部分属实

评分： 5.0/10

报告问题
Coalition
C0499

声明内容

“在未通知现任国家残疾保险计划（NDIS）董事会成员的情况下，开始为其职位发布招聘广告。”
残障 福利
原始来源： Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

NDISNDIS NDIS 由yóu yóu 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì ，， ， 《《 《 20132013 2013 年nián nián 国家guó jiā guó jiā 残疾cán jí cán jí 保险bǎo xiǎn bǎo xiǎn 计划jì huà jì huà 法fǎ fǎ 》》 》 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 11 1 日rì rì 生效shēng xiào shēng xiào [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The NDIS was established by the Gillard Labor Government, with the National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013 coming into effect on July 1, 2013 [1].
 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 描述miáo shù miáo shù 的de de 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 20152015 2015 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè ，， ， 即jí jí 艾伯特ài bó tè ài bó tè -- - 特恩tè ēn tè ēn 布尔bù ěr bù ěr 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 任期rèn qī rèn qī 内nèi nèi 。。 。
The incident described in the claim occurred in September 2015, during the Abbott-Turnbull Coalition Government's term.
 根据gēn jù gēn jù 《《 《 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 》》 》 ，， ， 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 可kě kě 根据gēn jù gēn jù 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 和hé hé 《《 《 内阁nèi gé nèi gé 手册shǒu cè shǒu cè 》》 》 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú ，， ， 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 或huò huò 推荐tuī jiàn tuī jiàn 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 现任xiàn rèn xiàn rèn 公职人员gōng zhí rén yuán gōng zhí rén yuán [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
According to the Australian Government Appointments Framework, ministers may reappoint or recommend for reappointment incumbents to public offices subject to legislative requirements and Cabinet Handbook requirements [2].
 该gāi gāi 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，， ， "" " 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 的de de 程序chéng xù chéng xù 与yǔ yǔ 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 程序chéng xù chéng xù 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
The framework notes that "the procedures to be followed for reappointments are the same as those for appointments" [3].
 所suǒ suǒ 描述miáo shù miáo shù 的de de 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn —— — —— — 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 通过tōng guò tōng guò 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 其qí qí 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi 被bèi bèi 发布fā bù fā bù 招聘广告zhāo pìn guǎng gào zhāo pìn guǎng gào —— — —— — 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 负责fù zé fù zé 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 办公室bàn gōng shì bàn gōng shì 与yǔ yǔ 任期rèn qī rèn qī 即将jí jiāng jí jiāng 届满jiè mǎn jiè mǎn 的de de 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 沟通gōu tōng gōu tōng 程序chéng xù chéng xù 出现chū xiàn chū xiàn 破裂pò liè pò liè 。。 。
The incident described—where board members discovered their positions being advertised through media rather than direct notification—represents a procedural breakdown in communication between the responsible minister's office and the board members whose terms were expiring.

