EntertainmentEntertainment Entertainment 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 公司gōng sī gōng sī 之一zhī yī zhī yī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
It has a general centre-left editorial stance but maintains professional journalism standards and fact-checking.
它持tā chí tā chí 一般yì bān yì bān 中zhōng zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ,, , 但dàn dàn 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 和hé hé 事实shì shí shì shí 核查hé chá hé chá 。。 。
This article is a factual news report by Dan Nolan, not an opinion piece, citing direct quotes from government officials and victim advocates [1].
这zhè zhè 篇文章piān wén zhāng piān wén zhāng 是shì shì DanDan Dan NolanNolan Nolan 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào ,, , 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 评论píng lùn píng lùn 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng ,, , 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 官员guān yuán guān yuán 和hé hé 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引语yǐn yǔ yǐn yǔ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Credibility: **High for factual reporting**. **ABC News:** The ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) is Australia's national public broadcaster, funded by government but editorially independent [2].
可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù :: : ** * ** * 高gāo gāo ,, , 用于yòng yú yòng yú 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào ** * ** * 。。 。
This article is factual reporting citing direct quotes and statements from advocates, lawyers, and victims [2].
** * ** * ABCABC ABC NewsNews News :: : ** * ** *
The article presents multiple perspectives including government position.
ABCABC ABC (( ( AustralianAustralian Australian BroadcastingBroadcasting Broadcasting CorporationCorporation Corporation )) ) 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国家guó jiā guó jiā 公共广播gōng gòng guǎng bō gōng gòng guǎng bō 公司gōng sī gōng sī ,, , 由yóu yóu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 资助zī zhù zī zhù 但dàn dàn 编辑biān jí biān jí 独立dú lì dú lì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Credibility: **Very High for factual reporting**. **Assessment of Bias:** Neither source is particularly partisan in these articles.
这zhè zhè 篇文章piān wén zhāng piān wén zhāng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 、、 、 律师lǜ shī lǜ shī 和hé hé 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引语yǐn yǔ yǐn yǔ 和hé hé 陈述chén shù chén shù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Both are straightforward reporting of the policy problem and stalled legislative response.
该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 从cóng cóng 多个duō gè duō gè 角度jiǎo dù jiǎo dù 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn ,, , 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
However, both articles emphasize victim frustration, which gives them a sympathetic framing toward victims—this is appropriate given the subject matter involves serious crimes and suffering.
可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù :: : ** * ** * 非常fēi cháng fēi cháng 高gāo gāo ,, , 用于yòng yú yòng yú 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào ** * ** * 。。 。
** * ** * 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 评估píng gū píng gū :: : ** * ** * 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán 在zài zài 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 中zhōng zhōng 都dōu dōu 不是bú shì bú shì 特别tè bié tè bié 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 化huà huà 。。 。
两者liǎng zhě liǎng zhě 都dōu dōu 是shì shì 对duì duì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 问题wèn tí wèn tí 和hé hé 停滞不前tíng zhì bù qián tíng zhì bù qián 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 回应huí yìng huí yìng 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 报道bào dào bào dào 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 两篇liǎng piān liǎng piān 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 都dōu dōu 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 的de de 挫折感cuò zhé gǎn cuò zhé gǎn ,, , 这使zhè shǐ zhè shǐ 它们tā men tā men 对duì duì 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 同情tóng qíng tóng qíng 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià —— — —— — 鉴于jiàn yú jiàn yú 主题zhǔ tí zhǔ tí 涉及shè jí shè jí 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì 和hé hé 痛苦tòng kǔ tòng kǔ ,, , 这是zhè shì zhè shì 恰当qià dàng qià dàng 的de de 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做zuò zuò 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ?? ?
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government superannuation victims compensation child abuse" and "Albanese government superannuation loophole reform 2023 2024" **Finding:** Labor government has not introduced legislation to close this loophole either, despite taking office in May 2022 [4].
** * ** *
The issue appears to have remained unaddressed under the Albanese government through at least early 2024 (based on available search results).
搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng :: : "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 赔偿péi cháng péi cháng 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 虐待nüè dài nüè dài "" " 和hé hé "" " AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 20232023 2023 20242024 2024 "" "
This suggests the loophole problem is not unique to the Coalition—it has persisted under both governments without resolution [4].
** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn :: : ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 也yě yě 未能wèi néng wèi néng 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 来lái lái 关闭guān bì guān bì 这一zhè yī zhè yī 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng ,, , 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 于yú yú 20222022 2022 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 就职jiù zhí jiù zhí [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
This indicates either: 1.
根据gēn jù gēn jù 可用kě yòng kě yòng 的de de 搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ ,, , 这一zhè yī zhè yī 问题wèn tí wèn tí 似乎sì hū sì hū 至少zhì shǎo zhì shǎo 在zài zài 20242024 2024 年初nián chū nián chū 之前zhī qián zhī qián 一直yì zhí yì zhí 未wèi wèi 在zài zài AlbaneseAlbanese Albanese 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 得到dé dào dé dào 解决jiě jué jiě jué 。。 。
The policy complexity genuinely is significant enough to delay action across political transitions, or 2.
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu —— — —— — 它tā tā 在zài zài 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 都dōu dōu 未wèi wèi 得到dé dào dé dào 解决jiě jué jiě jué [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
Neither government has prioritized the issue sufficiently to overcome those complexities Neither government appears to have a decisive track record of solving this problem [3][4].
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng :: :
11 1 .. . 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 确实què shí què shí 足够zú gòu zú gòu 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà ,, , 以至于yǐ zhì yú yǐ zhì yú 在zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 更迭gēng dié gēng dié 期间qī jiān qī jiān 延迟yán chí yán chí 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng ,, , 或huò huò
22 2 .. . 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 足够zú gòu zú gòu 重视zhòng shì zhòng shì 该gāi gāi 问题wèn tí wèn tí 以yǐ yǐ 克服kè fú kè fú 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng
两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 似乎sì hū sì hū 都dōu dōu 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 解决jiě jué jiě jué 这一zhè yī zhè yī 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 决定性jué dìng xìng jué dìng xìng 记录jì lù jì lù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

