具有误导性

评分： 4.0/10

报告问题
Coalition
C0607

声明内容

“削减所有无家可归者和社区住房项目的资金，除了法律要求资助的项目。”
福利
原始来源： Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 指zhǐ zhǐ 的de de 是shì shì 20142014 2014 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 社会shè huì shè huì 服务部fú wù bù fú wù bù 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
The claim refers to funding cuts announced in December 2014 by the Abbott government's Social Services Department.
 据jù jù 多个duō gè duō gè 消息来源xiāo xī lái yuán xiāo xī lái yuán 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí ，， ， 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 和hé hé homelessnesshomelessness homelessness 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
According to multiple sources, the government did indeed cut funding to several peak advocacy organizations in the housing and homelessness sector [1][2]. **Specific cuts confirmed:** - **National Shelter**: Lost federal funding; three-year contract terminated a year early.
 ** * ** * 确认què rèn què rèn 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ：： ： ** * ** *
The organization previously received approximately $5 million annually to advocate for low-income households and the homeless [1]. - **Community Housing Federation Australia**: Funding contract rescinded, to cease in June 2015 (a year early).
 -- - ** * ** * NationalNational National ShelterShelter Shelter ** * ** * ：： ： 失去shī qù shī qù 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 资金zī jīn zī jīn ；； ； 三年sān nián sān nián 合同hé tóng hé tóng 提前tí qián tí qián 一年yī nián yī nián 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ 。。 。
The organization received approximately $21 million over four years under the housing and homelessness program [2]. - **Financial Counselling Australia**: Lost entire $260,000 annual federal funding and missed out on $920,000 in requested new grants [1]. - **Highlands Community Centres (NSW)**: Lost all federal funding after 20 years of service [1]. **Funding continued (legally required):** The government explicitly stated it would only continue funding agreements it had a "legislated duty to fund" [1].
 该gāi gāi 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 每年měi nián měi nián 获得huò dé huò dé 约yuē yuē 500500 500 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ，， ， 用于yòng yú yòng yú 为wèi wèi 低收入dī shōu rù dī shōu rù 家庭jiā tíng jiā tíng 和hé hé homelesshomeless homeless 人群rén qún rén qún 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
This primarily refers to the **National Affordable Housing Agreement (NAHA)** with the states under the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) process, which is indeed a formal intergovernmental agreement requiring ongoing Commonwealth contribution [3][4]. **Context on NPAH:** Earlier in 2014, the government had extended the National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness (NPAH) with $115 million in funding for one year (July 2014 - June 2015) [5][6].
 -- - ** * ** * CommunityCommunity Community HousingHousing Housing FederationFederation Federation AustraliaAustralia Australia ** * ** * ：： ： 资金zī jīn zī jīn 合同hé tóng hé tóng 被bèi bèi 撤销chè xiāo chè xiāo ，， ， 将jiāng jiāng 于yú yú 20152015 2015 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè 终止zhōng zhǐ zhōng zhǐ （（ （ 提前tí qián tí qián 一年yī nián yī nián ）） ） 。。 。
This was a $44 million reduction from what Labor had provided, but the government maintained this was for capital works only, not frontline services [5].
 该gāi gāi 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 在zài zài 四年sì nián sì nián 内nèi nèi 根据gēn jù gēn jù 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 和hé hé homelesshomeless homeless 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 获得huò dé huò dé 约yuē yuē 21002100 2100 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Minister Kevin Andrews stated the extension "buys the Government time to plan an overhaul of housing policy" [5].
