The Claim
“Claimed that the average electricity bill will be $200 per year lower without the price on carbon, despite relevant power companies rejecting the magnitude of this figure.”
Original Sources Provided
✅ FACTUAL VERIFICATION
The claim is TRUE. The Coalition Government, led by Prime Minister Tony Abbott, did indeed claim that repealing the carbon tax would reduce average household electricity bills by approximately $200 per year. This was part of a broader claim that households would save approximately $550 annually in total from the carbon tax repeal [1][2].
According to ABC News, "Mr Abbott said that if the carbon tax repeal legislation was passed, the government estimated the average household power bill would be $200 a year lower and the average gas bill would be $70 a year lower" [2]. This $200 figure was specifically attributed to electricity savings, while the total $550 claim encompassed all household cost reductions [1].
Treasury documents released under Freedom of Information (FOI) confirmed the government's modeling estimated household costs would be "around $10.50 per week in 2014-15 (or around $550 over the year) lower, on average, than they would otherwise be" [5].
Missing Context
The claim omits several important contextual factors:
The $550 was a total household figure, not just electricity: The $200 electricity component was part of a broader $550 total savings claim that included reductions in gas bills ($70), and other cost-of-living impacts [1][2].
Actual savings were difficult to verify: As The Conversation noted, "Trying to measure the savings from the carbon tax is a mug's game" because isolating the carbon tax impact from other factors (network charges, generation costs, retailer margins) is extremely complex [6].
ABC Fact Check found the $550 claim problematic: An ABC Fact Check analysis concluded that "The documents released by Treasury under freedom of information do not show that electricity prices have come down $550 per household as a result of the Coalition abolishing the carbon tax" [3]. The Treasury FOI documents showed modeling estimates, not actual observed outcomes.
Network costs were a major driver of price increases: During the same period, electricity prices were significantly affected by network infrastructure costs (poles and wires), which were often larger drivers than the carbon price. The carbon tax repeal did not address these structural cost drivers [3].
Source Credibility Assessment
The Australian Independent Media Network (theaimn.com) is a citizen journalism platform that aggregates content from independent bloggers and contributors [7].
Media Bias Assessment: Similar independent Australian media networks (such as Independent Australia) have been rated by Media Bias/Fact Check as having "Left-Center bias" with "HIGH for factual reporting" [8]. The AIMN platform describes itself as providing "a platform for citizen journalists and bloggers to write and engage in an independent Australian media environment" [7].
Credibility: While the specific AIMN article referenced is not independently rated, the platform operates in the same ecosystem as other progressive/independent Australian media outlets. Users should be aware this source likely presents a critical perspective on Coalition policies.
Original Source Limitation: The claim provides only one source (theaimn.com), which is a commentary/opinion platform rather than a primary source. The factual basis of the claim is better verified through ABC News reports and Treasury documents [1][2][5].
Labor Comparison
Did Labor do something similar regarding electricity prices?
Search conducted: "Labor government electricity price policy carbon tax claims"
Finding: The Labor Government under Julia Gillard introduced the Carbon Pricing Mechanism (Clean Energy Act 2011), which came into effect on July 1, 2012 [4][9]. This was the policy that the Coalition later repealed.
Labor's approach to electricity costs:
- The Gillard Government acknowledged that the carbon price would impact electricity prices but argued it was necessary for emissions reduction [9].
- According to LSE/Grantham Institute research, "The combined impact attributable to the carbon price is estimated as a reduction of between 5 and 8 million tonnes of CO2 emissions (3.2 to 5 per cent) in 2012/13" [9].
- The carbon pricing mechanism was in place for only two years before Coalition repeal (July 2012 - June 2014) [4].
Comparison: Unlike the Coalition's explicit promise of specific dollar savings ($200/$550), Labor's messaging focused on the environmental necessity and long-term economic transition rather than direct consumer cost reduction. Both approaches involved trade-offs between climate policy and cost-of-living concerns.
