The Claim
“Appointed Tim Wilson as human rights commissioner. He has personally advocated for the abolition of the human rights commission, and his new 6 figure salary is so large that the commission will have to cut education and anti-bullying programs to fund it.”
Original Sources Provided
✅ FACTUAL VERIFICATION
Tim Wilson's Appointment:
The Abbott government appointed Tim Wilson as Human Rights Commissioner in December 2013, with the appointment taking effect in February 2014 [1]. Wilson was previously the policy director at the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA), a right-wing free-market think tank [2].
Advocacy for Abolition:
The claim that Wilson advocated for abolition of the Human Rights Commission is accurate. Under Wilson's leadership at the IPA, the organization called for the Australian Human Rights Commission to be abolished [3]. In January 2013 (prior to his appointment), the IPA published policy positions including the call to "Abolish the Australian Human Rights Commission" [4]. Wilson defended his appointment despite this prior position, stating: "The key reason why the IPA advocated for its abolition is because it wasn't [doing its job], and so some would see it as very consistent indeed" [5].
Salary and Budget Impact:
The claim regarding salary and budget cuts is substantially accurate. Wilson's salary was approximately $320,000 per year [6]. According to Commission President Gillian Triggs, this salary would have to come from the Commission's existing annual budget of approximately $25 million, with no additional funding provided by the government for this new appointment [7].
Triggs explicitly stated: "This really does squeeze the commission" and indicated that commissioners would need to decide where cuts would be made, suggesting "an anti-bullying program and a program on education for older Australians might be in the firing line" [8].
Missing Context
Historical Precedent of Partisan Appointments:
The claim omits important context about the partisan nature of Human Rights Commission appointments across governments. Just months earlier, Attorney-General George Brandis (who appointed Wilson) had criticized the Labor government for appointing Tim Soutphommasane as Race Discrimination Commissioner, calling him "yet another partisan of the Left" [9]. Brandis argued Soutphommasane "would not be able to win the public's confidence" due to his Labor Party connections [10].
Government Justification:
The Coalition government defended the appointment as an effort to "restore balance" to the Commission. Brandis stated: "The appointment of Mr Wilson to this important position will help to restore balance to the Australian Human Rights Commission which, during the period of the Labor government, had become increasingly narrow and selective in its view of human rights" [11].
Wilson's Resignation from Affiliations:
Upon accepting the appointment, Wilson resigned from both the IPA and the Victorian Liberal Party [12]. This is standard practice for such appointments, similar to Tim Soutphommasane resigning from the Labor Party when appointed by Labor.
Source Credibility Assessment
The original source is The Sydney Morning Herald (SMH), a mainstream Australian newspaper with a long history of political coverage. SMH is generally considered a reputable, center-left publication with professional journalistic standards [13]. The article was written by Judith Ireland, a political reporter for Fairfax Media (then SMH's parent company).
The SMH article is factual reporting based on statements from Commission President Gillian Triggs and government officials. There is no evidence of fabrication or significant bias in this specific article, though the framing emphasizes the controversial nature of the appointment.
Labor Comparison
Did Labor do something similar?
Search conducted: "Labor government Human Rights Commissioner appointments partisan"
Finding: Yes, Labor made similarly partisan appointments.
In 2013, the Labor government appointed Tim Soutphommasane as Race Discrimination Commissioner. Soutphommasane was a former Labor Party member and former staffer to Labor Foreign Minister Bob Carr [14]. When appointed, Soutphommasane also resigned his Labor Party membership [15].
Attorney-General Brandis explicitly criticized this appointment as partisan: "Appointees must be people who can command the confidence of the entire community that they will discharge their responsibilities in a human rights field in a non-partisan manner... Dr Soutphommasane's appointment reinforced concerns that the Human Rights Commission had 'become an ideologically driven agency whose agenda lies entirely with advancing the causes of the Left'" [16].
Comparison: Both governments appointed commissioners with clear political affiliations:
- Labor: Appointed a former Labor staffer to Race Discrimination Commissioner
- Coalition: Appointed a think tank director who had called for the Commission's abolition
Both appointees resigned their party/organizational memberships upon appointment.