 -- - ** * ** * FinancialFinancial Financial CounsellingCounselling Counselling AustraliaAustralia Australia ** * ** * ：： ： 失去shī qù shī qù 全部quán bù quán bù 2626 26 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 年度nián dù nián dù 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 资金zī jīn zī jīn ，， ， 并bìng bìng 错过cuò guò cuò guò 了le le 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 的de de 9292 92 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 新xīn xīn 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - ** * ** * HighlandsHighlands Highlands CommunityCommunity Community CentresCentres Centres （（ （ 新南威尔士州xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu xīn nán wēi ěr shì zhōu ）） ） ** * ** * ：： ： 在zài zài 2020 20 年nián nián 服务fú wù fú wù 后hòu hòu 失去shī qù shī qù 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 资金zī jīn zī jīn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 继续jì xù jì xù 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn （（ （ 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú ）） ） ：： ： ** * ** *
政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ，， ， 只会zhǐ huì zhǐ huì 继续jì xù jì xù 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng "" " 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 义务yì wù yì wù 资助zī zhù zī zhù "" " 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 协议xié yì xié yì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 指zhǐ zhǐ 根据gēn jù gēn jù 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 理事会lǐ shì huì lǐ shì huì （（ （ COAGCOAG COAG ）） ） 程序chéng xù chéng xù 与yǔ yǔ 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 签订qiān dìng qiān dìng 的de de ** * ** * NationalNational National AffordableAffordable Affordable HousingHousing Housing AgreementAgreement Agreement (( ( NAHANAHA NAHA )) ) ** * ** * ，， ， 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 间jiān jiān 协议xié yì xié yì ，， ， 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 持续chí xù chí xù 出资chū zī chū zī [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 关于guān yú guān yú NPAHNPAH NPAH 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：： ： ** * ** *
20142014 2014 年初nián chū nián chū ，， ， 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 已yǐ yǐ 将jiāng jiāng NationalNational National PartnershipPartnership Partnership AgreementAgreement Agreement onon on HomelessnessHomelessness Homelessness (( ( NPAHNPAH NPAH )) ) 延长yán cháng yán cháng 一年yī nián yī nián ，， ， 提供tí gōng tí gōng 1.151.15 1.15 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 资金zī jīn zī jīn （（ （ 20142014 2014 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 至zhì zhì 20152015 2015 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè ）） ） [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
这比zhè bǐ zhè bǐ 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 减少jiǎn shǎo jiǎn shǎo 了le le 44004400 4400 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán ，， ， 但dàn dàn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 这仅zhè jǐn zhè jǐn 用于yòng yú yòng yú 资本zī běn zī běn 工程gōng chéng gōng chéng ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 一线yī xiàn yī xiàn 服务fú wù fú wù [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng KevinKevin Kevin AndrewsAndrews Andrews 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì ，， ， 延长yán cháng yán cháng "" " 为wèi wèi 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 规划guī huà guī huà 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 争取zhēng qǔ zhēng qǔ 了le le 时间shí jiān shí jiān "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。

