C0988 - 经济 | PoliticalClaims.au

C0988

声明内容

“削减3亿澳元儿童保育人员补贴。”

经济

原始来源： Matthew Davis

原始来源

mdavis.xyz

Documentation of Coalition government policies and claims.

Matthew Davis

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng ** * ** * 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ** * ** * 。。。

The claim is **factually accurate**.

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 33 3 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 人员rén yuán rén yuán 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ，，，尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 具体情况jù tǐ qíng kuàng jù tǐ qíng kuàng 和hé hé 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 方式fāng shì fāng shì 值得zhí de zhí de 审视shěn shì shěn shì 。。。

The Coalition government did cut a $300 million child care staff subsidy program, though the specific circumstances and framing warrant examination. **Program Details:** The Labor government established the Early Years Quality Fund (EYQF) on March 19, 2013, committing $300 million over two years to provide grants to long day care providers specifically for wage supplements to move childcare workers from award rates to enterprise agreement rates [1].

** * ** * 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 详情xiáng qíng xiáng qíng ：：： ** * ** *

The program was designed to improve workforce quality and retention by increasing educator compensation across approximately 30% of the long day care sector [2]. **Timeline of Events:** Applications for EYQF funding opened on July 23, 2013, receiving 1,173 submissions, of which 453 were approved [1].

工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 33 3 月yuè yuè 1919 19 日rì rì 设立shè lì shè lì 了le le EarlyEarly Early YearsYears Years QualityQuality Quality FundFund Fund （（（ EYQFEYQF EYQF ））），，，承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián 内nèi nèi 投入tóu rù tóu rù 33 3 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán ，，，向xiàng xiàng 长期cháng qī cháng qī 日托rì tuō rì tuō 机构jī gòu jī gòu 提供tí gōng tí gōng 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn ，，，专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 用于yòng yú yòng yú 将jiāng jiāng 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 工作者gōng zuò zhě gōng zuò zhě 从cóng cóng 标准工资biāo zhǔn gōng zī biāo zhǔn gōng zī 水平shuǐ píng shuǐ píng 提升tí shēng tí shēng 至zhì zhì 企业qǐ yè qǐ yè 协议xié yì xié yì 工资水平gōng zī shuǐ píng gōng zī shuǐ píng 的de de 工资gōng zī gōng zī 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

By September 6, 2013 (the day before the federal election), only 16 funding agreements had been finalized totaling $137 million: $132 million to Goodstart Early Learning and $5 million to 15 smaller providers [1].

该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 通过tōng guò tōng guò 提高tí gāo tí gāo 约yuē yuē 30%30% 30% 长期cháng qī cháng qī 日托rì tuō rì tuō 行业háng yè háng yè 教育工作者jiào yù gōng zuò zhě jiào yù gōng zuò zhě 的de de 薪酬xīn chóu xīn chóu 来lái lái 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn workforceworkforce workforce 质量zhì liàng zhì liàng 和hé hé retentionretention retention [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

Following the Coalition's election victory in September 2013, Assistant Minister Sussan Ley announced within weeks that the EYQF would be abolished [3].

** * ** * 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 时间shí jiān shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn ：：： ** * ** *

On October 11, 2013, the government formally revoked all remaining conditional funding offers made in August 2013, and in December 2013, the program was terminated entirely [1]. **The Cut:** The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) audit confirms that approximately $300 million in committed wage increase funding was effectively eliminated through the program's termination, with only $137 million distributed before the reversal [1].

EYQFEYQF EYQF 资金zī jīn zī jīn 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 2323 23 日rì rì 开放kāi fàng kāi fàng ，，，共gòng gòng 收到shōu dào shōu dào 11 1 ,, , 173173 173 份fèn fèn 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng ，，，其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 453453 453 份fèn fèn 获批huò pī huò pī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

Of the pre-election distributions, the government requested that Goodstart Early Learning "voluntarily return" $60 million of its $132 million allocation, though Goodstart refused, arguing that both wages and professional development were essential [4].