缺失背景

** * ** * NDISNDIS NDIS 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 历史背景lì shǐ bèi jǐng lì shǐ bèi jǐng ：： ： ** * ** *
**Historical Context of NDIS Governance:** The NDIS was Labor's signature disability reform, legislated in 2013 under Prime Minister Julia Gillard [1].
 NDISNDIS NDIS 是shì shì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 标志性biāo zhì xìng biāo zhì xìng 的de de 残疾cán jí cán jí 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ，， ， 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 由yóu yóu 朱zhū zhū 莉娅lì yà lì yà ·· · 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 总理zǒng lǐ zǒng lǐ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 通过tōng guò tōng guò 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The board members in question were appointed under the previous Labor government.
 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 是shì shì 在zài zài 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián 的de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 的de de 。。 。
When the Coalition took office in September 2013, they inherited the NDIS structure, including its board composition. **Normal Board Appointment Processes:** Under standard Australian government board appointment procedures, it is common practice for current board directors to re-apply when their terms expire [4].
 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 于yú yú 20132013 2013 年nián nián 99 9 月yuè yuè 上台shàng tái shàng tái 后hòu hòu ，， ， 继承jì chéng jì chéng 了le le NDISNDIS NDIS 的de de 机构jī gòu jī gòu 架构jià gòu jià gòu ，， ， 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 其qí qí 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 组成zǔ chéng zǔ chéng 。。 。
However, Victorian Public Sector Commission guidelines note that "if a decision is made by the Minister to automatically re-appoint an existing Board Director there is no requirement to advertise or interview other candidates" [5]. **Systemic Issue, Not Unique to Coalition:** The Briggs Review into Public Sector Board Appointments Processes (2022) found systemic issues with government board appointments across multiple administrations.
 ** * ** * 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 的de de 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 程序chéng xù chéng xù ：： ： ** * ** *
The review documented "reward for past loyalty" and patronage-based appointments that "should have no place in the modern Australian society" [6].
 根据gēn jù gēn jù 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 的de de 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 程序chéng xù chéng xù ，， ， 现任xiàn rèn xiàn rèn 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 在zài zài 任期rèn qī rèn qī 届满时jiè mǎn shí jiè mǎn shí 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi 是shì shì 常见cháng jiàn cháng jiàn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
The report explicitly states that "all too often these appointments have looked like forms of patronage and nepotism" and refers to "last-minute bequests" before elections as practices that "bring governments into disrepute" [6].
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 维多利亚州wéi duō lì yà zhōu wéi duō lì yà zhōu 公共部门gōng gòng bù mén gōng gòng bù mén 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 指导方针zhǐ dǎo fāng zhēn zhǐ dǎo fāng zhēn 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，， ， "" " 如果rú guǒ rú guǒ 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 决定jué dìng jué dìng 自动zì dòng zì dòng 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì ，， ， 则zé zé 无需wú xū wú xū 发布fā bù fā bù 招聘广告zhāo pìn guǎng gào zhāo pìn guǎng gào 或huò huò 面试miàn shì miàn shì 其他qí tā qí tā 候选人hòu xuǎn rén hòu xuǎn rén "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
Critically, the report covers issues that persisted across both Labor and Coalition governments, indicating this is a systemic governance problem rather than unique to one party.
 ** * ** * 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 非fēi fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu ：： ： ** * ** *
20222022 2022 年nián nián 布里格斯bù lǐ gé sī bù lǐ gé sī 公共部门gōng gòng bù mén gōng gòng bù mén 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 程序chéng xù chéng xù 审查shěn chá shěn chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ，， ， 多duō duō 届jiè jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 存在cún zài cún zài 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
该gāi gāi 审查shěn chá shěn chá 记录jì lù jì lù 了le le "" " 对duì duì 过去guò qù guò qù 忠诚zhōng chéng zhōng chéng 的de de 奖励jiǎng lì jiǎng lì "" " 和hé hé 基于jī yú jī yú 庇护bì hù bì hù 关系guān xì guān xì 的de de 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng ，， ， 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē "" " 在zài zài 现代xiàn dài xiàn dài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 社会shè huì shè huì 中zhōng zhōng 不bù bù 应有yīng yǒu yīng yǒu 立足之地lì zú zhī dì lì zú zhī dì "" " [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
报告bào gào bào gào 明确指出míng què zhǐ chū míng què zhǐ chū ，， ， "" " 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 往往wǎng wǎng wǎng wǎng 看起来kàn qǐ lái kàn qǐ lái 像是xiàng shì xiàng shì 庇护bì hù bì hù 关系guān xì guān xì 和hé hé 裙带关系qún dài guān xì qún dài guān xì 的de de 形式xíng shì xíng shì "" " ，， ， 并bìng bìng 将jiāng jiāng 选举xuǎn jǔ xuǎn jǔ 前qián qián 的de de "" " 临终lín zhōng lín zhōng 遗赠yí zèng yí zèng "" " 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 称为chēng wéi chēng wéi "" " 使shǐ shǐ 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 名誉扫地míng yù sǎo dì míng yù sǎo dì "" " 的de de 行为xíng wéi xíng wéi [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 的de de 是shì shì ，， ， 该gāi gāi 报告bào gào bào gào 涵盖hán gài hán gài 了le le 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 和hé hé 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 存在cún zài cún zài 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 某mǒu mǒu 一yī yī 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 。。 。