缺失背景

** * ** * 服务fú wù fú wù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 与yǔ yǔ 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 区别qū bié qū bié ：： ： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 模糊mó hú mó hú 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 两者之间liǎng zhě zhī jiān liǎng zhě zhī jiān 做出zuò chū zuò chū 的de de 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié ：： ：
**The distinction between service delivery and advocacy:** The claim obscures a critical distinction the government made between: 1. **Frontline service delivery** (shelters, crisis accommodation, direct assistance) - which continued through NPAH 2. **Peak advocacy bodies** (National Shelter, Community Housing Federation, etc.) - which lost funding The government maintained that funding for actual homelessness services continued through the $115 million NPAH extension [5][6], while advocacy organizations lost their funding contracts. **Timing and political context:** The funding cuts to advocacy bodies were announced just days before Christmas (December 22, 2014), which drew criticism for being "callous" [1][2].
 11 1 .. . ** * ** * 一线yī xiàn yī xiàn 服务fú wù fú wù 提供tí gōng tí gōng ** * ** * （（ （ 庇护所bì hù suǒ bì hù suǒ 、、 、 危机wēi jī wēi jī 住宿zhù sù zhù sù 、、 、 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 援助yuán zhù yuán zhù ）） ） —— — —— — 通过tōng guò tōng guò NPAHNPAH NPAH 继续jì xù jì xù 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng
This timing suggests the government was aware the decision would be controversial. **Budget pressures:** These cuts occurred in the context of the government's broader 2014-15 budget consolidation efforts.
 22 2 .. . ** * ** * 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 机构jī gòu jī gòu ** * ** * （（ （ NationalNational National ShelterShelter Shelter 、、 、 CommunityCommunity Community HousingHousing Housing FederationFederation Federation 等děng děng ）） ） —— — —— — 失去shī qù shī qù 资金zī jīn zī jīn
Total budget cuts to service funding were forecast at $240 million over 4 years [1]. **Historical precedent:** The article notes that when the Howard government came to office in 1996, it also stopped funding some housing advocacy services but retained commitments to homelessness and community housing programs [1].
 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng ，， ， 实际shí jì shí jì 无家可归wú jiā kě guī wú jiā kě guī 服务fú wù fú wù 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 通过tōng guò tōng guò 1.151.15 1.15 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de NPAHNPAH NPAH 延期yán qī yán qī 继续jì xù jì xù [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] ，， ， 而ér ér 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 失去shī qù shī qù 了le le 资金zī jīn zī jīn 合同hé tóng hé tóng 。。 。
This suggests the pattern of defunding advocacy bodies while maintaining service delivery has historical precedent within Coalition governments.
 ** * ** * 时机shí jī shí jī 和hé hé 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：： ： ** * ** * 对duì duì 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 恰在qià zài qià zài 圣诞节shèng dàn jié shèng dàn jié 前qián qián 几天jǐ tiān jǐ tiān （（ （ 20142014 2014 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè 2222 22 日rì rì ）） ） 宣布xuān bù xuān bù ，， ， 这zhè zhè 被bèi bèi 批评pī píng pī píng 为wèi wèi "" " 无情wú qíng wú qíng "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
这一zhè yī zhè yī 时机shí jī shí jī 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 意识yì shí yì shí 到dào dào 该gāi gāi 决定jué dìng jué dìng 会huì huì 引起争议yǐn qǐ zhēng yì yǐn qǐ zhēng yì 。。 。
** * ** * 预算yù suàn yù suàn 压力yā lì yā lì ：： ： ** * ** * 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 20142014 2014 -- - 1515 15 年度预算nián dù yù suàn nián dù yù suàn 整合zhěng hé zhěng hé 努力nǔ lì nǔ lì 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 下xià xià 。。 。
服务fú wù fú wù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 的de de 总预算zǒng yù suàn zǒng yù suàn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 预计yù jì yù jì 在zài zài 四年sì nián sì nián 内达nèi dá nèi dá 2.42.4 2.4 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 先例xiān lì xiān lì ：： ： ** * ** * 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，， ， 19961996 1996 年nián nián HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 上台shàng tái shàng tái 时shí shí ，， ， 也yě yě 停止tíng zhǐ tíng zhǐ 了le le 对duì duì 一些yī xiē yī xiē 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 服务fú wù fú wù 的de de 资助zī zhù zī zhù ，， ， 但dàn dàn 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 了le le 对duì duì homelesshomeless homeless 和hé hé 社区shè qū shè qū 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 的de de 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 在zài zài CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 内nèi nèi ，， ， 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 资金zī jīn zī jīn 同时tóng shí tóng shí 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 服务fú wù fú wù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 的de de 模式mó shì mó shì 有yǒu yǒu 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 先例xiān lì xiān lì 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * SydneySydney Sydney MorningMorning Morning HeraldHerald Herald (( ( SMHSMH SMH )) ) ：： ： ** * ** *
