The Claim
“Approved a $36,000 grant to a shooting club without declaring that the approving minister was a member of that club.”
Original Sources Provided
✅ FACTUAL VERIFICATION
The core claim is TRUE. Senator Bridget McKenzie, then Minister for Sport, did approve a $35,980 grant (approximately $36,000) to the Wangaratta Clay Target Club without publicly declaring her membership in that club [1][2][3].
The timeline of events is documented as follows:
- January 25, 2019: Senator McKenzie visited the Wangaratta Clay Target Club and signed up as a full fee-paying member [1][2][3].
- February 25, 2019: Senator McKenzie announced $35,980 in funding to the Wangaratta Clay Target Club through the Community Sports Infrastructure Grant Program [1][2][3].
- The grant was to fund installation of new toilets and amenities at the club [2][3].
- November 21, 2019: Senator McKenzie's last update to her Senate register of interests did not include the club membership—nearly 10 months after joining [1].
The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) confirmed in its January 15, 2020 report that this grant was part of broader irregularities in the $100 million Community Sports Infrastructure Program, which was "not informed by an appropriate assessment process and sound advice" [4][5].
Missing Context
However, the claim omits several important contextual details:
1. Grant Decision Timeline
Senator McKenzie's office stated that "round-two funding became available in December 2018 at MYEFO and funding decisions were made from that time" [1]. This suggests the grant may have been under consideration before she became a member in January 2019, though the announcement occurred after she joined [3].
2. The Broader Sports Grants Scandal
The Wangaratta club grant was not an isolated incident of poor process. The ANAO found that across all three rounds of the $100 million program, Minister McKenzie systematically diverted grants from merit-based recommendations:
- Round 1: 91 of 223 projects (41%) approved by the Minister were not on Sport Australia's recommended list [5]
- Round 2: 162 of 232 projects (70%) initially recommended were rejected in favor of McKenzie's selections [5]
- Round 3: 167 of 228 projects (73%) had not been initially recommended by Sport Australia [5]
The ANAO found the Minister used "a colour-coded spreadsheet highlighting types of electorates" to identify preferred projects, predominantly favoring marginal Coalition seats ahead of the May 2019 election [5].
3. Ministerial Register of Interests vs. Senate Register
There are two separate disclosure regimes. Senator McKenzie's office argued that as the Wangaratta Clay Target Club membership was a "gift" valued at less than $300, declaration to the Senate was "unnecessary" [1]. However, as a minister, she was required under the Ministerial Code to declare interests to the Prime Minister's Office within 28 days [1].
The critical question—whether she declared this to the Prime Minister's Office or recused herself from the decision—was not answered in public statements [1]. The Prime Minister's Department later investigated and found she "breached ministerial standards" by not declaring the interest [3].
4. The Judgment About Impropriety
The claim frames this as a straightforward conflict of interest, but the situation is more nuanced:
- The grant was not "to" Senator McKenzie personally—it was to the club
- The membership was recent (obtained just weeks before the funding decision)
- The club itself publicly promoted McKenzie's membership as supporting their operations, suggesting the membership had broader political and community engagement purpose, not purely personal benefit [2]
5. Ministerial Discretion
The ANAO found that while the grant program guidelines identified the Minister in an approval role, "there are no records that evidence that the Department of Health or Sport Australia advised the Minister on the legal basis on which the Minister could undertake an approval role" [5]. This suggests broader questions about whether the Minister even had legal authority to approve grants, beyond the specific conflict-of-interest issue.
Source Credibility Assessment
The original source, The New Daily, is an Australian online news outlet with Labor Party alignment. However, the claim itself is corroborated by multiple independent, authoritative sources:
- Sydney Morning Herald (January 21, 2020) - Mainstream broadsheet [1]
- SBS News (January 22, 2020) - Public broadcaster [2][3]
- Australian National Audit Office (January 15, 2020) - Independent statutory authority [5]
- Wikipedia (citing multiple official sources) [6]
All major news outlets across the political spectrum reported this fact identically, suggesting strong factual accuracy despite the Labor-friendly framing of the source claim.
Balanced Perspective
In McKenzie's defense:
The issue is genuinely more complex than presented in the claim. While the conflict of interest was real and ultimately ruled a breach of ministerial standards, there are legitimate defenses to the characterization as simple "corruption":
Not unique to Coalition: The precedent of Ros Kelly under Labor demonstrates that sports grants pork-barrelling occurs across parties [6]. This is not uniquely a Coalition problem.
