C0364 - 新冠疫情恐怖福利药物检测

C0364

声明内容

“在未咨询法律、医疗或药物专家的情况下开始对福利领取者进行药物检测。他们同时声称将随机选择人员，又声称基于数据驱动的分析工具进行选择（即并非随机）。”

新冠疫情反恐福利

原始来源： Matthew Davis

原始来源

mdavis.xyz

Documentation of Coalition government policies and claims.

Matthew Davis

✅ 事实核查

CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 20132013 2013 年nián nián 至zhì zhì 20192019 2019 年nián nián 期间qī jiān qī jiān 多次duō cì duō cì 提议tí yì tí yì 对duì duì 福利fú lì fú lì 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 者zhě zhě 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè ，，，这一zhè yī zhè yī 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 在zài zài 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 关键点guān jiàn diǎn guān jiàn diǎn 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 有yǒu yǒu 依据yī jù yī jù 的de de ：：：

The Coalition government did propose welfare drug testing on multiple occasions between 2013 and 2019, and this claim has merit on several key points: **Timeline of proposals:** The Coalition first proposed drug testing welfare recipients in the May 2013 budget, and subsequently reintroduced the proposal in 2017 (under Turnbull) and again in 2019 (under Morrison) [1].

** * ** * 提议tí yì tí yì 时间shí jiān shí jiān 线xiàn xiàn ：：： ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 首次shǒu cì shǒu cì 在zài zài 20132013 2013 年nián nián 55 5 月yuè yuè 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 中zhōng zhōng 提议tí yì tí yì 对duì duì 福利fú lì fú lì 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 者zhě zhě 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè ，，，随后suí hòu suí hòu 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián （（（ TurnbullTurnbull Turnbull 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān ）））和hé hé 20192019 2019 年nián nián （（（ MorrisonMorrison Morrison 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān ）））再次zài cì zài cì 提出tí chū tí chū 该gāi gāi 提议tí yì tí yì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。。

The 2019 Morrison government plan proposed testing 5,000 Newstart and Youth Allowance recipients in Logan (Queensland), Bankstown (Sydney), and Mandurah (Western Australia) [2]. **The contradictory "random" vs. "profiling" claim is substantiated:** Government documents and parliamentary debate show that while the policy was described as involving "randomly selected" recipients, the selection criteria explicitly included using a "data-driven profiling tool developed for the trial to identify relevant characteristics that indicate a higher risk of substance abuse issues" [3].

20192019 2019 年nián nián MorrisonMorrison Morrison 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 计划jì huà jì huà 提议tí yì tí yì 对duì duì LoganLogan Logan （（（昆士兰州kūn shì lán zhōu kūn shì lán zhōu ）））、、、 BankstownBankstown Bankstown （（（悉尼xī ní xī ní ）））和hé hé MandurahMandurah Mandurah （（（西澳大利亚xī ào dà lì yà xī ào dà lì yà 州zhōu zhōu ）））的de de 55 5 ,, , 000000 000 名míng míng NewstartNewstart Newstart 和hé hé 青年qīng nián qīng nián 津贴jīn tiē jīn tiē 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 者zhě zhě 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 测试cè shì cè shì [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

This creates a fundamental contradiction: the selection process would not be random but rather based on algorithmic profiling of welfare recipients' characteristics [4]. **Lack of proper consultation with legal and medical experts is well-documented:** A critical August 2013 report by the Australian National Council on Drugs (ANCD) - a government-funded advisory body - explicitly warned that welfare drug testing would have "serious ethical and legal problems" [5].

