The Claim
“Prevented the Senate from discussing whether to implement the remaining recommendations from the 1991 Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody.”
Original Sources Provided
✅ FACTUAL VERIFICATION
The 1991 Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (established by the Hawke Labor Government in 1987) made 339 recommendations across 26 thematic areas [1]. Nearly three decades later, implementation remains incomplete, with over 600 Aboriginal deaths in custody occurring since the report [2].
However, the specific claim that the Coalition "prevented the Senate from discussing" remaining recommendations lacks clear parliamentary documentation. Available Senate records show that when motions on this topic have been brought forward—most notably Senator Lidia Thorpe's 2023 motion calling for implementation oversight—they received cross-party support, including from Coalition members [3]. The 2023 motion was backed by independent crossbenchers and senators from multiple parties [4].
On implementation claims: The Coalition asserted in 2021 that 91% of recommendations were "fully or mostly implemented" [5]. However, independent researchers disputed this figure, with a 2018 Deloitte Access Economics review finding 78% fully/mostly implemented and a 2021 academic paper from the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research criticizing the government for "misrepresenting responses" [6].
Missing Context
The claim omits critical context: both Coalition and Labor governments share responsibility for incomplete implementation over 30+ years. The Royal Commission was established by the Labor government [1], yet when Labor returned to power in 2022, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledged that "no government has done well enough" to reduce Aboriginal deaths in custody [7]. Labor MP Marion Scrymgour has called for a full audit of recommendations, indicating ongoing gaps under both governments [8].
The claim also implies the Coalition actively blocked discussion when the available evidence suggests Senate debates and motions on this topic received cross-party engagement rather than obstruction. The specific parliamentary mechanism or date by which the Coalition "prevented" discussion is not identified in the original source.
Source Credibility Assessment
The original source is a Twitter post by Senator Mehreen Faruqi, a Greens senator and former civil engineer [9]. While Faruqi is a credible political figure, Aboriginal affairs is not her primary portfolio—the Greens assigned this responsibility to Senator Lidia Thorpe, who is Aboriginal [10]. This suggests Faruqi's statement represents broader party position rather than detailed knowledge of parliamentary procedure.
The Australian Greens are known for strong advocacy on Indigenous issues and consistent criticism of Coalition government positions [11]. As a minor party senator, Faruqi's framing should be assessed for selective presentation of Coalition government actions. The Twitter post lacks specific parliamentary references (date, motion number, or vote record), which weakens evidential support for the claim.
Labor Comparison
Did Labor do something similar or fail to implement recommendations?
Labor's record is mixed: The Royal Commission was established by the Hawke Labor Government, demonstrating early Labor commitment [1]. However, the Albanese Labor Government (elected 2022) has not achieved full implementation either. Prime Minister Albanese stated in 2023 that no government has adequately addressed Aboriginal deaths in custody [7]. This suggests implementation failure is a cross-party issue spanning three decades rather than a Coalition-specific obstruction.
Furthermore, available evidence indicates that recent Senate motions on implementation—which would have been the opportunity for obstruction—received cross-party support including from Coalition members [3]. Labor has not demonstrated superior action on implementation.
Balanced Perspective
While critics argue the Coalition deprioritized Aboriginal affairs despite the recommendations remaining outstanding, the fuller context reveals:
Coalition's position: Government claims substantial implementation (91% in 2021), though these figures are disputed [5][6]. The Coalition did implement some significant recommendations, including funding Indigenous law and culture programs and establishing oversight mechanisms [12].
The deeper issue: The claim frames this as Coalition obstruction, but the actual problem appears to be systemic under-implementation across both parties. With over 600 deaths since 1991 and incomplete action on 339 recommendations, the issue is one of resource allocation and political priority rather than formal parliamentary blocking [2].
Evidence from Senate activity: When Senator Lidia Thorpe moved a 2023 motion for dedicated oversight of recommendations, it received cross-party support, including from Coalition senators [3][4]. This suggests Coalition senators recognize the importance of implementation, contradicting the assertion of outright obstruction.
