C0670
Ang Claim
“Mali ang pag-aangkin na ang mga bansa sa buong mundo ay ipinapawalang-bisa ang mga emissions trading scheme, kahit na may kasalukuyang netong pagtaas sa pagpapatupad ng mga naturang scheme.”
Orihinal na Pinagmulan: Matthew Davis
Orihinal na Pinagmulan
✅ FACTUAL NA BERIPIKASYON
**Ang pag-aangkin ay totoong batay sa katotohanan.** Pinatunayan ni Punong Ministro Tony Abbott noong 2014 na ang mga emissions trading scheme ay "itinatapon" sa buong mundo, habang ang mga mapagkakatiwalaang ebidensya ay nagpapakita ng kabaligtaran.
**The claim is factually accurate.** Prime Minister Tony Abbott did repeatedly assert in 2014 that emissions trading schemes were "being discarded" around the world, while authoritative evidence showed the opposite was true.
Ayon sa ABC fact check mula noong Hulyo 9, 2014, sinabi ni Tony Abbott: "Walang senyales na ang mga trading scheme ay patuloy na pinapatupad. According to an ABC fact check from July 9, 2014, Tony Abbott stated: "There is no sign that trading schemes are increasingly being adopted.
Kung mayroon man, ang mga trading scheme ay itinatapon hindi pinapatupad" [1]. If anything trading schemes are being discarded not adopted" [1].
Ang pahayag na ito ay ginawa bilang bahagi ng pagtulak ng Coalition government na ipawalang-bisa ang carbon pricing regime ng Labor. This statement was made as part of the Coalition government's push to repeal Labor's carbon pricing regime.
Gayunpaman, maraming mga mapagkakatiwalaang pinagmulan ang sumalungat sa pag-aangkin ni Abbott: Ang ulat ng World Bank na "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2014" (inilathala noong Mayo 28, 2014) ay nagtala ng makabuluhang paglago sa mga mekanismo ng carbon pricing sa buong mundo. However, multiple authoritative sources contradicted Abbott's claim:
The World Bank's "State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2014" report (published May 28, 2014) documented significant growth in carbon pricing mechanisms globally.
Ayon sa World Bank, "39 national at 23 sub-national jurisdictions – na responsable sa halos isang-kapat ng pandaigdigang greenhouse gas emissions – ay nagpatupad o nakatakdang magpatupad ng mga carbon pricing instruments" [2]. According to the World Bank, "39 national and 23 sub-national jurisdictions – responsible for almost a quarter of the global greenhouse gas emissions – have implemented or are scheduled to implement carbon pricing instruments" [2].
Tukoy na binanggit ng ulat na "walong bagong carbon market ang nagsimula noong 2013, at isa pang nagsimula noong maagang 2014," na may halaga na humigit-kumulang US$30 billion ang emissions trading schemes sa mundo [2]. The report specifically noted that "eight new carbon markets opened in 2013, and another launched in early 2014," with the world's emissions trading schemes valued at approximately US$30 billion [2].
Ang ICAP (International Carbon Action Partnership) Status Report 2014 ay nagbigay ng karagdagang ebidensya, na nagsabing "ang 2013 ay isang record year: sa kabuuan, siyam na bagong emissions trading scheme (ETS) ang nagsimulang gumana sa buong mundo" [3]. The International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP) Status Report 2014 provided further evidence, stating that "2013 was a record year: in total, nine new emissions trading schemes (ETS) started operation worldwide" [3].
Lima sa mga bagong sistemang ito ay nasa China, ang pinakamalaking nagtatapon ng greenhouse gases sa mundo, na may mga pilot scheme na inilunsad sa Shenzhen, Shanghai, Beijing, Guangdong, Hubei, at Tianjin [3][2]. **Hatol ng ABC:** Ang ABC fact check unit ay nagkonklusyon: "Ang pag-aangkin ni Abbott na ang mga trading scheme ay itinatapon hindi pinapatupad ay hindi napatunayan" [1]. Five of these new systems were in China, the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases, with pilot schemes launched in Shenzhen, Shanghai, Beijing, Guangdong, Hubei, and Tianjin [3][2].