###### ### 批评pī píng pī píng (( ( 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào )) )
### The Criticism (Valid)
CoalitionCoalition Coalition "" " 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 。。 。
The criticism that the Coalition "broke a promise" is factually accurate.
KellyKelly Kelly OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer 做出zuò chū zuò chū 了le le 明确míng què míng què 的de de 、、 、 有yǒu yǒu 时间shí jiān shí jiān 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì 的de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò (( ( 20182018 2018 年nián nián "" " 年底nián dǐ nián dǐ 前qián qián "" " )) ) ,, , 但dàn dàn 未能wèi néng wèi néng 兑现duì xiàn duì xiàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Kelly O'Dwyer made an explicit, time-bound commitment ("before the end of the year" 2018) that was not fulfilled [1].
到dào dào 20222022 2022 年nián nián —— — —— — 四年sì nián sì nián 后hòu hòu —— — —— — 尚未shàng wèi shàng wèi 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 。。 。
By 2022—four years later—no legislation had been introduced.
对于duì yú duì yú 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 和hé hé 倡导者chàng dǎo zhě chàng dǎo zhě 来说lái shuō lái shuō ,, , 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 他们tā men tā men 获得huò dé huò dé 赔偿péi cháng péi cháng 能力néng lì néng lì 的de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
For victims and advocates, this represents a genuine broken promise affecting their ability to access compensation [1].
政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 延迟yán chí yán chí 有yǒu yǒu 实际shí jì shí jì 后果hòu guǒ hòu guǒ :: : MauriceMaurice Maurice VanVan Van RynRyn Ryn 、、 、 PeterPeter Peter LiddyLiddy Liddy 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 可能kě néng kě néng 的de de 其他qí tā qí tā 犯罪者fàn zuì zhě fàn zuì zhě 继续jì xù jì xù 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 数百万美元shù bǎi wàn měi yuán shù bǎi wàn měi yuán 的de de 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 账户zhàng hù zhàng hù ,, , 受到shòu dào shòu dào 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 免受miǎn shòu miǎn shòu 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 索赔suǒ péi suǒ péi ,, , 而ér ér 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 犯罪fàn zuì fàn zuì 的de de 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 则zé zé 在zài zài 持续chí xù chí xù 的de de 创伤chuāng shāng chuāng shāng 中zhōng zhōng 生活shēng huó shēng huó ,, , 依赖yī lài yī lài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 赔偿péi cháng péi cháng 和hé hé 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 支持zhī chí zhī chí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The policy delay has real consequences: Maurice Van Ryn, Peter Liddy, and potentially other offenders continue to have multimillion-dollar superannuation accounts shielded from victims, while victims of serious crimes live with ongoing trauma and depend on government compensation and healthcare support [1][2].
###### ### 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng (( ( 合法hé fǎ hé fǎ 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng )) )
### The Government's Position (Legitimate Context)
CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng "" " 初步设计chū bù shè jì chū bù shè jì 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò "" " ,, , 并bìng bìng 认识rèn shí rèn shí 到dào dào 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The Coalition government stated it was conducting "initial design work" and recognized the policy complexity [1].
财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 的de de 解释jiě shì jiě shì 揭示jiē shì jiē shì 了le le 需要xū yào xū yào 仔细zǐ xì zǐ xì 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 设计shè jì shè jì 的de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 复杂fù zá fù zá 问题wèn tí wèn tí :: :
Treasury's explanation reveals genuine complications that require careful legislative design: - Balancing rights across multiple victims with claims on the same offender's super - Interactions with family law (superannuation is a contested asset in divorce) - Bankruptcy law implications - Cross-jurisdictional coordination [1] These aren't trivial drafting questions—they involve fundamental legal principles.
-- - 平衡píng héng píng héng 同一tóng yī tóng yī 犯罪者fàn zuì zhě fàn zuì zhě 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 上shàng shàng 多个duō gè duō gè 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 的de de 权利quán lì quán lì
Poor legislative design could create unintended consequences.
-- - 与yǔ yǔ 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 法fǎ fǎ 的de de 互动hù dòng hù dòng (( ( 养老金yǎng lǎo jīn yǎng lǎo jīn 是shì shì 离婚lí hūn lí hūn 中有zhōng yǒu zhōng yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 的de de 资产zī chǎn zī chǎn )) )
### Broader Assessment
-- - 破产法pò chǎn fǎ pò chǎn fǎ 的de de 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng
