属实

评分： 7.0/10

报告问题
Coalition
C0139

声明内容

“在经济衰退期间削减了澳大利亚无家可归者服务机构4100万澳元的资金。”
福利
原始来源： Matthew Davis

原始来源

✅ 事实核查

核心hé xīn hé xīn 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 是shì shì ** * ** * 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ** * ** * 。。 。
The core claim is **accurate**.
 20202020 2020 年nián nián 联邦lián bāng lián bāng 预算yù suàn yù suàn 于yú yú 20202020 2020 年nián nián 1010 10 月yuè yuè 66 6 日rì rì 公布gōng bù gōng bù ，， ， 确实què shí què shí 从cóng cóng 20212021 2021 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 起qǐ qǐ 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 41004100 4100 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 资金zī jīn zī jīn [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The 2020 Federal Budget, delivered on October 6, 2020, did cut homelessness funding by $41.3 million effective from July 2021 [1][2].
 这zhè zhè 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 真正zhēn zhèng zhēn zhèng 的de de 衰退shuāi tuì shuāi tuì 期间qī jiān qī jiān ：： ： 由于yóu yú yóu yú 新冠xīn guān xīn guān 疫情yì qíng yì qíng ，， ， 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 在zài zài 20202020 2020 年nián nián 第一季度dì yī jì dù dì yī jì dù 和hé hé 第二季度dì èr jì dù dì èr jì dù 经历jīng lì jīng lì 了le le GDPGDP GDP 负增长fù zēng zhǎng fù zēng zhǎng ，， ， 失业率shī yè lǜ shī yè lǜ 预计yù jì yù jì 到dào dào 20202020 2020 年nián nián 1212 12 月yuè yuè 将jiāng jiāng 达到dá dào dá dào 8%8% 8% [[ [ 33 3 ]] ] 。。 。
This occurred during a genuine recession: Australia experienced negative GDP growth in Q1 and Q2 2020 due to COVID-19, with unemployment projected to reach 8% by December 2020 [3].
 根据gēn jù gēn jù 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 的de de 官方guān fāng guān fāng 声明shēng míng shēng míng ，， ， 预算yù suàn yù suàn 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò "" " 从cóng cóng 20212021 2021 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 起qǐ qǐ 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 服务fú wù fú wù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 41004100 4100 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
According to Homelessness Australia's official statement, the budget included "a $41.3 million cut to homelessness services from July 2021" [2].
 《《 《 新xīn xīn 日报rì bào rì bào 》》 》 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 该gāi gāi 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 主席zhǔ xí zhǔ xí 珍妮zhēn nī zhēn nī ·· · 史密斯shǐ mì sī shǐ mì sī 的话de huà de huà 称chēng chēng ：： ： "" " 今晚jīn wǎn jīn wǎn 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 是shì shì 毁灭性huǐ miè xìng huǐ miè xìng 的de de 。。 。
The New Daily article cites the organization's chair Jenny Smith stating: "Tonight's budget is devastating.
 在zài zài 失业率shī yè lǜ shī yè lǜ 大幅dà fú dà fú 上升shàng shēng shàng shēng 、、 、 租房zū fáng zū fáng 压力yā lì yā lì 和hé hé 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 激增jī zēng jī zēng 的de de 这zhè zhè 一年yī nián yī nián ，， ， 联邦政府lián bāng zhèng fǔ lián bāng zhèng fǔ 选择xuǎn zé xuǎn zé 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 资金zī jīn zī jīn "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
In a year with huge increases in unemployment creating a surge in rental stress and homelessness, the federal government has chosen to slash homelessness funding" [1].
 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 证实zhèng shí zhèng shí 了le le 需求xū qiú xū qiú 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā ：： ： 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 报告bào gào bào gào 称chēng chēng ，， ， 由于yóu yú yóu yú 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 和hé hé 支助zhī zhù zhī zhù 不足bù zú bù zú ，， ， 服务fú wù fú wù 部门bù mén bù mén 在zài zài 前qián qián 一年yī nián yī nián "" " 每天měi tiān měi tiān 拒绝jù jué jù jué 253253 253 人rén rén "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The broader context confirms increased need: Homelessness Australia reported that services had "turned away 253 people every day" in the previous year due to insufficient housing and support [2].
 此外cǐ wài cǐ wài ，， ， 预算yù suàn yù suàn 只zhǐ zhǐ 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò "" " 向xiàng xiàng 昆士兰州kūn shì lán zhōu kūn shì lán zhōu 提供tí gōng tí gōng 一次性yí cì xìng yí cì xìng 拨款bō kuǎn bō kuǎn 用于yòng yú yòng yú 偏远地区piān yuǎn dì qū piān yuǎn dì qū 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng "" " ，， ， 而ér ér 偏远地区piān yuǎn dì qū piān yuǎn dì qū 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 资金zī jīn zī jīn 从cóng cóng 20172017 2017 -- - 1818 18 年度nián dù nián dù 的de de 5.2665.266 5.266 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 下降xià jiàng xià jiàng 到dào dào 每年měi nián měi nián 2.3722.372 2.372 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Additionally, the budget included only "a one-off payment to Queensland for remote Indigenous housing" while funding for remote Indigenous housing declined from $526.6 million in 2017-18 to $237.2 million annually [2].

