部分属实

评分: 5.0/10

Coalition
C0367

声明内容

“违背了设立保障措施以防止其数据保留计划被滥用的承诺。(警方在数据保留开始实施后的2周内非法访问了数据。)”
原始来源: Matthew Davis

原始来源

事实核查

###### ### 时间shí jiān shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn 准确性zhǔn què xìng zhǔn què xìng
### Timeline Accuracy
gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng zài zài 关于guān yú guān yú 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 发生fā shēng fā shēng 时间shí jiān shí jiān 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 存在cún zài cún zài 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 事实shì shí shì shí 错误cuò wù cuò wù
The claim contains a significant factual error regarding when illegal police access occurred.
CoalitionCoalition Coalition AbbottAbbott Abbott 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 20142014 2014 nián nián 1010 10 yuè yuè 3030 30 提出tí chū tí chū le le 电信diàn xìn diàn xìn 拦截lán jié lán jié 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 修正xiū zhèng xiū zhèng 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 20152015 2015 nián nián 33 3 yuè yuè 2626 26 通过tōng guò tōng guò 议会yì huì yì huì 两院liǎng yuàn liǎng yuàn bìng bìng 当年dāng nián dāng nián 晚些时候wǎn xiē shí hòu wǎn xiē shí hòu 获得huò dé huò dé 御准yù zhǔn yù zhǔn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The Coalition (Abbott) government introduced the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill on 30 October 2014, which passed both houses of Parliament on 26 March 2015 and received royal assent later that year [1].
yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 计划jì huà jì huà ** * ** * 20152015 2015 nián nián 1010 10 yuè yuè 1313 13 ** * ** * 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 实施shí shī shí shī [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
The metadata retention scheme officially commenced on **13 October 2015** [2].
然而rán ér rán ér yǒu yǒu 记录jì lù jì lù de de 澳大利亚联邦ào dà lì yà lián bāng ào dà lì yà lián bāng 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá AFPAFP AFP 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 发生fā shēng fā shēng zài zài ** * ** * 20172017 2017 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè ** * ** * 大约dà yuē dà yuē zài zài 计划jì huà jì huà 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 实施shí shī shí shī hòu hòu de de ** * ** * 1818 18 yuè yuè ** * ** * ér ér fēi fēi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 所说suǒ shuō suǒ shuō de de "" " zài zài 22 2 周内zhōu nèi zhōu nèi "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
However, the documented illegal police access by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) occurred in **April 2017** - approximately **18 months** after the scheme commenced, not "within 2 weeks" as the claim states [3].
一名yī míng yī míng AFPAFP AFP 警官jǐng guān jǐng guān zài zài 调查diào chá diào chá 未经wèi jīng wèi jīng 授权shòu quán shòu quán de de 信息xìn xī xìn xī 披露pī lù pī lù shí shí zài zài wèi wèi 获得huò dé huò dé suǒ suǒ de de 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 令状lìng zhuàng lìng zhuàng de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng xià xià 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn le le 一名yī míng yī míng 记者jì zhě jì zhě de de 电话diàn huà diàn huà 记录jì lù jì lù [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
An AFP officer accessed a journalist's phone records without obtaining the required Journalist Information Warrant while investigating an unauthorized disclosure of information [3].
CommonwealthCommonwealth Commonwealth OmbudsmanOmbudsman Ombudsman de de 后续hòu xù hòu xù 调查diào chá diào chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 记录jì lù jì lù de de 副本fù běn fù běn dōu dōu bèi bèi 销毁xiāo huǐ xiāo huǐ zhè zhè AFPAFP AFP 局长jú zhǎng jú zhǎng 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng xiāng xiāng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]
Commonwealth Ombudsman investigations later found that not all copies of the unlawfully accessed records had been destroyed, contradicting earlier claims by the AFP Commissioner [4].
###### ### 违规wéi guī wéi guī de de 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 模式mó shì mó shì
### Broader Pattern of Violations
虽然suī rán suī rán 20172017 2017 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè de de 记者jì zhě jì zhě 案是àn shì àn shì 最受zuì shòu zuì shòu 关注guān zhù guān zhù de de 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn dàn dàn zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 孤立gū lì gū lì de de 违规行为wéi guī xíng wéi wéi guī xíng wéi