**Sydney Morning Herald (SMH):** - The SMH is a mainstream Australian newspaper with generally factual reporting and minimal bias in news coverage, though editorial positions lean slightly left [7][8]. - The 2014 article by Heath Aston is straightforward reporting with direct quotes from affected organizations and government statements. - SMH endorsed Labor in the 2019 election and tends left on editorial positions [7]. - Bias rating: Left-center, but factual reporting. **ABC News:** - Australia's public broadcaster, generally regarded as balanced and factual. - Multiple ABC reports confirm the same funding cuts with similar details [2][5]. - Bias rating: Center, high credibility. **Government sources:** - Former Ministers DSS website (official government archive) confirms the $115 million NPAH extension [6]. - Parliamentary committee documents confirm the NPAH was extended only until June 2015 in the 2014-15 Budget [3].
 -- - SMHSMH SMH 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ ，， ， 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 基本jī běn jī běn 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què ，， ， 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 极小jí xiǎo jí xiǎo ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 社论shè lùn shè lùn 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 略偏lüè piān lüè piān 左zuǒ zuǒ [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - HeathHeath Heath AstonAston Aston 20142014 2014 年nián nián 的de de 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 是shì shì 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 报道bào dào bào dào ，， ， 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 了le le 受shòu shòu 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 和hé hé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 引语yǐn yǔ yǐn yǔ 。。 。
-- - SMHSMH SMH 在zài zài 20192019 2019 年nián nián 大选dà xuǎn dà xuǎn 中zhōng zhōng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng ，， ， 社论shè lùn shè lùn 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 评级píng jí píng jí ：： ： 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 中间zhōng jiān zhōng jiān ，， ， 但dàn dàn 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 。。 。
** * ** * ABCABC ABC NewsNews News ：： ： ** * ** *
-- - 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 公共广播gōng gòng guǎng bō gōng gòng guǎng bō 公司gōng sī gōng sī ，， ， 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 被bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 平衡píng héng píng héng 且qiě qiě 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 。。 。
-- - 多篇duō piān duō piān ABCABC ABC 报道bào dào bào dào 确认què rèn què rèn 了le le 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 细节xì jié xì jié [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - 偏见piān jiàn piān jiàn 评级píng jí píng jí ：： ： 中间zhōng jiān zhōng jiān ，， ， 高gāo gāo 可信度kě xìn dù kě xìn dù 。。 。
** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 来源lái yuán lái yuán ：： ： ** * ** *
-- - 前qián qián 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng DSSDSS DSS 网站wǎng zhàn wǎng zhàn （（ （ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 官方guān fāng guān fāng 档案dàng àn dàng àn ）） ） 确认què rèn què rèn 1.151.15 1.15 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 的de de NPAHNPAH NPAH 延期yán qī yán qī [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
-- - 议会yì huì yì huì 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 确认què rèn què rèn 在zài zài 20142014 2014 -- - 1515 15 年度预算nián dù yù suàn nián dù yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng NPAHNPAH NPAH 仅jǐn jǐn 延期yán qī yán qī 至zhì zhì 20152015 2015 年nián nián 66 6 月yuè yuè [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ？？ ？
**Did Labor do something similar?** Search conducted: "Labor government defunding homelessness advocacy peak bodies" **Finding:** Labor governments generally maintained or expanded funding for advocacy organizations.
 ** * ** *
The Rudd-Gillard government (2007-2013) established the National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness (NPAH) in 2009 with over $1 billion in funding [9].
 搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 内容nèi róng nèi róng ：： ： "" " LaborLabor Labor governmentgovernment government defundingdefunding defunding homelessnesshomelessness homelessness advocacyadvocacy advocacy peakpeak peak bodiesbodies bodies "" "
However, Labor also faced criticism for failing to make provisions for future funding after the previous agreement expired [6], leaving the incoming Coalition government to negotiate the 2014 extension. **Key differences:** - Labor created and funded these peak advocacy structures - The Coalition defunded them while maintaining statutory obligations - The Howard government (1996-2007) had also defunded housing advocacy groups upon taking office [1] **Pattern analysis:** There appears to be a partisan pattern: Labor governments tend to fund advocacy organizations as policy partners, while Coalition governments defund advocacy bodies they view as politically aligned with their opponents or unnecessary to service delivery.
 ** * ** * 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ：： ： ** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 维持wéi chí wéi chí 或huò huò 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 对duì duì 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 。。 。
This mirrors broader patterns where the Howard government weakened support for civil society organizations [10].
 RuddRudd Rudd -- - GillardGillard Gillard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ （（ （ 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 ）） ） 于yú yú 20092009 2009 年nián nián 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 了le le NationalNational National PartnershipPartnership Partnership AgreementAgreement Agreement onon on HomelessnessHomelessness Homelessness (( ( NPAHNPAH NPAH )) ) ，， ， 资金zī jīn zī jīn 超过chāo guò chāo guò 1010 10 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 也yě yě 因yīn yīn 在zài zài 前qián qián 一yī yī 协议xié yì xié yì 到期dào qī dào qī 后hòu hòu 未能wèi néng wèi néng 为wèi wèi 未来wèi lái wèi lái 资金zī jīn zī jīn 做出zuò chū zuò chū 安排ān pái ān pái 而ér ér 受到shòu dào shòu dào 批评pī píng pī píng [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] ，， ， 留给liú gěi liú gěi incomingincoming incoming CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 协商xié shāng xié shāng 20142014 2014 年nián nián 延期yán qī yán qī 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié ：： ： ** * ** *
-- - 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 创建chuàng jiàn chuàng jiàn 并bìng bìng 资助zī zhù zī zhù 了le le 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 结构jié gòu jié gòu
-- - CoalitionCoalition Coalition 在zài zài 履行lǚ xíng lǚ xíng 法定fǎ dìng fǎ dìng 义务yì wù yì wù 的de de 同时tóng shí tóng shí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 对duì duì 它们tā men tā men 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn
-- - HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ （（ （ 19961996 1996 -- - 20072007 2007 ）） ） 在zài zài 上台shàng tái shàng tái 时shí shí 也yě yě 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 对duì duì 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 团体tuán tǐ tuán tǐ 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 模式分析mó shì fēn xī mó shì fēn xī ：： ： ** * ** *
似乎sì hū sì hū 存在cún zài cún zài 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 模式mó shì mó shì ：： ： 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 于yú yú 将jiāng jiāng 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 伙伴huǒ bàn huǒ bàn 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn ，， ， 而ér ér CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 则zé zé 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 它们tā men tā men 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 与yǔ yǔ 对手duì shǒu duì shǒu 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 一致yí zhì yí zhì 或huò huò 对duì duì 其qí qí 服务fú wù fú wù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 的de de 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 。。 。
这zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de HowardHoward Howard 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 削弱xuē ruò xuē ruò 公民gōng mín gōng mín 社会shè huì shè huì 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 支持zhī chí zhī chí 的de de 模式mó shì mó shì [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ：： ： ** * ** *