缺失背景

然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 遗漏yí lòu yí lòu 了le le 几个jǐ gè jǐ gè 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 因素yīn sù yīn sù ：： ：
However, the claim omits several important contextual factors: **1.
 ** * ** * 11 1 .. . 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 预算yù suàn yù suàn 支出zhī chū zhī chū 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：： ： ** * ** * 虽然suī rán suī rán 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 某mǒu mǒu 一yī yī 领域lǐng yù lǐng yù 的de de 41004100 4100 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ，， ， 但dàn dàn 20202020 2020 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 明确míng què míng què 是shì shì 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 支出zhī chū zhī chū 预算yù suàn yù suàn 。。 。
The broader budget spending context:** While this was a $41.3 million cut in one area, the 2020 budget was explicitly a major spending budget.
 赤字chì zì chì zì 达到dá dào dá dào 21372137 2137 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán ，， ， 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 的de de 总支出zǒng zhī chū zǒng zhī chū 侧重于cè zhòng yú cè zhòng yú 新冠xīn guān xīn guān 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 经济jīng jì jīng jì 刺激cì jī cì jī ，， ， 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò JobKeeperJobKeeper JobKeeper 工资gōng zī gōng zī 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 和hé hé 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The deficit reached $213.7 billion, with total announced spending focused on COVID-19 economic stimulus including JobKeeper wage subsidies and tax cuts [1].
 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 是shì shì immediateimmediate immediate 经济jīng jì jīng jì 刺激cì jī cì jī 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 长期cháng qī cháng qī 社会shè huì shè huì 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 投资tóu zī tóu zī 。。 。
The government's stated priority was immediate economic stimulus rather than long-term social housing investment. **2.
 ** * ** * 22 2 .. . 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 性质xìng zhì xìng zhì ：： ： ** * ** * 资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 专门zhuān mén zhuān mén 针对zhēn duì zhēn duì 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě ** * 服务fú wù fú wù ** * （（ （ 支持zhī chí zhī chí 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù ）） ） ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 总支出zǒng zhī chū zǒng zhī chū 。。 。
The specific nature of the cut:** The funding cut was specifically for homelessness *services* (support programs), not total homelessness spending.
 预算yù suàn yù suàn 确实què shí què shí 包括bāo kuò bāo kuò "" " 1010 10 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 低成本dī chéng běn dī chéng běn 融资róng zī róng zī 用于yòng yú yòng yú 支持zhī chí zhī chí 经济jīng jì jīng jì 适用房shì yòng fáng shì yòng fáng 建设jiàn shè jiàn shè "" " [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] ，， ， 这zhè zhè 得到dé dào dé dào 的de de 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 关注guān zhù guān zhù 少于shǎo yú shǎo yú 服务fú wù fú wù 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 。。 。
The budget did include "$1 billion in low-cost finance to support the construction of affordable housing" [1], which received less media attention than the service cuts. **3.
 ** * ** * 33 3 .. . 历史lì shǐ lì shǐ 资金zī jīn zī jīn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：： ： ** * ** * 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 聚焦jù jiāo jù jiāo 于yú yú 20202020 2020 年nián nián 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn ，， ， 但dàn dàn 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 还hái hái 记录jì lù jì lù 了le le "" " 从cóng cóng 20172017 2017 -- - 1818 18 年nián nián 到dào dào 20202020 2020 -- - 2121 21 年nián nián 三年sān nián sān nián 期间qī jiān qī jiān 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 和hé hé 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 资金zī jīn zī jīn 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 10%10% 10% ，， ， 其中qí zhōng qí zhōng 大部分dà bù fèn dà bù fèn 是从shì cóng shì cóng 偏远地区piān yuǎn dì qū piān yuǎn dì qū 原住民yuán zhù mín yuán zhù mín 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 的de de "" " [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
Historical funding context:** The claim focuses on the 2020 cut, but Homelessness Australia also documented "a 10 per cent cut to housing and homelessness funding over the three years from 2017-18 to 2020-21, most of which has been cut from remote Indigenous housing" [2].
 这zhè zhè 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 20202020 2020 年nián nián 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 是shì shì 长期趋势cháng qī qū shì cháng qī qū shì 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 突然tū rán tū rán 决定jué dìng jué dìng 。。 。
This suggests the 2020 cut was part of a longer trend rather than a sudden decision. **4.
 ** * ** * 44 4 .. . 资金zī jīn zī jīn 悬崖xuán yá xuán yá 问题wèn tí wèn tí ：： ： ** * ** * 41004100 4100 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 是shì shì 由于yóu yú yóu yú 现有xiàn yǒu xiàn yǒu 资金zī jīn zī jīn 安排ān pái ān pái 到期dào qī dào qī 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 新xīn xīn 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 决定jué dìng jué dìng 。。 。
The funding cliff issue:** The $41.3 million cut resulted from the expiration of existing funding arrangements rather than a new policy decision.
 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 区别qū bié qū bié 很hěn hěn 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào ：： ： 这是zhè shì zhè shì 未能wèi néng wèi néng 续期xù qī xù qī 资金zī jīn zī jīn ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 主动zhǔ dòng zhǔ dòng 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 。。 。
This distinction matters: it was a failure to renew funding rather than an active slashing of a program.