** * ** * "" " 随机suí jī suí jī "" " 与yǔ yǔ "" " 分析fēn xī fēn xī "" " 相xiāng xiāng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 得到dé dào dé dào 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí ：：： ** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 和hé hé 议会yì huì yì huì 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn 记录jì lù jì lù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ，，，虽然suī rán suī rán 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 被bèi bèi 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi 涉及shè jí shè jí "" " 随机suí jī suí jī 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé "" " 的de de 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 者zhě zhě ，，，但dàn dàn 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 明确míng què míng què 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng "" " 为wèi wèi 试点shì diǎn shì diǎn 开发kāi fā kāi fā 的de de 、、、用于yòng yú yòng yú 识别shí bié shí bié 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 药物滥用yào wù làn yòng yào wù làn yòng 问题wèn tí wèn tí 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 较jiào jiào 高gāo gāo 的de de 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 特征tè zhēng tè zhēng 的de de 数据shù jù shù jù 驱动qū dòng qū dòng 分析fēn xī fēn xī 工具gōng jù gōng jù "" " [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。。

Despite this warning existing since 2013, the Coalition proceeded with proposals in 2017 and 2019.

这zhè zhè 就jiù jiù 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 了le le 一个yí gè yí gè 根本性gēn běn xìng gēn běn xìng 的de de 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn ：：：选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 过程guò chéng guò chéng 不会bú huì bú huì 是shì shì 随机suí jī suí jī 的de de ，，，而是ér shì ér shì 基于jī yú jī yú 对duì duì 福利fú lì fú lì 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 者zhě zhě 特征tè zhēng tè zhēng 的de de 算法suàn fǎ suàn fǎ 分析fēn xī fēn xī [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。。

When the 2019 proposal re-emerged, medical organizations including the Australian Medical Association (AMA), Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP), and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians publicly condemned the proposal as "mean and nasty" and ineffective [6].

** * ** * 缺乏quē fá quē fá 与yǔ yǔ 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 和hé hé 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 的de de 适当shì dàng shì dàng 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 是shì shì 有yǒu yǒu 充分chōng fèn chōng fèn 记录jì lù jì lù 的de de ：：： ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 国家guó jiā guó jiā 药物yào wù yào wù 委员会wěi yuán huì wěi yuán huì （（（ ANCDANCD ANCD ））） —— — —— — 一个yí gè yí gè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 资助zī zhù zī zhù 的de de 咨询机构zī xún jī gòu zī xún jī gòu —— — —— — 在zài zài 20132013 2013 年nián nián 88 8 月yuè yuè 的de de 一份yī fèn yī fèn 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 报告bào gào bào gào 中zhōng zhōng 明确míng què míng què 警告jǐng gào jǐng gào ，，，福利fú lì fú lì 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 将jiāng jiāng 存在cún zài cún zài "" " 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 的de de 伦理lún lǐ lún lǐ 和hé hé 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。。

There is no documented evidence the government sought legal advice before proposing the scheme, contrary to standard legislative practice [7].

尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 自zì zì 20132013 2013 年nián nián 以来yǐ lái yǐ lái 就jiù jiù 存在cún zài cún zài 这一zhè yī zhè yī 警告jǐng gào jǐng gào ，，， CoalitionCoalition Coalition 仍réng réng 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 和hé hé 20192019 2019 年nián nián 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 提议tí yì tí yì 。。。

当dāng dāng 20192019 2019 年nián nián 的de de 提议tí yì tí yì 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 出现chū xiàn chū xiàn 时shí shí ，，，包括bāo kuò bāo kuò 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 医学yī xué yī xué 协会xié huì xié huì （（（ AMAAMA AMA ）））、、、澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 皇家huáng jiā huáng jiā 全科医师quán kē yī shī quán kē yī shī 学院xué yuàn xué yuàn （（（ RACGPRACGP RACGP ）））和hé hé 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 皇家huáng jiā huáng jiā 内科nèi kē nèi kē 医师yī shī yī shī 学院xué yuàn xué yuàn 在内zài nèi zài nèi 的de de 医疗机构yī liáo jī gòu yī liáo jī gòu 公开gōng kāi gōng kāi 谴责qiǎn zé qiǎn zé 该gāi gāi 提议tí yì tí yì "" " 刻薄kè bó kè bó 而ér ér 恶毒è dú è dú "" " 且qiě qiě 无效wú xiào wú xiào [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。。

