C0775 - 税收 | PoliticalClaims.au

C0775

声明内容

“审计委员会（Commission of Audit）超出预算100万美元（67%），该委员会旨在调查如何更审慎地使用纳税人资金。”

税收

原始来源： Matthew Davis

原始来源

mdavis.xyz

Documentation of Coalition government policies and claims.

Matthew Davis

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 事实shì shí shì shí 要素yào sù yào sù ** * ** * 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ** * ** * 。。。

The core factual elements of this claim are **accurate**.

由yóu yóu AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 设立shè lì shè lì 的de de 国家guó jiā guó jiā 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì （（（ NationalNational National CommissionCommission Commission ofof of AuditAudit Audit ）））最初zuì chū zuì chū 预算yù suàn yù suàn 约yuē yuē 为wèi wèi 100100 100 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán ，，，但dàn dàn 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 耗资hào zī hào zī 250250 250 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán —— — —— — 这zhè zhè 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 超支chāo zhī chāo zhī 150150 150 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 或huò huò 约yuē yuē 150%150% 150% （（（主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 中zhōng zhōng 的de de 67%67% 67% 数字shù zì shù zì 低估dī gū dī gū 了le le 实际shí jì shí jì 百分比bǎi fēn bǐ bǎi fēn bǐ 增幅zēng fú zēng fú ））） [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

The National Commission of Audit, established by the Abbott government in 2013, was initially budgeted at approximately $1 million but ended up costing $2.5 million – representing a $1.5 million or approximately 150% cost overrun (the claim's 67% figure understates the actual percentage increase) [1][2].

该gāi gāi 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 成立chéng lì chéng lì ，，，是shì shì AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 首批shǒu pī shǒu pī 举措jǔ cuò jǔ cuò 之一zhī yī zhī yī ，，，由yóu yóu 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 商业shāng yè shāng yè 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí TonyTony Tony ShepherdShepherd Shepherd 担任dān rèn dān rèn 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí ，，，前qián qián HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng AmandaAmanda Amanda VanstoneVanstone Vanstone 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 和hé hé 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 前qián qián 负责人fù zé rén fù zé rén PeterPeter Peter BoxallBoxall Boxall 和hé hé TonyTony Tony ColeCole Cole 担任dān rèn dān rèn 委员wěi yuán wěi yuán [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。。

The Commission was established in October 2013 as one of the Abbott government's first acts, chaired by Tony Shepherd (then President of the Business Council of Australia), with former Howard government minister Amanda Vanstone and former heads of Finance and Treasury departments Peter Boxall and Tony Cole as commissioners [3][4].

最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 报告bào gào bào gào 于yú yú 20142014 2014 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 11 1 日rì rì 发布fā bù fā bù [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

The final report was released on May 1, 2014 [5].

据jù jù 报道bào dào bào dào ，，，成本chéng běn chéng běn 构成gòu chéng gòu chéng 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò ：：：

The cost breakdown, as reported, included: - $1.9 million for expert staff from Finance, Treasury, and Prime Minister's departments [1] - $157,000 for Peter Crone (head of the secretariat) [1] - $85,000 each for Chairman Tony Shepherd and Commissioner Amanda Vanstone [1] - $50,000 to Boston Consulting Group [1]

-- - 190190 190 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 用于yòng yú yòng yú 来自lái zì lái zì 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 、、、财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 和hé hé 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 部门bù mén bù mén 的de de 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 人员rén yuán rén yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

-- - 15.715.7 15.7 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 用于yòng yú yòng yú 秘书处mì shū chù mì shū chù 负责人fù zé rén fù zé rén PeterPeter Peter CroneCrone Crone [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

-- - 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí TonyTony Tony ShepherdShepherd Shepherd 和hé hé 委员wěi yuán wěi yuán AmandaAmanda Amanda VanstoneVanstone Vanstone 各gè gè 8.58.5 8.5 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

-- - 55 5 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 支付zhī fù zhī fù 给gěi gěi 波士顿bō shì dùn bō shì dùn 咨询zī xún zī xún 集团jí tuán jí tuán （（（ BostonBoston Boston ConsultingConsulting Consulting GroupGroup Group ））） [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]

缺失背景

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 省略shěng lüè shěng lüè 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 要素yào sù yào sù ：：：

The claim omits several important contextual elements: **1.

