The Claim
“Spent more money on detention centres than it would cost to house asylum seekers in Sydney's most expensive 5 star hotels (per asylum seeker per day).”
Original Sources Provided
✅ FACTUAL VERIFICATION
Cost of Immigration Detention:
According to Australian Government data and independent analysis, the claim is factually accurate. Immigration detention costs per person were indeed significantly higher than luxury hotel accommodation costs.
The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) and Department of Finance data show that onshore detention cost $655 per person per day as of 2016 [1]. The Global Detention Project reported detention centre costs at approximately $360,000 per person per year (roughly $986 per day) compared to $47,000 per year ($129 per day) for community housing [2]. By 2022-2023, costs had risen further to $505,176 per person per year in held detention (approximately $1,384 per day) [3].
Cost of 5-Star Hotels in Sydney:
Comparative data on Sydney hotel rates shows that 5-star luxury hotels average approximately $414-$477 per night, with the cheapest 5-star options available at around $74-$346 per night [4][5].
Conclusion on Core Claim:
The mathematics support the claim. At $655-$1,384 per day for detention versus $414-$477 per night for 5-star hotels, detention costs were indeed 1.5x to 3x more expensive than luxury hotel accommodation. Even comparing to Sydney's "most expensive" 5-star hotels (which might reach $800-$1,000+ per night for premium suites), detention costs remained in the same ballpark or higher.
Missing Context
The claim omits several critical pieces of context:
Bipartisan Policy Foundation: The high-cost detention policy was not initiated by the Coalition alone. The offshore detention system was re-established by the Labor Government in August 2012 under Prime Minister Julia Gillard, who reopened detention centres on Nauru and Manus Island [6]. Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd then announced the "PNG Solution" on July 19, 2013 - just weeks before the 2013 election - declaring that no asylum seeker arriving by boat would ever be settled in Australia [7]. The Coalition won government in September 2013 and continued this bipartisan policy framework.
Alternative Options Are Cheaper: The claim implies wastefulness but doesn't acknowledge that significantly cheaper alternatives exist. Community detention costs approximately $102,000 per year ($279 per day), while bridging visas allowing people to live in the community cost only approximately $40,000 per year ($110 per day) [8][9]. These alternatives are not just cheaper but also more humane and result in better mental health outcomes.
Offshore Processing Was the Primary Cost Driver: The most expensive component was offshore processing on Nauru and Manus Island (PNG), which cost approximately $573,000 per person per year ($1,569 per day) according to Equity Economics analysis [10]. The total cost of offshore processing reached $9.65 billion from July 2013 to 2021-2022, spanning both Coalition and Labor governments [11].
Cost Blowouts Under Both Governments: The Refugee Council documented "the seventh substantial blowout in eight years" in 2022, with offshore processing costs exceeding budget allocations by $146 million in 2021-22 alone [11]. These cost overruns occurred under both parties' watch.
Source Credibility Assessment
Sydney Morning Herald (SMH):
The original source is the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH), a mainstream Australian newspaper owned by Nine Entertainment. SMH is generally considered a reputable, center-left mainstream media outlet with a long history of journalism. However, the specific 2014 article cited appears to be business/economic reporting that examined the commercial aspects of detention centre contracts rather than a comprehensive policy analysis.
The article's framing as "Big bills and tax havens" suggests a critical investigative angle focused on corporate profiteering rather than government policy efficacy. This is legitimate journalism but represents one perspective on a complex policy issue.
Labor Comparison
Did Labor do something similar?
Yes - Labor established and significantly expanded the high-cost offshore detention system.
- August 2012: Labor Prime Minister Julia Gillard reopened offshore detention facilities on Nauru and Manus Island [6]
- July 19, 2013: Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd announced the "PNG Solution" - the policy that no person arriving by boat would ever be settled in Australia [7]
- Cost trajectory: By 2015-16 (three years after Rudd left office), offshore detention costs remained over $1 billion per year, with per-detainee costs at $829,000 per year ($2,271 per day) [12]
The offshore processing infrastructure that generated these extraordinary costs was established under Labor and continued under the Coalition. While the Coalition maintained and operated the system, they inherited the policy framework and infrastructure from the previous Labor government.
Comparative Analysis:
Both parties pursued policies that cost significantly more than community-based alternatives. The Coalition continued a bipartisan approach to asylum seeker deterrence that was economically inefficient by design - spending more to maintain offshore detention as a deterrent signal rather than because it represented value for money.
Balanced Perspective
The Full Story:
While the claim is factually correct about relative costs, it presents the issue without essential policy context.
The Deterrence Policy Rationale:
Both Labor and Coalition governments implemented offshore detention not because it was cost-effective, but as a deterrence measure to discourage dangerous boat journeys and prevent deaths at sea. The policy aimed to make Australia an unattractive destination by ensuring harsh conditions and no prospect of settlement. From this perspective, higher costs were arguably a feature, not a bug - demonstrating the government's commitment to the "tough on borders" message.