**Is this unique to the Coalition?** No.
-- - 跨kuà kuà 管辖权guǎn xiá quán guǎn xiá quán 协调xié tiáo xié tiáo [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Labor government, which took office in May 2022, has also not introduced legislation to close this loophole [4].
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 都dōu dōu 不是bú shì bú shì 微不足道wēi bù zú dào wēi bù zú dào 的de de 起草qǐ cǎo qǐ cǎo 问题wèn tí wèn tí —— — —— — 它们tā men tā men 涉及shè jí shè jí 基本jī běn jī běn 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 原则yuán zé yuán zé 。。 。
This suggests either: 1.
糟糕zāo gāo zāo gāo 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 设计shè jì shè jì 可能kě néng kě néng 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 意想不到yì xiǎng bù dào yì xiǎng bù dào 的de de 后果hòu guǒ hòu guǒ 。。 。
The policy is genuinely complex and difficult to implement across government transitions, or 2.
###### ### 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 评估píng gū píng gū
Neither government has prioritized it sufficiently This is not a Coalition-specific failure of governance, but rather a systemic failure across both major parties to prioritize closing a loophole that affects a relatively small number of cases but involves profound injustice [1][2][4].
** * ** * 这是zhè shì zhè shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 吗ma ma ?? ?
### The Offsetting Consideration
** * ** *
From a victims' perspective, complexity and careful legislative design are secondary concerns.
不是bú shì bú shì 。。 。
From their viewpoint, four years (2018-2022) without legislative action under the Coalition, followed by additional years without action under Labor, represents administrative and political failure to address a documented injustice [1][2].
于yú yú 20222022 2022 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 就职jiù zhí jiù zhí 的de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 也yě yě 未能wèi néng wèi néng 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 来lái lái 关闭guān bì guān bì 这一zhè yī zhè yī 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The victims' position—that this should be a "no-brainer"—has merit from a justice perspective, even if legislative complexity explains the delay [1].
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng :: :
11 1 .. . 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 确实què shí què shí 复杂fù zá fù zá ,, , 难以nán yǐ nán yǐ 在zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 更迭gēng dié gēng dié 期间qī jiān qī jiān 实施shí shī shí shī ,, , 或huò huò
22 2 .. . 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 足够zú gòu zú gòu 重视zhòng shì zhòng shì 该gāi gāi 问题wèn tí wèn tí
这zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 特有tè yǒu tè yǒu 的de de 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 失败shī bài shī bài ,, , 而是ér shì ér shì 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 都dōu dōu 未能wèi néng wèi néng 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 关闭guān bì guān bì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 较jiào jiào 少数shǎo shù shǎo shù 案件àn jiàn àn jiàn 但dàn dàn 涉及shè jí shè jí 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 不bù bù 公正gōng zhèng gōng zhèng 的de de 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 失败shī bài shī bài [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
###### ### 抵消dǐ xiāo dǐ xiāo 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ
从cóng cóng 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 的de de 角度jiǎo dù jiǎo dù 来看lái kàn lái kàn ,, , 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 和hé hé 仔细zǐ xì zǐ xì 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 设计shè jì shè jì 是shì shì 次要cì yào cì yào 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
从cóng cóng 他们tā men tā men 的de de 角度jiǎo dù jiǎo dù 来看lái kàn lái kàn ,, , CoalitionCoalition Coalition 下xià xià 四年sì nián sì nián (( ( 20182018 2018 -- - 20222022 2022 年nián nián )) ) 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng ,, , 随后suí hòu suí hòu LaborLabor Labor 下xià xià 又yòu yòu 几年jǐ nián jǐ nián 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 行动xíng dòng xíng dòng ,, , 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 解决jiě jué jiě jué 已yǐ yǐ 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de 不bù bù 公正gōng zhèng gōng zhèng 的de de 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 和hé hé 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 失败shī bài shī bài [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng —— — —— — 这zhè zhè 应该yīng gāi yīng gāi 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè "" " 无需wú xū wú xū 思考sī kǎo sī kǎo "" " 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí —— — —— — 从cóng cóng 正义zhèng yì zhèng yì 的de de 角度jiǎo dù jiǎo dù 来看lái kàn lái kàn 是shì shì 有yǒu yǒu 道理dào lǐ dào lǐ 的de de ,, , 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 解释jiě shì jiě shì 了le le 延迟yán chí yán chí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。