**ABC's verdict:** The ABC fact check unit concluded: "Mr Abbott's claim that trading schemes are being discarded not adopted does not check out" [1].
Nawawalang Konteksto
**Ang posisyon ng Coalition sa konteksto ng kasaysayan:** Ang Abbott government ay nakatuon sa pagpawalang-bisa ng Clean Energy Act 2011 (ang carbon pricing mechanism na ipinakilala ng Gillard Labor government), na nagkabisa noong Hulyo 1, 2012 [4].
**The Coalition's position in historical context:** The Abbott government was committed to repealing the Clean Energy Act 2011 (the carbon pricing mechanism introduced by the Gillard Labor government), which took effect on July 1, 2012 [4].
Ang pagpawalang-bisa ay huli na lamang na naipasa noong Hulyo 17, 2014 [4]. **Pagsusuri ng eksperto sa natatangi posisyon ng Australia:** Sinabi ni Ginoong Stephen Howes, Direktor ng Development Policy Centre sa Australian National University, noong 2014: "Masasabi kong ang Australia ay nangingibabaw bilang ang tanging bansa na nagpatupad ng carbon price at pagkatapos ay nagpasiyang itapon ito. The repeal was ultimately passed on July 17, 2014 [4].
**Expert analysis on Australia's unique position:** Professor Stephen Howes, Director of the Development Policy Centre at the Australian National University, stated in 2014: "I'd say Australia stands out as being the only country that has put in place a carbon price and then decided to discard it.
Kaya't dahan-dahan pero tiyak nakikita natin ang higit na mga bansa, higit na mga pamahalaan kaysa sa mas kaunti ang nagpapatupad ng mga emissions trading scheme, mga carbon prices ng isang uri o iba pa" [1]. So slowly but surely we are seeing more countries, more governments rather than less putting in place emissions trading schemes, carbon prices of one type or another" [1].
Sinabi ni Ginoong Ross Garnaut, ang ekonomista na namuno sa 2008 Garnaut Climate Change Review, sa ABC na hindi niya alam ng kahit saan sa mundo na ang carbon pricing ay inaalis: "Kilala ko ang maraming bansa na nasa proseso ng pagpapakilala ng emissions trading schemes... Professor Ross Garnaut, the economist who headed the 2008 Garnaut Climate Change Review, told the ABC he didn't know of anywhere else in the world where carbon pricing was being rolled back: "I know a lot of countries that are in the process of introducing emissions trading schemes...
Wala akong kilalang bansa na aktwal na nagsisira ng mga ito. I don't know of any country that's actually dismantling them.
Maraming aksyon sa maraming bansa, ang Australia ay lumalangoy laban sa agos na iyon" [1]. Lots of action in lots of countries, Australia is swimming against that tide" [1].
Pagsusuri ng Kredibilidad ng Pinagmulan
**Pinagmulan:** Ang ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) ay ang pampublikong broadcaster ng Australia, pangkalahatang itinuturing bilang isang mainstream, mapagkakatiwalaang mapagkukunan ng balita na may statutory obligation na mapanatili ang kalayaan at katumpakan.
**Original source:** The ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) is Australia's public broadcaster, generally regarded as a mainstream, reputable news source with a statutory obligation to maintain independence and accuracy.
Ang tiyak na artikulo na binanggit sa pag-aangkin (ABC PM program, 2014) ay isang ulat ng balita. The specific article cited in the claim (ABC PM program, 2014) is a news report.
Ang ABC's fact check unit, na independiyenteng nagpatunayan ng pag-aangking ito, ay isang dedikadong fact-checking service na nag-aatas ng mga pampulitikang pahayag laban sa magagamit na ebidensya. ABC's fact check unit, which independently verified this claim, was a dedicated fact-checking service that assessed political statements against available evidence.