Balanced Perspective
Criticisms of Wilson's Appointment:
- Appointing someone who had publicly called for the Commission's abolition raised legitimate questions about their commitment to the institution [17]
- The appointment was made without additional budget funding, forcing existing programs to face cuts [18]
- Labor's Shadow Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus described the appointment as signaling a "blatant political agenda" [19]
Government Justifications:
- The Coalition argued the Commission had become ideologically unbalanced under Labor and needed "restoring" [20]
- Wilson had established credentials as a public policy intellectual and advocate for individual freedoms [21]
- The appointment fulfilled a Coalition election promise to create a focus on "traditional liberal democratic and common law rights" [22]
Systemic Context:
This appointment was part of a broader pattern where both major Australian parties appoint commissioners aligned with their political philosophies when in government. The Human Rights Commission has historically seen appointments from both sides of politics, with commissioners often bringing distinct ideological perspectives.
Key context: This was not unique to the Coalition - both parties have made partisan-leaning appointments to the Commission. The controversy was heightened in Wilson's case due to the explicit nature of his prior calls to abolish the very body he was appointed to serve.
TRUE
8.0
out of 10
The claim is factually accurate on all three points:
- Tim Wilson was appointed Human Rights Commissioner by the Coalition government
- He had advocated for the Commission's abolition through his work at the IPA
- His six-figure salary came from the existing Commission budget, and Commission President Gillian Triggs confirmed this would likely require cuts to education and anti-bullying programs
However, the claim lacks important comparative context that both major parties have made partisan-leaning appointments to the Commission. The unprecedented aspect of Wilson's appointment was not the partisan nature (common to both sides), but rather that he had explicitly called for the Commission's abolition - a more extreme position than typical partisan appointments.
Final Score
8.0
OUT OF 10
TRUE
The claim is factually accurate on all three points:
- Tim Wilson was appointed Human Rights Commissioner by the Coalition government
- He had advocated for the Commission's abolition through his work at the IPA
- His six-figure salary came from the existing Commission budget, and Commission President Gillian Triggs confirmed this would likely require cuts to education and anti-bullying programs
However, the claim lacks important comparative context that both major parties have made partisan-leaning appointments to the Commission. The unprecedented aspect of Wilson's appointment was not the partisan nature (common to both sides), but rather that he had explicitly called for the Commission's abolition - a more extreme position than typical partisan appointments.
📚 SOURCES & CITATIONS (11)
-
1
Tim Wilson, former policy director of Institute of Public Affairs, appointed Human Rights Commissioner
The incoming human rights commissioner has defended his appointment to a role that he recently said should be scrapped.
Abc Net -
2
George Brandis appoints IPA's Tim Wilson to Human Rights Commission
The Abbott government has made a member of a right-wing think tank Australia's newest human rights commissioner.
The Sydney Morning Herald -
3
Human Rights Commission president reacts to appointment of Tim Wilson
Tim Wilson has now resigned his positions with the Institute of Public Affairs and the Liberal Party to take a job as a commissioner of the Australian Human Rights Commission. It's an organisation he once argued should be abolished.
ABC listen -
4
The IPA, Tim Wilson, human rights and influence
That Tim Wilson used his Human Rights Commission email account for political purposes when he became the Human Rights Commissioner may seem trivial or “utterly irrelevant” as he calls it. Yet surely it risked compromising the independence of the Commission and represents a new form of politicization of the public service.
Pearls and Irritations -
5
New Human Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson gets expenses package of $56,000 on top of salary
News Com
-
6
Tim Wilson: Human Rights Commission cuts on cards after George Brandis appointment
Tim Wilson's appointment as human rights commissioner could lead to cuts to a program on school bullying as...
Canberratimes Com -
7
Tim Wilson's appointment as human rights commissioner could see cuts to a program on school bullying
Mr Wilson's salary would have to come out of the commission's current annual $25m budget.
Canberratimes Com -
8
The Sydney Morning Herald - About
Smh Com
Original link unavailable — view archived version -
9
Tim Wilson's resignation is his greatest contribution to human rights
The resignation of Human Rights Commissioner Tim Wilson may well be regarded as his greatest contribution to human rights, writes Tess Lawrence.
Independent Australia -
10
Tim Wilson: Human Rights Commission cuts on cards after George Brandis appointment
Tim Wilson's appointment as human rights commissioner could lead to cuts to a program on school bullying as the Australian Human Rights Commission accommodates his six-figure salary without any extra funding from the government.
The Sydney Morning Herald -
11
Tim Wilson (Australian politician) - Wikipedia
En Wikipedia
Rating Scale Methodology
1-3: FALSE
Factually incorrect or malicious fabrication.
4-6: PARTIAL
Some truth but context is missing or skewed.
7-9: MOSTLY TRUE
Minor technicalities or phrasing issues.
10: ACCURATE
Perfectly verified and contextually fair.
Methodology: Ratings are determined through cross-referencing official government records, independent fact-checking organizations, and primary source documents.