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 《《 《 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 金融jīn róng jīn róng 评论píng lùn píng lùn 报bào bào 》》 》 （（ （ AFRAFR AFR ）） ） ：： ： ** * ** *
**Australian Financial Review (AFR):** The AFR is Australia's leading business and financial newspaper, owned by Nine Entertainment Co.
 《《 《 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 金融jīn róng jīn róng 评论píng lùn píng lùn 报bào bào 》》 》 是shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 领先lǐng xiān lǐng xiān 的de de 商业shāng yè shāng yè 和hé hé 金融jīn róng jīn róng 报纸bào zhǐ bào zhǐ ，， ， 由yóu yóu 九号jiǔ hào jiǔ hào 娱乐yú lè yú lè 公司gōng sī gōng sī 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 。。 。
It is generally considered a mainstream, credible news source with a focus on business and economic reporting [7].
 它tā tā 通常tōng cháng tōng cháng 被bèi bèi 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 是shì shì 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 、、 、 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 新闻来源xīn wén lái yuán xīn wén lái yuán ，， ， 专注zhuān zhù zhuān zhù 于yú yú 商业shāng yè shāng yè 和hé hé 经济jīng jì jīng jì 报道bào dào bào dào [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。 。
While business media may have certain center-right economic leanings, the AFR maintains journalistic standards and is not considered a partisan advocacy outlet.
 虽然suī rán suī rán 商业shāng yè shāng yè 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 可能kě néng kě néng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 一定yí dìng yí dìng 的de de 中zhōng zhōng 右翼yòu yì yòu yì 经济jīng jì jīng jì 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng ，， ， 但dàn dàn AFRAFR AFR 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn ，， ， 不bù bù 被bèi bèi 视为shì wèi shì wèi 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 性xìng xìng 宣传机构xuān chuán jī gòu xuān chuán jī gòu 。。 。
The AFR's reporting on this matter appears to be factual reporting of a specific incident rather than opinion or advocacy journalism.
 AFRAFR AFR 对duì duì 此事cǐ shì cǐ shì 的de de 报道bào dào bào dào 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 对duì duì 此类cǐ lèi cǐ lèi 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng // / 程序性chéng xù xìng chéng xù xìng 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 的de de 事实shì shí shì shí 报道bào dào bào dào ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 或huò huò 宣传性xuān chuán xìng xuān chuán xìng 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 。。 。
The source is credible for reporting this type of administrative/procedural news.
 该gāi gāi 来源lái yuán lái yuán 对于duì yú duì yú 报道bào dào bào dào 此类cǐ lèi cǐ lèi 行政xíng zhèng xíng zhèng // / 程序性chéng xù xìng chéng xù xìng 新闻xīn wén xīn wén 是shì shì 可信kě xìn kě xìn 的de de 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 也yě yě 有yǒu yǒu 过guò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì ？？ ？
**Did Labor have similar board appointment controversies?** Yes.
 ** * ** *
Board appointment controversies occurred under Labor governments as well: 1. **2008 Australian Government Merit and Transparency Policy:** The Rudd Labor Government introduced this policy in 2008 to address board appointment processes, suggesting concerns about appointments existed prior to the Coalition government [6]. 2. **Robert Gerard/RBA Controversy (2005, but relevant context):** While predating the 2007-2013 Labor government, this controversy over Reserve Bank board appointments established precedents for how board appointment issues were handled.
 是shì shì 的de de 。。 。
The ANU's Public Sector Governance in Australia text notes this as an incident that "undermined public confidence in Australia's appointment processes" [8]. 3. **Systemic Nature of the Problem:** The 2022 Briggs Review explicitly found that problematic board appointment practices persisted across multiple governments, noting "jobs for mates" culture was not limited to one political party [6]. **Comparative Analysis:** The failure to notify board members before advertising their positions represents a communications/process failure rather than a policy failure.