截至jié zhì jié zhì 20132013 2013 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 66 6 日rì rì （（（联邦lián bāng lián bāng 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 前一天qián yī tiān qián yī tiān ））），，，仅jǐn jǐn 完成wán chéng wán chéng 了le le 1616 16 项xiàng xiàng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 协议xié yì xié yì ，，，总计zǒng jì zǒng jì 1.371.37 1.37 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán ：：： 1.321.32 1.32 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 拨给bō gěi bō gěi GoodstartGoodstart Goodstart EarlyEarly Early LearningLearning Learning ，，， 500500 500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 拨给bō gěi bō gěi 1515 15 家jiā jiā 小型xiǎo xíng xiǎo xíng 机构jī gòu jī gòu [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 在zài zài 20132013 2013 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 赢得yíng dé yíng dé 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 后hòu hòu ，，，助理zhù lǐ zhù lǐ 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng SussanSussan Sussan LeyLey Ley 在zài zài 数周shù zhōu shù zhōu 内nèi nèi 宣布xuān bù xuān bù EYQFEYQF EYQF 将jiāng jiāng 被bèi bèi 废除fèi chú fèi chú [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。。

20132013 2013 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 1111 11 日rì rì ，，，政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo 了le le 20132013 2013 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 发出fā chū fā chū 的de de 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 剩余shèng yú shèng yú 有yǒu yǒu 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn 资金zī jīn zī jīn offeroffer offer ，，，并于bìng yú bìng yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè 完全wán quán wán quán 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 了le le 该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

** * ** * 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng ：：： ** * ** *

澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国家审计署guó jiā shěn jì shǔ guó jiā shěn jì shǔ （（（ ANAOANAO ANAO ）））审计shěn jì shěn jì 确认què rèn què rèn ，，，通过tōng guò tōng guò 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ，，，约yuē yuē 33 3 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 已yǐ yǐ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 加薪jiā xīn jiā xīn 资金zī jīn zī jīn 被bèi bèi 有效yǒu xiào yǒu xiào 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ，，，仅jǐn jǐn 在zài zài 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo 前qián qián 发放fā fàng fā fàng 了le le 1.371.37 1.37 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

在zài zài 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 前qián qián 发放fā fàng fā fàng 的de de 款项kuǎn xiàng kuǎn xiàng 中zhōng zhōng ，，，政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú GoodstartGoodstart Goodstart EarlyEarly Early LearningLearning Learning "" " 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 退还tuì huán tuì huán "" " 其qí qí 1.321.32 1.32 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 66 6 ,, , 000000 000 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ，，，但dàn dàn GoodstartGoodstart Goodstart 拒绝jù jué jù jué ，，，辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng 工资gōng zī gōng zī 和hé hé 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 都dōu dōu 至关重要zhì guān zhòng yào zhì guān zhòng yào [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。。

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 在zài zài 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 了le le 不bù bù 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng 的de de 图景tú jǐng tú jǐng ：：：

The claim presents an incomplete picture in several important respects: **Pre-Election Coalition Promise:** Coalition leader Tony Abbott stated before the September 2013 election that "while the budget remains in its current state, there can be no extra funding for childcare" but promised to "honour funds contracted from the EYQF" [5].

** * ** * 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián CoalitionCoalition Coalition 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ：：： ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù TonyTony Tony AbbottAbbott Abbott 在zài zài 20132013 2013 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 前qián qián 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ，，， "" " 在zài zài 预算yù suàn yù suàn 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 现状xiàn zhuàng xiàn zhuàng 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià ，，，无法wú fǎ wú fǎ 为wèi wèi 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 额外é wài é wài 资金zī jīn zī jīn "" " ，，，但dàn dàn 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 将jiāng jiāng "" " 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng EYQFEYQF EYQF 已yǐ yǐ 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

This was followed by a post-election reversal where the government not only abolished the program but requested voluntary return of already-distributed funds, representing a broken election commitment [4]. **Program Coverage Limitations:** The claim doesn't note that EYQF was only designed to benefit approximately 30% of childcare workers—primarily those in long day care.