来源可信度评估

** * ** * 《《 《 新xīn xīn 日报rì bào rì bào 》》 》 ：： ： ** * ** * 根据gēn jù gēn jù MediaMedia Media BiasBias Bias // / FactFact Fact CheckCheck Check 的de de 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ ，， ， 《《 《 新xīn xīn 日报rì bào rì bào 》》 》 "" " 保持bǎo chí bǎo chí 一般性yì bān xìng yì bān xìng 关注guān zhù guān zhù ，， ， 涵盖hán gài hán gài 政治zhèng zhì zhèng zhì 、、 、 金融jīn róng jīn róng 、、 、 体育tǐ yù tǐ yù 等děng děng "" " [[ [ 44 4 ]] ] 。。 。
**The New Daily:** According to Media Bias/Fact Check, The New Daily "maintains a general interest focus, covering politics, finance, sports, and more" [4].
 该gāi gāi 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 被bèi bèi 评为píng wèi píng wèi "" " 基于jī yú jī yú 与yǔ yǔ 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì 适度shì dù shì dù 一致yí zhì yí zhì 的de de 编辑biān jí biān jí 观点guān diǎn guān diǎn 而ér ér 偏向piān xiàng piān xiàng 左翼zuǒ yì zuǒ yì "" " ，， ， 以及yǐ jí yǐ jí "" " MostlyMostly Mostly FactualFactual Factual 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 高度gāo dù gāo dù 可信kě xìn kě xìn ，， ， 因为yīn wèi yīn wèi 缺乏quē fá quē fá 超链接chāo liàn jiē chāo liàn jiē 引用yǐn yòng yǐn yòng 来源lái yuán lái yuán "" " [[ [ 55 5 ]] ] 。。 。
The organization is rated as "Left-Center biased based on an editorial perspective that moderately aligns with the left" and "Mostly Factual rather than high due to a lack of hyperlinked sourcing" [5].
 这zhè zhè 意味着yì wèi zhe yì wèi zhe 该gāi gāi 文章wén zhāng wén zhāng 虽然suī rán suī rán 如实rú shí rú shí 报道bào dào bào dào 了le le 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng ，， ， 但dàn dàn 可能kě néng kě néng 比bǐ bǐ 中立zhōng lì zhōng lì 媒体méi tǐ méi tǐ 更gèng gèng 突出tū chū tū chū 负面fù miàn fù miàn 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 。。 。
This means the article, while factually reporting the cut, likely emphasizes the negative aspects more prominently than a centrist outlet might. **Homelessness Australia:** This is a peak body/advocacy organization representing homelessness services.
 ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī ：： ： ** * ** * 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 服务fú wù fú wù 的de de 最高zuì gāo zuì gāo 机构jī gòu jī gòu // / 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 。。 。
Their media release is a primary source for the $41.3 million figure and criticism, but should be understood as coming from an organization with a vested interest in securing funding.
 他们tā men tā men 的de de 新闻稿xīn wén gǎo xīn wén gǎo 是shì shì 41004100 4100 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 数字shù zì shù zì 和hé hé 批评pī píng pī píng 的de de 主要zhǔ yào zhǔ yào 来源lái yuán lái yuán ，， ， 但应dàn yīng dàn yīng 理解lǐ jiě lǐ jiě 其qí qí 来自lái zì lái zì 一个yí gè yí gè 对duì duì 确保què bǎo què bǎo 资金zī jīn zī jīn 有yǒu yǒu 既得利益jì dé lì yì jì dé lì yì 的de de 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 。。 。
Their statements are factually accurate regarding the budget details, but their interpretation (calling it "devastating," "cruel," and "senseless") reflects their advocacy position. **Overall assessment:** Both sources accurately report the cut amount and timing, but frame it negatively without extensive detail on the government's stated reasoning or the broader spending context.
 他们tā men tā men 的de de 声明shēng míng shēng míng 在zài zài 预算yù suàn yù suàn 细节xì jié xì jié 方面fāng miàn fāng miàn 是shì shì 事实shì shí shì shí 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 的de de ，， ， 但dàn dàn 他们tā men tā men 的de de 解读jiě dú jiě dú （（ （ 称其为chēng qí wèi chēng qí wèi "" " 毁灭性huǐ miè xìng huǐ miè xìng 的de de "" " 、、 、 "" " 残忍cán rěn cán rěn 的de de "" " 和hé hé "" " 毫无意义háo wú yì yì háo wú yì yì 的de de "" " ）） ） 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 他们tā men tā men 的de de 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 。。 。
** * ** * 总体zǒng tǐ zǒng tǐ 评估píng gū píng gū ：： ： ** * ** * 两个liǎng gè liǎng gè 来源lái yuán lái yuán 都dōu dōu 准确zhǔn què zhǔn què 报道bào dào bào dào 了le le 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 金额jīn é jīn é 和hé hé 时间shí jiān shí jiān ，， ， 但dàn dàn 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 详细xiáng xì xiáng xì 说明shuō míng shuō míng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 声明shēng míng shēng míng 的de de 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu 或huò huò 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 支出zhī chū zhī chū 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng 而ér ér 对duì duì 其qí qí 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng 了le le 负面fù miàn fù miàn 框定kuāng dìng kuāng dìng 。。 。
⚖️