 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 也yě yě 发生fā shēng fā shēng 过guò guò 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì ：： ：
Similar procedural issues with board appointments have occurred under both major parties in Australia.
 11 1 .. . ** * ** * 20082008 2008 年nián nián 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 择优zé yōu zé yōu 透明tòu míng tòu míng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ：： ： ** * ** * 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 于yú yú 20082008 2008 年nián nián 推出tuī chū tuī chū 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè ，， ， 以yǐ yǐ 解决jiě jué jiě jué 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 程序chéng xù chéng xù 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 在zài zài 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 之前zhī qián zhī qián 就jiù jiù 已yǐ yǐ 存在cún zài cún zài 对duì duì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 担忧dān yōu dān yōu [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
The Briggs Review's finding that current arrangements "expose ministers to unnecessary risk while failing to deliver the best candidates" applies equally to governments of either persuasion [6].
 22 2 .. . ** * ** * 罗伯特luó bó tè luó bó tè ·· · 杰拉德jié lā dé jié lā dé // / 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 储备chǔ bèi chǔ bèi 银行yín háng yín háng 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì （（ （ 20052005 2005 年nián nián ，， ， 但dàn dàn 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ）） ） ：： ： ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 早于zǎo yú zǎo yú 20072007 2007 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián 的de de 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ，， ， 但dàn dàn 这场zhè chǎng zhè chǎng 关于guān yú guān yú 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 储备chǔ bèi chǔ bèi 银行yín háng yín háng 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 的de de 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 确立què lì què lì 了le le 如何rú hé rú hé 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 先例xiān lì xiān lì 。。 。
澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国立大学guó lì dà xué guó lì dà xué 的de de 《《 《 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 公共部门gōng gòng bù mén gōng gòng bù mén 治理zhì lǐ zhì lǐ 》》 》 教材jiào cái jiào cái 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 称为chēng wéi chēng wéi "" " 削弱xuē ruò xuē ruò 了le le 公众gōng zhòng gōng zhòng 对duì duì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 程序chéng xù chéng xù 信心xìn xīn xìn xīn "" " 的de de 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。 。
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng ：： ： ** * ** * 20222022 2022 年nián nián 布里格斯bù lǐ gé sī bù lǐ gé sī 审查shěn chá shěn chá 明确míng què míng què 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ，， ， 问题wèn tí wèn tí 重重的chóng chóng de chóng chóng de 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 在zài zài 多届duō jiè duō jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 中zhōng zhōng 持续chí xù chí xù 存在cún zài cún zài ，， ， 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū "" " 为wèi wèi 朋友péng yǒu péng yǒu 谋móu móu 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi "" " 的de de 文化wén huà wén huà 并bìng bìng 不bù bù 局限于jú xiàn yú jú xiàn yú 某mǒu mǒu 一个yí gè yí gè 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
** * ** * 对比duì bǐ duì bǐ 分析fēn xī fēn xī ：： ： ** * ** *
未能wèi néng wèi néng 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 就jiù jiù 为wèi wèi 其qí qí 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi 发布fā bù fā bù 招聘广告zhāo pìn guǎng gào zhāo pìn guǎng gào ，， ， 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 的de de 是shì shì 沟通gōu tōng gōu tōng // / 程序chéng xù chéng xù 失败shī bài shī bài ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 失败shī bài shī bài 。。 。