Ang fact check ay mapagkakatiwalaan sapagkat ito: - Direktang kinukota ang mga pahayag ng Punong Ministro - Nagsasaad ng mga mapagkakatiwalaang pinagmulan (World Bank, ANU professors, Garnaut Review) - Nagbibigay ng mga tiyak na data points na may petsa - Nagsasama ng maraming opinyon ng mga eksperto **Karagdagang mga mapagkakatiwalaang pinagmulan:** - World Bank: Lubos na mapagkakatiwalaang internasyonal na financial institution na may ekspertisa sa climate finance - ICAP (International Carbon Action Partnership): Internasyonal na forum para sa mga pamahalaang nagtatrabaho sa emissions trading - ANU (Australian National University): Nangungunang unibersidad sa pananaliksik ng Australia - Ginoong Ross Garnaut: Internasyonal na kinikilalang ekonomista na may ekspertisa sa climate policy The fact check is credible because it:
- Directly quotes the Prime Minister's statements
- Cites authoritative sources (World Bank, ANU professors, Garnaut Review)
- Provides specific data points with dates
- Includes multiple expert opinions
**Additional authoritative sources:**
- World Bank: Highly credible international financial institution with expertise in climate finance
- ICAP (International Carbon Action Partnership): International forum for governments working on emissions trading
- ANU (Australian National University): Australia's leading research university
- Professor Ross Garnaut: Internationally recognized economist with climate policy expertise
⚖️
Paghahambing sa Labor
**Ginawa ba ng Labor ang katulad na bagay?** Hindi.
**Did Labor do something similar?**
No.
Ang Labor Party (sa ilalim ng parehong Rudd at Gillard governments) ay naghangad ng *pagpapatupad* ng carbon pricing, hindi ang pagpawalang-bisa nito. The Labor Party (under both Rudd and Gillard governments) pursued the *implementation* of carbon pricing, not its repeal.
Ang timeline ng kasaysayan ay nagpapakita: - **2007:** Nangako si Kevin Rudd sa isang emissions trading scheme (Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme - CPRS) - **2009:** Ang CPRS legislation ay natalo sa Senado (hinindi ng Greens at Coalition) - **2011:** Ang Julia Gillard government ay pumasa sa Clean Energy Act (carbon pricing mechanism) - **2012:** Ang carbon pricing ay nagkabisa noong Hulyo 1, 2012 - **2014:** Ang Abbott Coalition government ay ipinawalang-bisa ang carbon pricing mechanism Ang Australia ay natatangi sa buong mundo bilang ang tanging bansa na nagpatupad at pagkatapos ay ipinawalang-bisa ang isang carbon emission trading scheme [5]. The historical timeline shows:
- **2007:** Kevin Rudd committed to an emissions trading scheme (Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme - CPRS)
- **2009:** CPRS legislation was defeated in the Senate (voted down by Greens and Coalition)
- **2011:** Julia Gillard government passed the Clean Energy Act (carbon pricing mechanism)
- **2012:** Carbon pricing took effect on July 1, 2012
- **2014:** Abbott Coalition government repealed the carbon pricing mechanism
Australia is unique globally as the only country to have implemented and then repealed a carbon emission trading scheme [5].
Ang pagbabaliktad na ito ay direktang resulta ng 'climate wars' ng Australia - pulitikal na pag-aaway sa palibot ng climate policy [5]. This reversal was a direct result of Australia's 'climate wars' - political strife surrounding climate policy [5].
Ang mga Labor governments (Rudd 2007-2010, Gillard 2010-2013) ay patuloy na sumuporta sa mga carbon pricing mechanisms, habang ang Coalition (Howard 1996-2007, Abbott 2013-2015) ay tumutol sa mga ito. The Labor governments (Rudd 2007-2010, Gillard 2010-2013) consistently supported carbon pricing mechanisms, while the Coalition (Howard 1996-2007, Abbott 2013-2015) opposed them.
Kapansin-pansin, ang Liberal government ni John Howard ay aktwal na nagmungkahi ng isang emissions trading scheme noong 2007 bilang isang election policy bago matalo sa puwesto [4]. Notably, John Howard's Liberal government had actually proposed an emissions trading scheme in 2007 as an election policy before losing office [4].