工党对比

** * ** * 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 是否shì fǒu shì fǒu 做过zuò guò zuò guò 类似lèi sì lèi sì 的de de 事情shì qíng shì qíng ？？ ？
**Did Labor do something similar?** The search conducted for "Kevin Rudd Julia Gillard homelessness funding cuts housing Australia" did not return specific comparative data on Labor-era homelessness funding decisions.
 ** * ** *
However, broader historical context is relevant: Australia's homelessness support system has faced chronic underfunding across multiple government administrations.
 对duì duì "" " KevinKevin Kevin RuddRudd Rudd JuliaJulia Julia GillardGillard Gillard homelessnesshomelessness homelessness fundingfunding funding cutscuts cuts housinghousing housing AustraliaAustralia Australia "" " 的de de 搜索sōu suǒ sōu suǒ 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 返回fǎn huí fǎn huí 关于guān yú guān yú 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 时期shí qī shí qī 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 资金zī jīn zī jīn 决策jué cè jué cè 的de de 具体jù tǐ jù tǐ 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 数据shù jù shù jù 。。 。
The Rudd-Gillard Labor government (2007-2010, 2010-2013) implemented the National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness (NPAH) starting in 2008, which represented a significant new initiative.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 更gèng gèng 广泛guǎng fàn guǎng fàn 的de de 历史背景lì shǐ bèi jǐng lì shǐ bèi jǐng 是shì shì 相关xiāng guān xiāng guān 的de de ：： ：
However, the failure to provide comparable sustained funding increases across administrations suggests this is a systemic cross-party issue rather than a Coalition-specific problem [6].
 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 的de de 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 支持系统zhī chí xì tǒng zhī chí xì tǒng 面临miàn lín miàn lín 多个duō gè duō gè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 执政zhí zhèng zhí zhèng 期间qī jiān qī jiān 的de de 长期cháng qī cháng qī 资金不足zī jīn bù zú zī jīn bù zú 。。 。
Notably, the current Labor government (Albanese, from 2022 onwards) has committed to major homelessness funding increases.
 陆克文lù kè wén lù kè wén -- - 吉拉德jí lā dé jí lā dé 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ （（ （ 20072007 2007 -- - 20102010 2010 年nián nián 、、 、 20102010 2010 -- - 20132013 2013 年nián nián ）） ） 从cóng cóng 20082008 2008 年nián nián 开始kāi shǐ kāi shǐ 实施shí shī shí shī 了le le 《《 《 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 国家guó jiā guó jiā 伙伴关系huǒ bàn guān xì huǒ bàn guān xì 协议xié yì xié yì 》》 》 （（ （ NPAHNPAH NPAH ）） ） ，， ， 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一项yī xiàng yī xiàng 重要zhòng yào zhòng yào 的de de 新举措xīn jǔ cuò xīn jǔ cuò 。。 。
The National Agreement on Social Housing and Homelessness provides $9.3 billion over five years from July 2024 [7], representing a substantial reversal of cuts from the Coalition era.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 未能wèi néng wèi néng 提供tí gōng tí gōng comparablecomparable comparable 持续chí xù chí xù 的de de 资金zī jīn zī jīn 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 这是zhè shì zhè shì 一个yí gè yí gè 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 特有tè yǒu tè yǒu 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí [[ [ 66 6 ]] ] 。。 。
However, this came after the cuts being analyzed here—it doesn't establish that Labor would have handled the 2020 recession differently. **Key finding:** There is insufficient evidence to directly compare Labor's approach to equivalent 2020-style recession spending decisions.
 值得注意zhí de zhù yì zhí de zhù yì 的de de 是shì shì ，， ， 现任xiàn rèn xiàn rèn 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ （（ （ 阿尔巴尼ā ěr bā ní ā ěr bā ní 斯sī sī ，， ， 从cóng cóng 20222022 2022 年nián nián 起qǐ qǐ ）） ） 已yǐ yǐ 承诺chéng nuò chéng nuò 大幅dà fú dà fú 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 资金zī jīn zī jīn 。。 。
However, Australia's chronic homelessness underfunding appears to be a systemic issue across parties rather than unique to the Coalition.
 《《 《 社会shè huì shè huì 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 和hé hé 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 国家guó jiā guó jiā 协议xié yì xié yì 》》 》 从cóng cóng 20242024 2024 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 起qǐ qǐ 五年wǔ nián wǔ nián 内nèi nèi 提供tí gōng tí gōng 9393 93 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán [[ [ 77 7 ]] ] ，， ， 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 与yǔ yǔ 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 时期shí qī shí qī 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 相比xiāng bǐ xiāng bǐ 的de de 重大zhòng dà zhòng dà 逆转nì zhuǎn nì zhuǎn 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 这zhè zhè 是shì shì 在zài zài 分析fēn xī fēn xī 的de de 这些zhè xiē zhè xiē 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 之后zhī hòu zhī hòu —— — —— — 这zhè zhè 并bìng bìng 不能bù néng bù néng 证明zhèng míng zhèng míng 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 会以huì yǐ huì yǐ 不同bù tóng bù tóng 方式fāng shì fāng shì 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 20202020 2020 年nián nián 的de de 衰退shuāi tuì shuāi tuì 。。 。
** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 发现fā xiàn fā xiàn ：： ： ** * ** * 没有méi yǒu méi yǒu 足够zú gòu zú gòu 的de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 直接zhí jiē zhí jiē 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 工党gōng dǎng gōng dǎng 对duì duì 类似lèi sì lèi sì 20202020 2020 年nián nián 衰退shuāi tuì shuāi tuì 支出zhī chū zhī chū 决策jué cè jué cè 的de de 处理chǔ lǐ chǔ lǐ 方式fāng shì fāng shì 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 长期cháng qī cháng qī 资金不足zī jīn bù zú zī jīn bù zú 似乎sì hū sì hū 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
🌐