然而rán ér rán ér 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 后hòu hòu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 不仅bù jǐn bù jǐn 废除fèi chú fèi chú 了le le 该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ，，，还hái hái 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 退还tuì huán tuì huán 已yǐ yǐ 发放fā fàng fā fàng 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn ，，，这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。。

This meant approximately 70% of the childcare workforce (family day care, in-home care, and other providers) would have been ineligible regardless [2].

** * ** * 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 覆盖范围fù gài fàn wéi fù gài fàn wéi 限制xiàn zhì xiàn zhì ：：： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 未说明wèi shuō míng wèi shuō míng EYQFEYQF EYQF 仅jǐn jǐn 设计shè jì shè jì 用于yòng yú yòng yú 惠及huì jí huì jí 约yuē yuē 30%30% 30% 的de de 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 工作者gōng zuò zhě gōng zuò zhě —— — —— — 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 是shì shì 长期cháng qī cháng qī 日托rì tuō rì tuō 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 工作人员gōng zuò rén yuán gōng zuò rén yuán 。。。

Parliamentary submissions during the bill's passage noted concerns that the first-in-first-served approach would create significant wage disparity within the sector [6]. **Government Justification:** The Coalition government argued that wage-setting should be determined by the Fair Work Commission rather than direct government subsidy, and characterized the EYQF as "a dodgy fund, set up in a hurry" with insufficient safeguards [3].

这zhè zhè 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 约yuē yuē 70%70% 70% 的de de 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù workforceworkforce workforce （（（家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 日托rì tuō rì tuō 、、、居家jū jiā jū jiā 照料zhào liào zhào liào 和hé hé 其他qí tā qí tā 提供者tí gōng zhě tí gōng zhě ）））无论如何wú lùn rú hé wú lùn rú hé 都dōu dōu 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 资格zī gé zī gé 获得huò dé huò dé [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

The government replaced the wage subsidy with a professional development program instead, redirecting $6.3 million of the funding [1]. **Scale of Overall Cuts:** The $300 million child care cut was part of a broader childcare funding reduction across multiple programs.

法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 通过tōng guò tōng guò 期间qī jiān qī jiān 的de de 议会yì huì yì huì 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，，，先到xiān dào xiān dào 先得xiān dé xiān dé 的de de 方式fāng shì fāng shì 将jiāng jiāng 在zài zài 行业háng yè háng yè 内nèi nèi 造成zào chéng zào chéng 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 的de de 工资gōng zī gōng zī 差距chā jù chā jù [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

ABC Fact Check verified that the Abbott government cut an estimated $450 million from Outside School Hours Care, $157 million from Family Day Care changes, $78 million from Indigenous Children and Family Centres (eliminated entirely), and $39 million from staff career development programs [7].

** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ：：： ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 工资gōng zī gōng zī 应由yīng yóu yīng yóu FairFair Fair WorkWork Work CommissionCommission Commission 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 来lái lái 确定què dìng què dìng ，，，并bìng bìng 将jiāng jiāng EYQFEYQF EYQF 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 匆忙cōng máng cōng máng 设立shè lì shè lì 的de de 、、、保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 不足bù zú bù zú 的de de 可疑kě yí kě yí 基金jī jīn jī jīn "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。。

政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 用yòng yòng 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 取代qǔ dài qǔ dài 了le le 工资gōng zī gōng zī 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē ，，，重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 定向dìng xiàng dìng xiàng 了le le 630630 630 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 资金zī jīn zī jīn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

** * ** * 整体zhěng tǐ zhěng tǐ 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 规模guī mó guī mó ：：： ** * ** * 这zhè zhè 33 3 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 是shì shì 多个duō gè duō gè 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 。。。