类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 程序chéng xù chéng xù 问题wèn tí wèn tí 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 两大liǎng dà liǎng dà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 都dōu dōu 发生fā shēng fā shēng 过guò guò 。。 。
布里格斯bù lǐ gé sī bù lǐ gé sī 审查shěn chá shěn chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 现行xiàn xíng xiàn xíng 安排ān pái ān pái "" " 使shǐ shǐ 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 的de de 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn ，， ， 同时tóng shí tóng shí 未能wèi néng wèi néng 提供tí gōng tí gōng 最佳zuì jiā zuì jiā 候选人hòu xuǎn rén hòu xuǎn rén "" " ，， ， 这一zhè yī zhè yī 结论jié lùn jié lùn 同样tóng yàng tóng yàng 适用shì yòng shì yòng 于yú yú 任何rèn hé rèn hé 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 批评pī píng pī píng ：： ： ** * ** *
**Legitimate Criticisms:** - The failure to notify board members before advertising their positions demonstrates poor administrative process and disrespect for the individuals involved [original source] - Board members who had served the NDIS since its inception deserved direct communication about the government's intentions regarding their positions - The incident created unnecessary uncertainty and damaged working relationships **Context and Mitigating Factors:** - Government board appointments are ministerial prerogatives in the Westminster system - Board members serve at the pleasure of the government and terms are not automatically renewed - The NDIS was still in its early implementation phase (launched July 2013, only 2 years prior), and the government may have had legitimate reasons for seeking fresh board composition - The Australian Government Appointments Framework notes that reappointments follow the same procedures as appointments, suggesting advertising positions is standard practice even for incumbents [3] **Normal Government Practice:** The Victorian Public Sector Commission guidance states: "It is common practice for current Board Directors to re-apply" when their terms expire [4].
 -- - 在zài zài 为wèi wèi 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi 发布fā bù fā bù 招聘广告zhāo pìn guǎng gào zhāo pìn guǎng gào 前qián qián 未能wèi néng wèi néng 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 他们tā men tā men ，， ， demonstratesdemonstrates demonstrates poorpoor poor administrativeadministrative administrative processprocess process andand and disrespectdisrespect disrespect forfor for thethe the individualsindividuals individuals involvedinvolved involved [[ [ 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán ]] ]
This suggests that advertising positions—even for sitting board members—is not inherently improper, though notification should be provided as a courtesy. **Systemic Issue Across Parties:** The 2022 Briggs Review found widespread issues with board appointments across Australian governments of all political persuasions.
 -- - 自zì zì NDISNDIS NDIS 成立chéng lì chéng lì 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 一直yì zhí yì zhí 任职rèn zhí rèn zhí 的de de 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 理应lǐ yīng lǐ yīng 获得huò dé huò dé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 就jiù jiù 其qí qí 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi 意向yì xiàng yì xiàng 的de de 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 沟通gōu tōng gōu tōng
The review called for legislation to "systematise appointment processes" to prevent patronage and nepotism [6].
 -- - 该gāi gāi 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 造成zào chéng zào chéng 了le le 不必要bù bì yào bù bì yào 的de de 不确定性bù què dìng xìng bù què dìng xìng ，， ， 损害sǔn hài sǔn hài 了le le 工作gōng zuò gōng zuò 关系guān xì guān xì
This suggests the 2015 NDIS incident was part of a broader pattern of informal, non-transparent appointment practices that characterized Australian government board appointments for years under multiple governments.
 ** * ** * 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 和hé hé 减轻jiǎn qīng jiǎn qīng 因素yīn sù yīn sù ：： ： ** * ** *
-- - 在zài zài 威斯敏斯特wēi sī mǐn sī tè wēi sī mǐn sī tè 体系tǐ xì tǐ xì 中zhōng zhōng ，， ， 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 属于shǔ yú shǔ yú 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 特权tè quán tè quán