** * ** * 11 1 .. . 成本chéng běn chéng běn 超支chāo zhī chāo zhī 的de de 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì ** * ** * ：：： 100100 100 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 的de de "" " 预算yù suàn yù suàn "" " 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì TonyTony Tony ShepherdShepherd Shepherd 在zài zài 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 上shàng shàng 提到tí dào tí dào 的de de 初步chū bù chū bù 估算gū suàn gū suàn ，，，他tā tā 在zài zài 听证会tīng zhèng huì tīng zhèng huì 上称shàng chēng shàng chēng 该gāi gāi 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì "" " 物有所值wù yǒu suǒ zhí wù yǒu suǒ zhí "" " ，，，耗资hào zī hào zī 100100 100 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

Nature of the Cost Overrun**: The "budget" of $1 million appears to have been a preliminary estimate mentioned by Tony Shepherd in Senate hearings where he described the Commission as "great value for money" at $1 million [6].

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，正如zhèng rú zhèng rú 参议院cān yì yuàn cān yì yuàn 质询zhì xún zhì xún 中zhōng zhōng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 的de de ，，，这一zhè yī zhè yī 数字shù zì shù zì 不bù bù 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 从cóng cóng 各gè gè 部门bù mén bù mén 借调jiè diào jiè diào 到dào dào 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 的de de 公务员gōng wù yuán gōng wù yuán 成本chéng běn chéng běn [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

However, as noted in Senate questioning, this figure did not include the costs of public servants from departments who were seconded to work on the Commission [6].

250250 250 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 的de de 数字shù zì shù zì 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 部门bù mén bù mén 支持zhī chí zhī chí 人员rén yuán rén yuán 在内zài nèi zài nèi 的de de 全部quán bù quán bù 成本chéng běn chéng běn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

The $2.5 million figure represents the full cost including departmental support staff [1]. **2.

** * ** * 22 2 .. . 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 于yú yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 支出zhī chū zhī chū 的de de 规模guī mó guī mó ** * ** * ：：：审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 耗资hào zī hào zī 250250 250 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 审查shěn chá shěn chá 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 的de de 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 和hé hé 运营yùn yíng yùn yíng —— — —— — 仅jǐn jǐn 占zhàn zhàn 40004000 4000 多duō duō 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 的de de 极小jí xiǎo jí xiǎo 比例bǐ lì bǐ lì 。。。

Scale Relative to Government Spending**: The Commission of Audit cost $2.5 million to review the entire Commonwealth government's finances and operations – a tiny fraction of the $400+ billion federal budget.

如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 得到dé dào dé dào 实施shí shī shí shī ，，，将jiāng jiāng 节省jié shěng jié shěng 数十shù shí shù shí 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。。

The Commission's recommendations, if implemented, would have resulted in billions of dollars in savings [7]. **3.

** * ** * 33 3 .. . 前届qián jiè qián jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 先例xiān lì xiān lì ** * ** * ：：： HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 19961996 1996 年nián nián 设立shè lì shè lì 了le le 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 国家guó jiā guó jiā 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì （（（由yóu yóu BobBob Bob OfficerOfficer Officer 教授jiào shòu jiào shòu 担任dān rèn dān rèn 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí ））），，，任期rèn qī rèn qī 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 时即shí jí shí jí 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。。

Precedent from Previous Government**: The Howard government established a similar National Commission of Audit in 1996 (chaired by Professor Bob Officer) at the beginning of their term [3][8].

这为zhè wèi zhè wèi incomingincoming incoming CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 开展kāi zhǎn kāi zhǎn 全面quán miàn quán miàn 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 审查shěn chá shěn chá 确立què lì què lì 了le le 先例xiān lì xiān lì 。。。

This established a precedent for incoming Coalition governments to conduct comprehensive audits of government finances. **4.