ABCABC ABC FactFact Fact CheckCheck Check 核实hé shí hé shí ，，， AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 从cóng cóng 课外kè wài kè wài 托管tuō guǎn tuō guǎn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 约yuē yuē 4.54.5 4.5 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán ，，，从cóng cóng 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 日托rì tuō rì tuō 变更biàn gēng biàn gēng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 1.571.57 1.57 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán ，，，从cóng cóng 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 和hé hé 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 中心zhōng xīn zhōng xīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 77 7 ,, , 800800 800 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán （（（完全wán quán wán quán 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo ））），，，以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 从cóng cóng 工作人员gōng zuò rén yuán gōng zuò rén yuán 职业zhí yè zhí yè 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 33 3 ,, , 900900 900 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * TheThe The AgeAge Age （（（原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán ）））：：： ** * ** * TheThe The AgeAge Age 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ （（（隶属于lì shǔ yú lì shǔ yú FairfaxFairfax Fairfax // / NineNine Nine MediaMedia Media 集团jí tuán jí tuán ））），，， editorialeditorial editorial 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 偏中piān zhōng piān zhōng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì ，，，但dàn dàn 在zài zài 报道bào dào bào dào 事实shì shí shì shí 准确性zhǔn què xìng zhǔn què xìng 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 享有声誉xiǎng yǒu shēng yù xiǎng yǒu shēng yù 。。。

**The Age (Original Source):** The Age is a mainstream Australian newspaper (part of Fairfax/Nine Media group) with a center-left editorial stance but a reputation for factual accuracy in reporting.

这篇zhè piān zhè piān 20132013 2013 年nián nián 1111 11 月yuè yuè 的de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 报道bào dào bào dào 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi opinionopinion opinion 新闻xīn wén xīn wén [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。。

The article from November 2013 appears to be a news report covering government policy announcements, not opinion journalism [8]. **Labor-Aligned Framing:** The claim comes from a Labor-aligned source (mdavis.xyz is identified as Labor-aligned).

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù ：：： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 来自lái zì lái zì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 来源lái yuán lái yuán （（（ mdavismdavis mdavis .. . xyzxyz xyz 被bèi bèi 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 为wèi wèi 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng ）））。。。

While the factual claim is accurate, the framing emphasizes the negative ("cut") without contextualizing the ideological disagreement about government's role in wage-setting or the program's limited coverage [5].

尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 事实性shì shí xìng shì shí xìng 声明shēng míng shēng míng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ，，，但dàn dàn 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 负面fù miàn fù miàn （（（ "" " 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn "" " ））），，，而ér ér 未wèi wèi 将jiāng jiāng 关于guān yú guān yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 工资gōng zī gōng zī 设定shè dìng shè dìng 中zhōng zhōng 角色jué sè jué sè 的de de 意识形态yì shí xíng tài yì shí xíng tài 分歧fēn qí fēn qí 或huò huò 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn 覆盖范围fù gài fàn wéi fù gài fàn wéi 纳入nà rù nà rù 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 相应xiāng yìng xiāng yìng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ：：： ** * ** *

**Labor's Equivalent Policy:** The EYQF itself was Labor's childcare worker wage improvement initiative, making this claim essentially reporting on Coalition reversal of a Labor program rather than a Coalition innovation [1].

EYQFEYQF EYQF 本身běn shēn běn shēn 是shì shì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 工作者gōng zuò zhě gōng zuò zhě 工资gōng zī gōng zī 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn initiativeinitiative initiative ，，，使该shǐ gāi shǐ gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 本质běn zhì běn zhì 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 报告bào gào bào gào CoalitionCoalition Coalition 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 创新chuàng xīn chuàng xīn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

Labor had determined that direct government wage subsidies were necessary to address childcare workforce retention and quality issues [2]. **Subsequent Labor Policies:** In contrast to the Coalition's approach, subsequent Labor governments have proposed different childcare funding strategies.