没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 提出tí chū tí chū 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 之前zhī qián zhī qián 寻求xún qiú xún qiú 了le le 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn ，，，这zhè zhè 与yǔ yǔ 标准biāo zhǔn biāo zhǔn 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ 惯例guàn lì guàn lì 相悖xiāng bèi xiāng bèi [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] 。。。

缺失背景

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 一些yī xiē yī xiē 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 细微差别xì wēi chā bié xì wēi chā bié ：：：

However, the claim omits important nuances: **The proposals never actually implemented:** Despite three separate efforts (2013, 2017, 2019), the Coalition failed to pass the legislation and the drug testing trial never commenced [8].

** * ** * 提议tí yì tí yì 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 实施shí shī shí shī ：：： ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 有yǒu yǒu 三次sān cì sān cì 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 努力nǔ lì nǔ lì （（（ 20132013 2013 年nián nián 、、、 20172017 2017 年nián nián 、、、 20192019 2019 年nián nián ））），，， CoalitionCoalition Coalition 未能wèi néng wèi néng 通过tōng guò tōng guò 立法lì fǎ lì fǎ ，，，药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 试点shì diǎn shì diǎn 从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 启动qǐ dòng qǐ dòng [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。。

This is significant because while the proposals were poorly conceived, they were not enacted policy.

这zhè zhè 一点yì diǎn yì diǎn 很hěn hěn 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào ，，，因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 虽然suī rán suī rán 提议tí yì tí yì 构思gòu sī gòu sī 不周bù zhōu bù zhōu ，，，但dàn dàn 它们tā men tā men 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 实际shí jì shí jì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。。

The claim's phrasing ("Started drug testing") could misleadingly suggest the program was operational. **Labor's position on the issue:** Labor consistently opposed the proposals, characterizing them as "mean and nasty," which is worth noting as context.

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí （（（ "" " 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè "" " ）））可能kě néng kě néng 会huì huì 误导性wù dǎo xìng wù dǎo xìng 地dì dì 暗示àn shì àn shì 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 实施shí shī shí shī 。。。

However, Labor did not propose equivalent drug testing schemes when in government [9].

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 此cǐ cǐ 问题wèn tí wèn tí 上shàng shàng 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng ：：： ** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 一贯yí guàn yí guàn 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 提议tí yì tí yì ，，，将jiāng jiāng 其qí qí 描述miáo shù miáo shù 为wèi wèi "" " 刻薄kè bó kè bó 而ér ér 恶毒è dú è dú "" " ，，，这zhè zhè 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 信息xìn xī xìn xī 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì 。。。

The issue appears genuinely partisan rather than bipartisan support that was poorly consulted. **The 2013 report predated most proposals:** While the 2013 ANCD report warned of legal and ethical problems, the government's decisions in 2017 and 2019 to resurrect the proposal despite this prior advice is arguably worse than a complete absence of consultation - it represents a choice to ignore expert warnings. **Medical consensus was clear:** By the time of the 2019 proposal, the AMA, RACGP, and other medical bodies had formally rejected drug testing welfare recipients, making claims of lack of consultation especially damaging to the government's position [10].

然而rán ér rán ér ，，， LaborLabor Labor 在zài zài 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 时shí shí 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 提出tí chū tí chū 对duì duì 等děng děng 的de de 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 方案fāng àn fāng àn [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。。

这个zhè ge zhè ge 问题wèn tí wèn tí 看起来kàn qǐ lái kàn qǐ lái 确实què shí què shí 是shì shì 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 性xìng xìng 的de de ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 支持zhī chí zhī chí 但dàn dàn 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 不力bù lì bù lì 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。。