** * ** * 44 4 .. . 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 和hé hé 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi ** * ** * ：：：委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 被bèi bèi 赋予fù yǔ fù yǔ 了le le 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 雄心勃勃xióng xīn bó bó xióng xīn bó bó 的de de 授权shòu quán shòu quán ，，，涵盖hán gài hán gài "" " 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 、、、当前dāng qián dāng qián 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 与yǔ yǔ 州zhōu zhōu 关系guān xì guān xì 的de de 架构jià gòu jià gòu 、、、政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 支出zhī chū zhī chū 的de de 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 和hé hé 效果xiào guǒ xiào guǒ 、、、联邦lián bāng lián bāng 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 预算yù suàn yù suàn 控制kòng zhì kòng zhì 和hé hé 纪律jì lǜ jì lǜ 的de de 充分性chōng fèn xìng chōng fèn xìng "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

Complexity and Scope**: The Commission was given an ambitious mandate covering "the scope of government, the current architecture of commonwealth-state relations, the efficiency and effectiveness of government expenditure, commonwealth finances, and adequacy of existing budgetary controls and disciplines" [6].

政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 最初zuì chū zuì chū 仅jǐn jǐn 分配fēn pèi fēn pèi 三个sān gè sān gè 月yuè yuè 时间shí jiān shí jiān 完成wán chéng wán chéng 这项zhè xiàng zhè xiàng 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò （（（后来hòu lái hòu lái 延长yán cháng yán cháng 至zhì zhì 五个wǔ gè wǔ gè 月yuè yuè ））） [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

The government initially allocated only three months for this work (later extended to five months) [3][6].

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán （（（ Yahoo7Yahoo7 Yahoo7 新闻xīn wén xīn wén // / 西澳xī ào xī ào 人报rén bào rén bào ）））需要xū yào xū yào 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 评估píng gū píng gū ：：：

The original source (Yahoo7 News/The West Australian) requires contextual assessment: **The West Australian** is a daily newspaper published in Perth, owned by Seven West Media.

** * ** * 西澳xī ào xī ào 人报rén bào rén bào （（（ TheThe The WestWest West AustralianAustralian Australian ））） ** * ** * 是shì shì 珀斯pò sī pò sī 出版chū bǎn chū bǎn 的de de 日报rì bào rì bào ，，，由yóu yóu SevenSeven Seven WestWest West MediaMedia Media 拥有yōng yǒu yōng yǒu 。。。

While generally considered a mainstream media outlet, Seven West Media has historically leaned toward conservative editorial positions.

虽然suī rán suī rán 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 被bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 是shì shì 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ ，，，但dàn dàn SevenSeven Seven WestWest West MediaMedia Media 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 上shàng shàng 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 于yú yú 保守bǎo shǒu bǎo shǒu 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。。

The story was republished on Yahoo7 News, a joint venture between Yahoo and Seven West Media [1][9].

该gāi gāi 报道bào dào bào dào 在zài zài Yahoo7Yahoo7 Yahoo7 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 上shàng shàng 转载zhuǎn zǎi zhuǎn zǎi ，，，这是zhè shì zhè shì YahooYahoo Yahoo 与yǔ yǔ SevenSeven Seven WestWest West MediaMedia Media 的de de 合资企业hé zī qǐ yè hé zī qǐ yè [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。。

The reporting appears factual and is corroborated by other sources including ABC News and The Conversation [1][6].

报道bào dào bào dào 内容nèi róng nèi róng 看似kàn shì kàn shì 事实性shì shí xìng shì shí xìng ，，，并bìng bìng 得到dé dào dé dào ABCABC ABC 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 和hé hé TheThe The ConversationConversation Conversation 等děng děng 其他qí tā qí tā 来源lái yuán lái yuán 的de de 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

The cost figures cited are consistent across multiple reports.

引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 数字shù zì shù zì 在zài zài 多篇duō piān duō piān 报道bào dào bào dào 中zhōng zhōng 一致yí zhì yí zhì 。。。

However, the framing of the story – emphasizing the irony of an austerity-focused review going over budget – follows a narrative pattern common in political reporting that highlights perceived government hypocrisy.