While the April 2017 journalist case is the most publicized incident, it was not an isolated breach.
CommonwealthCommonwealth Commonwealth OmbudsmanOmbudsman Ombudsman de de 合规hé guī hé guī 检查jiǎn chá jiǎn chá 揭示jiē shì jiē shì le le 多个duō gè duō gè 机构jī gòu jī gòu 存在cún zài cún zài de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 违规wéi guī wéi guī
Commonwealth Ombudsman compliance inspections revealed systemic violations across multiple agencies: - **2017-18:** 1 compliance recommendation to the AFP [5] - **2018-19:** 13 recommendations across multiple agencies; the Ombudsman found that **ALL 10 agencies investigated had accessed metadata without proper authorization** [5] - **2020-21:** 29 recommendations, indicating escalating problems [5] The 2018-19 report specifically found that the AFP "did not have in place strong system controls for preventing applications that did not meet relevant thresholds from being progressed" and relied on manual checks and corporate knowledge rather than automated safeguards [5].
-- - ** * ** * 20172017 2017 -- - 1818 18 ** * ** * xiàng xiàng AFPAFP AFP 提出tí chū tí chū 11 1 xiàng xiàng 合规hé guī hé guī 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
Victoria Police and AFP both had "lax systems to record the 'use and disclosure' of metadata" [5].
-- - ** * ** * 20182018 2018 -- - 1919 19 ** * ** * xiàng xiàng 多个duō gè duō gè 机构jī gòu jī gòu 提出tí chū tí chū 1313 13 xiàng xiàng 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì OmbudsmanOmbudsman Ombudsman 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ** * ** * 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu shòu shòu 调查diào chá diào chá de de 1010 10 机构jī gòu jī gòu dōu dōu zài zài 未获wèi huò wèi huò 适当shì dàng shì dàng 授权shòu quán shòu quán de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng xià xià 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn le le yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù ** * ** * [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
### Safeguards Assessment
-- - ** * ** * 20202020 2020 -- - 2121 21 ** * ** * 提出tí chū tí chū 2929 29 xiàng xiàng 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 不断bù duàn bù duàn 升级shēng jí shēng jí [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
**Important Context:** The claim frames this as a "broken promise" regarding safeguards, but safeguards were actually included in the legislation passed in 2015.
20182018 2018 -- - 1919 19 年度报告nián dù bào gào nián dù bào gào 特别tè bié tè bié 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn AFPAFP AFP "" " 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 建立jiàn lì jiàn lì 强有力qiáng yǒu lì qiáng yǒu lì de de 系统控制xì tǒng kòng zhì xì tǒng kòng zhì lái lái 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 符合fú hé fú hé 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 门槛mén kǎn mén kǎn de de 申请shēn qǐng shēn qǐng bèi bèi 推进tuī jìn tuī jìn "" " 而是ér shì ér shì 依赖yī lài yī lài 人工rén gōng rén gōng 检查和jiǎn chá hé jiǎn chá hé 企业qǐ yè qǐ yè 知识zhī shí zhī shí ér ér fēi fēi 自动化zì dòng huà zì dòng huà 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The problem was not that they were promised and broken, but that they were **insufficient and ineffectively implemented** [2].
维多利亚州wéi duō lì yà zhōu wéi duō lì yà zhōu 警察jǐng chá jǐng chá AFPAFP AFP dōu dōu "" " zài zài 记录jì lù jì lù yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù de de '' ' 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 披露pī lù pī lù '' ' 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 存在cún zài cún zài 松懈sōng xiè sōng xiè de de 系统xì tǒng xì tǒng "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The Act included the following safeguards: 1. **Privacy Principles:** Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) from the Privacy Act 1988 applied to retained data [1] 2. **Independent Oversight:** Commonwealth Ombudsman given inspection powers over agency metadata access [1] 3. **Annual Reporting:** Agencies required to report metadata access annually to Parliament [2] 4. **Journalist Protections:** Specific provisions requiring Journalist Information Warrants before accessing journalist's phone/internet metadata [3] 5. **Ministerial Controls:** Procedural safeguards requiring ministerial consideration of public interest [2] However, these safeguards proved inadequate in practice due to implementation failures rather than deliberate policy violations.
