The Claim
“Blocked the construction of Australia's first offshore wind farm for years, which would create 12,000 jobs and meet 20% of Victoria's electricity demand.”
Original Sources Provided
✅ FACTUAL VERIFICATION
The core claim conflates two separate issues: (1) delays in approving an exploration license and (2) blocking construction. The evidence shows the situation is more nuanced.
The Star of the South Project Timeline:
Australia's first offshore wind farm project, Star of the South, was proposed off Gippsland, Victoria. The project specifications are largely accurate: at 2.2 GW capacity, it would supply up to 20% of Victoria's electricity needs and power approximately 1.2 million homes [1][2]. The Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) claimed the project would create up to 12,000 manufacturing and construction jobs [3].
The Approval Delay:
Energy Minister Angus Taylor approved an exploration license for the project in March 2019 [4]. However, this approval came after a significant delay—the project had been proposed but was stalled pending Taylor's sign-off. Historical reports indicate the project was "put on hold" awaiting the minister's approval [5]. The delay between initial proposal and exploration license approval represented a period where the project could not proceed to the next phase of development.
Key Timeline:
- 2017: Project initially commissioned by Copenhagen Offshore Partners (COP)
- 2019 (March): Coalition government approved exploration license under Angus Taylor [4]
- 2020 (May 11): Victorian Minister for Planning required preparation of Environment Effects Statement (EES) [6]
- 2021 (August): Victorian government approved scoping requirements [6]
- 2022 (December): Australian Government awarded Major Project Status [6]
The "Blocked Construction" Characterization:
The claim's language about "blocked the construction...for years" is misleading. The government did not block construction—it delayed approval of an exploration license necessary for feasibility studies. The exploration license, when approved in March 2019, permitted technical and environmental resource assessment, not construction itself. Construction approvals came much later (2020-2022 timeframe with environmental assessments and major project status).
Missing Context
1. Absence of Regulatory Framework Before 2019
A critical context omission: no regulatory framework for offshore wind existed in Australia before 2019. The Coalition government had to develop Marine Orders and associated regulations to govern offshore wind exploration [7]. This wasn't simply a matter of approving an application under existing rules—the legal and regulatory structure itself had to be created first.
2. The Exploration Phase Was Lengthy but Necessary
The March 2019 approval initiated a resource exploration phase, not construction. Between exploration license approval (March 2019) and Major Project Status (December 2022), three years of environmental assessment and studies were required—which is standard for major infrastructure projects [6]. This was not unusual delay but normal project development.
3. The Original Source's Framing
The MUA is a union representing seafarers and offshore workers. While their support for the project is genuine, they have a direct economic interest in offshore wind development. Their advocacy should be contextualized as representing worker interests rather than neutral analysis [3].
4. Labor Government and Offshore Wind
During Labor's 2007-2013 period, offshore wind was not a developed technology in Australia. The first regulatory frameworks and licensing structures only emerged during the Coalition period (2013-2022). Labor did not establish offshore wind approval mechanisms—this was a new regulatory domain created during the Coalition's time in office [7].
Source Credibility Assessment
The original source provided is from the Maritime Union of Australia (MUA), a union organization representing offshore workers and seafarers. The MUA has a direct financial interest in offshore wind development due to potential employment opportunities for members [3]. This represents advocacy from an interested party, not independent fact-checking.
While the MUA's factual claims about project specifications (12,000 jobs, 20% of Victoria's electricity) appear to be accurately sourced from project documentation, the framing emphasizes benefits and delays without acknowledging the regulatory development phase that was occurring.
Labor Comparison
Did Labor do something similar?
Search conducted: "Labor offshore wind policy Australia 2007-2013"
Findings:
During Labor's 2007-2013 period, offshore wind was not pursued as a policy priority. Labor's renewable energy focus was on (1) the Renewable Energy Target (RET), which primarily incentivized onshore wind and solar [8], and (2) the Carbon Price Mechanism (2012-2014). Neither Labor nor Coalition governments had developed offshore wind regulatory frameworks during Labor's tenure [7].
When the Coalition came to power in 2013, offshore wind remained undeveloped in Australia. The Coalition government, despite later criticisms about delays, was actually the first to develop the necessary regulatory structures (Marine Orders framework) to enable offshore wind exploration and development.
Comparative Context:
Neither major party had pursued offshore wind during Labor's time in office (2007-2013). The Coalition was the first government to establish the regulatory framework enabling Australian offshore wind projects, though the approval process for specific projects (like Star of the South) involved delays that could reasonably be attributed to the novelty of the regulatory domain and required environmental assessments.
Balanced Perspective
Criticisms of Coalition Delays:
The claim has some factual basis: the exploration license approval did take time, and in early 2019 the project was described as being "on hold" pending ministerial approval [5]. The Maritime Union of Australia specifically urged Energy Minister Angus Taylor to "proceed with exploration license" in February 2019, suggesting there was advocacy pressure for faster approval [9].
From a renewable energy advocacy perspective, these delays did slow the development of Australia's first offshore wind project and delayed the potential employment and emissions reduction benefits by 1-2 years.