** * ** * 20132013 2013 年nián nián 的de de 报告bào gào bào gào 早zǎo zǎo 于yú yú 大多数dà duō shù dà duō shù 提议tí yì tí yì ：：： ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 20132013 2013 年nián nián 的de de ANCDANCD ANCD 报告bào gào bào gào 警告jǐng gào jǐng gào 了le le 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 和hé hé 伦理lún lǐ lún lǐ 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，，，但dàn dàn 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 和hé hé 20192019 2019 年nián nián 决定jué dìng jué dìng 不顾bù gù bù gù 这一zhè yī zhè yī 先前xiān qián xiān qián 的de de 建议jiàn yì jiàn yì 而ér ér 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 提出tí chū tí chū 该gāi gāi 提议tí yì tí yì ，，，这比zhè bǐ zhè bǐ 完全wán quán wán quán 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 更gèng gèng 糟糕zāo gāo zāo gāo —— — —— — 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 无视wú shì wú shì 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 警告jǐng gào jǐng gào 。。。

** * ** * 医学界yī xué jiè yī xué jiè 的de de 共识gòng shí gòng shí 是shì shì 明确míng què míng què 的de de ：：： ** * ** * 到dào dào 20192019 2019 年nián nián 提出tí chū tí chū 该gāi gāi 提议tí yì tí yì 时shí shí ，，， AMAAMA AMA 、、、 RACGPRACGP RACGP 和hé hé 其他qí tā qí tā 医疗机构yī liáo jī gòu yī liáo jī gòu 已yǐ yǐ 正式zhèng shì zhèng shì 拒绝接受jù jué jiē shòu jù jué jiē shòu 对duì duì 福利fú lì fú lì 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 者zhě zhě 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè ，，，这zhè zhè 使得shǐ de shǐ de 缺乏quē fá quē fá 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 对duì duì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 尤为yóu wèi yóu wèi 不利bù lì bù lì [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。。

来源可信度评估

原始yuán shǐ yuán shǐ 来源lái yuán lái yuán 是shì shì AliceAlice Alice WorkmanWorkman Workman 撰写zhuàn xiě zhuàn xiě 的de de BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 。。。

The original sources provided are BuzzFeed articles by Alice Workman.

BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed NewsNews News 的de de 声誉shēng yù shēng yù 参差不齐cēn cī bù qí cēn cī bù qí ：：：它tā tā 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 娱乐yú lè yú lè // / 生活shēng huó shēng huó 方式fāng shì fāng shì 出版物chū bǎn wù chū bǎn wù 而ér ér 闻名wén míng wén míng ，，，但dàn dàn 已yǐ yǐ 发展fā zhǎn fā zhǎn 了le le 严肃yán sù yán sù 的de de 调查diào chá diào chá 部门bù mén bù mén 。。。

BuzzFeed News has a mixed reputation: it is primarily known as an entertainment/lifestyle publication but has developed a serious investigations unit.

WorkmanWorkman Workman 关于guān yú guān yú 福利fú lì fú lì 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 的de de 20172017 2017 年nián nián 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 是shì shì 调查diào chá diào chá 性xìng xìng 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào ，，，揭露jiē lù jiē lù 了le le 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 和hé hé 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn ，，，特别tè bié tè bié 是shì shì "" " 随机suí jī suí jī "" " 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 与yǔ yǔ 数据分析shù jù fēn xī shù jù fēn xī 之间zhī jiān zhī jiān 的de de 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。。

Workman's 2017 articles on welfare drug testing were investigative journalism that exposed government documents and policy contradictions, particularly the contradiction between "random" selection and data profiling [4].

这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 已yǐ yǐ 被bèi bèi 以下yǐ xià yǐ xià 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí ：：：

These articles have been corroborated by: - Government documents (parliamentary bills and budget papers) - Medical organizations' official statements (RACGP, AMA, RACP) - Official government advisory body reports (ANCD 2013) - Parliamentary debate records The BuzzFeed articles are factually accurate in their core claims, though like all opinion-inflected journalism, they frame the policy negatively.

-- - 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn （（（议会yì huì yì huì 法案fǎ àn fǎ àn 和hé hé 预算yù suàn yù suàn 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn ）））

This framing is consistent with medical and legal expert consensus opposing the policy.