###### ### 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 评估píng gū píng gū
The root causes included reliance on manual oversight, insufficient officer training about warrant requirements (characterized as "human error" by AFP Commissioner Andrew Colvin [3]), and lack of strong automated system controls [5].
** * ** * 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng jiāng jiāng 此事cǐ shì cǐ shì 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi 关于guān yú guān yú 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī de de "" " 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " dàn dàn 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 实际上shí jì shàng shí jì shàng 包含bāo hán bāo hán zài zài 20152015 2015 nián nián 通过tōng guò tōng guò de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ zhōng zhōng
问题wèn tí wèn tí 在于zài yú zài yú 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò le le 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī què què 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò ér ér 在于zài yú zài yú 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī ** * ** * 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn qiě qiě 实施shí shī shí shī 效果xiào guǒ xiào guǒ 不佳bù jiā bù jiā ** * ** * [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
gāi gāi 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 原则yuán zé yuán zé ** * ** * 19881988 1988 nián nián 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī zhōng zhōng de de 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 隐私yǐn sī yǐn sī 原则yuán zé yuán zé APPsAPPs APPs 适用shì yòng shì yòng 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú de de 数据shù jù shù jù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 独立dú lì dú lì 监督jiān dū jiān dū ** * ** * CommonwealthCommonwealth Commonwealth OmbudsmanOmbudsman Ombudsman bèi bèi 授予shòu yǔ shòu yǔ duì duì 机构jī gòu jī gòu yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn de de 检查jiǎn chá jiǎn chá quán quán [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 年度报告nián dù bào gào nián dù bào gào ** * ** * 机构jī gòu jī gòu 每年měi nián měi nián xiàng xiàng 议会yì huì yì huì 报告bào gào bào gào yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 记者jì zhě jì zhě 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù ** * ** * 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú zài zài 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 记者jì zhě jì zhě 电话diàn huà diàn huà // / 互联网hù lián wǎng hù lián wǎng yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù qián qián 必须bì xū bì xū 获得huò dé huò dé 记者jì zhě jì zhě 信息xìn xī xìn xī 令状lìng zhuàng lìng zhuàng [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
55 5 .. . ** * ** * 部长级bù zhǎng jí bù zhǎng jí 管控guǎn kòng guǎn kòng ** * ** * 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 部长bù zhǎng bù zhǎng 考虑kǎo lǜ kǎo lǜ 公共利益gōng gòng lì yì gōng gòng lì yì de de 程序性chéng xù xìng chéng xù xìng 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
然而rán ér rán ér 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 在实践中zài shí jiàn zhōng zài shí jiàn zhōng 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng shì shì 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn de de 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn shì shì 实施shí shī shí shī 失败shī bài shī bài ér ér 非故意fēi gù yì fēi gù yì de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 违规wéi guī wéi guī
根本原因gēn běn yuán yīn gēn běn yuán yīn 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 依赖yī lài yī lài 人工rén gōng rén gōng 监督jiān dū jiān dū 警官jǐng guān jǐng guān duì duì 令状lìng zhuàng lìng zhuàng 要求yāo qiú yāo qiú 培训péi xùn péi xùn 不足bù zú bù zú bèi bèi AFPAFP AFP 局长jú zhǎng jú zhǎng AndrewAndrew Andrew ColvinColvin Colvin 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi "" " 人为rén wéi rén wéi 错误cuò wù cuò wù "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí 缺乏quē fá quē fá 强有力qiáng yǒu lì qiáng yǒu lì de de 自动化zì dòng huà zì dòng huà 系统控制xì tǒng kòng zhì xì tǒng kòng zhì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]