Balanced Perspective
The Coalition's $200 electricity savings claim was based on Treasury modeling rather than observed outcomes. While the modeling was professionally conducted [5], the actual realized savings were difficult to isolate and verify due to multiple concurrent factors affecting electricity prices [6].
The carbon tax repeal was a central Coalition election promise, and the government had a legitimate interest in quantifying expected benefits for voters. However, the specificity of the dollar figures ($200 for electricity, $550 total) created an expectation that was difficult to meet in practice, given the complex factors driving electricity pricing including network infrastructure costs, wholesale generation costs, and retailer margins [3].
When compared to Labor's record, the Gillard Government implemented the carbon pricing mechanism knowing it would increase electricity costs in the short term, but argued this was necessary for emissions reduction [9]. The Coalition's promise to reverse these costs was politically popular but technically challenging to deliver in the exact dollar amounts promised.
Key context: This type of specific dollar-figure promise for complex economic policies is not unique to either party. Both major parties have made quantifiable cost-of-living claims that are difficult to verify retrospectively due to the multiple variables affecting household costs.
TRUE
7.0
out of 10
The Coalition Government did indeed claim that average electricity bills would be approximately $200 per year lower without the carbon price (as part of a total $550 household savings claim). This claim was based on Treasury modeling [5] and was explicitly stated by Prime Minister Abbott [2]. The claim that "relevant power companies rejecting the magnitude of this figure" also appears accurate based on expert analysis showing the difficulty of isolating carbon tax impacts from other price drivers [3][6]. However, the claim omits that this was Treasury modeling rather than observed outcomes, and that the $200 was part of a broader $550 total household savings estimate.
Final Score
7.0
OUT OF 10
TRUE
The Coalition Government did indeed claim that average electricity bills would be approximately $200 per year lower without the carbon price (as part of a total $550 household savings claim). This claim was based on Treasury modeling [5] and was explicitly stated by Prime Minister Abbott [2]. The claim that "relevant power companies rejecting the magnitude of this figure" also appears accurate based on expert analysis showing the difficulty of isolating carbon tax impacts from other price drivers [3][6]. However, the claim omits that this was Treasury modeling rather than observed outcomes, and that the $200 was part of a broader $550 total household savings estimate.
📚 SOURCES & CITATIONS (9)
-
1
Will the carbon tax repeal really mean we get back $550 a year?
News Com
-
2
Households to be $550 'ahead'
Heraldsun Com
-
3
Fact Check: Have electricity prices dropped $550 since the carbon tax repeal?
Treasurer Joe Hockey said newly released Treasury documents show electricity prices have come down $550 per household since abolishing the carbon tax. But experts estimates don't come close to the $550 figure. ABC Fact Check investigates
Abc Net -
4
Carbon pricing in Australia - Wikipedia
Wikipedia
-
5PDF
CARBON TAX REPEAL - PRICE IMPACTS
Treasury Gov • PDF Document -
6
Trying to measure the savings from the carbon tax is a mug's game
The carbon tax repeal was supposed to save the average household A$550. And it might well have done, but teasing out the exact figure amid the myriad other economic factors is a herculean task.
The Conversation -
7
The AIM Network - The Australian Independent Media Network
The AIMN is a platform for citizen journalists and bloggers to write and engage in an independent Australian media environment.
The AIM Network -
8
Independent Australia - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check
LEFT-CENTER BIAS These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording
Media Bias/Fact Check -
9PDF
Impact of the carbon price on Australia's electricity demand, supply and emissions
Lse Ac • PDF Document
Rating Scale Methodology
1-3: FALSE
Factually incorrect or malicious fabrication.
4-6: PARTIAL
Some truth but context is missing or skewed.
7-9: MOSTLY TRUE
Minor technicalities or phrasing issues.
10: ACCURATE
Perfectly verified and contextually fair.
Methodology: Ratings are determined through cross-referencing official government records, independent fact-checking organizations, and primary source documents.