-- - 医疗机构yī liáo jī gòu yī liáo jī gòu 的de de 官方guān fāng guān fāng 声明shēng míng shēng míng （（（ RACGPRACGP RACGP 、、、 AMAAMA AMA 、、、 RACPRACP RACP ）））

-- - 官方guān fāng guān fāng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 咨询机构zī xún jī gòu zī xún jī gòu 报告bào gào bào gào （（（ ANCDANCD ANCD 20132013 2013 ）））

-- - 议会yì huì yì huì 辩论biàn lùn biàn lùn 记录jì lù jì lù

BuzzFeedBuzzFeed BuzzFeed 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 的de de 核心hé xīn hé xīn 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 是shì shì 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ，，，尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 像xiàng xiàng 所有suǒ yǒu suǒ yǒu 带有dài yǒu dài yǒu 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 色彩sè cǎi sè cǎi 的de de 新闻报道xīn wén bào dào xīn wén bào dào 一样yī yàng yī yàng ，，，它们tā men tā men 对duì duì 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 持chí chí 负面fù miàn fù miàn 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 。。。

这一zhè yī zhè yī 框架kuāng jià kuāng jià 与yǔ yǔ 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 医学yī xué yī xué 和hé hé 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 共识gòng shí gòng shí 一致yí zhì yí zhì 。。。

⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * LaborLabor Labor 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 对duì duì 等děng děng 的de de 福利fú lì fú lì 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè ？？？

**Did Labor propose equivalent welfare drug testing?** No documented evidence exists of Labor proposing mandatory drug testing of welfare recipients as policy [9].

** * ** *

Labor's position was consistently critical of Coalition proposals, with Labor politicians like Jim Chalmers stating the policy was counterproductive and stigmatizing [11].

没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng LaborLabor Labor 曾céng céng 将jiāng jiāng 福利fú lì fú lì 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 者zhě zhě 的de de 强制性qiáng zhì xìng qiáng zhì xìng 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 提出tí chū tí chū [[ [ 99 9 ]] ] 。。。

When Labor has proposed welfare measures, they have focused on support and treatment rather than punitive testing regimes.

LaborLabor Labor 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 一贯yí guàn yí guàn 是shì shì 批评pī píng pī píng CoalitionCoalition Coalition 的de de 提议tí yì tí yì ，，， LaborLabor Labor 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 人物rén wù rén wù 如rú rú JimJim Jim ChalmersChalmers Chalmers 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 适得其反shì dé qí fǎn shì dé qí fǎn 并bìng bìng 具有jù yǒu jù yǒu 污名wū míng wū míng 化huà huà 效应xiào yìng xiào yìng [[ [ 1111 11 ]] ] 。。。

This distinguishes welfare drug testing from some other policies where both parties had adopted similar measures (e.g., various welfare compliance activities).

当dāng dāng LaborLabor Labor 提出tí chū tí chū 福利fú lì fú lì 措施cuò shī cuò shī 时shí shí ，，，他们tā men tā men 侧重于cè zhòng yú cè zhòng yú 支持zhī chí zhī chí 和hé hé 治疗zhì liáo zhì liáo ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi 惩罚性chéng fá xìng chéng fá xìng 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 制度zhì dù zhì dù 。。。

Welfare drug testing appears to be a distinctly Coalition policy initiative that did not have Labor equivalents.