缺失背景

###### ### LaborLabor Labor de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí
### Labor's Bipartisan Support
gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng jiāng jiāng 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de 失败shī bài shī bài dàn dàn 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu le le 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 计划jì huà jì huà shì shì zài zài ** * ** * 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí xià xià ** * ** * 通过tōng guò tōng guò de de zhè zhè 事实shì shí shì shí [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The claim frames this as purely a Coalition failure, but significantly omits that the data retention scheme was passed with **bipartisan support** [1].
虽然suī rán suī rán LaborLabor Labor 领袖lǐng xiù lǐng xiù BillBill Bill ShortenShorten Shorten 最初zuì chū zuì chū 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 但经dàn jīng dàn jīng 谈判tán pàn tán pàn hòu hòu LaborLabor Labor zài zài 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā le le 额外é wài é wài de de 记者jì zhě jì zhě 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī hòu hòu 同意tóng yì tóng yì 通过tōng guò tōng guò gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
While Labor leader Bill Shorten initially opposed the scheme, after negotiations Labor agreed to its passage following additional journalist protections being included [1].
最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 20152015 2015 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè zài zài LaborLabor Labor de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí xià xià 通过tōng guò tōng guò 两院liǎng yuàn liǎng yuàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The final legislation passed both houses with Labor's support in April 2015 [1].
这一zhè yī zhè yī 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng hěn hěn 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi
This is important context because: - It was not a unilateral Coalition imposition - Labor actively participated in negotiating safeguards - Both parties agreed the safeguards were adequate at the time
-- - zhè zhè 不是bú shì bú shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 单方面dān fāng miàn dān fāng miàn de de 强加qiáng jiā qiáng jiā
### Nature of the Implementation Failure
-- - LaborLabor Labor 积极参与jī jí cān yù jī jí cān yù le le 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī de de 协商xié shāng xié shāng
The claim characterizes this as a deliberate "broken promise," but evidence suggests the problems were systemic implementation and oversight failures rather than intentional policy abandonment [5].
-- - 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 当时dāng shí dāng shí dōu dōu 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī shì shì 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn de de
The AFP and other agencies appear to have had inadequate staff training, weak system controls, and poor record-keeping practices rather than deliberately ignoring safeguards [5].
###### ### 实施shí shī shí shī 失败shī bài shī bài de de 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì
### Government Response and Ongoing Reforms
gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng jiāng jiāng 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi 故意gù yì gù yì de de "" " 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " dàn dàn 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 问题wèn tí wèn tí chū chū zài zài 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng de de 实施shí shī shí shī 监督jiān dū jiān dū 失败shī bài shī bài ér ér 非故意fēi gù yì fēi gù yì de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 放弃fàng qì fàng qì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The claim provides no context for how the government and oversight bodies responded to these violations.
AFPAFP AFP 其他qí tā qí tā 机构jī gòu jī gòu 似乎sì hū sì hū 存在cún zài cún zài 员工yuán gōng yuán gōng 培训péi xùn péi xùn 不足bù zú bù zú 系统控制xì tǒng kòng zhì xì tǒng kòng zhì 薄弱bó ruò bó ruò 记录jì lù jì lù 保存bǎo cún bǎo cún 不善bù shàn bù shàn de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí ér ér 非故意fēi gù yì fēi gù yì 无视wú shì wú shì 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
Following the Ombudsman investigations: - The government acknowledged the systemic compliance issues [5] - Multiple reform proposals have been discussed, including stronger system controls and automated safeguards [5] - As of 2023, the government committed to legislative reforms to address identified compliance gaps [5]
###### ### 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 回应huí yìng huí yìng 持续chí xù chí xù 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé
### Broader Agency Compliance
gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng wèi wèi 提供tí gōng tí gōng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 监督机构jiān dū jī gòu jiān dū jī gòu 如何rú hé rú hé 回应huí yìng huí yìng 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 违规行为wéi guī xíng wéi wéi guī xíng wéi de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng
While the claim focuses on police misuse, the 2018-19 Ombudsman investigation found compliance issues across **all 10 agencies** tested, not unique to law enforcement [5].
zài zài OmbudsmanOmbudsman Ombudsman 调查diào chá diào chá 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu
This suggests the problem was systemic and technical rather than specific to police abuse or deliberate policy violation.
-- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn le le 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 合规hé guī hé guī 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
-- - 讨论tǎo lùn tǎo lùn 多项duō xiàng duō xiàng 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 提案tí àn tí àn 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò gèng gèng 强大qiáng dà qiáng dà de de 系统控制xì tǒng kòng zhì xì tǒng kòng zhì 自动化zì dòng huà zì dòng huà 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
-- - 截至jié zhì jié zhì 20232023 2023 nián nián 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 解决jiě jué jiě jué 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn de de 合规hé guī hé guī 漏洞lòu dòng lòu dòng [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
###### ### gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 机构jī gòu jī gòu 合规hé guī hé guī 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng
虽然suī rán suī rán gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 关注guān zhù guān zhù 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 滥用làn yòng làn yòng 问题wèn tí wèn tí dàn dàn 20182018 2018 -- - 1919 19 年度nián dù nián dù OmbudsmanOmbudsman Ombudsman 调查diào chá diào chá 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ** * ** * 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu shòu shòu 调查diào chá diào chá de de 1010 10 机构jī gòu jī gòu ** * ** * dōu dōu 存在cún zài cún zài 合规hé guī hé guī 问题wèn tí wèn tí ér ér fēi fēi 执法zhí fǎ zhí fǎ 部门bù mén bù mén 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 问题wèn tí wèn tí shì shì 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 技术性jì shù xìng jì shù xìng de de ér ér fēi fēi 特定tè dìng tè dìng 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 滥用làn yòng làn yòng huò huò 故意gù yì gù yì de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 违规wéi guī wéi guī