平衡视角

虽然suī rán suī rán 批评者pī píng zhě pī píng zhě 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 在zài zài 经济衰退jīng jì shuāi tuì jīng jì shuāi tuì 期间qī jiān qī jiān 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 41004100 4100 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 是shì shì 残忍cán rěn cán rěn 和hé hé 毫无意义háo wú yì yì háo wú yì yì 的de de [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] ，， ， 但dàn dàn 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 的de de 立场lì chǎng lì chǎng 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 不同bù tóng bù tóng 的de de 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 。。 。
While critics argue the $41.3 million cut was cruel and senseless during a recession [1][2], the Coalition government's position reflected different policy priorities.
 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 明确míng què míng què 表示biǎo shì biǎo shì 重点zhòng diǎn zhòng diǎn 是shì shì 通过tōng guò tōng guò JobKeeperJobKeeper JobKeeper 工资gōng zī gōng zī 补贴bǔ tiē bǔ tiē 和hé hé 减税jiǎn shuì jiǎn shuì 进行jìn xíng jìn xíng immediateimmediate immediate 经济jīng jì jīng jì 刺激cì jī cì jī ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 长期cháng qī cháng qī 社会shè huì shè huì 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 投资tóu zī tóu zī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
The government was explicitly focused on immediate economic stimulus through JobKeeper wage subsidies and tax cuts rather than long-term social housing investment [1].
 据jù jù 报道bào dào bào dào ，， ， 财政部cái zhèng bù cái zhèng bù 和hé hé 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 官员guān yuán guān yuán 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi immediateimmediate immediate 需求xū qiú xū qiú 侧cè cè 刺激cì jī cì jī 对于duì yú duì yú 防止fáng zhǐ fáng zhǐ 经济jīng jì jīng jì 崩溃bēng kuì bēng kuì 比bǐ bǐ 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 福利fú lì fú lì 更为gèng wéi gèng wéi 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 。。 。
Treasury and policy officials reportedly believed immediate demand-side stimulus was more critical to preventing economic collapse than welfare expansion. **Key context:** This is not unique to the Coalition—homelessness has been chronically underfunded across Australian governments.
 ** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ：： ： ** * ** * 这zhè zhè 并非bìng fēi bìng fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu —— — —— — 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 各届gè jiè gè jiè 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 中zhōng zhōng 都dōu dōu 长期cháng qī cháng qī 资金不足zī jīn bù zú zī jīn bù zú 。。 。
The Homelessness Australia submission to the 2020 budget specifically called for $30,000 new social housing projects as economic stimulus, indicating the sector believed this was the optimal crisis response [1].