这使zhè shǐ zhè shǐ 福利fú lì fú lì 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 有别于yǒu bié yú yǒu bié yú 其他qí tā qí tā 两党liǎng dǎng liǎng dǎng 都dōu dōu 采取cǎi qǔ cǎi qǔ 类似lèi sì lèi sì 措施cuò shī cuò shī 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè （（（例如lì rú lì rú 各种gè zhǒng gè zhǒng 福利fú lì fú lì 合规hé guī hé guī 活动huó dòng huó dòng ）））。。。

福利fú lì fú lì 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì CoalitionCoalition Coalition 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 倡议chàng yì chàng yì ，，， LaborLabor Labor 并bìng bìng 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 对duì duì 等děng děng 的de de 方案fāng àn fāng àn 。。。

🌐

平衡视角

** * ** * 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 既定jì dìng jì dìng 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ：：： ** * ** * CoalitionCoalition Coalition 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 辩称biàn chēng biàn chēng ，，，对duì duì 福利fú lì fú lì 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 者zhě zhě 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 是shì shì 必要bì yào bì yào 的de de ，，，以yǐ yǐ 确保què bǎo què bǎo 公共gōng gòng gōng gòng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 不会bú huì bú huì 支持zhī chí zhī chí 药物yào wù yào wù 成瘾chéng yǐn chéng yǐn ，，，促进cù jìn cù jìn 就业jiù yè jiù yè 参与cān yù cān yù ，，，并bìng bìng 解决jiě jué jiě jué 目标mù biāo mù biāo 社区shè qū shè qū 的de de 药物滥用yào wù làn yòng yào wù làn yòng 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。。

**The government's stated rationale:** The Coalition government argued that drug testing welfare recipients was necessary to ensure public funds were not supporting drug addiction, promote employment participation, and address substance abuse issues in targeted communities [2].

政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 坚称jiān chēng jiān chēng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 旨在zhǐ zài zhǐ zài 收集shōu jí shōu jí 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 的de de "" " 试点shì diǎn shì diǎn "" " ，，，而ér ér 非永久性fēi yǒng jiǔ xìng fēi yǒng jiǔ xìng 的de de 惩罚性chéng fá xìng chéng fá xìng 措施cuò shī cuò shī 。。。

The government maintained this was a "trial" aimed at evidence gathering rather than a permanent punitive measure. **Why the policy failed:** Beyond expert opposition, the policy faced practical obstacles: - Constitutional concerns about warrantless searches and discrimination [12] - Cost-effectiveness issues: International evidence from US states showed drug testing programs cost significantly more than they saved, with positive test rates below 1% [13] - No evidence of effectiveness: The 2013 ANCD report stated definitively "there is no evidence that drug testing welfare beneficiaries will have any positive effects for those individuals or for society" [5] - Implementation challenges: The "random profiling" contradiction meant the policy lacked internal logical coherence [4] **Why the claim is substantively fair:** The government did propose this policy multiple times despite clear expert warnings.

** * ** * 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 失败shī bài shī bài 的de de 原因yuán yīn yuán yīn ：：： ** * ** * 除了chú le chú le 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 外wài wài ，，，该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 还hái hái 面临miàn lín miàn lín 实际shí jì shí jì 障碍zhàng ài zhàng ài ：：：

Medical organizations, legal scholars, and government advisors all raised serious concerns that appear to have been ignored or minimized in the policy development process.

-- - 关于guān yú guān yú 无证wú zhèng wú zhèng 搜查sōu chá sōu chá 和hé hé 歧视qí shì qí shì 的de de 宪法xiàn fǎ xiàn fǎ 担忧dān yōu dān yōu [[ [ 1212 12 ]] ]

The contradiction between claiming "random" selection while using data-driven profiling tools is a legitimate criticism of unclear or contradictory policy design. **Key context:** This does not appear to be a case where the government consulted widely but disagreed with experts.

-- - 成本chéng běn chéng běn 效益xiào yì xiào yì 问题wèn tí wèn tí ：：：美国měi guó měi guó 各州gè zhōu gè zhōu 的de de 国际guó jì guó jì 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 显示xiǎn shì xiǎn shì ，，，药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 计划jì huà jì huà 的de de 成本chéng běn chéng běn 远高于yuǎn gāo yú yuǎn gāo yú 其qí qí 节省jié shěng jié shěng 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn ，，，阳性yáng xìng yáng xìng 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 率lǜ lǜ 低于dī yú dī yú 1%1% 1% [[ [ 1313 13 ]] ]

Rather, it appears the government either: (a) did not consult properly before proposing the policy, (b) received consultation but disregarded it, or (c) failed to conduct proper legal review before proposing the scheme.