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 提供tí gōng tí gōng de de 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán ** * ** *
**Original Sources Provided:** The Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) is a major Australian mainstream media outlet with strong reputation for accuracy and investigative journalism.
悉尼xī ní xī ní 先驱xiān qū xiān qū 晨报chén bào chén bào SMHSMH SMH shì shì 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 准确性zhǔn què xìng zhǔn què xìng 调查diào chá diào chá xìng xìng 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 享有xiǎng yǒu xiǎng yǒu 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo 声誉shēng yù shēng yù
The April 2017 reporting on the AFP's unauthorized journalist metadata access is well-documented and factually verified [3].
关于guān yú guān yú AFPAFP AFP 未经wèi jīng wèi jīng 授权shòu quán shòu quán 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 记者jì zhě jì zhě yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù de de 20172017 2017 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè 报道bào dào bào dào yǒu yǒu 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 记录jì lù jì lù qiě qiě 经过jīng guò jīng guò 事实shì shí shì shí 核实hé shí hé shí [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
ZDNet is a reputable technology publication that accurately reported on the introduction of the data retention scheme [2].
ZDNetZDNet ZDNet shì shì 一家yī jiā yī jiā 声誉shēng yù shēng yù 良好liáng hǎo liáng hǎo de de 技术jì shù jì shù 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 报道bào dào bào dào le le 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 计划jì huà jì huà de de 推出tuī chū tuī chū [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
Both original sources are credible mainstream outlets. **Source Accuracy Note:** The original sources correctly identified the April 2017 incident.
两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán dōu dōu shì shì 可信kě xìn kě xìn de de 主流zhǔ liú zhǔ liú 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ
However, the claim appears to have mischaracterized the timing (suggesting "within 2 weeks" rather than ~18 months) and framed it as a "broken promise" about safeguards rather than an implementation failure of existing safeguards.
** * ** * 来源lái yuán lái yuán 准确性zhǔn què xìng zhǔn què xìng 说明shuō míng shuō míng ** * ** * 原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 正确zhèng què zhèng què 识别shí bié shí bié le le 20172017 2017 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè de de 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn
然而rán ér rán ér gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 似乎sì hū sì hū 错误cuò wù cuò wù 描述miáo shù miáo shù le le 时间shí jiān shí jiān 暗示àn shì àn shì "" " zài zài 22 2 周内zhōu nèi zhōu nèi "" " ér ér 非约fēi yuē fēi yuē 1818 18 yuè yuè bìng bìng jiāng jiāng 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi 关于guān yú guān yú 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī de de "" " 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " ér ér fēi fēi 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī de de 实施shí shī shí shī 失败shī bài shī bài
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 推出tuī chū tuī chū huò huò 支持zhī chí zhī chí le le 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú
**Did Labor introduce or support data retention?** Labor's position evolved on this issue [1]: - **Prior Labor Government (2012):** The previous Labor government had supported data retention measures and advocated for metadata collection schemes - **Opposition Period (2014-15):** Labor initially opposed Abbott's data retention bill, with Bill Shorten calling it an "internet tax" - **Final Position:** After negotiations, Labor agreed to the final legislation following additional journalist protections, providing bipartisan support for passage in April 2015 [1] - **Rationale:** Labor's shift was driven by national security concerns and recognition that the scheme would proceed regardless, so they negotiated for stronger protections for journalists and civil liberties [1] **Key Finding:** Labor did not "oppose the scheme" as critics of this claim might suggest - they ultimately supported it after negotiations.
** * ** *
This makes it inaccurate to frame this purely as a Coalition responsibility without acknowledging Labor's bipartisan role in passing the legislation.
LaborLabor Labor zài zài 这个zhè ge zhè ge 问题wèn tí wèn tí shàng shàng de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 有所yǒu suǒ yǒu suǒ 演变yǎn biàn yǎn biàn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - ** * ** * 先前xiān qián xiān qián de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 20122012 2012 nián nián ** * ** * 此前cǐ qián cǐ qián de de LaborLabor Labor 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ céng céng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 措施cuò shī cuò shī bìng bìng 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 收集shōu jí shōu jí 计划jì huà jì huà
-- - ** * ** * 反对党fǎn duì dǎng fǎn duì dǎng 时期shí qī shí qī 20142014 2014 -- - 1515 15 nián nián ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 最初zuì chū zuì chū 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì AbbottAbbott Abbott de de 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn BillBill Bill ShortenShorten Shorten 称其为chēng qí wèi chēng qí wèi "" " 互联网hù lián wǎng hù lián wǎng shuì shuì "" "
-- - ** * ** * 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ** * ** * jīng jīng 谈判tán pàn tán pàn hòu hòu LaborLabor Labor zài zài 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā le le 额外é wài é wài de de 记者jì zhě jì zhě 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī hòu hòu 同意tóng yì tóng yì 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 20152015 2015 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè 提供tí gōng tí gōng 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 支持zhī chí zhī chí 通过tōng guò tōng guò [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
-- - ** * ** * 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng de de 转变zhuǎn biàn zhuǎn biàn shì shì yóu yóu 国家guó jiā guó jiā 安全ān quán ān quán 关切guān qiè guān qiè duì duì gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 无论如何wú lùn rú hé wú lùn rú hé dōu dōu huì huì 推进tuī jìn tuī jìn de de 认识rèn shí rèn shí suǒ suǒ 驱动qū dòng qū dòng de de 因此yīn cǐ yīn cǐ 他们tā men tā men 协商xié shāng xié shāng wèi wèi 记者jì zhě jì zhě 公民自由gōng mín zì yóu gōng mín zì yóu 争取zhēng qǔ zhēng qǔ 更强gèng qiáng gèng qiáng de de 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor bìng bìng xiàng xiàng gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng de de 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 可能kě néng kě néng 暗示àn shì àn shì de de 那样nà yàng nà yàng "" " 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà "" " 他们tā men tā men 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng zài zài 谈判tán pàn tán pàn hòu hòu 予以yǔ yǐ yǔ yǐ 支持zhī chí zhī chí
zhè zhè 使得shǐ de shǐ de zài zài 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn LaborLabor Labor zài zài 通过tōng guò tōng guò 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ zhōng zhōng de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng xià xià jiāng jiāng 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de 责任zé rèn zé rèn shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què de de
🌐