工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 曾céng céng 认定rèn dìng rèn dìng 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 工资gōng zī gōng zī 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 对于duì yú duì yú 解决jiě jué jiě jué 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù workforceworkforce workforce retentionretention retention 和hé hé 质量zhì liàng zhì liàng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 至关重要zhì guān zhòng yào zhì guān zhòng yào [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

For example, in 2022, Labor promised 15% wage increases for childcare workers through direct government support and a billion-dollar rural childcare fund [9], demonstrating a return to wage improvement focus rather than the Coalition's professional development-only approach. **Ideological Difference:** This represents a genuine policy disagreement rather than equivalent parallel conduct.

** * ** * 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ：：： ** * ** *

The Coalition believed the Fair Work Commission should determine wages; Labor believed direct government investment in childcare worker wages was necessary to improve workforce quality [3].

与yǔ yǔ CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 相比xiāng bǐ xiāng bǐ ，，，随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 策略cè lüè cè lüè 。。。

Both parties subsequently advocated for childcare funding—the difference was in mechanism (wage subsidies vs. professional development vs. wage increases).

例如lì rú lì rú ，，， 20222022 2022 年nián nián ，，，工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 通过tōng guò tōng guò 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 支持zhī chí zhī chí 和hé hé 十shí shí 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 农村nóng cūn nóng cūn 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 基金jī jīn jī jīn 为wèi wèi 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 工作者gōng zuò zhě gōng zuò zhě 提供tí gōng tí gōng 15%15% 15% 的de de 工资gōng zī gōng zī 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] ，，， demonstratingdemonstrating demonstrating 回归huí guī huí guī 工资gōng zī gōng zī 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn 重点zhòng diǎn zhòng diǎn ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 仅jǐn jǐn 注重zhù zhòng zhù zhòng 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 。。。

** * ** * 意识形态yì shí xíng tài yì shí xíng tài 差异chā yì chā yì ：：： ** * ** * 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 分歧fēn qí fēn qí ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi 等同děng tóng děng tóng 的de de 平行píng xíng píng xíng 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi 。。。

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 工资gōng zī gōng zī 应由yīng yóu yīng yóu FairFair Fair WorkWork Work CommissionCommission Commission 决定jué dìng jué dìng ；；；工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 投资tóu zī tóu zī 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 工作者gōng zuò zhě gōng zuò zhě 工资gōng zī gōng zī 对于duì yú duì yú 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn workforceworkforce workforce 质量zhì liàng zhì liàng 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。。

两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 随后suí hòu suí hòu 都dōu dōu 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 资金zī jīn zī jīn —— — —— — 差异chā yì chā yì 在于zài yú zài yú 机制jī zhì jī zhì （（（工资gōng zī gōng zī 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē vsvs vs 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn vsvs vs 工资gōng zī gōng zī 增长zēng zhǎng zēng zhǎng ）））。。。

🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 批评pī píng pī píng ：：： ** * ** *

**The Legitimate Criticism:** Critics correctly argue that the Coalition abolished a committed wage improvement program, which had the effect of reducing earnings prospects for childcare workers in the short term.

批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 正确zhèng què zhèng què 地dì dì 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi ，，， CoalitionCoalition Coalition 废除fèi chú fèi chú 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 已yǐ yǐ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 的de de 工资gōng zī gōng zī 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ，，，这zhè zhè 在短期内zài duǎn qī nèi zài duǎn qī nèi 降低jiàng dī jiàng dī 了le le 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 工作者gōng zuò zhě gōng zuò zhě 的de de 收入shōu rù shōu rù 前景qián jǐng qián jǐng 。。。

The program was already partially implemented, with $137 million distributed before reversal.

该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 部分bù fèn bù fèn 实施shí shī shí shī ，，，在zài zài 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn 前qián qián 已yǐ yǐ 发放fā fàng fā fàng 1.371.37 1.37 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 。。。

The Coalition's pre-election promise to honor contracted funds followed by post-election demands for "voluntary returns" does represent a broken election commitment [4][5]. **The Coalition's Justification:** The government argued that wage-setting should operate through market mechanisms (Fair Work Commission determinations) rather than direct government subsidies, which they characterized as inefficient and inadequately targeted [3].