Economic Inefficiency as Policy Design:
The extraordinary costs reflect deliberate policy choices:
- Contracting with private security firms (G4S, Serco, etc.) for remote facility management
- Transporting asylum seekers to Pacific islands with limited infrastructure
- Maintaining separate health, security, and administrative systems offshore
- Paying the governments of Nauru and PNG for their cooperation
Comparative International Context:
Australia's approach was exceptionally expensive by international standards. Most comparable Western nations process asylum claims through community-based systems at a fraction of the cost while maintaining security checks.
Labor vs. Coalition Continuity:
This was not a Coalition-specific policy failure. Both major parties supported offshore detention with its associated costs:
- Labor established the modern offshore detention system (2012-2013)
- The Coalition continued and maintained it (2013-2022)
- Neither party seriously proposed moving to the far cheaper community-based processing model
Key Point: The cost comparison to 5-star hotels is accurate but politically misleading if presented as unique Coalition wastefulness. It was bipartisan policy to spend more on deterrence than on humane, cost-effective alternatives. The claim would be more accurate if it stated "Australian governments (both Labor and Coalition) spent more on detention centres than it would cost to house asylum seekers in Sydney's most expensive 5-star hotels."
TRUE
6.0
out of 10
The core factual claim is accurate: immigration detention costs (approximately $655-$1,384 per day) were indeed higher than 5-star hotel accommodation costs (approximately $414-$477 per night). However, the framing implies this was uniquely a Coalition government failure when in fact:
- The high-cost offshore detention system was established by Labor in 2012-2013 before the Coalition took office
- The policy continued with bipartisan support throughout the 2013-2022 period
- Both parties chose expensive deterrence over cheaper, more humane alternatives
- The costs were a deliberate feature of the deterrence policy, not accidental waste
The claim is accurate in its specific assertion but misleading in its implicit framing as a Coalition-specific issue.
Final Score
6.0
OUT OF 10
TRUE
The core factual claim is accurate: immigration detention costs (approximately $655-$1,384 per day) were indeed higher than 5-star hotel accommodation costs (approximately $414-$477 per night). However, the framing implies this was uniquely a Coalition government failure when in fact:
- The high-cost offshore detention system was established by Labor in 2012-2013 before the Coalition took office
- The policy continued with bipartisan support throughout the 2013-2022 period
- Both parties chose expensive deterrence over cheaper, more humane alternatives
- The costs were a deliberate feature of the deterrence policy, not accidental waste
The claim is accurate in its specific assertion but misleading in its implicit framing as a Coalition-specific issue.
📚 SOURCES & CITATIONS (12)
-
1
idcoalition.org
A 2016 audit from the Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) details the inappropriate spending of billions of dollars to hire private contractors to run
International Detention Coalition -
2PDF
GDP Australia Detention Report 2022 2
Globaldetentionproject • PDF Document -
3
refugeecouncil.org.au
This page provides recent immigration detention statistics for Australia, including people seeking asylum in detention. The page is updated monthly.
Refugee Council of Australia -
4
skyscanner.com
Skyscanner
-
5
hotelscombined.com.au
HotelsCombined compares all Sydney hotel deals from the best accommodation sites at once. Read Guest Reviews on 4,445 hotels in Sydney.
HotelsCombined -
6
rac-vic.org
Refugee Action Collective (Vic) | Free the refugees! Let them land, let them stay! -
7
refugeecouncil.org.au
The Australian Government’s failure to find solutions for more than 1000 refugees sent to offshore detention in 2013 and 2014 must prompt urgent rethinking of
Refugee Council of Australia -
8PDF
1912 At What Cost report
Asrc Org • PDF Document -
9
asrc.org.au
ASRC Policy Statement: All people seeking asylum should have their claims for Protection processed in the community according to law.
Asylum Seeker Resource Centre -
10
equityeconomics.com.au
The human and economic cost of Australia’s offshore detention policies 2019
Equity Economics -
11PDF
2022 23 Budget summary 1
Refugeecouncil Org • PDF Document -
12
ozeunleashed.substack.com
A Decade of Chaos: The Rudd-Gillard-Rudd Border Catastrophe
Ozeunleashed Substack
Rating Scale Methodology
1-3: FALSE
Factually incorrect or malicious fabrication.
4-6: PARTIAL
Some truth but context is missing or skewed.
7-9: MOSTLY TRUE
Minor technicalities or phrasing issues.
10: ACCURATE
Perfectly verified and contextually fair.
Methodology: Ratings are determined through cross-referencing official government records, independent fact-checking organizations, and primary source documents.