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，报道bào dào bào dào 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià —— — —— — 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 专注zhuān zhù zhuān zhù 于yú yú 紧缩jǐn suō jǐn suō 的de de 审查shěn chá shěn chá 反而fǎn ér fǎn ér 超支chāo zhī chāo zhī 的de de 讽刺性fěng cì xìng fěng cì xìng —— — —— — 遵循zūn xún zūn xún 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 报道bào dào bào dào 中zhōng zhōng 常见cháng jiàn cháng jiàn 的de de 叙事xù shì xù shì 模式mó shì mó shì ，，，突出tū chū tū chū 感知gǎn zhī gǎn zhī 到dào dào 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 虚伪xū wěi xū wěi 。。。

⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ？？？

**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government audit review commission spending efficiency program Australia" Finding: The Rudd government (2007-2013) conducted several large-scale reviews and summits, most notably the **Australia 2020 Summit** held in April 2008.

** * ** *

This summit brought together 1,000 participants to discuss "long-term challenges and opportunities" facing Australia across 10 policy streams [10].

搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ ：：： "" " LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 审计shěn jì shěn jì 审查shěn chá shěn chá 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 支出zhī chū zhī chū 效率xiào lǜ xiào lǜ 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù AustraliaAustralia Australia "" "

While an exact cost figure for the Australia 2020 Summit is not readily available in the sources examined, summits of this scale typically cost several million dollars in venue, logistics, and personnel costs.

发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ：：： RuddRudd Rudd 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ （（（ 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 ）））进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 几次jǐ cì jǐ cì 大规模dà guī mó dà guī mó 审查shěn chá shěn chá 和hé hé 峰会fēng huì fēng huì ，，，最zuì zuì 著名zhù míng zhù míng 的de de 是shì shì 20082008 2008 年nián nián 44 4 月yuè yuè 举行jǔ xíng jǔ xíng 的de de ** * ** * AustraliaAustralia Australia 20202020 2020 峰会fēng huì fēng huì ** * ** * 。。。

The summit was criticized by some as an expensive "talkfest" that produced limited concrete outcomes [10].

该gāi gāi 峰会fēng huì fēng huì 汇集huì jí huì jí 了le le 10001000 1000 名míng míng 参与者cān yù zhě cān yù zhě ，，，讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 1010 10 个gè gè 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 面临miàn lín miàn lín 的de de "" " 长期cháng qī cháng qī 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn 和hé hé 机遇jī yù jī yù "" " [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。。

Additionally, the Labor government commissioned numerous reviews during their tenure (2007-2013), including: - The Gonski Review of School Funding (which was extensive and multi-year) - Various health system reviews - The Henry Tax Review (2009-2010), a comprehensive review of Australia's tax system The Henry Tax Review alone involved extensive consultation, research, and a large secretariat over approximately 18 months, costing millions of dollars [11]. **Precedent for Commission of Audit**: The 1996 Commission of Audit under the Howard government established the precedent for incoming governments to conduct comprehensive financial reviews.

虽然suī rán suī rán 在zài zài 查阅chá yuè chá yuè 的de de 来源lái yuán lái yuán 中zhōng zhōng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 找到zhǎo dào zhǎo dào AustraliaAustralia Australia 20202020 2020 峰会fēng huì fēng huì 的de de 确切què qiè què qiè 成本chéng běn chéng běn 数字shù zì shù zì ，，，但dàn dàn 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 规模guī mó guī mó 的de de 峰会fēng huì fēng huì 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 在zài zài 场地chǎng dì chǎng dì 、、、后勤hòu qín hòu qín 和hé hé 人员rén yuán rén yuán 成本chéng běn chéng běn 上shàng shàng 花费huā fèi huā fèi 数百万美元shù bǎi wàn měi yuán shù bǎi wàn měi yuán 。。。

This practice has been adopted by subsequent Coalition governments but not by Labor governments, which have tended to use different mechanisms (summits, targeted reviews) for policy development.