 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 组织zǔ zhī zǔ zhī 向xiàng xiàng 20202020 2020 年nián nián 预算yù suàn yù suàn 提交tí jiāo tí jiāo 的de de 文件wén jiàn wén jiàn 特别tè bié tè bié 呼吁hū yù hū yù 建设jiàn shè jiàn shè 33 3 万个wàn gè wàn gè 新xīn xīn 的de de 社会shè huì shè huì 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 项目xiàng mù xiàng mù 作为zuò wéi zuò wéi 经济jīng jì jīng jì 刺激cì jī cì jī ，， ， 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 该gāi gāi 部门bù mén bù mén 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 这是zhè shì zhè shì 最佳zuì jiā zuì jiā 的de de 危机wēi jī wēi jī 应对yìng duì yìng duì 措施cuò shī cuò shī [[ [ 11 1 ]] ] 。。 。
Economists also advocated for this approach.
 经济学家jīng jì xué jiā jīng jì xué jiā 也yě yě 倡导chàng dǎo chàng dǎo 这种zhè zhǒng zhè zhǒng 方法fāng fǎ fāng fǎ 。。 。
However, this represents a difference in policy philosophy rather than evidence of malice or neglect.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 这zhè zhè 代表dài biǎo dài biǎo 了le le 政策zhèng cè zhèng cè 理念lǐ niàn lǐ niàn 的de de 差异chā yì chā yì ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 恶意è yì è yì 或huò huò 忽视hū shì hū shì 的de de 证据zhèng jù zhèng jù 。。 。
The timing is genuinely problematic: cutting support services *during* a recession with surging unemployment did increase homelessness risk.
 时机shí jī shí jī 确实què shí què shí 存在cún zài cún zài 问题wèn tí wèn tí ：： ： 在zài zài 失业shī yè shī yè 激增jī zēng jī zēng 的de de 衰退shuāi tuì shuāi tuì 期间qī jiān qī jiān 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 支持zhī chí zhī chí 服务fú wù fú wù 确实què shí què shí 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 了le le 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 的de de 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 。。 。
Services were already "inundated" and turning away 253 people daily [2].
 服务fú wù fú wù 部门bù mén bù mén 已经yǐ jīng yǐ jīng "" " 不堪重负bù kān zhòng fù bù kān zhòng fù "" " ，， ， 每天měi tiān měi tiān 拒绝jù jué jù jué 253253 253 人rén rén [[ [ 22 2 ]] ] 。。 。
The $41.3 million cut, while not massive in budgetary terms, had real impacts on vulnerable populations facing heightened housing insecurity. **Critical distinction:** Australia did eventually declare a recession (Q1 and Q2 2020 negative growth), but at the time of the October 6 budget, the economic outlook was still uncertain.
 虽然suī rán suī rán 41004100 4100 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 在zài zài 预算yù suàn yù suàn 条款tiáo kuǎn tiáo kuǎn 中zhōng zhōng 不算bù suàn bù suàn 巨大jù dà jù dà ，， ， 但dàn dàn 对duì duì 面临miàn lín miàn lín 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 不安全感bù ān quán gǎn bù ān quán gǎn 加剧jiā jù jiā jù 的de de 弱势群体ruò shì qún tǐ ruò shì qún tǐ 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 了le le 实际shí jì shí jì 影响yǐng xiǎng yǐng xiǎng 。。 。
The government was acting on forecasts of 8% unemployment rather than demonstrated current conditions.
 ** * ** * 关键guān jiàn guān jiàn 区别qū bié qū bié ：： ： ** * ** * 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 最终zuì zhōng zuì zhōng 宣布xuān bù xuān bù 衰退shuāi tuì shuāi tuì （（ （ 20202020 2020 年nián nián 第一季度dì yī jì dù dì yī jì dù 和hé hé 第二季度dì èr jì dù dì èr jì dù 负增长fù zēng zhǎng fù zēng zhǎng ）） ） ，， ， 但dàn dàn 在zài zài 1010 10 月yuè yuè 66 6 日rì rì 预算yù suàn yù suàn 公布gōng bù gōng bù 时shí shí ，， ， 经济jīng jì jīng jì 前景qián jǐng qián jǐng 仍réng réng 不bù bù 确定què dìng què dìng 。。 。
This doesn't excuse the cut, but explains the reasoning: they believed stimulating employment was the priority.