平衡视角

###### ### 确实què shí què shí 存在cún zài cún zài de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí
### The Legitimate Problem
gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 确实què shí què shí 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū le le 一个yí gè yí gè 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 计划jì huà jì huà de de 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 不足以bù zú yǐ bù zú yǐ 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ duì duì 记者jì zhě jì zhě 电话diàn huà diàn huà 记录jì lù jì lù de de 未经wèi jīng wèi jīng 授权shòu quán shòu quán 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn
The claim does identify a genuine issue: the data retention scheme's safeguards proved insufficient to prevent unauthorized access to journalist phone records.
20172017 2017 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè de de 事件shì jiàn shì jiàn shì shì 一次yī cì yī cì 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng de de 信任xìn rèn xìn rèn 违约wéi yuē wéi yuē CommonwealthCommonwealth Commonwealth OmbudsmanOmbudsman Ombudsman 关于guān yú guān yú 多个duō gè duō gè 机构jī gòu jī gòu 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 违规wéi guī wéi guī de de 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo le le 需要xū yào xū yào 关注guān zhù guān zhù de de 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 失败shī bài shī bài [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
The April 2017 incident was a serious breach of trust, and the Commonwealth Ombudsman's findings of systemic violations across multiple agencies represent genuine policy failure requiring attention [5].
鉴于jiàn yú jiàn yú 记者jì zhě jì zhě 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù shì shì 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi LaborLabor Labor 支持zhī chí zhī chí de de 条件tiáo jiàn tiáo jiàn 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 协商xié shāng xié shāng de de 未能wèi néng wèi néng 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 记者jì zhě jì zhě yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 尤其yóu qí yóu qí 令人担忧lìng rén dān yōu lìng rén dān yōu [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
The failure to adequately protect journalist metadata is particularly concerning given that journalist protections were specifically negotiated as a condition for Labor's support [1].
zhè zhè 至少zhì shǎo zhì shǎo 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo le le zài zài 维持wéi chí wéi chí suǒ suǒ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò de de 保护bǎo hù bǎo hù 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn de de 部分bù fèn bù fèn 失败shī bài shī bài
This represents at least a partial failure to maintain the protections that were promised.
###### ### 复杂性fù zá xìng fù zá xìng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng
### The Complexity and Context
然而rán ér rán ér jiāng jiāng 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi "" " 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò "" " 过度guò dù guò dù 简化jiǎn huà jiǎn huà le le 一个yí gè yí gè 复杂fù zá fù zá de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí
However, the characterization as "broken promise" oversimplifies a complex issue: 1. **Safeguards Existed:** Unlike the framing suggests, safeguards were not promised and abandoned - they were included in the legislation [1] 2. **Implementation vs.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 存在cún zài cún zài ** * ** * 所述suǒ shù suǒ shù 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 不同bù tóng bù tóng 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò hòu hòu bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 它们tā men tā men 包含bāo hán bāo hán zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ zhōng zhōng [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
Design Failure:** The problem appears to be implementation failure (weak system controls, inadequate training, poor record-keeping) rather than the safeguards themselves being inadequate in design [5] 3. **Bipartisan Responsibility:** Both Coalition and Labor agreed the April 2015 legislation with safeguards was appropriate after negotiations [1] 4. **Systemic Issue:** The violations affected all 10 tested agencies, not unique to police, suggesting a broader systemic problem with oversight and compliance across government [5] 5. **AFP's Characterization:** The AFP characterized the journalist metadata access as "human error" rather than deliberate abuse or defiance of safeguards [3] 6. **Government Response:** Following Ombudsman investigations, the government has acknowledged problems and proposed reforms [5]
