The Claim
“Scrapped the Wage Connect Program (a scheme which encouraged employers to hire long-term unemployed people).”
Original Sources Provided
✅ FACTUAL VERIFICATION
The Coalition government did suspend the Wage Connect program on December 6, 2013, shortly after the Abbott government took office in September 2013 [1][2]. Assistant Minister for Employment Luke Hartsuyker announced the suspension, stating the $25 million program was being put "on hold" to new applicants [1][2]. The program had achieved 24,173 job placements as of June 2014 [3]. While the claim uses the term "scrapped," the official terminology was "suspended" - though in practice, new applications were not accepted, effectively ending the program for new participants [1][2].
Missing Context
The claim omits several important contextual factors:
1. The program was oversubscribed: The suspension was attributed to the program being "too popular" and exceeding its budget allocation [1]. The Assistant Minister stated the government was seeking ways to "improve the scheme and ensure its long-term sustainability" [2].
2. Replacement program introduced: The Coalition government introduced the "Restart" program on July 1, 2014, which provided wage subsidies specifically for mature age job seekers (50 years and older) [4][5]. This represented a refocusing of wage subsidy policy rather than complete abolition of the concept.
3. Temporary vs. permanent nature: The suspension was initially announced as a one-year pause to review and restructure the program [1], though the program did not resume in its original form.
Source Credibility Assessment
The original source is The Daily Examiner, a daily newspaper serving Grafton, New South Wales, owned by News Corp Australia [6]. News Corp Australia publications generally have a conservative editorial leaning [6]. The newspaper is a mainstream regional news source reporting on local and national matters. While owned by a company with conservative editorial positions, the reporting on this government decision appears to be factual news coverage rather than opinion or advocacy.
Labor Comparison
Did Labor do something similar?
Search conducted: "Labor government employment programs cancelled changed"
Finding: Labor governments have also modified, replaced, and cancelled employment programs:
The Keating Labor government established "Employment Assistance Australia" (EAA) in 1994 under the Employment Services Act, which was later restructured [7].
The Whitlam Labor government (1972-1975) initially focused on training programs and direct job creation during high unemployment, before the Fraser Coalition government shifted the orientation in 1975 [8].
The Rudd/Gillard Labor government continued and modified employment services established under the Howard government, maintaining the privatised Job Services Australia model introduced by the Coalition [7].
Most significantly, when the Howard Coalition government came to power in 1996, it "substantially cut the Working Nation labour market programs" that had been implemented under the previous Labor government [9].
Historical context: Employment programs have been regularly restructured, renamed, and replaced by governments of both parties. The Howard government's 1998 introduction of the Job Network replaced the public Commonwealth Employment Service with a privatised, contestable market model - a far more significant structural change than the suspension of a single wage subsidy program [7][10].
Balanced Perspective
While critics argued the suspension would harm long-term unemployed job seekers who needed the subsidy to transition to employment [2], the government maintained the program had exceeded its budget due to high demand and required restructuring to ensure sustainability [1][2]. The Coalition did not abolish wage subsidies entirely - they redirected the funding toward the Restart program targeting mature age workers, who face significant barriers to workforce participation [4][5].
Wage subsidies have been a long-standing feature of Australian employment policy under governments of both persuasions, with programs regularly modified, renamed, and restructured when governments change [8][11]. The Australian National Audit Office has examined wage subsidy administration across multiple governments, indicating their ongoing use regardless of which party holds power [11].
Key context: This is not unique to the Coalition. Both major parties have historically restructured employment programs upon taking office, with the Howard government's cancellation of Labor's Working Nation programs in 1996 being a more substantial precedent than this 2013 suspension [9].
TRUE
6.0
out of 10
The core factual claim is accurate - the Coalition government did suspend (effectively ending for new applicants) the Wage Connect program in December 2013 [1][2]. However, the framing omits that: (1) the suspension was attributed to the program being oversubscribed and exceeding its $25 million budget [1]; (2) the Coalition introduced a replacement wage subsidy program (Restart) focused on mature age workers in 2014 [4][5]; and (3) both parties have historically restructured employment programs upon taking office, with the Howard government's 1996 cancellation of Labor's Working Nation programs being a more significant precedent [9].
Final Score
6.0
OUT OF 10
TRUE
The core factual claim is accurate - the Coalition government did suspend (effectively ending for new applicants) the Wage Connect program in December 2013 [1][2]. However, the framing omits that: (1) the suspension was attributed to the program being oversubscribed and exceeding its $25 million budget [1]; (2) the Coalition introduced a replacement wage subsidy program (Restart) focused on mature age workers in 2014 [4][5]; and (3) both parties have historically restructured employment programs upon taking office, with the Howard government's 1996 cancellation of Labor's Working Nation programs being a more significant precedent [9].
📚 SOURCES & CITATIONS (11)
-
1
Government closes popular jobs program
Private Briefing presents a practical daily macroeconomic and financial news briefing, with original reporting and insights into financial policy news that are under-reported elsewhere in the Australian financial press.
Private Briefing - Personal finance news from the Parliamentary Press Gallery -
2
Scheme to help jobless on hold
Theaustralian Com
-
3
5.6 Working-age support: assistance with employment and training
Aihw Gov
-
4
Promise check: Establish a seniors employment incentive payment
On September 4, 2013, the Liberal Party promised that, if elected, "a Coalition government will establish a new 'seniors employment incentive payment' of $3,250 for employers that hire mature workers aged 50 or older and keep them on for at least six months."
Abc Net -
5PDF
Restart Programme Job Seeker Fact Sheet
Seekingseniors Com • PDF Document -
6
The Daily Examiner - Wikipedia
Wikipedia
-
7
The next generation of employment services - Appendices
Dewr Gov
-
8
Wage Subsidy Programs: A Primer
This article provides an introduction to wage subsidy programs for jobseekers facing barriers to employment. First, the features of a wage subsidy program are described, and a brief history of this type of program in Australia is presented. Second, Australian and international evidence on the impact of wage subsidy programs is reviewed. Third, the main aspects of the design of wage subsidy programs are considered.
Ajle -
9
The Australian Labour Market in the 1990s
Reserve Bank of Australia -
10
The Howard government 'radically transformed' the job search experience
Australia's experiment with 'marketisation' of employment services has failed, and we must refocus on helping unemployed people, a new parliamentary report says.
Abc Net -
11
Use and Administration of Wage Subsidies
Anao Gov
Rating Scale Methodology
1-3: FALSE
Factually incorrect or malicious fabrication.
4-6: PARTIAL
Some truth but context is missing or skewed.
7-9: MOSTLY TRUE
Minor technicalities or phrasing issues.
10: ACCURATE
Perfectly verified and contextually fair.
Methodology: Ratings are determined through cross-referencing official government records, independent fact-checking organizations, and primary source documents.