属实

7.0

/ 10

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20182018 2018 年nián nián 做出zuò chū zuò chū 了le le 关闭guān bì guān bì 这一zhè yī zhè yī 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng 的de de 明确míng què míng què 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò (( ( KellyKelly Kelly OO O '' ' DwyerDwyer Dwyer ,, , "" " 年底nián dǐ nián dǐ 前qián qián "" " )) ) 。。 。
The Coalition government did make an explicit promise to close this loophole in 2018 (Kelly O'Dwyer, "before the end of the year").
该gāi gāi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 未能wèi néng wèi néng 兑现duì xiàn duì xiàn —— — —— — 在zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 剩余shèng yú shèng yú 任期rèn qī rèn qī 内nèi nèi 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 引入yǐn rù yǐn rù 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The promise was not fulfilled—no legislation was introduced during the Coalition's remaining years in office [1][2].
这是zhè shì zhè shì 关于guān yú guān yú 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 的de de 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de 陈述chén shù chén shù 。。 。
This is a factually true statement of broken promise.
然而rán ér rán ér ,, , 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì :: :
However, the full context reveals: 1.
11 1 .. . 潜在qián zài qián zài 的de de 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng 确实què shí què shí 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de ,, , 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě
The underlying loophole is genuinely real and affects real victims 2.
22 2 .. . 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 尝试cháng shì cháng shì 了le le 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò ,, , 并bìng bìng 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 了le le 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng
The government genuinely attempted policy work and identified real legislative complexity 3.
33 3 .. . 该gāi gāi 问题wèn tí wèn tí 在zài zài LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 也yě yě 未能wèi néng wèi néng 解决jiě jué jiě jué ,, , 这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 是shì shì 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 困难kùn nán kùn nán 而ér ér 非fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 特有tè yǒu tè yǒu 的de de 阻挠zǔ náo zǔ náo [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
The problem has persisted unsolved under the Labor government as well, suggesting systemic difficulty rather than Coalition-specific obstruction [3][4] 4.
44 4 .. . 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 似乎sì hū sì hū 都dōu dōu 低估dī gū dī gū 了le le 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 于yú yú 其qí qí 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 解决jiě jué jiě jué 该gāi gāi 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 重要性zhòng yào xìng zhòng yào xìng
Both parties appear to have underestimated the importance of solving this issue relative to its complexity The claim is **TRUE as a statement of broken promise**, but **INCOMPLETE as a critique of governance**, since the issue remains unresolved under Labor and appears to reflect systemic Australian political inattention to complex victim compensation policy.
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 关于guān yú guān yú 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 的de de 陈述chén shù chén shù ** * ** * 属实shǔ shí shǔ shí ** * ** * ,, , 但dàn dàn 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 对duì duì 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng ** * ** * 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng ** * ** * ,, , 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 该gāi gāi 问题wèn tí wèn tí 在zài zài LaborLabor Labor 下xià xià 仍réng réng 未wèi wèi 解决jiě jué jiě jué ,, , 似乎sì hū sì hū 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 对duì duì 复杂fù zá fù zá 受害者shòu hài zhě shòu hài zhě 赔偿péi cháng péi cháng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 关注guān zhù guān zhù 不足bù zú bù zú 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (2)

  1. 1
    Crime victims urge federal government to close super loophole

    Crime victims urge federal government to close super loophole

    The federal government pledged to close a legal loophole that allows sex offenders to quarantine their superannuation from civil compensation payouts to victims, but, four years later, victims are still waiting.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  2. 2
    Paedophiles should forfeit superannuation to pay compensation, child sex abuse victim says

    Paedophiles should forfeit superannuation to pay compensation, child sex abuse victim says

    A victim of notorious South Australian paedophile Peter Liddy joins a call for child sex offenders to be stripped of their superannuation, and for the money to instead go towards redress.

    Abc Net

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。