-- - 缺乏quē fá quē fá 有效性yǒu xiào xìng yǒu xiào xìng 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù ：：： 20132013 2013 年nián nián ANCDANCD ANCD 报告bào gào bào gào 明确míng què míng què 声明shēng míng shēng míng "" " 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 对duì duì 福利fú lì fú lì 受益人shòu yì rén shòu yì rén 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè 会huì huì 对duì duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 个人gè rén gè rén 或huò huò 社会shè huì shè huì 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 任何rèn hé rèn hé 积极jī jí jī jí 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ]

The fact that a 2013 government report warned of "serious ethical and legal problems" yet the proposal resurfaced in 2017 and 2019 suggests institutional failure in policy development, not reasonable disagreement with experts.

-- - 实施shí shī shí shī 挑战tiǎo zhàn tiǎo zhàn ：：： "" " 随机suí jī suí jī 分析fēn xī fēn xī "" " 的de de 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 缺乏quē fá quē fá 内在nèi zài nèi zài 逻辑luó jí luó jí 一致性yí zhì xìng yí zhì xìng [[ [ 44 4 ]] ]

** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 为何wèi hé wèi hé 实质shí zhì shí zhì 上shàng shàng 是shì shì 公平gōng píng gōng píng 的de de ：：： ** * ** * 尽管jǐn guǎn jǐn guǎn 有yǒu yǒu 明确míng què míng què 的de de 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 警告jǐng gào jǐng gào ，，，政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 多次duō cì duō cì 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 。。。

医疗机构yī liáo jī gòu yī liáo jī gòu 、、、法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 学者xué zhě xué zhě 和hé hé 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 顾问gù wèn gù wèn 都dōu dōu 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 关切guān qiè guān qiè ，，，这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 关切guān qiè guān qiè 在zài zài 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 过程guò chéng guò chéng 中zhōng zhōng 似乎sì hū sì hū 被忽视bèi hū shì bèi hū shì 或huò huò 最小化zuì xiǎo huà zuì xiǎo huà 。。。

在zài zài 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng "" " 随机suí jī suí jī "" " 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 的de de 同时tóng shí tóng shí 使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 数据shù jù shù jù 驱动qū dòng qū dòng 分析fēn xī fēn xī 工具gōng jù gōng jù ，，，这zhè zhè 是shì shì 对duì duì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 设计shè jì shè jì 不bù bù 清晰qīng xī qīng xī 或huò huò 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 批评pī píng pī píng 。。。

** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：：： ** * ** * 这zhè zhè 似乎sì hū sì hū 不是bú shì bú shì 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 但dàn dàn 不bù bù 同意tóng yì tóng yì 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 。。。

相反xiāng fǎn xiāng fǎn ，，，政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 似乎sì hū sì hū 要么yào me yào me ：：：（（（ aa a ）））在zài zài 提出tí chū tí chū 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 之前zhī qián zhī qián 未wèi wèi 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 适当shì dàng shì dàng 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng ，，，（（（ bb b ）））收到shōu dào shōu dào 了le le 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 意见yì jiàn yì jiàn 但dàn dàn 置之不理zhì zhī bù lǐ zhì zhī bù lǐ ，，，或huò huò （（（ cc c ）））在zài zài 提出tí chū tí chū 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 之前zhī qián zhī qián 未wèi wèi 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 适当shì dàng shì dàng 的de de 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 审查shěn chá shěn chá 。。。