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 签约qiān yuē qiān yuē 资金zī jīn zī jīn ，，，选后xuǎn hòu xuǎn hòu 却què què 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú "" " 自愿zì yuàn zì yuàn 退还tuì huán tuì huán "" " ，，，确实què shí què shí 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

The Coalition also noted that the EYQF would only have benefited approximately 30% of the sector, creating inequitable outcomes across long day care providers and potentially fragmenting the childcare workforce [2][6].

** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ：：： ** * ** *

Redirecting funds to professional development rather than wage subsidies reflected a different theory about improving quality—focusing on educator skills and qualifications rather than compensation [1]. **Context of Budget Pressures:** The Abbott government came to office committed to reducing budget expenditure and emphasized fiscal consolidation.

政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 工资gōng zī gōng zī 设定shè dìng shè dìng 应yīng yīng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 市场机制shì chǎng jī zhì shì chǎng jī zhì （（（ FairFair Fair WorkWork Work CommissionCommission Commission 裁决cái jué cái jué ）））而ér ér 非fēi fēi 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 来lái lái 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò ，，，后者hòu zhě hòu zhě 被bèi bèi 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 低下dī xià dī xià 且qiě qiě 目标mù biāo mù biāo 不够bù gòu bù gòu 明确míng què míng què [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。。

The elimination of the EYQF fit within this broader approach, along with reductions to numerous other programs [7].

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 还hái hái 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，，， EYQFEYQF EYQF 仅会jǐn huì jǐn huì 使shǐ shǐ 约yuē yuē 30%30% 30% 的de de 行业háng yè háng yè 受益shòu yì shòu yì ，，，在zài zài 长期cháng qī cháng qī 日托rì tuō rì tuō 机构jī gòu jī gòu 间jiān jiān 造成zào chéng zào chéng 不bù bù 公平gōng píng gōng píng 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ ，，，并bìng bìng 可能kě néng kě néng 使shǐ shǐ 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù workforceworkforce workforce 碎片suì piàn suì piàn 化huà huà [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

Whether this fiscal approach was economically sound remains contested among economists. **Key Context:** This is **not unique to the Coalition**—all Australian governments have made politically difficult decisions about wage subsidies, program cuts, and budget priorities.

将jiāng jiāng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 从cóng cóng 工资gōng zī gōng zī 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 定向dìng xiàng dìng xiàng 至zhì zhì 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn ，，，反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 质量zhì liàng zhì liàng 改善gǎi shàn gǎi shàn 理论lǐ lùn lǐ lùn —— — —— — 侧重于cè zhòng yú cè zhòng yú 教育者jiào yù zhě jiào yù zhě 的de de 技能jì néng jì néng 和hé hé 资格zī gé zī gé 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 薪酬xīn chóu xīn chóu [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

However, the specific reversal of an already-implemented program after an election commitment to honor it is noteworthy and distinguishes this from routine budget reallocation [4][5].

** * ** * 预算yù suàn yù suàn 压力yā lì yā lì 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：：： ** * ** *

AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 上任shàng rèn shàng rèn 时shí shí 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 预算yù suàn yù suàn 支出zhī chū zhī chū ，，，并bìng bìng 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 整合zhěng hé zhěng hé 。。。

取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo EYQFEYQF EYQF 符合fú hé fú hé 这一zhè yī zhè yī 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ，，，以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 对duì duì 众多zhòng duō zhòng duō 其他qí tā qí tā 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。。

这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 在经济上zài jīng jì shàng zài jīng jì shàng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 健全jiàn quán jiàn quán ，，，在zài zài 经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā 中zhōng zhōng 仍réng réng 存在cún zài cún zài 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 。。。

** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：：： ** * ** * 这zhè zhè ** * ** * 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu ** * ** * —— — —— — 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 在zài zài 工资gōng zī gōng zī 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 、、、项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 和hé hé 预算yù suàn yù suàn 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 做出zuò chū zuò chū 过guò guò 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 上shàng shàng 艰难jiān nán jiān nán 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 。。。