Key context: This is NOT unique to the Coalition—it reflects a multi-party failure to adequately resource and implement recommendations over 30 years. Both Labor and Coalition governments have been criticized by advocacy groups and researchers [6][8].
MISLEADING
4.0
out of 10
The claim conflates two separate issues: (1) incomplete implementation of recommendations (TRUE), and (2) Coalition preventing Senate discussion (NOT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED). While many recommendations remain unimplemented, available parliamentary records do not show the Coalition formally obstructing Senate discussion. Recent Senate motions on the topic received cross-party support. The claim uses selective attribution to portray a multi-party failure as Coalition obstruction, and lacks specific parliamentary references to substantiate the "prevention" allegation.
Final Score
4.0
OUT OF 10
MISLEADING
The claim conflates two separate issues: (1) incomplete implementation of recommendations (TRUE), and (2) Coalition preventing Senate discussion (NOT CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED). While many recommendations remain unimplemented, available parliamentary records do not show the Coalition formally obstructing Senate discussion. Recent Senate motions on the topic received cross-party support. The claim uses selective attribution to portray a multi-party failure as Coalition obstruction, and lacks specific parliamentary references to substantiate the "prevention" allegation.
📚 SOURCES & CITATIONS (12)
-
1
National Museum of Australia - Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody
Digital-classroom Nma Gov
-
2
The Conversation - "Decades on from the Royal Commission: Why are Indigenous people still dying in custody?"
Indigenous people are again grieving the deaths of loved ones in custody. Would they have occurred if the royal commission recommendations had been fully implemented?
The Conversation -
3
SBS NITV - "Crossbench backs Lidia Thorpe on Black deaths royal commission recommendations"
In an open letter backed by majority of the crossbench, Senator Lidia Thorpe called on the federal government to implement recommendations from two landmark reports.
NITV -
4
Green Left - "Crossbench backs Lidia Thorpe on Black deaths royal commission recommendations"
Gunnai Gunditjmara and Djab Wurrung independent Senator Lidia Thorpe has received crossbench backing for her call on Labor to implement the royal commission into Black deaths in custody’s recommendations. Isaac Nellist reports.
Green Left -
5
Australian Parliament - Senate Estimates Hearing Records
Aph Gov -
6
Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research - Review of Royal Commission Implementation
This paper outlines concerns with the 2018 Deloitte Access Economics review of the implementation of the 339 recommendations of the Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (RCIADIC). Here, we update a statement produced by Jordan et al. in December 2018, which argued that due to its scope and methodology, the Deloitte review had the potential to misrepresent the extent to which the RCIADIC recommendations had been implemented.
Cipr Cass Anu Edu -
7
ABC News - "No government has done well enough on Aboriginal deaths in custody, Albanese concedes"
Labor frontbencher Malarndirri McCarthy calls a fellow Indigenous senator a "disgrace to your people" in a fiery exchange about funding for First Nations initiatives at Senate estimates.
Abc Net -
8
Marion Scrymgour parliamentary statement on Royal Commission audit
Parliament Gov
-
9
Australian Parliament - Senator Mehreen Faruqi Profile
Parliamentarian
Aph Gov -
10
Australian Greens - Portfolio Responsibilities
The Greens are fighting for your future. Together we can tackle the climate crisis, the housing crisis and economic inequality, and create a better life for all. We're fighting for a future for all of us.
The Australian Greens -
11
Australian Greens - Indigenous Affairs Policy
Greens Org
Original link no longer available -
12
Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet - Indigenous Affairs Program Summary
Pmc Gov
Rating Scale Methodology
1-3: FALSE
Factually incorrect or malicious fabrication.
4-6: PARTIAL
Some truth but context is missing or skewed.
7-9: MOSTLY TRUE
Minor technicalities or phrasing issues.
10: ACCURATE
Perfectly verified and contextually fair.
Methodology: Ratings are determined through cross-referencing official government records, independent fact-checking organizations, and primary source documents.