一些yī xiē yī xiē 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 该gāi gāi 峰会fēng huì fēng huì 是shì shì 昂贵áng guì áng guì 的de de "" " 空谈kōng tán kōng tán 会huì huì "" " ，，，产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 成果chéng guǒ chéng guǒ 有限yǒu xiàn yǒu xiàn [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。。

此外cǐ wài cǐ wài ，，，工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 任期rèn qī rèn qī 内nèi nèi （（（ 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 ）））委托wěi tuō wěi tuō 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 多次duō cì duō cì 审查shěn chá shěn chá ，，，包括bāo kuò bāo kuò ：：：

-- - GonskiGonski Gonski 学校xué xiào xué xiào 资助zī zhù zī zhù 审查shěn chá shěn chá （（（广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 且qiě qiě 持续chí xù chí xù 多年duō nián duō nián ）））

-- - 各种gè zhǒng gè zhǒng 医疗系统yī liáo xì tǒng yī liáo xì tǒng 审查shěn chá shěn chá

-- - HenryHenry Henry 税务shuì wù shuì wù 审查shěn chá shěn chá （（（ 20092009 2009 -- - 20102010 2010 ））），，，对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 税收shuì shōu shuì shōu 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 综合zōng hé zōng hé 审查shěn chá shěn chá

仅jǐn jǐn HenryHenry Henry 税务shuì wù shuì wù 审查shěn chá shěn chá 就jiù jiù 涉及shè jí shè jí 约yuē yuē 1818 18 个gè gè 月yuè yuè 的de de 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 咨询zī xún zī xún 、、、研究yán jiū yán jiū 和hé hé 大型dà xíng dà xíng 秘书处mì shū chù mì shū chù 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò ，，，耗资hào zī hào zī 数百万美元shù bǎi wàn měi yuán shù bǎi wàn měi yuán [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ] 。。。

** * ** * 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 先例xiān lì xiān lì ** * ** * ：：： HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 19961996 1996 年nián nián 在zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 联盟lián méng lián méng （（（ CoalitionCoalition Coalition ）））下xià xià 设立shè lì shè lì 了le le 国家guó jiā guó jiā 审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 。。。

这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 被bèi bèi 随后suí hòu suí hòu 的de de CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 采纳cǎi nà cǎi nà ，，，但dàn dàn 未wèi wèi 被bèi bèi 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 采用cǎi yòng cǎi yòng ，，，工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 于yú yú 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 机制jī zhì jī zhì （（（峰会fēng huì fēng huì 、、、针对性zhēn duì xìng zhēn duì xìng 审查shěn chá shěn chá ）））进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 。。。

🌐

平衡视角

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 突出tū chū tū chū 了le le 一个yí gè yí gè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 成本chéng běn chéng běn 超支chāo zhī chāo zhī 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 案例àn lì àn lì ，，，该gāi gāi 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 识别shí bié shí bié 浪费làng fèi làng fèi 性支出xìng zhī chū xìng zhī chū 。。。

The claim highlights a legitimate instance of cost overruns on a government program specifically designed to identify wasteful spending.

讽刺性fěng cì xìng fěng cì xìng 不可否认bù kě fǒu rèn bù kě fǒu rèn ：：：一个yí gè yí gè 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng 审慎shěn shèn shěn shèn 的de de 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 反而fǎn ér fǎn ér 超出chāo chū chāo chū 自身zì shēn zì shēn 预算yù suàn yù suàn 150%150% 150% 。。。

The irony is undeniable: a commission advocating for fiscal prudence exceeded its own budget by 150%.

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 因素yīn sù yīn sù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 了le le 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：：：

However, several factors provide important context: **Defense of the Cost Overrun**: 1. **Partial vs.

** * ** * 对duì duì 成本chéng běn chéng běn 超支chāo zhī chāo zhī 的de de 辩护biàn hù biàn hù ** * ** * ：：：

Full Costing**: The initial $1 million estimate appears to have been a partial estimate excluding departmental secondments.