Coalition Government Justifications and Context:
Regulatory Framework Development: The Coalition had to create the legal framework for offshore wind from scratch. No predecessor regulatory system existed. This required developing Marine Orders, environmental assessment protocols, and Commonwealth-state coordination mechanisms [7].
Due Diligence on Novel Technology: Offshore wind was new to Australia. Thorough environmental and feasibility assessments were needed before approving exploration in Commonwealth waters, particularly given Australian marine conservation concerns.
Broader Energy Policy: The Coalition's overall energy policy prioritized energy security and reliability. Offshore wind, while supported in principle by Taylor's approval, was one of multiple energy sources being considered [10].
Political Economy: The Coalition's energy minister may have been cautious about pushing a large new renewable energy project that could face resistance within Coalition ranks, given the party's mixed stance on climate policy during this period.
Balanced Assessment:
While the claim correctly identifies that the Coalition delayed approval of the exploration license (from project proposal in ~2017 to approval in March 2019), the characterization of "blocked construction for years" overstates the impact. The exploration license, when approved, only permitted resource assessment—not construction. Construction approvals came 2-3 years later and involved standard environmental assessment processes that would occur under any government.
The Coalition can reasonably be criticized for the time taken to approve the exploration license, but it should be credited for developing the regulatory framework that made offshore wind development possible in the first place.
PARTIALLY TRUE
6.0
out of 10
The Coalition did delay approval of the exploration license for Australia's first offshore wind farm project (Star of the South), and this delay did slow development. The project specifications cited (12,000 jobs, 20% of Victoria's electricity demand) are accurate [1][2][3]. However, the claim's characterization of "blocked the construction...for years" significantly overstates the facts. The Coalition approved an exploration license in March 2019 [4], which initiated the resource assessment phase. Construction wasn't blocked; rather, the project proceeded through normal environmental assessment timelines (2020-2022) before reaching Major Project Status [6]. The delay in exploration license approval (approximately 1-2 years) is legitimate to criticize, but calling this "blocking construction for years" mischaracterizes both the duration and the nature of the delay.
Final Score
6.0
OUT OF 10
PARTIALLY TRUE
The Coalition did delay approval of the exploration license for Australia's first offshore wind farm project (Star of the South), and this delay did slow development. The project specifications cited (12,000 jobs, 20% of Victoria's electricity demand) are accurate [1][2][3]. However, the claim's characterization of "blocked the construction...for years" significantly overstates the facts. The Coalition approved an exploration license in March 2019 [4], which initiated the resource assessment phase. Construction wasn't blocked; rather, the project proceeded through normal environmental assessment timelines (2020-2022) before reaching Major Project Status [6]. The delay in exploration license approval (approximately 1-2 years) is legitimate to criticize, but calling this "blocking construction for years" mischaracterizes both the duration and the nature of the delay.
📚 SOURCES & CITATIONS (10)
-
1
Overview — Star of the South
Star of the South -
2
Star of the South Infrastructure Pipeline
Star of the South is a proposed offshore wind farm with up to 2.2 gigawatts of generating capacity located in the Gippsland Offshore Wind Zone.
Infrastructure Pipeline -
3
Building Offshore Wind in Australia
Mua Org
-
4
Morrison government approves licence to explore possibility of Australia's first offshore wind farm
Minister Industry Gov
-
5
Australia's first offshore wind farm being stalled by Morrison Government
Development of Australia's first offshore wind farm, which would power up to 1.2 million homes, has been stalled by Energy Minister Angus Taylor's
Mirage News -
6
Star of the South Offshore Wind Farm
Learn more about the Star of the South offshore wind farm
Planning -
7
Offshore wind development and regulation in Australia
Dlapiper
-
8
Legislation and regulations - DCCEEW
Dcceew Gov
-
9
Powerful Maritime Union backs Star of the South, urges Energy Minister to proceed with exploration license
Friends of the Earth Australia (FoEA) believes that social and environmental issues cannot be separated from each other. As a result, FoEA is a social and environmental justice organisation. We seek to work toward a sustainable and equitable future, and to operate in a way that empowers individuals and communities. This means that all members of FoEA operates on a collective basis, and utilises the consensus decision-making model to work towards the aims and objectives of the federation, and remain independent of any political parties and economic interests. Friends of the Earth Australia is a member of Friends of the Earth International which is the world's largest grassroots environmental network, uniting 77 national member groups and some 5,000 local activist groups on every continent.
Friends of the Earth Australia -
10
The regulatory framework for offshore wind projects in Australian waters – Parliament of Australia
Executive summary The framework for the regulation of offshore renewable energy and transmission infrastructure (collectively referred to as offshore infrastructure activities) was established in November 2021 by the Offshore Electricity Infrastructure Act 2
Aph Gov
Rating Scale Methodology
1-3: FALSE
Factually incorrect or malicious fabrication.
4-6: PARTIAL
Some truth but context is missing or skewed.
7-9: MOSTLY TRUE
Minor technicalities or phrasing issues.
10: ACCURATE
Perfectly verified and contextually fair.
Methodology: Ratings are determined through cross-referencing official government records, independent fact-checking organizations, and primary source documents.