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 实施shí shī shí shī 失败shī bài shī bài 设计shè jì shè jì 失败shī bài shī bài ** * ** * 问题wèn tí wèn tí 似乎sì hū sì hū shì shì 实施shí shī shí shī 失败shī bài shī bài 系统控制xì tǒng kòng zhì xì tǒng kòng zhì 薄弱bó ruò bó ruò 培训péi xùn péi xùn 不足bù zú bù zú 记录jì lù jì lù 保存bǎo cún bǎo cún 不善bù shàn bù shàn ér ér fēi fēi 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 本身běn shēn běn shēn 设计shè jì shè jì 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
### Comparative Analysis
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 共同gòng tóng gòng tóng 责任zé rèn zé rèn ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition LaborLabor Labor zài zài 谈判tán pàn tán pàn hòu hòu dōu dōu 同意tóng yì tóng yì 20152015 2015 nián nián 44 4 yuè yuè 包含bāo hán bāo hán 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī de de 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ shì shì 适当shì dàng shì dàng de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
**Is this unique to the Coalition?** The bipartisan nature of the legislation means both Coalition and Labor bear responsibility for the oversight failures.
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ** * ** * 违规行为wéi guī xíng wéi wéi guī xíng wéi 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng le le 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu shòu shòu 调查diào chá diào chá de de 1010 10 机构jī gòu jī gòu 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ zài zài 监督jiān dū jiān dū 合规hé guī hé guī 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 存在cún zài cún zài gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
Labor's support for the scheme after negotiating protections means Labor also bears responsibility for ensuring those protections worked as intended [1].
55 5 .. . ** * ** * AFPAFP AFP de de 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng ** * ** * AFPAFP AFP jiāng jiāng 记者jì zhě jì zhě yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng wèi wèi "" " 人为rén wéi rén wéi 错误cuò wù cuò wù "" " ér ér 非故意fēi gù yì fēi gù yì 滥用làn yòng làn yòng huò huò 违抗wéi kàng wéi kàng 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
The Ombudsman's findings of violations across **all 10 agencies** tested (not just Coalition-era agencies) suggest the compliance problems may have persisted regardless of which party was in government [5].
66 6 .. . ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 回应huí yìng huí yìng ** * ** * zài zài OmbudsmanOmbudsman Ombudsman 调查diào chá diào chá hòu hòu 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 承认chéng rèn chéng rèn 问题wèn tí wèn tí bìng bìng 提出tí chū tí chū 改革gǎi gé gǎi gé 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
###### ### 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 分析fēn xī fēn xī
** * ** * 这是zhè shì zhè shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu de de ma ma
** * ** *
gāi gāi 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe CoalitionCoalition Coalition LaborLabor Labor dōu dōu duì duì 监督jiān dū jiān dū 失败shī bài shī bài 负有责任fù yǒu zé rèn fù yǒu zé rèn
LaborLabor Labor zài zài 协商xié shāng xié shāng 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī hòu hòu duì duì gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà de de 支持zhī chí zhī chí 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe LaborLabor Labor duì duì 确保què bǎo què bǎo 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 保护措施bǎo hù cuò shī bǎo hù cuò shī àn àn 预期yù qī yù qī 运作yùn zuò yùn zuò 负有责任fù yǒu zé rèn fù yǒu zé rèn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
OmbudsmanOmbudsman Ombudsman 关于guān yú guān yú ** * ** * 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu shòu shòu 调查diào chá diào chá de de 1010 10 机构jī gòu jī gòu ** * ** * 违规wéi guī wéi guī de de 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn 不仅仅bù jǐn jǐn bù jǐn jǐn shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 时期shí qī shí qī de de 机构jī gòu jī gòu 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 无论wú lùn wú lùn 哪个nǎ ge nǎ ge 政党zhèng dǎng zhèng dǎng 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 合规hé guī hé guī 问题wèn tí wèn tí 可能kě néng kě néng dōu dōu huì huì 持续chí xù chí xù 存在cún zài cún zài [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]

