The Claim
“Tried to silence the media to stop them criticising the upcoming private jet deal for politicians.”
Original Sources Provided
✅ FACTUAL VERIFICATION
The Abbott Government did propose a new VIP jet arrangement in 2014, but the characterization of this as an attempt to "silence the media" is a significant distortion of what actually occurred.
According to News.com.au, the Abbott Government planned to "seek a truce with media outlets and taxpayers so it can buy or lease larger VIP jets to fly politicians, officials and journalists overseas on the same aircraft" [1]. The proposal involved providing media access to travel on the same VIP aircraft as politicians, rather than silencing criticism.
The RAAF has operated VIP aircraft for over 75 years, providing air travel to parliamentarians, official dignitaries, and senior military officers regardless of which party is in government [2]. The fleet has been regularly upgraded by successive governments from both sides of politics.
Missing Context
The claim omits several critical pieces of context:
Long-standing bipartisan program: VIP aircraft have been used by Australian governments since the 1940s, with the RAAF's No. 34 Squadron operating these services continuously regardless of which party holds office [2]. The fleet includes Boeing 737-700 BBJs and Dassault Falcon 7x aircraft configured for VIP transport of the Governor-General, Prime Minister, and senior government members.
The proposal's actual nature: The government's proposal was to allow journalists to travel aboard the same VIP aircraft as politicians on overseas trips—not to suppress media coverage but to include media representatives in the travel arrangements [1]. This is fundamentally different from "silencing" criticism.
Legitimate operational reasons: VIP jets serve essential functions including secure communications for the Prime Minister during international travel, ability to fly non-stop on long-haul routes (such as the Airbus KC-30A for worldwide non-stop travel), and transporting visiting foreign dignitaries [3]. These are standard requirements for any modern government, not luxuries specific to the Coalition.
Source Credibility Assessment
The original source (News.com.au) is a mainstream Australian news outlet owned by News Corp Australia. While it has a center-right editorial leaning, it is generally considered a credible news source rather than partisan advocacy. The article's headline uses the phrase "seeks media deal" rather than "silence media," indicating the claim's characterization is more extreme than the original reporting.
The archived source was from January 2014, early in the Abbott government's term, when they were proposing upgrades to aging VIP aircraft that had been in service for many years.
Labor Comparison
Did Labor do something similar?
Search conducted: "Labor government VIP jets use and upgrades"
Finding: The Labor government (2022-present) has continued and expanded the VIP aircraft program significantly. Key findings include:
Labor's $450 million VIP jet purchase: The current Labor government, led by Anthony Albanese, approved the purchase of two new Boeing 737 MAX 8 Boeing Business Jets for $450 million to replace the aging VIP fleet [4][5].
Labor continues VIP jet use: Labor ministers including Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles and other senior figures regularly use VIP jets, facing similar scrutiny and criticism over their use [6].
Transparency concerns under Labor: The Defence Department under the current Labor government has "stonewalled" Freedom of Information requests regarding politicians' use of VIP jets and stopped publishing regular reports on jet fleet usage [7].
Historical Labor use: Previous Labor governments (Rudd/Gillard) routinely used the same VIP aircraft without controversy, as this is standard practice for all Australian governments.
Comparison: The VIP aircraft program has been maintained and upgraded by governments of both major parties for over 75 years. Both Coalition and Labor governments have faced occasional criticism over VIP jet use and costs, but both have continued the program as essential for government operations.
Balanced Perspective
The claim presents a routine government proposal for VIP aircraft upgrades as an attempt at media censorship, which fundamentally mischaracterizes the situation.
While critics could argue that including journalists on VIP flights might create coziness between media and politicians, this is the opposite of "silencing"—it's providing access. The proposal was transparently reported in the media at the time [1], which itself disproves the notion of silencing.
The VIP aircraft program serves legitimate purposes including:
- Secure communications for the Prime Minister during international travel
- Ability to conduct government business while traveling
- Transport of foreign dignitaries visiting Australia
- Operational continuity for senior government officials
Both major parties have used and upgraded these aircraft. The Rudd/Gillard Labor government used the same fleet, and the current Albanese Labor government has approved even more expensive upgrades ($450 million) [4][5].
Key context: This is standard government practice across all Australian governments, not a Coalition-specific attempt at media manipulation. The characterization of a "media deal" proposal as "silencing" represents a significant distortion of the actual events.
MISLEADING
3.0
out of 10
The claim fundamentally mischaracterizes the Abbott Government's proposal. The government sought a "truce" (mutual agreement) with media outlets regarding coverage of VIP jet upgrades, proposing to allow journalists to travel aboard the same aircraft—not to silence criticism, but to provide media access. This has been described as seeking a "media deal," not media silence. Furthermore, VIP aircraft are a bipartisan institutional feature of Australian government used by both parties for over 75 years. The current Labor government has continued and expanded this program with $450 million in new aircraft purchases. The claim's framing ignores the standard nature of VIP aircraft across all governments and misrepresents a proposal for media inclusion as an attempt at media suppression.
Final Score
3.0
OUT OF 10
MISLEADING
The claim fundamentally mischaracterizes the Abbott Government's proposal. The government sought a "truce" (mutual agreement) with media outlets regarding coverage of VIP jet upgrades, proposing to allow journalists to travel aboard the same aircraft—not to silence criticism, but to provide media access. This has been described as seeking a "media deal," not media silence. Furthermore, VIP aircraft are a bipartisan institutional feature of Australian government used by both parties for over 75 years. The current Labor government has continued and expanded this program with $450 million in new aircraft purchases. The claim's framing ignores the standard nature of VIP aircraft across all governments and misrepresents a proposal for media inclusion as an attempt at media suppression.
📚 SOURCES & CITATIONS (7)
-
1
news.com.au
News Com
-
2
aph.gov.au
All links in this paper were valid as at November 2020. <a name="_Toc341519958"><a name=DeleteForMESI2>Introduction The Royal Australian Air Force (RAAF) fleet of special purpose aircraft (colloquially known as the ‘VIP fleet’) has provided air travel to parliamentar
Aph Gov -
3
en.wikipedia.org
Wikipedia -
4
skynews.com.au
SkyNews.com.au — Australian News Headlines & World News Online from the best award winning journalists
Sky News -
5
australianaviation.com.au
It comes after reports revealed taxpayers will pay $450 million for the two new Boeing Business Jets (BBJ) because the cost of leasing replacements for 12 years rose from $372 million to $550 million, making an outright purchase more affordable.
Australian Aviation -
6
smh.com.au
Six teal MPs and fellow independent MP Andrew Wilkie have united to express disappointment about Labor’s commitment to transparency.
The Sydney Morning Herald -
7
theguardian.com
Morrison government stopped releasing reports on MPs’ use of business jet fleet in 2021, citing unspecified security concerns
the Guardian
Rating Scale Methodology
1-3: FALSE
Factually incorrect or malicious fabrication.
4-6: PARTIAL
Some truth but context is missing or skewed.
7-9: MOSTLY TRUE
Minor technicalities or phrasing issues.
10: ACCURATE
Perfectly verified and contextually fair.
Methodology: Ratings are determined through cross-referencing official government records, independent fact-checking organizations, and primary source documents.