-- - 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 服务fú wù fú wù 于yú yú 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ ，， ， 其qí qí 任期rèn qī rèn qī 不会bú huì bú huì 自动zì dòng zì dòng 续任xù rèn xù rèn
-- - NDISNDIS NDIS 仍réng réng 处于chǔ yú chǔ yú 早期zǎo qī zǎo qī 实施shí shī shí shī 阶段jiē duàn jiē duàn （（ （ 20132013 2013 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng ，， ， 仅jǐn jǐn 两年liǎng nián liǎng nián ）） ） ，， ， 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 可能kě néng kě néng 有yǒu yǒu 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 新xīn xīn 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 组成zǔ chéng zǔ chéng 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu
-- - 《《 《 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 》》 》 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ，， ， 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 遵循zūn xún zūn xún 与yǔ yǔ 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 相同xiāng tóng xiāng tóng 的de de 程序chéng xù chéng xù ，， ， 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 对于duì yú duì yú 现任xiàn rèn xiàn rèn 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán ，， ， 发布fā bù fā bù 招聘广告zhāo pìn guǎng gào zhāo pìn guǎng gào 也yě yě 是shì shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
** * ** * 正常zhèng cháng zhèng cháng 的de de 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ ：： ： ** * ** *
维多利亚州wéi duō lì yà zhōu wéi duō lì yà zhōu 公共部门gōng gòng bù mén gōng gòng bù mén 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì 的de de 指导方针zhǐ dǎo fāng zhēn zhǐ dǎo fāng zhēn 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū ：： ： "" " 现任xiàn rèn xiàn rèn 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 董事dǒng shì dǒng shì 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng "" " 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi 是shì shì 常见cháng jiàn cháng jiàn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 发布fā bù fā bù 招聘广告zhāo pìn guǎng gào zhāo pìn guǎng gào —— — —— — 即使jí shǐ jí shǐ 对于duì yú duì yú 在zài zài 任rèn rèn 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán —— — —— — 本身běn shēn běn shēn 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 不当bù dàng bù dàng ，， ， 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 应当yīng dāng yīng dāng 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 礼节lǐ jié lǐ jié 提供tí gōng tí gōng 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 。。 。
** * ** * 跨kuà kuà 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ：： ： ** * ** *
20222022 2022 年nián nián 布里格斯bù lǐ gé sī bù lǐ gé sī 审查shěn chá shěn chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ，， ， 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 倾向qīng xiàng qīng xiàng 的de de 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 存在cún zài cún zài 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
该gāi gāi 审查shěn chá shěn chá 呼吁hū yù hū yù 通过tōng guò tōng guò 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ "" " 使shǐ shǐ 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 程序chéng xù chéng xù 系统化xì tǒng huà xì tǒng huà "" " ，， ， 以yǐ yǐ 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 庇护bì hù bì hù 关系guān xì guān xì 和hé hé 裙带关系qún dài guān xì qún dài guān xì [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 20152015 2015 年nián nián 的de de NDISNDIS NDIS 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 是shì shì 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 多年duō nián duō nián 非正式fēi zhèng shì fēi zhèng shì 、、 、 不bù bù 透明tòu míng tòu míng 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ 的de de 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 模式mó shì mó shì 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ，， ， 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 模式mó shì mó shì 在zài zài 多届duō jiè duō jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 下xià xià 都dōu dōu 存在cún zài cún zài 。。 。