20132013 2013 年nián nián 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 报告bào gào bào gào 就jiù jiù 已yǐ yǐ 警告jǐng gào jǐng gào 存在cún zài cún zài "" " 严重yán zhòng yán zhòng 的de de 伦理lún lǐ lún lǐ 和hé hé 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 问题wèn tí wèn tí "" " ，，，但dàn dàn 该gāi gāi 提议tí yì tí yì 却què què 在zài zài 20172017 2017 年nián nián 和hé hé 20192019 2019 年nián nián 重新chóng xīn chóng xīn 出现chū xiàn chū xiàn ，，，这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 制定zhì dìng zhì dìng 中zhōng zhōng 存在cún zài cún zài 制度性zhì dù xìng zhì dù xìng 失败shī bài shī bài ，，，而ér ér 非fēi fēi 与yǔ yǔ 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 的de de 合理hé lǐ hé lǐ 分歧fēn qí fēn qí 。。。

属实

7.0

/ 10

核心hé xīn hé xīn 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 是shì shì 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ：：：（（（ 11 1 ））） CoalitionCoalition Coalition 确实què shí què shí 在zài zài 未记录wèi jì lù wèi jì lù 到dào dào 与yǔ yǔ 法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 和hé hé 医疗yī liáo yī liáo 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 适当shì dàng shì dàng 磋商cuō shāng cuō shāng 的de de 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 下xià xià 提出tí chū tí chū 了le le 福利fú lì fú lì 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] ；；；（（（ 22 2 ）））该gāi gāi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 在zài zài 声称shēng chēng shēng chēng "" " 随机suí jī suí jī "" " 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 的de de 同时tóng shí tóng shí ，，，使用shǐ yòng shǐ yòng 数据shù jù shù jù 驱动qū dòng qū dòng 的de de 算法suàn fǎ suàn fǎ 分析fēn xī fēn xī 来lái lái 识别shí bié shí bié "" " 高风险gāo fēng xiǎn gāo fēng xiǎn "" " 领取lǐng qǔ lǐng qǔ 者zhě zhě ，，，存在cún zài cún zài 根本性gēn běn xìng gēn běn xìng 矛盾máo dùn máo dùn [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] ；；；（（（ 33 3 ）））医疗yī liáo yī liáo 、、、法律fǎ lǜ fǎ lǜ 和hé hé 药物yào wù yào wù 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 专家zhuān jiā zhuān jiā 反对fǎn duì fǎn duì 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 提议tí yì tí yì [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] [[ [ 1010 10 ]] ] 。。。

The core claims are accurate: (1) The Coalition did propose welfare drug testing without documented proper consultation with legal and medical experts [5][6][7]; (2) The policy contained a fundamental contradiction between claiming "random" selection while using data-driven algorithmic profiling to identify "at-risk" recipients [3][4]; (3) Medical, legal, and drug policy experts opposed the proposals [5][6][10].

然而rán ér rán ér ，，，该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 的de de 措辞cuò cí cuò cí （（（ "" " 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 药物yào wù yào wù 检测jiǎn cè jiǎn cè "" " ）））可能kě néng kě néng 会huì huì 误导wù dǎo wù dǎo 读者dú zhě dú zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 该gāi gāi 计划jì huà jì huà 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng 实施shí shī shí shī 。。。

However, the claim's phrasing ("Started drug testing") could mislead readers into thinking the program was actually implemented.

事实上shì shí shàng shì shí shàng 并未bìng wèi bìng wèi 实施shí shī shí shī —— — —— — 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 提议tí yì tí yì 被bèi bèi 否决fǒu jué fǒu jué ，，，从未cóng wèi cóng wèi 成为chéng wéi chéng wéi 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè [[ [ 88 8 ]] ] 。。。

It was not - the proposals were defeated and never became policy [8].

该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 对duì duì 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 提议tí yì tí yì 和hé hé 程序chéng xù chéng xù 失败shī bài shī bài 的de de 描述miáo shù miáo shù 是shì shì 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 的de de ，，，但dàn dàn 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 对duì duì 已yǐ yǐ 实施shí shī shí shī 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 的de de 描述miáo shù miáo shù 则zé zé 不bù bù 真实zhēn shí zhēn shí 。。。

The claim is true as a description of policy proposals and process failures, but not true as a description of enacted policy.

最终评分

7.0

/ 10