11 1 .. . ** * ** * 部分bù fèn bù fèn 与yǔ yǔ 全部quán bù quán bù 成本核算chéng běn hé suàn chéng běn hé suàn ** * ** * ：：：最初zuì chū zuì chū 的de de 100100 100 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 估算gū suàn gū suàn 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 排除pái chú pái chú 部门bù mén bù mén 借调jiè diào jiè diào 的de de 部分bù fèn bù fèn 估算gū suàn gū suàn 。。。

The $2.5 million represents the true total cost including public servant time [6]. 2. **Scope and Complexity**: The Commission was tasked with reviewing the entire Commonwealth government operations in just a few months – an ambitious undertaking that naturally required significant resources [6]. 3. **Value Proposition**: The $2.5 million cost to review a $400+ billion budget represents approximately 0.0006% of annual federal expenditure.

250250 250 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 公务员gōng wù yuán gōng wù yuán 时间shí jiān shí jiān 在内zài nèi zài nèi 的de de 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 总成本zǒng chéng běn zǒng chéng běn [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

If the Commission's recommendations had been fully implemented (they were largely rejected due to political unpopularity), the savings would have been in the billions [7]. 4. **Expertise Required**: The Commission drew on senior public servants with deep institutional knowledge.

22 2 .. . ** * ** * 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 和hé hé 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng ** * ** * ：：：委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 任务rèn wù rèn wù 是shì shì 在zài zài 短短duǎn duǎn duǎn duǎn 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 月yuè yuè 内nèi nèi 审查shěn chá shěn chá 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 的de de 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò —— — —— — 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 雄心勃勃xióng xīn bó bó xióng xīn bó bó 的de de 举措jǔ cuò jǔ cuò ，，，自然zì rán zì rán 需要xū yào xū yào 大量dà liàng dà liàng 资源zī yuán zī yuán [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

Their compensation ($85,000 for five months' work for the Chair, equivalent to approximately $204,000 annualized) was not excessive for senior executive work [1]. **Comparison to Private Sector**: Major management consulting firms charge $500,000-$1 million+ for comprehensive organizational reviews.

33 3 .. . ** * ** * 价值jià zhí jià zhí 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng ** * ** * ：：：花费huā fèi huā fèi 250250 250 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 审查shěn chá shěn chá 40004000 4000 多duō duō 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 约yuē yuē 占zhàn zhàn 年度nián dù nián dù 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 支出zhī chū zhī chū 的de de 0.0006%0.0006% 0.0006% 。。。

The Commission's cost of $2.5 million to review an entire government's finances is relatively modest by comparison. **Political Context**: The claim's framing emphasizes irony and hypocrisy, which is a legitimate angle.

如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 得到dé dào dé dào 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 实施shí shī shí shī （（（它们tā men tā men 因yīn yīn 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 不bù bù 受欢迎shòu huān yíng shòu huān yíng 而ér ér 被bèi bèi 大量dà liàng dà liàng 拒绝jù jué jù jué ））），，，节省jié shěng jié shěng 将jiāng jiāng 达dá dá 数十shù shí shù shí 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。。

However, the scale of the overrun ($1.5 million) is minor in the context of federal government spending, and the comparison to Labor's Australia 2020 Summit (which had less concrete outcomes) suggests that this type of expenditure is not unique to one party.

44 4 .. . ** * ** * 所suǒ suǒ 需xū xū 专业知识zhuān yè zhī shí zhuān yè zhī shí ** * ** * ：：：委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 借助jiè zhù jiè zhù 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 深厚shēn hòu shēn hòu 机构jī gòu jī gòu 知识zhī shí zhī shí 的de de 高级gāo jí gāo jí 公务员gōng wù yuán gōng wù yuán 。。。

他们tā men tā men 的de de 薪酬xīn chóu xīn chóu （（（主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí 在zài zài 五个wǔ gè wǔ gè 月yuè yuè 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 中zhōng zhōng 获得huò dé huò dé 8.58.5 8.5 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán ，，，折合zhé hé zhé hé 年薪nián xīn nián xīn 约yuē yuē 20.420.4 20.4 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán ）））对于duì yú duì yú 高级gāo jí gāo jí 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 而言ér yán ér yán 并bìng bìng 不过bù guò bù guò 分fēn fēn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