部分属实

5.0

/ 10

gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū 警方jǐng fāng jǐng fāng zài zài yuán yuán 数据shù jù shù jù 保留bǎo liú bǎo liú 制度zhì dù zhì dù xià xià 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn le le 记者jì zhě jì zhě de de 电话diàn huà diàn huà 记录jì lù jì lù qiě qiě 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn
The claim accurately identifies that police illegally accessed journalists' phone records under the metadata retention regime and that safeguards proved insufficient.
然而rán ér rán ér zài zài 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 关键点guān jiàn diǎn guān jiàn diǎn shàng shàng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng
However, it is misleading on several key points: 1. **Timeline Error:** The illegal access occurred ~18 months after commencement, not "within 2 weeks" [3] 2. **Broken Promise Characterization:** Safeguards were not promised and abandoned - they were included in legislation and proved inadequately implemented rather than deliberately broken [1], [2] 3. **Missing Bipartisan Context:** Labor supported the final legislation after negotiating safeguards, making this not a purely Coalition responsibility [1] 4. **Oversimplification:** The issue stems from systemic implementation failures and oversight problems across multiple agencies, not a deliberate policy abandonment [5] The claim identifies a genuine problem (inadequate protection of journalist metadata and broader systemic compliance failures) but mischaracterizes its nature and timeline in ways that overstate Coalition culpability while omitting Labor's bipartisan role in creating and supporting the scheme.
11 1 .. . ** * ** * 时间shí jiān shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn 错误cuò wù cuò wù ** * ** * 非法fēi fǎ fēi fǎ 访问fǎng wèn fǎng wèn 发生fā shēng fā shēng zài zài 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 实施shí shī shí shī hòu hòu yuē yuē 1818 18 yuè yuè ér ér fēi fēi "" " zài zài 22 2 周内zhōu nèi zhōu nèi "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ]
22 2 .. . ** * ** * 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò de de 定性dìng xìng dìng xìng ** * ** * 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò hòu hòu bèi bèi 放弃fàng qì fàng qì 它们tā men tā men 包含bāo hán bāo hán zài zài 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ zhōng zhōng bìng bìng bèi bèi 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng shì shì 实施shí shī shí shī 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn ér ér 非故意fēi gù yì fēi gù yì 违背wéi bèi wéi bèi [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ]
33 3 .. . ** * ** * 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor zài zài 协商xié shāng xié shāng 保障bǎo zhàng bǎo zhàng 措施cuò shī cuò shī hòu hòu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ zhè zhè 使得shǐ de shǐ de zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 纯粹chún cuì chún cuì shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de 责任zé rèn zé rèn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ]
44 4 .. . ** * ** * 过度guò dù guò dù 简化jiǎn huà jiǎn huà ** * ** * 问题wèn tí wèn tí 源于yuán yú yuán yú 多个duō gè duō gè 机构jī gòu jī gòu de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 实施shí shī shí shī 失败shī bài shī bài 监督jiān dū jiān dū 问题wèn tí wèn tí ér ér 非故意fēi gù yì fēi gù yì de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 放弃fàng qì fàng qì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]
gāi gāi 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng 指出zhǐ chū zhǐ chū le le 一个yí gè yí gè 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 记者jì zhě jì zhě yuán yuán 数据保护shù jù bǎo hù shù jù bǎo hù 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 合规hé guī hé guī 失败shī bài shī bài dàn dàn 错误cuò wù cuò wù 描述miáo shù miáo shù le le 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì 时间shí jiān shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn 夸大kuā dà kuā dà de de 方式fāng shì fāng shì 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào CoalitionCoalition Coalition de de 责任zé rèn zé rèn 同时tóng shí tóng shí 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu le le LaborLabor Labor zài zài 创建chuàng jiàn chuàng jiàn 支持zhī chí zhī chí gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà zhōng zhōng de de 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 作用zuò yòng zuò yòng

📚 来源与引用 (10)

  1. 1
    legislation.gov.au

    Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Act 2015 Legislative History

    Federal Register of Legislation

  2. 2
    zdnet.com

    Australian metadata laws: what you need to know

    Zdnet

    Original link no longer available
  3. 3
    Police illegally obtained journalists' phone records under new metadata retention regime

    Police illegally obtained journalists' phone records under new metadata retention regime

    The breach took place as part of an investigation into a leak of confidential government material.

    The Sydney Morning Herald
  4. 4
    ombudsman.gov.au

    Commonwealth Ombudsman investigation findings on metadata access compliance

    Ombudsman Gov

  5. 5
    Australian police, regulators continue unlawfully accessing metadata

    Australian police, regulators continue unlawfully accessing metadata

    Ombudsman finds.

    iTnews
  6. 6
    Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2015 – Parliamentary Debate

    Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2015 – Parliamentary Debate

    Helpful information Text of bill First reading: Text of the bill as introduced into the Parliament Third reading: Prepared if the bill is amended by the house in which it was introduced. This version of the bill is then considered by the second house. As passed by

    Aph Gov
  7. 7
    Government acts to finally reform metadata regime

    Government acts to finally reform metadata regime

    A loophole meant more organisations could access your metadata.

    Information Age
  8. 8
    The passage of Australia's data retention regime: national security, human rights, and media scrutiny

    The passage of Australia's data retention regime: national security, human rights, and media scrutiny

    The Internet Policy Review is an open access, fast track and peer-reviewed journal on internet regulation.

    Policyreview
  9. 9
    sbs.com.au

    AFP unlawfully accessed journalist's phone records

    Sbs Com

    Original link no longer available
  10. 10
    aph.gov.au

    Australian Metadata Retention Scheme - Overview and Compliance Issues

    Aph Gov

    Original link no longer available

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性,但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。