Grant legitimacy: All approved projects, including the Wangaratta club, were technically eligible under the program guidelines [2][3]. The issue wasn't that ineligible projects were funded, but that merit-based assessments were overridden.
Ministerial discretion: The program guidelines did assign the Minister an approval role, though questions existed about the legal basis for this authority [5]. Using discretion to approve eligible projects is arguably within ministerial prerogative, even if the decision-making process was flawed.
Relatively modest amount: The $36,000 grant, while problematic for conflict-of-interest reasons, was not one of the largest or most egregious grants under the scheme (Perth tennis club received $500,000; Adelaide golf club received $190,000) [2].
The serious problems:
Undeclared interest: McKenzie failed to declare her membership either to the Senate register or (according to the Gaetjens report) to the Prime Minister's Office as required [3].
Systematic bias: This was not an isolated conflict—it was part of a pattern of ministerial discretion being used to redirect 40-73% of grants away from merit-based recommendations [5].
Electoral timing: The grant distributions were timed to maximize political benefit immediately before the May 2019 election [5].
Breach confirmed: The independent investigation by the Prime Minister's Secretary found McKenzie "breached ministerial standards" [3].
TRUE
8.0
out of 10
Senator Bridget McKenzie did approve a $36,000 grant to a shooting club (the Wangaratta Clay Target Club) without publicly disclosing her membership at the time of approval. The fact was confirmed by multiple independent sources including the ANAO, mainstream media, and government investigations. She later resigned from cabinet after the Prime Minister's Secretary found she had breached ministerial standards for the non-declaration.
However, the framing as "corruption" is slightly strong—while it was definitively improper and a breach of standards, the grant itself was technically eligible and the term "corruption" typically implies personal financial benefit or illegal conduct, neither of which is definitively established here. The issue is more accurately described as a serious conflict-of-interest breach within the broader context of politicized grant distribution.
Final Score
8.0
OUT OF 10
TRUE
Senator Bridget McKenzie did approve a $36,000 grant to a shooting club (the Wangaratta Clay Target Club) without publicly disclosing her membership at the time of approval. The fact was confirmed by multiple independent sources including the ANAO, mainstream media, and government investigations. She later resigned from cabinet after the Prime Minister's Secretary found she had breached ministerial standards for the non-declaration.
However, the framing as "corruption" is slightly strong—while it was definitively improper and a breach of standards, the grant itself was technically eligible and the term "corruption" typically implies personal financial benefit or illegal conduct, neither of which is definitively established here. The issue is more accurately described as a serious conflict-of-interest breach within the broader context of politicized grant distribution.
📚 SOURCES & CITATIONS (6)
-
1
Bridget McKenzie approved $36,000 for Wangaratta shooting club of which she was a member
Federal minister Bridget McKenzie did not declare she was a member of a Wangaratta shooting club that she presented a $36,000 grant to.
The Sydney Morning Herald -
2
Sports grants scandal: Prime Minister orders investigation into Bridget McKenzie conduct
Prime Minister Scott Morrison has referred the sports grants scandal engulfing Bridget McKenzie to the head of his department.
SBS News -
3
Bridget McKenzie resigns from frontbench over sports rort scandal
Bridget McKenzie has resigned as agriculture minister and stepped down as deputy leader of the Nationals over the sports rorts scandal.
SBS News -
4
Bridget McKenzie breaks silence over sports scandal, defending actions
Former Cabinet minister Bridget McKenzie defends her actions in the sports grants scandal, saying it was her "responsibility" to exercise discretion and allocate grants to projects that had not been merit-listed.
Abc Net -
5
Sports rorts affair (2020) - Wikipedia
En Wikipedia
-
6
Award of Funding under the Community Sport Infrastructure Program - Australian National Audit Office
Anao Gov
Rating Scale Methodology
1-3: FALSE
Factually incorrect or malicious fabrication.
4-6: PARTIAL
Some truth but context is missing or skewed.
7-9: MOSTLY TRUE
Minor technicalities or phrasing issues.
10: ACCURATE
Perfectly verified and contextually fair.
Methodology: Ratings are determined through cross-referencing official government records, independent fact-checking organizations, and primary source documents.