 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 是shì shì 根据gēn jù gēn jù 失业率shī yè lǜ shī yè lǜ 达到dá dào dá dào 8%8% 8% 的de de 预测yù cè yù cè 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 当前dāng qián dāng qián 实际shí jì shí jì 情况qíng kuàng qíng kuàng 采取行动cǎi qǔ xíng dòng cǎi qǔ xíng dòng 的de de 。。 。
The decision to invest $1 billion in affordable housing finance while cutting services funding suggests a "build your way out" philosophy—creating permanent housing rather than expanding temporary support.
 这zhè zhè 并bìng bìng 不能bù néng bù néng 为wèi wèi 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 开脱kāi tuō kāi tuō ，， ， 但dàn dàn 解释jiě shì jiě shì 了le le 理由lǐ yóu lǐ yóu ：： ： 他们tā men tā men 认为rèn wéi rèn wéi 刺激cì jī cì jī 就业jiù yè jiù yè 是shì shì 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 。。 。
However, this required more time to deliver results, leaving a gap for vulnerable people in the interim. **Comparative note:** The decision to cut service funding while maintaining/increasing capital investment has been repeated across multiple Australian governments, suggesting it reflects a systemic preference for infrastructure spending over recurrent services funding in times of constraint.
 决定jué dìng jué dìng 在zài zài 投资tóu zī tóu zī 1010 10 亿澳元yì ào yuán yì ào yuán 用于yòng yú yòng yú 经济jīng jì jīng jì 适用房shì yòng fáng shì yòng fáng 融资róng zī róng zī 的de de 同时tóng shí tóng shí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 服务fú wù fú wù 资金zī jīn zī jīn ，， ， 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 了le le 一种yī zhǒng yī zhǒng "" " 建设jiàn shè jiàn shè 出路chū lù chū lù "" " 的de de 理念lǐ niàn lǐ niàn —— — —— — 创建chuàng jiàn chuàng jiàn 永久yǒng jiǔ yǒng jiǔ 住房zhù fáng zhù fáng 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 扩大kuò dà kuò dà 临时lín shí lín shí 支持zhī chí zhī chí 。。 。
然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 这zhè zhè 需要xū yào xū yào 更gèng gèng 长时间zhǎng shí jiān zhǎng shí jiān 才能cái néng cái néng 产生chǎn shēng chǎn shēng 结果jié guǒ jié guǒ ，， ， 在zài zài 过渡期guò dù qī guò dù qī 给gěi gěi 弱势群体ruò shì qún tǐ ruò shì qún tǐ 留下liú xià liú xià 了le le 缺口quē kǒu quē kǒu 。。 。
** * ** * 比较bǐ jiào bǐ jiào 说明shuō míng shuō míng ：： ： ** * ** * 在zài zài 多个duō gè duō gè 澳大利亚政府ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ ào dà lì yà zhèng fǔ 中zhōng zhōng ，， ， 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 服务fú wù fú wù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 同时tóng shí tóng shí 维持wéi chí wéi chí // / 增加zēng jiā zēng jiā 资本zī běn zī běn 投资tóu zī tóu zī 的de de 决定jué dìng jué dìng 一再yī zài yī zài 重复chóng fù chóng fù ，， ， 表明biǎo míng biǎo míng 在zài zài 资金紧张zī jīn jǐn zhāng zī jīn jǐn zhāng 时期shí qī shí qī ，， ， 这zhè zhè 反映fǎn yìng fǎn yìng 了le le 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 偏好piān hǎo piān hǎo 基础设施jī chǔ shè shī jī chǔ shè shī 支出zhī chū zhī chū 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 经常性jīng cháng xìng jīng cháng xìng 服务fú wù fú wù 资金zī jīn zī jīn 。。 。