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，在zài zài 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 后hòu hòu ，，，逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn 已yǐ yǐ 实施shí shī shí shī 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 的de de 具体做法jù tǐ zuò fǎ jù tǐ zuò fǎ 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì ，，，并bìng bìng 使shǐ shǐ 其qí qí 与yǔ yǔ 常规cháng guī cháng guī 预算yù suàn yù suàn 重新分配chóng xīn fēn pèi chóng xīn fēn pèi 有所区别yǒu suǒ qū bié yǒu suǒ qū bié [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

属实

7.0

/ 10

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 33 3 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 人员rén yuán rén yuán 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù （（（ EarlyEarly Early YearsYears Years QualityQuality Quality FundFund Fund ）））。。。

The Coalition government did cut a $300 million child care staff subsidy program (the Early Years Quality Fund).

金额jīn é jīn é 、、、项目名称xiàng mù míng chēng xiàng mù míng chēng 和hé hé 基本jī běn jī běn 取消qǔ xiāo qǔ xiāo 事实shì shí shì shí 均jūn jūn 根据gēn jù gēn jù 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国家审计署guó jiā shěn jì shǔ guó jiā shěn jì shǔ 审计报告shěn jì bào gào shěn jì bào gào 和hé hé 议会yì huì yì huì 记录jì lù jì lù 准确无误zhǔn què wú wù zhǔn què wú wù 。。。

The dollar amount, program name, and basic fact of elimination are all accurate according to the Australian National Audit Office audit report and parliamentary records.

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，该gāi gāi 声明shēng míng shēng míng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：：：该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 仅jǐn jǐn 部分bù fèn bù fèn 实施shí shī shí shī （（（ 33 3 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 1.371.37 1.37 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 在zài zài 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 前qián qián 已yǐ yǐ 发放fā fàng fā fàng ））），，，它tā tā 是shì shì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 选前xuǎn qián xuǎn qián initiativeinitiative initiative 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ，，，且qiě qiě 仅jǐn jǐn 覆盖fù gài fù gài 约yuē yuē 30%30% 30% 的de de 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù workforceworkforce workforce [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

However, the claim omits important context: the program was only partially implemented ($137 million of $300 million distributed before termination), it was part of Labor's pre-election initiative, and it only would have covered approximately 30% of the childcare workforce [1][2][6].

将jiāng jiāng 此事cǐ shì cǐ shì 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 为wèi wèi 简单jiǎn dān jiǎn dān 的de de "" " 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn "" " 在zài zài 实质shí zhì shí zhì 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ，，，但dàn dàn 某种程度mǒu zhǒng chéng dù mǒu zhǒng chéng dù 上shàng shàng 不够bù gòu bù gòu 完整wán zhěng wán zhěng —— — —— — 更gèng gèng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 地说dì shuō dì shuō ，，， CoalitionCoalition Coalition 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn 了le le 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ，，，并用bìng yòng bìng yòng 专业zhuān yè zhuān yè 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 取而代之qǔ ér dài zhī qǔ ér dài zhī ，，，这是zhè shì zhè shì 基于jī yú jī yú 对duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 工资gōng zī gōng zī 设定shè dìng shè dìng 中zhōng zhōng 角色jué sè jué sè 的de de 意识形态yì shí xíng tài yì shí xíng tài 分歧fēn qí fēn qí [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。。

The framing as a simple "cut" is accurate in substance but somewhat incomplete—more precisely, the Coalition reversed a Labor program and replaced wage subsidies with a professional development program instead, based on ideological disagreement about government's role in wage-setting [3].

最终评分

7.0

/ 10

属实

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 33 3 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 儿童ér tóng ér tóng 保育bǎo yù bǎo yù 人员rén yuán rén yuán 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù （（（ EarlyEarly Early YearsYears Years QualityQuality Quality FundFund Fund ）））。。。

The Coalition government did cut a $300 million child care staff subsidy program (the Early Years Quality Fund).

The dollar amount, program name, and basic fact of elimination are all accurate according to the Australian National Audit Office audit report and parliamentary records.