**Government justification:** While critics condemned the cuts as an "attack on organizations which have had to point out uncomfortable truths" [2], the government's position was that: 1.
 虽然suī rán suī rán 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 谴责qiǎn zé qiǎn zé 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 是shì shì "" " 对duì duì 不得不bù dé bù bù dé bù 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 令人不安lìng rén bù ān lìng rén bù ān 真相zhēn xiàng zhēn xiàng 的de de 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 攻击gōng jī gōng jī "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] ，， ， 但dàn dàn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 是shì shì ：： ：
Frontline services continued through NPAH ($115 million) 2.
 11 1 .. . 通过tōng guò tōng guò NPAHNPAH NPAH （（ （ 1.151.15 1.15 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán ）） ） 继续jì xù jì xù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 一线yī xiàn yī xiàn 服务fú wù fú wù
The NAHA with states remained in place as a legislated obligation 3.
 22 2 .. . 与yǔ yǔ 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 的de de NAHANAHA NAHA 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 义务yì wù yì wù 继续jì xù jì xù 存在cún zài cún zài
The government was distinguishing between service delivery and advocacy **Critics' perspective:** Advocacy groups argued they served as essential "conduits" between government and the sector, providing research and policy advice [2].
 33 3 .. . 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 正在zhèng zài zhèng zài 区分qū fēn qū fēn 服务fú wù fú wù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 和hé hé 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo
National Shelter's executive officer noted: "They [the government] don't appear to want to hear from people at the bottom end of Australia" [1]. **Broader pattern:** These 2014 cuts were part of a larger trend of defunding peak advocacy bodies by the Coalition government.
 ** * ** * 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn ：： ： ** * ** *
Other organizations that had already been defunded in 2013-2014 included the Alcohol and Drug Council, Refugee Council of Australia, Australian Youth Affairs Coalition, and National Congress of Australia's First Peoples [1]. **Key context:** This is NOT unique to homelessness - it reflects a systematic approach to defunding advocacy organizations across multiple sectors.
 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 它们tā men tā men 充当chōng dāng chōng dāng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 与yǔ yǔ 该gāi gāi 行业háng yè háng yè 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào "" " 渠道qú dào qú dào "" " ，， ， 提供tí gōng tí gōng 研究yán jiū yán jiū 和hé hé 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
While legally required agreements (NAHA) were maintained, discretionary funding for peak bodies was cut.
 NationalNational National ShelterShelter Shelter 的de de 执行zhí xíng zhí xíng 主任zhǔ rèn zhǔ rèn 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ：： ： "" " 他们tā men tā men [[ [ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ]] ] 似乎sì hū sì hū 不想bù xiǎng bù xiǎng 听取tīng qǔ tīng qǔ 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 底层dǐ céng dǐ céng 民众mín zhòng mín zhòng 的de de 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 模式mó shì mó shì ：： ： ** * ** *
这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 20142014 2014 年nián nián 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 是shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 机构jī gòu jī gòu 资金zī jīn zī jīn 这一zhè yī zhè yī 更gèng gèng 大dà dà 趋势qū shì qū shì 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn 。。 。
20132013 2013 -- - 20142014 2014 年nián nián 已yǐ yǐ 被bèi bèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 资金zī jīn zī jīn 的de de 其他qí tā qí tā 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò AlcoholAlcohol Alcohol andand and DrugDrug Drug CouncilCouncil Council 、、 、 RefugeeRefugee Refugee CouncilCouncil Council ofof of AustraliaAustralia Australia 、、 、 AustralianAustralian Australian YouthYouth Youth AffairsAffairs Affairs CoalitionCoalition Coalition 和hé hé NationalNational National CongressCongress Congress ofof of AustraliaAustralia Australia '' ' ss s FirstFirst First PeoplesPeoples Peoples [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：： ： ** * ** * 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi homelesshomeless homeless 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu —— — —— — 它tā tā 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 多个duō gè duō gè 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 资金zī jīn zī jīn 的de de 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 的de de 协议xié yì xié yì （（ （ NAHANAHA NAHA ）） ） 得以dé yǐ dé yǐ 维持wéi chí wéi chí ，， ， 但dàn dàn 对duì duì 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 酌情zhuó qíng zhuó qíng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 被bèi bèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。