属实

7.0

/ 10

联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 政府zhèng fǔ zhèng fǔ 确实què shí què shí 从cóng cóng 20212021 2021 年nián nián 77 7 月yuè yuè 起qǐ qǐ 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 了le le 41004100 4100 万澳元wàn ào yuán wàn ào yuán 的de de 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 服务fú wù fú wù 资金zī jīn zī jīn ，， ， 而ér ér 这zhè zhè 一yī yī 决定jué dìng jué dìng 发生fā shēng fā shēng 在zài zài 澳大利亚ào dà lì yà ào dà lì yà 新冠xīn guān xīn guān 疫情yì qíng yì qíng 衰退shuāi tuì shuāi tuì 期间qī jiān qī jiān ，， ， 当时dāng shí dāng shí 失业率shī yè lǜ shī yè lǜ 激增jī zēng jī zēng ，， ， 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 风险fēng xiǎn fēng xiǎn 上升shàng shēng shàng shēng 。。 。
The Coalition government did cut $41.3 million in homelessness services funding from July 2021, and this decision occurred during Australia's COVID-19 recession when unemployment was surging and homelessness risk was elevated.
 然而rán ér rán ér ，， ， 该gāi gāi 说法shuō fǎ shuō fǎ 缺乏quē fá quē fá 背景bèi jǐng bèi jǐng ，， ， 即jí jí 削减xuē jiǎn xuē jiǎn 是shì shì immediateimmediate immediate 危机wēi jī wēi jī 应对yìng duì yìng duì 预算yù suàn yù suàn 优先yōu xiān yōu xiān 事项shì xiàng shì xiàng 的de de 一部分yī bù fèn yī bù fèn ，， ， 强调qiáng diào qiáng diào 刺激cì jī cì jī 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 社会shè huì shè huì 扩张kuò zhāng kuò zhāng ，， ， 而且ér qiě ér qiě 无家可归者wú jiā kě guī zhě wú jiā kě guī zhě 长期cháng qī cháng qī 资金不足zī jīn bù zú zī jīn bù zú 是shì shì 一个yí gè yí gè 跨kuà kuà 党派dǎng pài dǎng pài 的de de 系统性xì tǒng xìng xì tǒng xìng 问题wèn tí wèn tí ，， ， 而ér ér 非fēi fēi 联盟党lián méng dǎng lián méng dǎng 独有dú yǒu dú yǒu 的de de 问题wèn tí wèn tí 。。 。
However, the claim lacks context that the cut was part of immediate crisis-response budget priorities emphasizing stimulus over social expansion, and that chronic homelessness underfunding is a systemic cross-party issue rather than unique to the Coalition.

📚 来源与引用 (7)

  1. 1
    Federal budget 2020: Coalition slammed for failing to help those most affected by pandemic

    Federal budget 2020: Coalition slammed for failing to help those most affected by pandemic

    The Coalition hopes to rush billions in tax cuts through Parliament as its pandemic-era budget is criticised for not doing enough for those most affected.

    Thenewdaily Com
  2. 2
    Federal Budget reveals millions to be cut from vital homelessness services

    Federal Budget reveals millions to be cut from vital homelessness services

    Homelessnessaustralia Org
  3. 3
    The Australian Economy in 2020-21: The COVID‐19 Pandemic and Prospects

    The Australian Economy in 2020-21: The COVID‐19 Pandemic and Prospects

    This article summarises developments in the Australian economy in 2020. It describes the economic growth and labour market ramifications associated with COVID‐19, and the fiscal and monetary policies implemented to help counter its effects. COVID‐19 ...

    PubMed Central (PMC)
  4. 4
    The New Daily - Bias and Credibility

    The New Daily - Bias and Credibility

    LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording

    Media Bias/Fact Check
  5. 5
    Daily Source Bias Check: The New Daily

    Daily Source Bias Check: The New Daily

    LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.  They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording

    Media Bias/Fact Check
  6. 6
    anao.gov.au

    Implementation of the National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness

    Anao Gov

  7. 7
    pm.gov.au

    Delivering more homes for Australia

    The Albanese Labor Government’s Homes for Australia plan will deliver significant new funding across the country to build more homes with a new national housing agreement beginning on 1 July.As part of the new 5-year National Agreement on Social Housing and Homelessness which starts on 1 July 2024, states and territories will share in $9.3 billion.The funding will help to combat homelessness, provide crisis support and build and repair social housing.

    Prime Minister of Australia

评分方法

1-3: 不实

事实错误或恶意捏造。

4-6: 部分属实

有一定真实性，但缺乏背景或有所偏颇。

7-9: 基本属实

仅有微小的技术性或措辞问题。

10: 准确

完全经过验证且客观公正。

方法论: 评分通过交叉参照政府官方记录、独立事实核查机构和原始文件确定。

Previous: C0138 Next: C0140