🌐
Balanseng Pananaw
**Ang pagbibigay-katarungan ng Coalition:** Ang Abbott government ay nangatwiran na ang carbon pricing mechanism ng Australia ay naglalagay sa bansa sa isang kahinaan sa ekonomiya nang walang paghahatid ng benepisyong pangkapaligiran, dahil ang mga trading partner ng Australia ay alin man ay kulang sa carbon pricing o may mas mababang mga carbon prices [1].
**The Coalition's justification:** The Abbott government argued that Australia's carbon pricing mechanism placed the country at an economic disadvantage without delivering environmental benefits, given that Australia's trading partners either lacked carbon pricing or had much lower carbon prices [1].
Sumulong sila para sa kanilang "Direct Action" policy bilang isang alternatibong diskarte sa pagpapabawas ng emissions [4]. **Mga nagpapahirap na salik:** 1. **Pagbagsak ng European carbon price:** Noong Abril 2013, ang European carbon price ay bumagsak sa halos AU$3.34/tonne kumpara sa fixed rate ng Australia na $23/tonne [4]. They advocated for their "Direct Action" policy as an alternative approach to emissions reduction [4].
**Complicating factors:**
1. **European carbon price collapse:** In April 2013, the European carbon price collapsed to as low as AU$3.34/tonne compared to Australia's fixed rate of $23/tonne [4].
Ang price differential na ito ay ginamit ng mga kritiko upang ipakita na ang carbon price ng Australia ay masyadong mataas kumpara sa internasyonal na mga market. 2. **Kontekstong pulitikal:** Ang carbon pricing mechanism ay lubos na kontrobersyal sa pulitika. This price differential was used by critics to argue that Australia's carbon price was too high relative to international markets.
2. **Political context:** The carbon pricing mechanism was highly controversial politically.
Si Tony Abbott ay nagkampanya sa 2013 election sa isang plataporma na "axe the tax," na nangako na ang mga household ay makakatipid ng $550 bawat taon kung ang carbon tax ay ipawalang-bisa [4]. 3. **Pag-unlad ng China:** Sa kabila ng mga pag-aangkin ni Abbott, ang China ay mabilis na nagpapalawak ng emissions trading. Tony Abbott campaigned in the 2013 election on a platform to "axe the tax," pledging that households would save $550 per year if the carbon tax was repealed [4].
3. **China's progress:** Despite Abbott's claims, China was rapidly expanding emissions trading.
Noong 2014, ang China ay naglunsad ng anim na pilot ETS schemes at nagplano ng isang pambansang ETS sa panahon ng 13th Five Year Plan (2016-2020) [2]. By 2014, China had launched six pilot ETS schemes and was planning a national ETS during the 13th Five Year Plan (2016-2020) [2].
Binanggit ng World Bank: "Sa anim na Chinese pilots na operational, ang China ngayon ay may bahay sa ikalawang pinakamalaking carbon market sa mundo, na sumasaklaw sa katumbas ng higit sa 1.1 bilyong tonelada ng CO2, sa likod lamang ng EU ETS" [2]. 4. **Natatanging posisyon ng Australia:** Tulad ng binanggit ng mga eksperto, ang Australia ay naging ang tanging bansa sa mundo na nagpatupad at pagkatapos ay ganap na ipinawalang-bisa ang isang carbon pricing mechanism [5]. **Mahalagang konteksto:** Ang pag-aangking ito ay natatangi sa Coalition - walang ibang Australian political party na gumawa ng katulad na mga pag-aangkin tungkol sa pandaigdigang pag-abandona sa ETS. The World Bank noted: "With the six Chinese pilots operational, China now houses the second largest carbon market in the world, covering the equivalent of over 1.1 billion tons of CO2, just behind the EU ETS" [2].
4. **Australia's unique position:** As noted by experts, Australia became the only country in the world to implement and then completely repeal a carbon pricing mechanism [5].
**Key context:** This claim is unique to the Coalition - no other Australian political party made similar claims about global abandonment of ETS.