具有误导性

4.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi 。。 。
The claim overstates the scope of the cuts.
 虽然suī rán suī rán CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 对duì duì 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī （（ （ NationalNational National ShelterShelter Shelter 、、 、 CommunityCommunity Community HousingHousing Housing FederationFederation Federation AustraliaAustralia Australia 、、 、 FinancialFinancial Financial CounsellingCounselling Counselling AustraliaAustralia Australia 等děng děng ）） ） 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn ，， ， 但dàn dàn 并bìng bìng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn "" " 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 无家可归wú jiā kě guī wú jiā kě guī 和hé hé 社区shè qū shè qū 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn "" " 。。 。
While the Coalition did cut funding to peak advocacy organizations (National Shelter, Community Housing Federation Australia, Financial Counselling Australia, etc.), it did NOT cut "all funding of homelessness and community housing programs." The government: 1.
 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ：： ：
Extended the National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness (NPAH) with $115 million for service delivery [5][6] 2.
 11 1 .. . 将jiāng jiāng NationalNational National PartnershipPartnership Partnership AgreementAgreement Agreement onon on HomelessnessHomelessness Homelessness (( ( NPAHNPAH NPAH )) ) 延长yán cháng yán cháng 1.151.15 1.15 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 用于yòng yú yòng yú 服务fú wù fú wù 提供tí gōng tí gōng [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ]
Maintained the National Affordable Housing Agreement (NAHA) with states as required [1] 3.
 22 2 .. . 按àn àn 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 与yǔ yǔ 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 维持wéi chí wéi chí NationalNational National AffordableAffordable Affordable HousingHousing Housing AgreementAgreement Agreement (( ( NAHANAHA NAHA )) ) [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Only cut funding to advocacy/peak bodies, not frontline services The claim conflates "advocacy organizations" with "homelessness and community housing programs." While the cuts to advocacy bodies were significant and controversial, characterizing them as cutting "all funding" of programs is inaccurate.
 33 3 .. . 仅jǐn jǐn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 对duì duì 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo // / 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 一线yī xiàn yī xiàn 服务fú wù fú wù
The claim accurately captures the government's rationale (keeping only legally required funding), but misrepresents the scope by implying all program funding was cut when service delivery funding actually continued.
 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 将jiāng jiāng "" " 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī "" " 与yǔ yǔ "" " homelesshomeless homeless 和hé hé 社区shè qū shè qū 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù "" " 混为一谈hùn wéi yī tán hùn wéi yī tán 。。 。
虽然suī rán suī rán 对duì duì 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 机构jī gòu jī gòu 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 且qiě qiě 有yǒu yǒu 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì ，， ， 但dàn dàn 将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 表述biǎo shù biǎo shù 为wèi wèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn "" " 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 资金zī jīn zī jīn "" " 是shì shì 不bù bù 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de 。。 。
该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 捕捉bǔ zhuō bǔ zhuō 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu （（ （ 仅jǐn jǐn 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn ）） ） ，， ， 但dàn dàn 夸大kuā dà kuā dà 了le le 范围fàn wéi fàn wéi ，， ， 暗示àn shì àn shì 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 都dōu dōu 被bèi bèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ，， ， 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 服务fú wù fú wù 提供tí gōng tí gōng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 仍réng réng 在zài zài 继续jì xù jì xù 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (10)

  1. 1
    smh.com.au

    smh.com.au

    The Abbott government has quietly signalled a retreat from the homelessness and low-income housing sector.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  2. 2
    abc.net.au

    abc.net.au

    The Federal Government cuts funding to housing programs as it looks to make more budget savings before Christmas, leaving several peak housing bodies shocked by the timing of the announcement.

    Abc Net
  3. 3
    PDF

    report

    Aph Gov • PDF Document
  4. 4
    PDF

    sub082 housing homelessness

    Pc Gov • PDF Document
    Original link no longer available
  5. 5
    abc.net.au

    abc.net.au

    Kevin Andrews announces $115m from Federal Government to extend homelessness agreement with states

    Abc Net
  6. 6
    formerministers.dss.gov.au

    formerministers.dss.gov.au

    Formerministers Dss Gov
  7. 7
    mediabiasfactcheck.com

    mediabiasfactcheck.com

    LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording

    Media Bias/Fact Check
  8. 8
    mysydneydetour.com

    mysydneydetour.com

    The Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) is a prominent newspaper in Australia, known for its coverage of local, national, and international news. However, the

    My Sydney Detour
  9. 9
    change.org

    change.org

    Save the NPAH (National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness)

    Change.org
  10. 10
    PDF

    Star SOC ALT Vol 35 1

    Socialalternatives • PDF Document

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性，但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。

Previous: C0606 Next: C0608