** * ** * 与yǔ yǔ 私营部门sī yíng bù mén sī yíng bù mén 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào ** * ** * ：：：大型dà xíng dà xíng 管理guǎn lǐ guǎn lǐ 咨询zī xún zī xún 公司gōng sī gōng sī 收取shōu qǔ shōu qǔ 5050 50 万至wàn zhì wàn zhì 100100 100 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 以上yǐ shàng yǐ shàng 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 全面quán miàn quán miàn 的de de 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 审查shěn chá shěn chá 。。。

委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 花费huā fèi huā fèi 250250 250 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán 审查shěn chá shěn chá 整个zhěng gè zhěng gè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 财政cái zhèng cái zhèng ，，，相比之下xiāng bǐ zhī xià xiāng bǐ zhī xià 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 适度shì dù shì dù 。。。

** * ** * 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * ：：：该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 的de de 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 讽刺性fěng cì xìng fěng cì xìng 和hé hé 虚伪性xū wěi xìng xū wěi xìng ，，，这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 的de de 角度jiǎo dù jiǎo dù 。。。

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，超支chāo zhī chāo zhī 的de de 规模guī mó guī mó （（（ 150150 150 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán ）））在zài zài 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 支出zhī chū zhī chū 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 下xià xià 是shì shì 微小wēi xiǎo wēi xiǎo 的de de ，，，与yǔ yǔ 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de AustraliaAustralia Australia 20202020 2020 峰会fēng huì fēng huì （（（产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 较jiào jiào 少shǎo shǎo 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 成果chéng guǒ chéng guǒ ）））的de de 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng ，，，这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 支出zhī chū zhī chū 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 某一mǒu yī mǒu yī 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 。。。

属实

7.0

/ 10

事实shì shí shì shí 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ：：：审计shěn jì shěn jì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 确实què shí què shí 耗资hào zī hào zī 约yuē yuē 250250 250 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán ，，，而ér ér 初步chū bù chū bù 估算gū suàn gū suàn 约yuē yuē 为wèi wèi 100100 100 万美元wàn měi yuán wàn měi yuán ，，，代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 显著xiǎn zhù xiǎn zhù 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 超支chāo zhī chāo zhī 。。。

The factual claims are accurate: the Commission of Audit did cost approximately $2.5 million against an initial estimate of around $1 million, representing a significant cost overrun.

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，该gāi gāi 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 讽刺性fěng cì xìng fěng cì xìng ，，，同时tóng shí tóng shí 淡化dàn huà dàn huà 了le le 关于guān yú guān yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 成本chéng běn chéng běn 估算gū suàn gū suàn 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 如何rú hé rú hé 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò （（（初步chū bù chū bù 估算gū suàn gū suàn 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 不bù bù 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 部门bù mén bù mén 借调jiè diào jiè diào ）））、、、审查shěn chá shěn chá 的de de 雄心勃勃xióng xīn bó bó xióng xīn bó bó 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 于yú yú 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 规模guī mó guī mó 的de de 相对xiāng duì xiāng duì 适度shì dù shì dù 成本chéng běn chéng běn 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 。。。

However, the framing emphasizes irony while downplaying context about how government cost estimates often work (initial estimates frequently exclude departmental secondments), the ambitious scope of the review, and the relatively modest cost compared to the size of the federal budget.

主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 中zhōng zhōng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 的de de 67%67% 67% 数字shù zì shù zì 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 低估dī gū dī gū 了le le 超支chāo zhī chāo zhī ，，，实际shí jì shí jì 接近jiē jìn jiē jìn 150%150% 150% 。。。

The 67% figure cited in the claim actually understates the overrun, which was closer to 150%.

最终评分

7.0

/ 10

属实

The factual claims are accurate: the Commission of Audit did cost approximately $2.5 million against an initial estimate of around $1 million, representing a significant cost overrun.