Ang factual record ay malinaw na nagpapakita na noong 2013-2014, may netong paglago sa pagpapatupad ng emissions trading scheme sa buong mundo, hindi pagliit. The factual record clearly shows that in 2013-2014, there was net growth in emissions trading scheme adoption globally, not contraction.
HINDI TOTOO
2.0
sa 10
Ang mga paulit-ulit na pag-aangkin ni Tony Abbott na ang mga emissions trading scheme ay "itinatapon" sa buong mundo ay mali sa katotohanan.
Tony Abbott's repeated claims that emissions trading schemes were "being discarded" around the world were factually incorrect.
Ang maraming mapagkakatiwalaang pinagmulan (World Bank 2014, ICAP 2014) ay nagtala ng netong pagtaas sa pagpapatupad ng ETS, na may siyam na bagong scheme na nagsimula noong 2013 at patuloy na paglago noong 2014. Multiple authoritative sources (World Bank 2014, ICAP 2014) documented a net increase in ETS adoption, with nine new schemes starting in 2013 and continued growth in 2014.
Ang Australia ay, sa katotohanan, ang tanging bansa na gumagalaw sa kabaligtarang direksyon sa pamamagitan ng pagpawalang-bisa ng kanyang carbon pricing mechanism noong 2014. Australia was, in fact, the only country moving in the opposite direction by repealing its carbon pricing mechanism in 2014.
Ang pagsusuri ng eksperto mula kay Ginoong Stephen Howes ng ANU at Ginoong Ross Garnaut ay kumpirmadong walang ibang bansa ang nagsisira ng carbon pricing habang ang Australia ay patuloy sa pagpawalang-bisa. Expert analysis from ANU's Stephen Howes and Professor Ross Garnaut confirmed that no other country was dismantling carbon pricing while Australia was proceeding with repeal.
Huling Iskor
2.0
SA 10
HINDI TOTOO
Ang mga paulit-ulit na pag-aangkin ni Tony Abbott na ang mga emissions trading scheme ay "itinatapon" sa buong mundo ay mali sa katotohanan.
Tony Abbott's repeated claims that emissions trading schemes were "being discarded" around the world were factually incorrect.
Ang maraming mapagkakatiwalaang pinagmulan (World Bank 2014, ICAP 2014) ay nagtala ng netong pagtaas sa pagpapatupad ng ETS, na may siyam na bagong scheme na nagsimula noong 2013 at patuloy na paglago noong 2014. Multiple authoritative sources (World Bank 2014, ICAP 2014) documented a net increase in ETS adoption, with nine new schemes starting in 2013 and continued growth in 2014.
Ang Australia ay, sa katotohanan, ang tanging bansa na gumagalaw sa kabaligtarang direksyon sa pamamagitan ng pagpawalang-bisa ng kanyang carbon pricing mechanism noong 2014. Australia was, in fact, the only country moving in the opposite direction by repealing its carbon pricing mechanism in 2014.
Ang pagsusuri ng eksperto mula kay Ginoong Stephen Howes ng ANU at Ginoong Ross Garnaut ay kumpirmadong walang ibang bansa ang nagsisira ng carbon pricing habang ang Australia ay patuloy sa pagpawalang-bisa. Expert analysis from ANU's Stephen Howes and Professor Ross Garnaut confirmed that no other country was dismantling carbon pricing while Australia was proceeding with repeal.
Pamamaraan ng Rating Scale
1-3: MALI
Hindi tama sa katotohanan o malisyosong gawa-gawa.
4-6: BAHAGYA
May katotohanan ngunit kulang o baluktot ang konteksto.
7-9: HALOS TOTOO
Maliit na teknikal na detalye o isyu sa pagkakasulat.
10: TUMPAK
Perpektong na-verify at patas ayon sa konteksto.
Pamamaraan: Ang mga rating ay tinutukoy sa pamamagitan ng cross-referencing ng opisyal na mga rekord ng pamahalaan, independiyenteng mga organisasyong nag-fact-check, at mga primaryang dokumento.