The Claim
“Stopped weekly press conferences on asylum seekers. Declined further comment on the matter.”
Original Sources Provided
✅ FACTUAL VERIFICATION
The claim is TRUE based on the evidence from the original source and contemporaneous reporting. In December 2013, Immigration Minister Scott Morrison did stop holding weekly press conferences on asylum seeker boat arrivals [1].
According to the Sydney Morning Herald report, Morrison ended the practice of regular media briefings and instead began issuing written statements with no opportunity for journalists to ask questions [1]. His office stated: "Weekly reports will continue to be issued on arrivals and transfers and media conferences will be called as and when required to deal with any significant or serious events or announcements" [1].
The previous practice under the Immigration Department had been announcing asylum seeker boat arrivals in real time, which Morrison criticized as amounting to a "shipping news service for people smugglers" [1].
Missing Context
The claim omits several important contextual elements:
The change occurred around the Christmas/New Year holiday period in 2013. Morrison's office indicated that the briefings would resume in the new year, with the spokesman stating "the government would have more to say on this in the new year" [1]. This suggests a temporary holiday pause rather than a permanent cessation, though the format did change.
Written weekly reports continued. The government's position was that information would still be provided through written weekly reports on arrivals and transfers, and media conferences would be called "as and when required" for significant events [1]. This was a change in format and accessibility, not a complete information blackout.
The change was part of Operation Sovereign Borders. The media policy shift was tied to the Coalition's broader military-led operation to stop asylum seeker boats, which involved significant operational secrecy as a deliberate strategy [2].
Boat arrival numbers were being reported as declining. The December 2013 statement noted a 70% decline in arrivals compared to the previous December and an 87% fall over the first 100 days of Operation Sovereign Borders compared to the prior 100 days [1].
Source Credibility Assessment
The original source is the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH), a major Australian mainstream newspaper published by Fairfax Media [1].
Credibility assessment:
- SMH is a reputable mainstream media outlet with a long history of political reporting in Australia
- The article is a straightforward news report, not an opinion piece
- The article includes direct quotes from Morrison's spokesman and independent journalist Laurie Oakes
- The article was co-authored by Dan Harrison and Gareth Hutchens, journalists with the publication
- Fairfax publications (now part of Nine Entertainment) are generally considered center-left leaning, though individual articles should be assessed on their own merits
The source appears credible for the factual claims made, though as with any single-source claim, cross-referencing would be ideal.
Labor Comparison
Did Labor restrict media access on asylum seeker matters?
Search conducted: "Labor government asylum seeker media policy Rudd Gillard transparency"
Finding: The Labor governments under Kevin Rudd and Julia Gillard (2007-2013) also implemented highly restrictive policies regarding asylum seeker information:
Labor discontinued the "Pacific Solution" boat turnback policy initially when elected in 2007, only to later reinstate offshore processing under intense political pressure in 2012 [2][3]. By 2013, Kevin Rudd announced that no asylum seekers arriving by boat would ever be resettled in Australia - a policy the Coalition retained [2].
Both parties converged on similar restrictive approaches. According to parliamentary research and comparative analysis, by 2015 both Labor and the Coalition supported boat turnbacks, offshore processing, and strict border protection measures with limited transparency [2].
Operational secrecy became bipartisan. While Labor criticized Morrison's specific media approach, the broader policy of limiting real-time operational information about boat interceptions became standard practice across both major parties [2][4].
Comparison:
- The Coalition formalized the weekly briefing system under Operation Sovereign Borders, then modified it
- Labor's approach also involved significant restrictions on information, particularly regarding operational matters
- By 2015, Labor's policy platform indicated they would retain the offshore processing framework and boat turnback options [2], suggesting the media restrictions were not fundamentally opposed
Balanced Perspective
While the claim is factually accurate that Morrison stopped weekly press conferences, the broader context shows this was part of a deliberate operational strategy rather than arbitrary secrecy.
Coalition justification:
The government argued that real-time announcements of boat arrivals served as "shipping news service for people smugglers" - effectively providing market intelligence to criminal networks [1]. This operational security argument was the stated rationale for limiting immediate disclosure of interception activities.
Criticism:
Press gallery veteran Laurie Oakes criticized Morrison's approach, accusing him of arrogance and stating: "He sees it as getting at the press, but it's not. It's getting at the voters and eventually I think the voters will wake up" [1].
Comparative context:
The media restrictions were part of Operation Sovereign Borders, which was presented as a military-led operation requiring operational secrecy. While critics saw this as excessive secrecy, supporters argued it was necessary for the policy's effectiveness. The convergence of Labor and Coalition policies by 2015 on offshore processing and boat turnbacks suggests the transparency issues were systemic rather than unique to the Coalition [2].
Key context: This was not unique to the Coalition - both major Australian parties have struggled with transparency on asylum seeker matters, with Labor eventually adopting similar operational policies despite initial differences in approach [2][3].
TRUE
6.0
out of 10
The claim accurately reflects that Scott Morrison stopped holding weekly press conferences on asylum seekers in December 2013, moving to written statements without journalist questioning. However, the framing as simply "declining further comment" omits important context: (1) written weekly reports continued, (2) the change was presented as temporary through the holiday period with resumption planned, and (3) the change was justified as operational security to avoid providing intelligence to people smugglers. The broader pattern of restrictive media access on asylum matters was not unique to the Coalition - Labor governments also implemented significant restrictions, and by 2015 both parties supported similar operational frameworks [1][2].
Final Score
6.0
OUT OF 10
TRUE
The claim accurately reflects that Scott Morrison stopped holding weekly press conferences on asylum seekers in December 2013, moving to written statements without journalist questioning. However, the framing as simply "declining further comment" omits important context: (1) written weekly reports continued, (2) the change was presented as temporary through the holiday period with resumption planned, and (3) the change was justified as operational security to avoid providing intelligence to people smugglers. The broader pattern of restrictive media access on asylum matters was not unique to the Coalition - Labor governments also implemented significant restrictions, and by 2015 both parties supported similar operational frameworks [1][2].
📚 SOURCES & CITATIONS (5)
-
1
smh.com.au
Immigration Minister Scott Morrison has stopped holding weekly press conferences on asylum seeker boat arrivals, instead issuing a written statement with no opportunity for journalists to ask questions.
The Sydney Morning Herald -
2
theconversation.com
Following the Labor conference’s decision to leave open the option of turning back asylum seeker boats, are there any differences left between Labor’s asylum policies and the Coalition’s?
The Conversation -
3
en.wikipedia.org
Wikipedia -
4
asyluminsight.com
Asylum Insight
-
5
sbs.com.au
Asylum seekers, immigration and border protection look set to define Australia's next election.
SBS News
Rating Scale Methodology
1-3: FALSE
Factually incorrect or malicious fabrication.
4-6: PARTIAL
Some truth but context is missing or skewed.
7-9: MOSTLY TRUE
Minor technicalities or phrasing issues.
10: ACCURATE
Perfectly verified and contextually fair.
Methodology: Ratings are determined through cross-referencing official government records, independent fact-checking organizations, and primary source documents.