部分属实

5.0

/ 10

该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 在zài zài 事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de —— — —— — 确实què shí què shí 发生fā shēng fā shēng 了le le 程序性chéng xù xìng chéng xù xìng 失败shī bài shī bài ，， ， NDISNDIS NDIS 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 在zài zài 其qí qí 职位zhí wèi zhí wèi 被bèi bèi 发布fā bù fā bù 招聘广告zhāo pìn guǎng gào zhāo pìn guǎng gào 前qián qián 未获wèi huò wèi huò 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 。。 。
The claim is factually accurate—a procedural failure did occur where NDIS board members were not notified before their positions were advertised.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 主张zhǔ zhāng zhǔ zhāng 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 为wèi wèi 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 独特dú tè dú tè 失败shī bài shī bài ，， ， 而ér ér 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng ：： ：
However, the claim presents this as if it were a unique failing of the Coalition government, when in reality: 1.
 11 1 .. . NDISNDIS NDIS 是shì shì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 的de de 创举chuàng jǔ chuàng jǔ ，， ， 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 是shì shì 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 的de de 人选rén xuǎn rén xuǎn —— — —— — 新政府xīn zhèng fǔ xīn zhèng fǔ 上台shàng tái shàng tái 后hòu hòu 自然zì rán zì rán 的de de 人员rén yuán rén yuán 更替gēng tì gēng tì 是shì shì 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 做法zuò fǎ zuò fǎ
The NDIS was Labor's creation, and the board members were Labor appointees—natural turnover when a new government takes office is standard practice 2.
 22 2 .. . 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 也yě yě 发生fā shēng fā shēng 过guò guò 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 争议zhēng yì zhēng yì 和hé hé 程序chéng xù chéng xù 失败shī bài shī bài
Board appointment controversies and procedural failures have occurred under Labor governments as well 3.
 33 3 .. . 20222022 2022 年nián nián 布里格斯bù lǐ gé sī bù lǐ gé sī 审查shěn chá shěn chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 都dōu dōu 存在cún zài cún zài 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 仅jǐn jǐn 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 如此rú cǐ rú cǐ
The 2022 Briggs Review found systemic issues with board appointments across all Australian governments, not just the Coalition 4.
 44 4 .. . 该gāi gāi 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 的de de 是shì shì 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 中zhōng zhōng 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 文化wén huà wén huà 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 特有tè yǒu tè yǒu 的de de 失败shī bài shī bài
The incident reflects a broader cultural problem with government board appointments in Australia rather than a specific Coalition failing While the failure to notify board members was poor process, presenting this as a unique Coalition failing without acknowledging the systemic nature of board appointment issues across Australian governments is misleading.
 虽然suī rán suī rán 未能wèi néng wèi néng 通知tōng zhī tōng zhī 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 成员chéng yuán chéng yuán 是shì shì 糟糕zāo gāo zāo gāo 的de de 程序chéng xù chéng xù ，， ， 但dàn dàn 将jiāng jiāng 此cǐ cǐ 呈现chéng xiàn chéng xiàn 为wèi wèi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 的de de 独特dú tè dú tè 失败shī bài shī bài 而ér ér 不bù bù 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 董事会dǒng shì huì dǒng shì huì 任命rèn mìng rèn mìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 本质běn zhì běn zhì ，， ， 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 。。 。

📚 来源与引用 (7)

  1. 1
    ndis.gov.au

    History of the NDIS - Official NDIS Website

    A grassroots campaign was at the heart of the creation of the National Disability Insurance Schem

    Ndis Gov
  2. 2
    PDF

    Australian Government Appointments Framework

    Apsc Gov • PDF Document
  3. 3
    pmc.gov.au

    Annex I - Appointments Process - Cabinet Handbook 15th Edition

    Pmc Gov

  4. 4
    5. Re-appointments - Victorian Public Sector Commission

    5. Re-appointments - Victorian Public Sector Commission

    A vacancy arises when the appointment of a current Board Director expires. It is common practice for current Board Directors to re-apply.

    VPSC
  5. 5
    Jobs-for-mates report slams 'shameless' appointments

    Jobs-for-mates report slams 'shameless' appointments

    The Federal Government has finally released the damning

    Region Canberra
  6. 6
    Australian Financial Review - About

    Australian Financial Review - About

    The Australian Financial Review reports the latest news from business, finance, investment and politics, updated in real time. It has a reputation for independent, award-winning journalism and is essential reading for the business and investor community.

    Australian Financial Review
  7. 7
    PDF

    Public Sector Governance in Australia - Chapter 9

    Press-files Anu Edu • PDF Document

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性，但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。

Previous: C0498 Next: C0500